Human versus Artificial Intelligence: ChatGPT-4 Outperforming Bing, Bard, ChatGPT-3.5 and Humans in Clinical Chemistry Multiple-Choice Questions
Malik Sallam,
No information about this author
Khaled Al‐Salahat,
No information about this author
Huda Eid
No information about this author
et al.
Advances in Medical Education and Practice,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
Volume 15, P. 857 - 871
Published: Sept. 1, 2024
Artificial
intelligence
(AI)
chatbots
excel
in
language
understanding
and
generation.
These
models
can
transform
healthcare
education
practice.
However,
it
is
important
to
assess
the
performance
of
such
AI
various
topics
highlight
its
strengths
possible
limitations.
This
study
aimed
evaluate
ChatGPT
(GPT-3.5
GPT-4),
Bing,
Bard
compared
human
students
at
a
postgraduate
master's
level
Medical
Laboratory
Sciences.
Language: Английский
Artificial Intelligence
Advances in educational technologies and instructional design book series,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
unknown, P. 65 - 88
Published: Oct. 18, 2024
This
chapter
discusses
the
evolving
Artificial
Intelligence
(AI)
landscape
in
Higher
Education.
AI
is
new
development
that
affect
pedagogy
and
learning
outcomes
higher
education.
examines
as
a
key
component
delivery
of
curriculum.
It
aims
to
guide
institutions
adjust
fit
into
possible
changes
not
be
swayed
by
wave
has
gathered
momentum
globally.
The
should
prepare
stakeholders
future
will
require
shrunk
office
spaces.
Further,
there
need
for
adoption
use
such
technologies
within
confines
known
rules
regulations
ensure
zero
compromise
on
quality
teaching,
learning,
productivity.
Language: Английский
Assessment as a dilemmatic space in the GenAI age: mapping and unpacking university teachers’ conflicting priorities in assessment
Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
unknown, P. 1 - 15
Published: Jan. 7, 2025
This
study
uses
the
concept
of
dilemmatic
space
to
unpack
complexities
teachers'
work
when
it
comes
assessing
students
in
GenAI
age.
A
key
idea
is
that
dilemmas
are
not
'out
there'
but
constructions
based
on
individuals'
priorities,
knowledge
and
values.
Therefore,
studying
what
teachers
perceive
as
'dilemmatic'
or
'in
conflict'
important
for
understanding
how
they
position
themselves
prioritise
assessment
advanced
technologies
like
become
increasingly
integrated
into
our
everyday
lives.
Drawing
636
Reddit
posts
related
university
experiences
with
over
a
16-month
period,
we
identified
four
major
13
pairs
conflicting
priorities.
Teachers
have
consistently
AI-enabled
cheating
their
priority
address
specifically
saw
tension
this
varied.
Findings
shed
light
multiple
under-discussed
issues
use
assessment,
including
teacher
autonomy,
career
security,
teacher-student
relationship
professional
identity.
Very
few
reported
own
assist
grading
feedback
provision,
which
could
reflect
limited
awareness
ethical
implications
involved
use.
Language: Английский
Revolutionising Essay Evaluation
Hassan Saleh Mahdi,
No information about this author
Abdullah Al-Khateeb
No information about this author
International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
15(1), P. 1 - 19
Published: Feb. 1, 2025
This
study
aims
to
develop
a
robust
rubric
for
evaluating
artificial
intelligence
(AI)–assisted
essay
writing
in
English
as
Foreign
Language
(EFL)
contexts.
Employing
modified
Delphi
technique,
we
conducted
comprehensive
literature
review
and
administered
Likert
scale
questionnaires.
process
yielded
nine
key
evaluation
criteria,
forming
the
initial
rubric.
The
was
applied
evaluate
33
AI-assisted
essays
written
by
students
part
of
an
intensive
course
assignment.
Statistical
analysis
revealed
significant
inter-rater
reliability
convergent
validity
coefficients,
supporting
adoption
further
development
such
rubrics
across
higher
education
institutions.
developed
subsequently
used
these
using
two
AI
tools:
ChatGPT
Claude.
results
indicated
that
both
tools
evaluated
with
similar
scores,
demonstrating
consistency
their
assessment
capabilities.
Language: Английский
Leveraging Educational Artificial Intelligence in Personal Language Learning Environments
IGI Global eBooks,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
unknown, P. 75 - 90
Published: April 9, 2025
This
article
explores
the
implications
of
Artificial
Intelligence
(AI)
in
personalisation
language
learning
early
childhood
and
primary
education.
The
idea
is
to
adapt
educational
content
meet
individual
needs
students
based
on
their
knowledge,
skills,
interests.
Students
with
different
profiles
present
a
challenge
that
requires
us
explore
possibilities
AI
so
each
student
receives
an
individualised
plan
tailored
knowledge
needs.
work
focuses
provide
solutions
teaching
methods
abilities
rhythms
student,
thereby
improving
cognitive-emotional
experience,
despite
doubts
about
impact
these
innovations.
technology
could
help
teachers
develop
special
real-time
interaction
feedback,
potential
implement
virtual
environments
multimodal
formats
make
more
appealing
accessible.
Language: Английский
Eight Months into Reality: A Scoping Review of the Application of ChatGPT in Higher Education Teaching and Learning
Innovative Higher Education,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Feb. 22, 2025
Language: Английский
An exploration of students’ perceptions of artificial intelligence and plagiarism at a higher education institution
Equity in Education & Society,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: March 14, 2025
With
the
high
incidence
of
students’
use
artificial
intelligence
(AI)
content-generated
tools,
issues
in
academic
integrity
abound.
Artificial
and
plagiarism
have
emerged
as
main
threats
to
using
AI
tools
scholarly
literature.
This
study
proposes
answer
following
research
questions:
What
are
Master’s
views
tools?
Why
do
Master's
students
qualitative
descriptive
phenomenological
single
case
contains
interviews
with
nine
Guyanese
completing
their
theses
about
experiences
on
plagiarism.
These
were
chosen
based
non-probability
purposive
sampling.
The
researcher
implemented
six
steps
data
analysis.
In
vivo,
descriptive,
evaluative
coding
semantic
latent
meanings
considered.
Deontology,
utilitarianism,
rational
self-interest,
cultural
relativism
linked
three
components
Theory
Planned
Behavior
when
deductive
was
implemented.
can
inform
policy
development
implementation
Language: Английский
Legal regulation of AI-assisted academic writing: challenges, frameworks, and pathways
Runyang Gao,
No information about this author
Danghui Yu,
No information about this author
Biao Gao
No information about this author
et al.
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
8
Published: April 7, 2025
Introduction
The
widespread
application
of
artificial
intelligence
in
academic
writing
has
triggered
a
series
pressing
legal
challenges.
Methods
This
study
systematically
examines
critical
issues,
including
copyright
protection,
integrity,
and
comparative
research
methods.
We
establishes
risk
assessment
matrix
to
quantitatively
analyze
various
risks
AI-assisted
from
three
dimensions:
impact,
probability,
mitigation
cost,
thereby
identifying
high-risk
factors.
Results
findings
reveal
that
challenges
fundamental
principles
traditional
law,
with
judicial
practice
tending
position
AI
as
creative
tool
while
emphasizing
human
agency.
Regarding
new
risks,
such
“credibility
illusion”
“implicit
plagiarism,”
have
become
prominent
AI-generated
content,
necessitating
adaptive
regulatory
mechanisms.
Research
data
protection
personal
information
security
face
dual
require
technological
institutional
innovations.
Discussion
Based
on
these
findings,
we
propose
three-dimensional
framework
“transparency,
accountability,
technical
support”
present
systematic
policy
recommendations
design,
organizational
structure,
international
cooperation
perspectives.
results
deepen
understanding
attributes
creation,
promote
theoretical
innovation
digital
era
ethics,
provide
practical
guidance
for
institutions
formulating
usage
policies.
Language: Английский
Psychological Antecedents of Adoption and Use of Artificial Intelligence Among University of Lagos Students
Simon Omonigho UMUKORO,
No information about this author
Gabriel A. Akinbode,
No information about this author
Obalolu OKEOWO Damilola
No information about this author
et al.
LASU Journal of Employment Relations & Human Resource Management,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
5(1), P. 1 - 19
Published: March 20, 2025
This
study
investigated
the
influence
of
academic
integrity,
technological
literacy,
and
need
for
achievement
on
adoption
use
artificial
intelligence
(AI)
among
undergraduate
students
at
University
Lagos.
Using
a
quantitative-cross-sectional
design,
data
was
collected
from
381
participants
(196
males,
185
females)
recruited
eleven
faculties.
Four
standardized
scales
were
used
to
measure
achievement,
attitudes
towards
Artificial
Intelligence.
Results
indicated
significant
relationship
between
integrity
AI
purposes.
Access
technology
found
marginally
moderate
literacy
use,
with
positive
higher
levels
access.
A
correlation
observed
use.
No
gender
differences
in
found.
These
findings
suggest
that
(moderated
by
access),
play
substantial
roles
determining
undergraduates,
highlighting
dynamic
interaction
factors
influencing
integration
settings..
Language: Английский