Navigating the Web of Disinformation and Misinformation: Large Language Models as Double-Edged Swords

IEEE Access, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 1 - 1

Published: Jan. 1, 2024

This paper explores the dual role of Large Language Models (LLMs) in context online misinformation and disinformation. In today's digital landscape, where internet social media facilitate rapid dissemination information, discerning between accurate content falsified information presents a formidable challenge. Misinformation, often arising unintentionally, disinformation, crafted deliberately, are at forefront this LLMs such as OpenAI's GPT-4, equipped with advanced language generation abilities, present double-edged sword scenario. While they hold promise combating by fact-checking detecting LLM-generated text, their ability to generate realistic, contextually relevant text also poses risks for creating propagating misinformation. Further, plagued many problems biases, knowledge cutoffs, hallucinations, which may further perpetuate The outlines historical developments detection how it affects consumption, especially among youth, introduces applications various domains. It then critically analyzes potential counter disinformation sensitive topics healthcare, COVID-19, political agendas. discusses mitigation strategies, ethical considerations, regulatory measures, summarizing previous methods proposing future research direction toward leveraging benefits while minimizing misuse risks. concludes acknowledging powerful tools significant implications both spreading age.

Language: Английский

---

Community Notes vs. Snoping: How the Crowd Selects Fact-Checking Targets on Social Media

Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 18, P. 1262 - 1275

Published: May 28, 2024

Deploying links to professional fact-checking websites (so-called “snoping”) is a common misinformation intervention technique that can be used by social media users refute misleading claims made others. However, the real-world effect of snoping may limited as it suffers from low visibility and distrust towards fact-checkers. As remedy, X (formerly known Twitter) recently launched its community-based system “Community Notes” on which fact-checks are carried out actual directly shown fact-checked posts. Yet, an understanding how via Community Notes differs regular largely absent. In this study, we empirically analyze differences in contributors Snopers select their targets when For purpose, collect holistically two unique datasets X: (a) 25,912 community-created X's platform, (b) 52,505 “snopes” debunk posts replies link websites. We find focus different content. instance, tend fact-check larger accounts with higher influence relatively less likely emphasize accuracy non-misleading Fact-checking rarely overlap; however, those overlapping exhibit high level agreement assessment. Moreover, demonstrate at speed. Altogether, our findings imply approaches – same platform result vastly getting fact-checked. This has important implications for future research misinformation, should not rely single approach compiling datasets. From practical perspective, complement each other help providers optimize strategies combat platforms.

Language: Английский

---

Collaboratively adding context to social media posts reduces the sharing of false news.

SSRN Electronic Journal, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: Jan. 1, 2024

Download This Paper Open PDF in Browser Add to My Library Share: Permalink Using these links will ensure access this page indefinitely Copy URL DOI

Language: Английский

---

Community notes reduce the spread of misleading posts on X

Published: April 29, 2024

Community-based fact-checking is a promising approach to verify social media content and correct misleading posts at scale. Yet, causal evidence regarding its effectiveness in reducing the spread of misinformation on missing. Here, we performed large-scale empirical study analyze whether community notes reduce X. Using Difference-in-Differences design repost time series data for N=31,758 (community fact-checked) cascades that had been reposted more than 68 million times, found exposing users reduced by, average, 61.4%. However, our findings also suggest might be too slow intervene early (and most viral) stage diffusion. Our work offers important implications enhance community-based approaches media.

Language: Английский

---

Efficiency of Community-Based Content Moderation Mechanisms: A Discussion Focused on Birdwatch

Group Decision and Negotiation, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 33(3), P. 673 - 709

Published: March 23, 2024

Language: Английский

---

Readable and neutral? Reliability of crowdsourced misinformation debunking through linguistic and psycholinguistic cues

Frontiers in Psychology, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 15

Published: Nov. 13, 2024

Background In the face of proliferation misinformation during COVID-19 pandemic, crowdsourced debunking has surfaced as a counter-infodemic measure to complement efforts from professionals and regular individuals. 2021, X (formerly Twitter) initiated its community-driven fact-checking program, named Community Notes Birdwatch). This program allows users create contextual corrective notes for misleading posts rate helpfulness others' contributions. The effectiveness platform been preliminarily verified, but mixed findings on reliability indicate need further research. Objective study aims assess by comparing readability language neutrality helpful unhelpful notes. Methods A total 7,705 2,091 spanning January 20, May 30, 2023 were collected. Measures reading ease, analytical thinking, affect authenticity derived means Wordless Linguistic Inquiry Word Count (LIWC). Subsequently, non-parametric Mann–Whitney U -test was employed evaluate differences between groups. Results Both groups are easy read with no notable difference. Helpful show significantly greater logical authenticity, emotional restraint than ones. As such, is validated in terms neutrality. Nevertheless, prevalence prepared, negative swear indicates manipulative abusive attempts platform. wide value range group overall limited consensus note also suggest complex information ecology within platform, highlighting necessity guidance management. Conclusion Based statistical analysis linguistic psycholinguistic characteristics, identified room improvement. Future endeavors could explore psychological motivations underlying volunteering, gaming, or even behaviors, enhance system integrate it broader infodemic

Language: Английский

---