Just preservation, trusteeship and multispecies justice DOI Creative Commons
Francisco J. Santiago‐Ávila, Adrian Treves, William S. Lynn

et al.

Animal Sentience, Journal Year: 2020, Volume and Issue: 4(27)

Published: Jan. 1, 2020

We are grateful to all the commentators who engaged with our target article. Some have offered important insights into proposed design and methods for legally intervening on behalf of futurity. Others focused theoretical considerations central proposal multispecies justice trusteeship. All inspired modifications further elaboration initial proposal. In this Response, we engage commentaries, integrating their suggestions, striving convergence complementarity, but also discussing points divergence framework where necessary. There is substantial overlap in view three co-authors, there differences. Section 1 more reflective views AT 2 FJS-A WL.

Language: Английский

More-Than-Human Connections: Regenerating Through Multispecies Design DOI
David Sánchez Ruano

Cities and nature, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 39 - 68

Published: Jan. 1, 2025

Language: Английский

Citations

0
Incorporating animal agency into research design could improve behavioral and neuroscience research. DOI
Cédric Sueur,

Sarah Zanaz,

Marie Pelé

et al.

Deleted Journal, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 137(2), P. 129 - 143

Published: April 27, 2023

Despite increasing numbers of publications showing that many animals possess the neural substrates involved in emotions and consciousness exhibit agency their behavior, are still restrained forced to take part applied or fundamental research. However, these restraints procedures, because they stress limit expression adaptive may result compromised findings. Researchers should alter research paradigms understand mechanisms functions brain behavior so incorporate animals' agency. This article discusses how animal cannot only be key more wide-ranging improved existing domains but can also lead new questions about evolution. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

Language: Английский

Citations

8
Kinmaking: toward more-than-tourism (studies) DOI Creative Commons
Tomas Pernecky

Tourism Recreation Research, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 48(4), P. 558 - 568

Published: May 16, 2023

The field of tourism studies has entered an epoch manifold vulnerabilities, a period in which the academic community will have to respond environmental and planetary crises consider wellbeing not just humans but also nonhumans multispecies. In these momentous times, it is imperative overlook studies' ontological, epistemological, axiological vulnerabilities survey potential viabilities. Although blossoming criticalities greatly fuelled urgency correct, rectify, recalibrate existing relational arrangements replace by more sustainable, just, inclusive visions for/versions tourism, there still pressing need for conceptually, theoretically, philosophically malleable architecture. Inspired Donna Haraway's scholarship on broader matters, this contribution offers 'kinmaking' as critico-creative, disruptive space fitting thoughtscape transitioning into more-than-tourism (studies). Among key ideas covered paper are dangers epistemocentricism, necessity sympoietic approaches, rise postdisciplinary posthuman acumen, overall ripeness become domain critical relationalities.

Language: Английский

Citations

8
Keystones for conservation: Diversity, Wellbeing, Coexistence DOI

Lucrecia K. Aguilar,

Christine E. Webb

Biological Conservation, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 291, P. 110464 - 110464

Published: Feb. 19, 2024

Language: Английский

Citations

1
Un-tabooing empathy DOI Creative Commons

Christine Webb,

Becca Franks, Monica Gagliano

et al.

Routledge eBooks, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 216 - 234

Published: Jan. 4, 2023

Conventional scientific training instructs researchers to avoid empathy with their study subjects in the service of maintaining "objectivity" and warding off "anthropomorphism." This approach creates an artificial gulf between human nonhuman worlds, renders beings as radical others without minds or at best, that cannot be known accessed. Here authors reconsider wisdom utility this convention context research other animals, own field expertise. The taboo science raises a number serious ethical concerns. former has been elucidated by decades animal welfare rights scholarship activism, which have long exposed unethical treatment animals industries like science. against convoluted history originates part from human-centric assumptions about animals' minds.

Language: Английский

Citations

3
Ekososiaalinen kysymys DOI Creative Commons
Jani Pulkki, Pasi Takkinen

Kasvatus & Aika, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: 16(4)

Published: Dec. 21, 2022

Ekososiaalinen sivistys on tullut keskeiseksi käsitteeksi suomalaisessa kasvatuskeskustelussa, mutta ekososiaalisen aatteen sisältöä ei vielä tunneta kovin hyvin. Filosofinen artikkelimme tarkastelee kasvatuksen teoreettisia lähtökohtia. Pohdimme ekososiaalista kysymystä, jolla tarkoitamme toisiinsa kietoutuneita ekologisia ja sosiaalisia ongelmia: ihmisen sosiaalinen toiminta aiheuttaa maapallon elämää ylläpitäville järjestelmille uhkia, jotka lankeavat meidän tulevien sukupolvien ratkaistavaksi. Esitämme yhdenlaisen tulkinnan ekososiaaliseen ajatteluun liittyvistä aatevirtauksista analysoiden myös näiden vahvuuksia heikkouksia kasvatusajattelun kannalta. Artikkelimme pyrkii ymmärtämään ajattelun luonnetta kahdeksan ajattelutradition kautta: ekososiaalinen sivistys, ekologia, systeemiteoria, monilajisuus, enemmän-kuin-ihmisen maailma, ekofeminismi, ekologinen oikeudenmukaisuus sekä teknologia-analyysi. Emme tarjoa yhtä, tarkkarajaista määritelmää, uskomme tarkastelumme syventävän ymmärrystä mahdollistavan entistä parempaa ajattelua sen suunnittelua.

Citations

3
Expanding perspectives and understanding relational potential: Are mutually beneficial human-animal relationships compatible with current animal agricultural practices? DOI Creative Commons
Erin Ryan, Daniel M. Weary, Gosia Zobel

et al.

Animal Welfare, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 33

Published: Jan. 1, 2024

Abstract Animal agriculture employs approximately one-eighth of world’s human population and results in the slaughter over 160 billion animals annually, representing perhaps most extensive intertwining animal lives on planet. In principle, close, intersubjective relationships (involving shared attention mental states) between humans are possible, though these infrequently studied unlikely to be achieved farming, given systemic constraints (e.g. housing management). Much scientific research human-animal within has focused upon a fairly restricted range states reducing aversive interactions standard systems, toward improving productivity injuries workers). Considering relations along continuum, we review scholarship supporting rationale for expanding under consideration welfare research, impacts can have both stockpersons, increasing consumer demand humane food products, goal providing our care with good lives. Looking traditions that encourage taking perspective of, learning from non-humans, provide entry points approaches enable expand investigate broader relationship states. By showing potential close mutually beneficial relationships, this line highlights pathways understanding used agriculture.

Language: Английский

Citations

0
How to engage public support to protect overlooked species DOI Creative Commons
Scarlett R. Howard, Adrian G. Dyer

Animal Sentience, Journal Year: 2020, Volume and Issue: 4(27)

Published: Jan. 1, 2020

Treves et al. (2019) propose a non-anthropocentric approach to conservation biology for the 'just preservation' of non-humans. Some our current ways ranking efforts based on benefits humans are indeed critically flawed, but we doubt that completely is possible at this time. We way generate public support those non-human species may otherwise be overlooked in policy-making and efforts.

Language: Английский

Citations

2
Just preservation, trusteeship and multispecies justice DOI Creative Commons
Francisco J. Santiago‐Ávila, Adrian Treves, William S. Lynn

et al.

Animal Sentience, Journal Year: 2020, Volume and Issue: 4(27)

Published: Jan. 1, 2020

We are grateful to all the commentators who engaged with our target article. Some have offered important insights into proposed design and methods for legally intervening on behalf of futurity. Others focused theoretical considerations central proposal multispecies justice trusteeship. All inspired modifications further elaboration initial proposal. In this Response, we engage commentaries, integrating their suggestions, striving convergence complementarity, but also discussing points divergence framework where necessary. There is substantial overlap in view three co-authors, there differences. Section 1 more reflective views AT 2 FJS-A WL.

Language: Английский

Citations

2