The Lancet Rheumatology,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
5(2), P. e88 - e98
Published: Jan. 10, 2023
Concerns
have
been
raised
regarding
the
reduced
immunogenicity
of
vaccines
against
COVID-19
in
patients
with
autoimmune
diseases
treated
rituximab.
However,
incidence
and
severity
breakthrough
infections
unbiased
samples
specific
rheumatic
musculoskeletal
are
largely
unknown.
We
aimed
to
assess
SARS-CoV-2
infection,
compare
rates
moderate-to-severe
any
severe
infection
event,
evaluate
predictors
outcomes
rituximab.We
did
a
retrospective
cohort
study
all
rituximab-treated
single
centre
Leeds,
UK
between
March
1,
2020
(the
index
date),
April
2022.
Adults
aged
18
years
older,
who
fulfilled
classification
criteria
for
established
diseases,
received
therapy
at
least
one
rituximab
infusion
Sept
2019
(6
months
before
pandemic
UK),
2022,
were
eligible
inclusion
study.
was
defined
by
antigen
test
or
PCR.
categorised
as
mild
(from
ambulatory
hospitalised
but
not
requiring
oxygen
support)
(hospitalised
support
death).
The
primary
outcome
which
an
occurring
14
days
more
after
second
vaccine
dose.
Predictors
analysed
using
Cox
regression
proportional
hazards.Of
1280
cycle
since
Jan
2002,
485
(38%)
remained
on
Of
these
patients,
400
included
our
final
analysis.
mean
age
date
58·9
(SD
14·6),
288
(72%)
female
112
(28%)
male,
333
(83%)
White,
110
had
two
comorbidities.
272
(68%)
rheumatoid
arthritis,
48
(12%)
systemic
lupus
erythematosus,
anti-neutrophil
cytoplasmic
antibody-associated
vasculitis,
46
other
diseases.
During
study,
798
cycles
administered.
398
(>99%)
data,
372
(93%)
fully
vaccinated.
Over
774·6
patient-years
follow-up,
there
incremental
increase
types
over
three
phases
(wild-type
alpha,
delta,
omicron),
most
mild.
broadly
similar
across
variant
phases.
370
vaccinated
complete
(30%)
type
COVID-19,
16
(4%)
(<1%)
died.
In
post-vaccination
phase
(after
Dec
18,
2020),
substantially
lower
those
compared
unvaccinated
partially
individuals
(22·83
per
100
person-years
[95%
CI
18·94-27·52]
vs
89·46
[52·98-151·05]
severities,
3·32
[2·03-5·42]
25·56
[9·59-68·10]
infections).
rate
events
this
(5·68
4·22-7·63]).
multivariable
analysis,
factors
associated
increased
risk
number
comorbidities
(hazard
ratio
1·46
1·13-1·89];
p=0·0037)
hypogammaglobulinaemia
(defined
pre-rituximab
IgG
concentration
<6
g/L;
3·22
[1·27-8·19];
p=0·014).
This
each
dose
(0·49
[0·37-0·65];
p<0·0001).
Other
factors,
including
concomitant
prednisolone
use,
rituximab-associated
(eg,
time
vaccination
last
dose),
vaccine-associated
peripheral
B-cell
depletion)
predictive
outcomes.This
presented
detailed
analyses
during
various
pandemic.
later
stages
pandemic,
high
event
risk-benefit
might
still
favour
few
treatment
options.
Increased
vigilance
is
needed
presence
types.Wellcome
Trust
Eli
Lilly.
Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
7(1)
Published: May 21, 2022
Abstract
The
therapeutic
use
of
messenger
RNA
(mRNA)
has
fueled
great
hope
to
combat
a
wide
range
incurable
diseases.
Recent
rapid
advances
in
biotechnology
and
molecular
medicine
have
enabled
the
production
almost
any
functional
protein/peptide
human
body
by
introducing
mRNA
as
vaccine
or
agent.
This
represents
rising
precision
field
with
promise
for
preventing
treating
many
intractable
genetic
In
addition,
vitro
transcribed
achieved
programmed
production,
which
is
more
effective,
faster
design
well
flexible
cost-effective
than
conventional
approaches
that
may
offer.
Based
on
these
extraordinary
advantages,
vaccines
characteristics
swiftest
response
large-scale
outbreaks
infectious
diseases,
such
currently
devastating
pandemic
COVID-19.
It
always
been
scientists’
desire
improve
stability,
immunogenicity,
translation
efficiency,
delivery
system
achieve
efficient
safe
mRNA.
Excitingly,
scientific
dreams
gradually
realized
rapid,
amazing
achievements
biology,
technology,
vaccinology,
nanotechnology.
this
review,
we
comprehensively
describe
mRNA-based
therapeutics,
including
their
principles,
manufacture,
application,
effects,
shortcomings.
We
also
highlight
importance
optimization
systems
successful
therapeutics
discuss
key
challenges
opportunities
developing
tools
into
powerful
versatile
genetic,
infectious,
cancer,
other
refractory
BMJ,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
unknown, P. e068632 - e068632
Published: March 2, 2022
Abstract
Objective
To
compare
the
efficacy
of
covid-19
vaccines
between
immunocompromised
and
immunocompetent
people.
Design
Systematic
review
meta-analysis.
Data
sources
PubMed,
Embase,
Central
Register
Controlled
Trials,
COVID-19
Open
Research
Dataset
Challenge
(CORD-19),
WHO
databases
for
studies
published
1
December
2020
5
November
2021.
ClinicalTrials.gov
International
Clinical
Trials
Registry
Platform
were
searched
in
2021
to
identify
registered
but
as
yet
unpublished
or
ongoing
studies.
Study
selection
Prospective
observational
comparing
vaccination
participants.
Methods
A
frequentist
random
effects
meta-analysis
was
used
separately
pool
relative
absolute
risks
seroconversion
after
first
second
doses
a
vaccine.
without
SARS-CoV-2
antibody
titre
levels
performed
first,
second,
third
vaccine
rate
dose.
Risk
bias
certainty
evidence
assessed.
Results
82
included
Of
these
studies,
77
(94%)
mRNA
vaccines,
16
(20%)
viral
vector
4
(5%)
inactivated
whole
virus
vaccines.
63
assessed
be
at
low
risk
19
moderate
bias.
After
one
dose,
about
half
likely
patients
with
haematological
cancers
(risk
ratio
0.40,
95%
confidence
interval
0.32
0.50,
I
2
=80%;
0.29,
0.20
=89%),
immune
mediated
inflammatory
disorders
(0.53,
0.39
0.71,
=89%;
0.11
0.58,
=97%),
solid
(0.55,
0.46
0.65,
=78%;
0.44,
0.36
0.53,
=84%)
compared
controls,
whereas
organ
transplant
recipients
times
less
seroconvert
(0.06,
0.04
0.09,
=0%;
0.06,
0.08,
=0%).
remained
least
(0.39,
0.46,
=92%;
0.35,
0.26
0.46),
only
achieving
seroconversion.
Seroconversion
increasingly
(0.63,
0.57
0.69,
=88%;
0.62,
0.54
0.70,
=90%),
(0.75,
0.69
0.82,
0.77,
0.66
0.85,
=93%),
(0.90,
0.88
0.93,
=51%;
0.89,
0.86
0.91,
=49%).
similar
people
HIV
controls
(1.00,
0.98
1.01,
0.97,
0.83
1.00,
=89%).
11
showed
that
dose
associated
among
non-responders
cancers,
disorders,
although
response
variable
inadequately
studied
those
receiving
non-mRNA
Conclusion
rates
significantly
lower
patients,
especially
recipients.
consistently
improved
across
all
patient
groups,
albeit
magnitude
Targeted
interventions
including
(booster)
should
performed.
registration
PROSPERO
CRD42021272088.
MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
70(44), P. 1553 - 1559
Published: Nov. 2, 2021
Immunocompromised
persons,
defined
as
those
with
suppressed
humoral
or
cellular
immunity
resulting
from
health
conditions
medications,
account
for
approximately
3%
of
the
U.S.
adult
population
(1).
adults
are
at
increased
risk
severe
COVID-19
outcomes
(2)
and
might
not
acquire
same
level
protection
mRNA
vaccines
do
immunocompetent
(3,4).
To
evaluate
vaccine
effectiveness
(VE)
among
immunocompromised
adults,
data
VISION
Network*
on
hospitalizations
persons
aged
≥18
years
COVID-19-like
illness
187
hospitals
in
nine
states
during
January
17-September
5,
2021
were
analyzed.
Using
selected
discharge
diagnoses,†
VE
against
COVID-19-associated
hospitalization
conferred
by
completing
a
2-dose
series
an
≥14
days
before
index
date§
(i.e.,
being
fully
vaccinated)
was
evaluated
using
test-negative
design
comparing
20,101
(10,564
[53%]
whom
69,116
(29,456
[43%]
vaccinated).
2
doses
lower
patients
(77%;
95%
confidence
interval
[CI]
=
74%-80%)
than
(90%;
CI
89%-91%).
This
difference
persisted
irrespective
product,
age
group,
timing
relative
to
SARS-CoV-2
(the
virus
that
causes
COVID-19)
B.1.617.2
(Delta)
variant
predominance
state
hospitalization.
varied
across
immunocompromising
condition
subgroups,
ranging
59%
(organ
stem
cell
transplant
recipients)
81%
(persons
rheumatologic
inflammatory
disorder).
benefit
vaccination
but
less
protected
varies
subgroups.
receiving
should
receive
3
booster,
consistent
CDC
recommendations
(5),
practice
nonpharmaceutical
interventions,
and,
if
infected,
be
monitored
closely
considered
early
proven
therapies
can
prevent
outcomes.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
119(15)
Published: April 6, 2022
The
emergence
of
SARS-CoV-2
triggering
the
COVID-19
pandemic
ranks
as
arguably
greatest
medical
emergency
last
century.
has
highlighted
health
disparities
both
within
and
between
countries
will
leave
a
lasting
impact
on
global
society.
Nonetheless,
substantial
investment
in
life
sciences
over
recent
decades
facilitated
rapid
scientific
response
with
innovations
viral
characterization,
testing,
sequencing.
Perhaps
most
remarkably,
this
permitted
development
highly
effective
vaccines,
which
are
being
distributed
globally
at
unprecedented
speed.
In
contrast,
drug
treatments
for
established
disease
have
delivered
limited
benefits
so
far.
Innovative
approaches
design
execution
large-scale
clinical
trials
repurposing
existing
drugs
saved
many
lives;
however,
more
remain
risk.
review
we
describe
challenges
unmet
needs,
discuss
therapeutics,
address
future
opportunities.
Consideration
is
given
to
factors
that
hindered
order
support
planning
next
challenge
allow
cost-effective
new
therapeutics
equitable
delivery.
The Lancet Rheumatology,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
4(7), P. e490 - e506
Published: June 9, 2022
The
risk
of
severe
COVID-19
outcomes
in
people
with
immune-mediated
inflammatory
diseases
and
on
immune-modifying
drugs
might
not
be
fully
mediated
by
comorbidities
vary
factors
such
as
ethnicity.
We
aimed
to
assess
the
adults
those
therapies.
Arthritis & Rheumatology,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
75(1)
Published: Nov. 8, 2022
To
provide
guidance
to
rheumatology
providers
on
the
use
of
COVID-19
vaccines
for
patients
with
rheumatic
and
musculoskeletal
diseases
(RMDs).A
task
force
was
assembled
that
included
9
rheumatologists/immunologists,
2
infectious
specialists,
public
health
physicians.
After
agreeing
scoping
questions,
an
evidence
report
created
summarized
published
literature
publicly
available
data
regarding
vaccine
efficacy
safety,
as
well
other
in
RMD
patients.
Task
members
rated
their
agreement
draft
consensus
statements
a
9-point
numerical
scoring
system,
using
modified
Delphi
process
RAND/University
California
Los
Angeles
Appropriateness
Method,
refinement
iteration
over
sessions.
Consensus
determined
based
distribution
ratings.Despite
paucity
direct
evidence,
were
developed
by
agreed
upon
vaccines,
including
supplemental/booster
dosing,
offer
recommendations
timing
immunomodulatory
therapies
around
time
vaccination.These
are
intended
direction
care
how
best
facilitate
implementation
vaccination
strategies
npj Vaccines,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
7(1)
Published: Feb. 28, 2022
Abstract
Humoral
responses
to
COVID-19
vaccines
in
people
living
with
HIV
(PLWH)
remain
incompletely
characterized.
We
measured
circulating
antibodies
against
the
SARS-CoV-2
spike
protein
receptor-binding
domain
(RBD),
ACE2
displacement
and
viral
neutralization
activities
one
month
following
first
second
vaccine
doses,
again
3
months
dose,
100
adult
PLWH
152
controls.
All
were
receiving
suppressive
antiretroviral
therapy,
median
CD4+
T-cell
counts
of
710
(IQR
525–935)
cells/mm
,
though
nadir
ranged
as
low
<10
.
After
adjustment
for
sociodemographic,
health
vaccine-related
variables,
infection
was
associated
lower
anti-RBD
antibody
concentrations
activity
after
dose.
Following
two
doses
however,
not
significantly
magnitude
any
humoral
response
multivariable
adjustment.
Rather,
older
age,
a
higher
burden
chronic
conditions,
dual
ChAdOx1
vaccination
doses.
No
significant
correlation
observed
between
recent
or
PLWH.
These
results
indicate
that
well-controlled
loads
healthy
range
generally
mount
strong
initial
vaccination.
Factors
including
co-morbidities,
brand,
durability
rise
new
variants
will
influence
when
benefit
from
additional
Further
studies
who
are
treatment
have
needed,
longer-term
assessments
durability.