Vaccination Coverages Among Splenectomized Patients: A Retrospective Study from an Italian Southern Province
Giuseppe Di Martino,
No information about this author
Riccardo Mazzocca,
No information about this author
Tania Masci
No information about this author
et al.
Vaccines,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
13(2), P. 138 - 138
Published: Jan. 28, 2025
Background:
Splenectomized
patients
have
a
higher
risk
compared
to
the
general
population
of
developing
post-splenectomy
infection,
particularly
by
capsulated
bacteria.
need
be
vaccinated
against
pneumococcal
diseases,
meningococcal
disease,
and
heamophilus
influenzae
(Hib)
in
order
avoid
invasive
bacterial
diseases.
This
study
evaluated
vaccination
coverages
among
splenectomized
Southern
Italian
province.
Methods:
A
retrospective
was
conducted
evaluating
all
from
Pescara
province
2015
2023.
Vaccination
were
calculated
before
after
splenectomy
for
following
vaccines:
Hib,
COVID-19.
Results:
total
97
considered
during
period.
low
surgery,
but
they
increased
splenectomy.
Higher
found
diseases
(77.3%),
meninigococcal
disease
(58.8%),
COVID-19
(91.8%).
Conclusions:
are
not
satisfying.
It
is
imperative
implement
educational
measures
physicians
increase
coverages.
Language: Английский
A Critical Analysis of All-Cause Deaths during COVID-19 Vaccination in an Italian Province
Marco Alessandria,
No information about this author
Giovanni Malatesta,
No information about this author
Franco Berrino
No information about this author
et al.
Microorganisms,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
12(7), P. 1343 - 1343
Published: June 30, 2024
Immortal
time
bias
(ITB)
is
common
in
cohort
studies
and
distorts
the
association
estimates
between
treated
untreated.
We
used
data
from
an
Italian
study
on
COVID-19
vaccine
effectiveness,
with
a
large
cohort,
long
follow-up,
adjustment
for
confounding
factors,
affected
by
ITB,
aim
to
verify
real
impact
of
vaccination
campaign
comparing
risk
all-cause
death
vaccinated
population
unvaccinated
population.
aligned
all
subjects
single
index
date
considered
“all-cause
deaths”
outcome
compare
survival
distributions
group
versus
various
statuses.
The
all-cause-death
hazard
ratios
univariate
analysis
people
1,
2,
3/4
doses
were
0.88,
1.23,
1.21,
respectively.
multivariate
values
2.40,
1.98,
0.99.
Possible
explanations
this
trend
as
vaccinations
increase
could
be
harvesting
effect;
calendar-time
bias,
accounting
seasonality
pandemic
waves;
case-counting
window
bias;
healthy-vaccinee
or
some
combination
these
factors.
With
2
even
doses,
calculated
Restricted
Mean
Survival
Time
Lost
have
shown
small
but
significant
downside
populations.
Language: Английский
All-cause mortality according to COVID-19 vaccination status: An analysis of the UK office for National statistics public data
Marco Alessandria,
No information about this author
Giovanni Malatesta,
No information about this author
Giovanni Di Palmo
No information about this author
et al.
F1000Research,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
13, P. 886 - 886
Published: Feb. 20, 2025
Background
The
mass
vaccination
campaign
against
COVID-19
has
been
commonly
considered
the
best
response
to
global
pandemic
crisis.
However,
assessment
of
its
real-world
effect
can
be
performed
by
analysis
all-cause
mortality
status.
UK
is
perhaps
only
country
which
made
publicly
available
data
Methods
Data
from
April
2021
May
2023
published
Office
for
National
Statistics
(ONS)
were
retrospectively
analyzed
age
groups
and
status;
standardized
ratio
(SMR)
non-COVID-19
was
calculated
corresponding
unvaccinated
groups.
Results
We
found
that
across
all
groups,
SMRs
increased
a
certain
date,
dependent
on
group.
Across
initially
much
lower
than
1.
due
their
increase,
date
18-39,
80-89
90+
they
exceeded
reference
value.
For
other
at
SMR
would
reach
1
predicted,
provided
trend
maintained.
Non-COVID-19
SMRs’
trends
very
similar.
Their
initial
values
are
suggestive
significant
biases
in
ONS
dataset,
leading
underestimate
risks
vaccinated
people,
as
it
implausible
vaccines
protect
deaths.
Conclusions
increase
over
time
death
people
compared
unvaccinated,
excess
should
carefully
understand
underlying
factors.
Furthermore,
since
1,
we
assume
presence
understimate
It
desirable
major
countries
systematically
collect
status
and,
meantime,
pending
indepth
investigations,
greater
caution
exercised
promoting
campaigns.
Language: Английский
All-cause mortality according to COVID-19 vaccination status: An analysis of the UK office for National statistics public data
Marco Alessandria,
No information about this author
Giovanni Malatesta,
No information about this author
Giovanni Di Palmo
No information about this author
et al.
F1000Research,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
13, P. 886 - 886
Published: Aug. 5, 2024
Background
The
mass
vaccination
campaign
against
COVID-19
has
been
commonly
considered
the
best
response
to
global
pandemic
crisis.
However,
assess
its
real-world
overall
effects,
way
can
be
analysis
of
all-cause
mortality
by
status.
UK
is
perhaps
only
country
which
made
publicly
available
data
Methods
Data
from
April
2021
May
2023
published
Office
for
National
Statistics
(ONS)
were
retrospectively
analyzed
age
groups
and
status;
standardized
ratio
(SMR)
non-COVID-19
was
calculated
corresponding
unvaccinated
groups.
Results
We
found
that
across
all
groups,
SMRs
increased
a
certain
date,
dependent
on
group.
Across
initially
much
lower
than
1.
due
their
increase,
date
18-39,
80-89
90+
they
exceeded
reference
value.
For
other
at
SMR
would
reach
1
predicted,
provided
trend
maintained.
Non-COVID-19
SMRs’
trends
very
similar.
Their
initial
values
are
suggestive
significant
biases
in
ONS
dataset,
leading
underestimate
risks
vaccinated
people,
as
it
implausible
vaccines
protect
deaths.
Conclusions
increase
over
time
death
people
compared
unvaccinated,
excess
should
carefully
understand
underlying
factors.
It
desirable
major
countries
systematically
collect
status
and,
meantime,
moratorium
promoting
campaigns
implemented.
Language: Английский
Predictors of SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Severe and Lethal COVID-19 after Three Years of Follow-Up: A Population-Wide Study
Viruses,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
15(9), P. 1794 - 1794
Published: Aug. 24, 2023
In
this
cohort
study,
the
general
population
of
an
Italian
Province
was
followed
for
three
years
after
start
pandemic,
in
order
to
identify
predictors
SARS-CoV-2
infection
and
severe
or
lethal
COVID-19.
All
National
Healthcare
System
information
on
biographical
records,
vaccinations,
swabs,
COVID-19
cases,
hospitalizations
co-pay
exemptions
were
extracted
from
25
February
2020
15
2023.
Cox
proportional
hazard
analysis
used
compute
relative
hazards
COVID-19,
adjusting
age,
gender,
vaccine
status,
hypertension,
diabetes,
major
cardiovascular
diseases
(CVD),
chronic
obstructive
pulmonary
disease
(COPD),
kidney
cancer.
Among
300,079
residents
domiciled
citizens,
41.5%
had
≥1
positive
swabs
during
follow-up
(which
lasted
a
mean
932
days).
A
total
3.67%
infected
individuals
experienced
(n
=
4574)
1.76%
died
2190).
Females,
elderly
subjects
with
CVD,
COPD,
cancer
showed
significantly
higher
risk
infection.
The
likelihood
>90%
lower
among
youngest,
all
comorbidities
independently
associated
(ranging
+28%
+214%)
both
outcomes.
Two
immunization
campaign,
who
received
≥2
doses
vaccines
still
disease,
lowest
observed
at
least
one
booster
dose.
Language: Английский
A Reanalysis of an Italian Study on the Effectiveness of COVID-19 Vaccination Suggests That It Might Have Unintended Effects on Total Mortality
Marco Alessandria,
No information about this author
Giovanni Malatesta,
No information about this author
Franco Berrino
No information about this author
et al.
Published: June 6, 2024
Immortal-time
bias
(ITB)
is
known
to
be
common
in
cohort
studies
and
distorts
the
association
estimates
between
treated
untreated
groups.
We
used
data
from
last
of
two
large
an
Italian
province
on
COVID-19
vaccines
safety
effectiveness
incurred
this
bias,
aligned
entire
population
a
single
index
date,
correct
ITB.
considered
"all-cause
deaths"
outcome
compare
survival
curves
unvaccinated
group
various
vaccination
statuses.
The
all-cause
deaths
Hazard
Ratios
univariate
analysis
for
(reference)
versus
vaccinated
with
1,
2,
3/4
doses
were
0.88
(CI95:
0.78
–1.00;
p-value
0.044),
1.23
(1.16–1.32;
≤0.001)
1.21
(1.14–1.29;
≤0.001),
respectively.
multivariate
values
2.40
(2.00–2.88;
<0.0001),
1.98
(1.75–2.24;
0.99
(0.90–1.09;
ns).
possible
explanations
trend
as
vaccinations
increase
could
harvesting
effect;
calendar-time
accounting
seasonality
pandemic
waves;
case-counting
windows
bias;
healthy-vaccinee
or
some
their
combination.
With
even
calculated
Restricted
Mean
Survival
Time
Lost
have
shown
small
but
significant
downside
populations.
Language: Английский
All-Cause Mortality According to COVID-19 Vaccination Status: an analysis of the UK Office for National Statistics Public Data
Marco Alessandria,
No information about this author
Giovanni Malatesta,
No information about this author
Giovanni Di Palmo
No information about this author
et al.
Published: June 17, 2024
The
COVID-19
pandemics
has
had
an
unprecedented
global
impact,
and
the
mass
vaccination
campaign
been
commonly
regarded
as
crucial
to
overcome
pandemics.
Since
all-cause
mortality
is
best
way
measure
consequences
of
a
health
intervention,
present
study
was
devised
analyze
data
United
Kingdom
(UK),
which
are
made
publicly
available
broken
down
by
status.
Data
from
April
2021
May
2023
were
retrospectively
collected
analyzed
according
age
groups
status
Standardized
Mortality
Ratio
(SMR)
for
non-COVID-19
calculated
in
comparison
corresponding
unvaccinated
groups.
Results
show
that,
since
group
dependent
date,
SMRs
increasing
any
considered.
Initially,
all-causes
death
less
than
1
all
groups,
but
due
their
growth,
18-39,
80-89
90+
years
certain
date
they
exceeded
reference
value.
For
other
long
trend
maintained,
it
possible
predict
SMR
would
reach
value
1.
Non-COVID-19
values
very
similar
trend.
Their
initial
much
lower
suggest
presence
significant
biases
ONS
dataset
lead
underestimation
risks
those
vaccinated,
not
plausible
that
vaccine
protects
causes
COVID-19.
finding
vaccinated
people
increases
over
time
requires
careful
examination
understand
underlying
factors.
Meanwhile,
major
countries
should
undertake
systematic
collection
status,
be
implemented
moratorium
promotion
campaigns.
Language: Английский
Vaccination against COVID-19 in a post-pandemic era
European Respiratory Society eBooks,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Aug. 27, 2024
Language: Английский
Long-term effectiveness of an ultra-rapid rollout vaccination campaign with BNT162b2 on the incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection
Lena Tschiderer,
No information about this author
Hanna Innerhofer,
No information about this author
Lisa Seekircher
No information about this author
et al.
iScience,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
27(11), P. 111117 - 111117
Published: Oct. 10, 2024
Language: Английский
Risk of SARS-CoV-2 Reinfection 3 Years after the Start of the Pandemic: A Population-Level Observational Study
Life,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
13(11), P. 2111 - 2111
Published: Oct. 24, 2023
The
risk
of
SARS-CoV-2
reinfections
changes
as
new
variants
emerge,
but
the
follow-up
time
for
most
available
evidence
is
shorter
than
two
years.
This
study
evaluated
reinfection
rates
in
total
population
an
Italian
province
up
to
three
years
since
pandemic’s
start.
retrospective
cohort
used
official
National
Healthcare
System
data
on
testing
and
vaccinations,
demographics,
hospitalizations
Province
Pescara,
Italy,
from
2
March
2020
31
December
2022.
A
6541
(5.4%)
33
severe
18
lethal
COVID-19
cases
were
recorded
among
121,412
subjects
who
recovered
a
primary
infection.
There
no
events
following
young
population,
whereas
1.1%
reinfected
elderly
died.
significantly
higher
was
observed
females;
unvaccinated
individuals;
adults
(30–59
y);
with
hypertension,
COPD,
kidney
disease.
Up
after
infection,
majority
did
not
experience
reinfection.
very
low
adult
individuals
still
high
elderly.
hybrid
immunity
showed
lower
unvaccinated.
Language: Английский