Appliances of Generative AI-Powered Language Tools in Academic Writing: A Scoping Review DOI Creative Commons
Lilia Raitskaya, Elena Tikhonova

Journal of language and Education, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 10(4), P. 5 - 30

Published: Dec. 30, 2024

Introduction: Academic writing is getting through a transformative shift with the advent of generative AI-powered tools in 2022. It spurred research emerging field that focus on appliances academic writing. As AI technologies are changing fast, regular synthesis new knowledge needs revisiting. Though there scoping and systematic reviews some sub-fields, present review aims to set scope GenAI Method: The adhered PRISMA extension for reviews, PPC framework. eligibility criteria include problem, concept, context, language, subject area, types sources, database (Scopus), period (2023-2024). Results: three clusters reviewed 44 publications included (1) enhancing writing; (2) challenges (3) authorship integrity. potential language embraces many functions (text generation, proofreading, editing, text annotation, paraphrasing translation) provides assistance writing, offers strategies hybrid various assignments genres improvements quality. Language GenAI-powered also studied as feedback tool. concerns related such range from integrity overreliance tools, misleading or false generated content, inaccurate referencing, inability generate author’s voice. findings compliance trends outlined previous publications, though more mechanisms integrating AI-hybrid contexts. discourse migrating revisiting concepts originality Gen AI-generated content. Conclusion: directions have shown re-focusing, inputs focuses field. transformation accelerating, wrought academia face rethinking basic meet shift. Further syntheses essential, including all already existent sub-fields.

Language: Английский

Generative Artificial Intelligence Tools in Journal Article Preparation: A Preliminary Catalog of Ethical Considerations, Opportunities, and Pitfalls DOI Creative Commons
R.R. White

JDS Communications, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: Jan. 1, 2025

Language: Английский

Citations

0

Ethics For Responsible Data Research: Integrating Cybersecurity Perspectives In Digital Era DOI
Sheetal Temara

SSRN Electronic Journal, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: Jan. 1, 2025

Language: Английский

Citations

0

Understanding haze data contestations in Singapore: between accuracy and affect DOI
Nadeem Hussain

Environmental Sociology, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 1 - 17

Published: March 20, 2025

Language: Английский

Citations

0

Artificial intelligence-assisted academic writing: recommendations for ethical use DOI Creative Commons
Adam Cheng, Aaron W. Calhoun, Gabriel Reedy

et al.

Advances in Simulation, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 10(1)

Published: April 18, 2025

Language: Английский

Citations

0

How is ChatGPT acknowledged in academic publications? DOI
Kayvan Kousha

Scientometrics, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: Nov. 12, 2024

Language: Английский

Citations

3

Appliances of Generative AI-Powered Language Tools in Academic Writing: A Scoping Review DOI Creative Commons
Lilia Raitskaya, Elena Tikhonova

Journal of language and Education, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 10(4), P. 5 - 30

Published: Dec. 30, 2024

Introduction: Academic writing is getting through a transformative shift with the advent of generative AI-powered tools in 2022. It spurred research emerging field that focus on appliances academic writing. As AI technologies are changing fast, regular synthesis new knowledge needs revisiting. Though there scoping and systematic reviews some sub-fields, present review aims to set scope GenAI Method: The adhered PRISMA extension for reviews, PPC framework. eligibility criteria include problem, concept, context, language, subject area, types sources, database (Scopus), period (2023-2024). Results: three clusters reviewed 44 publications included (1) enhancing writing; (2) challenges (3) authorship integrity. potential language embraces many functions (text generation, proofreading, editing, text annotation, paraphrasing translation) provides assistance writing, offers strategies hybrid various assignments genres improvements quality. Language GenAI-powered also studied as feedback tool. concerns related such range from integrity overreliance tools, misleading or false generated content, inaccurate referencing, inability generate author’s voice. findings compliance trends outlined previous publications, though more mechanisms integrating AI-hybrid contexts. discourse migrating revisiting concepts originality Gen AI-generated content. Conclusion: directions have shown re-focusing, inputs focuses field. transformation accelerating, wrought academia face rethinking basic meet shift. Further syntheses essential, including all already existent sub-fields.

Language: Английский

Citations

0