Enhancing cross‐organizational collaboration in crisis management: Outcomes from a full‐scale regional exercise in Norway DOI Creative Commons
Kristine Steen‐Tveit, Bjørn Erik Munkvold, Kjetil Rustenberg

et al.

Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 32(4)

Published: Oct. 13, 2024

Abstract Cross‐organizational collaboration exercises are crucial in improving preparedness and promoting team situational awareness for effective crisis management. Despite their potential, studies suggest that these may often yield results with limited learning practical benefits. This study analyzes a full‐scale regional management exercise conducted Norway, involving 10 different organizations, engaging over 200 participants. Using survey‐based data collection method focusing on the ‘Collaboration, Learning, Utility‐Scale’, complemented by on‐site observations from various locations, we scrutinize exercise's effectiveness enhancing collaborative efforts, outcomes overall utility. The findings contribute valuable insights into strengths areas improvement cross‐organizational collaboration, offering implications optimizing future initiatives.

Language: Английский

The characteristics and functionalities of citizen-led disaster response through social media: A case study of the #HenanFloodsRelief on Sina Weibo DOI
Yubin Li,

Li Peng,

Yun Sang

et al.

International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 106, P. 104419 - 104419

Published: March 26, 2024

Language: Английский

Citations

6
Designing a resilience network for inter-organizational partnerships in disasters DOI

Mohammad Hossein Yarmohammadian,

Faeze Akbari,

Mozhdeh Hashemzadeh

et al.

Journal of Health Organization and Management, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: March 31, 2025

Purpose The shortcomings in multiorganizational collaboration and coordination disasters necessitate a resilience network to facilitate all parties’ involvement which is the aim of this study. Design/methodology/approach This study began with comparative review disaster management networks ten countries identify responsible entities their functions. advantages each country for designing public–private partnerships were benchmarked. initial was validated through focus group discussions interviews. Findings research revealed that governments typically assume responsibility councils, workgroups, etc., often using administrative organization (NAO) approach, varying autonomy Non-governmental Organizations (NGOs) private sectors (PSs). proposed consists four inter-organizational groups at national, state, county, city/town local levels, predefined roles, responsibilities mutual communication. Voluntary called “CHEED” resiliency councils collaborate public entities, such as coordinating liaison offices, organize participants ensure competency. Practical implications provides policymakers situation-based responses within central, participatory governance contexts. By integrating NAO, lead organization-governed (LOGN) participant-governed (PGN) forms, ensures effective among public, voluntary across phases. approach can improve overall efficiency practical restructuring by granting legitimacy future exercises. Originality/value unique its comprehensive, multi-tiered structure integrates from national levels phases, enhancing partnerships.

Language: Английский

Citations

0
Enhancing cross‐organizational collaboration in crisis management: Outcomes from a full‐scale regional exercise in Norway DOI Creative Commons
Kristine Steen‐Tveit, Bjørn Erik Munkvold, Kjetil Rustenberg

et al.

Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 32(4)

Published: Oct. 13, 2024

Abstract Cross‐organizational collaboration exercises are crucial in improving preparedness and promoting team situational awareness for effective crisis management. Despite their potential, studies suggest that these may often yield results with limited learning practical benefits. This study analyzes a full‐scale regional management exercise conducted Norway, involving 10 different organizations, engaging over 200 participants. Using survey‐based data collection method focusing on the ‘Collaboration, Learning, Utility‐Scale’, complemented by on‐site observations from various locations, we scrutinize exercise's effectiveness enhancing collaborative efforts, outcomes overall utility. The findings contribute valuable insights into strengths areas improvement cross‐organizational collaboration, offering implications optimizing future initiatives.

Language: Английский

Citations

1