
Frontiers in Physiology, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 16
Published: May 9, 2025
This study aimed to summarize the findings of research comparing effects high-intensity interval training (HIIT) with active controls (alternative methods) and passive (no exercise intervention) on aerobic anaerobic performance in male female athletes engaged Olympic combat sports. Using PICOS framework, included original healthy, trained These studies compared HIIT interventions (lasting at least 4 weeks) control groups, focusing outcomes. Studies that measured other fitness parameters, had non-randomized designs, or involved mixed were excluded. A database search was conducted February 1, 2025, through PubMed, Scopus, Web Science. Study quality risk bias assessed using Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale, while GRADE scale used assess certainty evidence. After screening, 20 deemed eligible for inclusion this review. The results showed a significant effect over groups maximal oxygen uptake, moderate size (ES = 1.007, 95% CI 0.701 1.312, p < 0.001). significant, but small, favoring also found peak power output 0.528, 0.102 0.954, 0.015). Furthermore, analysis mean 0.871, 0.392 1.350, In conclusion, HIIT, whether performed running sport-specific techniques, appears effectively enhance both participating improvements could contribute better overall performance, supporting physical physiological demands these
Language: Английский