Microorganisms,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
12(3), P. 591 - 591
Published: March 15, 2024
This
study
compared
SARS-CoV-2
RNA
loads
at
different
anatomical
sites,
and
the
impact
of
self-swabbing
food
intake.
Adult
symptomatic
patients
with
or
non-SARS-CoV-2
respiratory
tract
infection
were
included
between
2021
2022.
Patients
performed
a
nasal
buccal
swab
before
professionally
collected
nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal
(NOPS).
Buccal
swabs
fasting
after
breakfast
in
subgroup
patients.
determined
by
nucleic
acid
testing.
Swabbing
convenience
was
evaluated
using
survey.
The
median
age
199
54
years
(interquartile
range
38–68);
42%
female
52%
tested
positive
for
SARS-CoV-2.
majority
(70%)
hospitalized.
mean
load
6.6
log10
copies/mL
(standard
deviation
(SD),
±1.5),
5.6
(SD
±
1.9),
3.4
1.9)
NOPS,
self-collected
swabs,
respectively
(p
<
0.0001).
Sensitivity
96.1%
(95%
CI
90.4–98.9)
75.3%
63.9–81.8)
respectively.
After
intake,
decreased
=
0.0006).
swabbing
preferred
sampling
procedure
In
conclusion,
NOPS
yielded
highest
loads.
Nasal
emerged
as
reliable
alternative
contrast
to
swabs.
If
are
used,
they
should
be
Clinical Microbiology and Infection,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
29(3), P. 391.e1 - 391.e7
Published: Nov. 13, 2022
To
assess
the
performances
of
three
commonly
used
antigen
rapid
diagnostic
tests
as
self-tests
in
asymptomatic
individuals
Omicron
period.We
performed
a
cross-sectional
test
accuracy
study
period
public
health
service
COVID-19
sites
Netherlands,
including
3600
aged
≥
16
years
presenting
for
SARS-CoV-2
testing
any
reason
except
confirmatory
after
positive
self-test.
Participants
were
sampled
RT-PCR
(reference
test)
and
received
one
self-test
(either
Acon
Flowflex
[Flowflex],
MP
Biomedicals
(MPBio),
or
Siemens-Healthineers
CLINITEST
[CLINITEST])
to
perform
unsupervised
at
home.
Diagnostic
accuracies
each
calculated.Overall
sensitivities
27.5%
(95%
CI,
21.3-34.3%)
Flowflex,
20.9%
(13.9-29.4%)
MPBio,
25.6%
(19.1-33.1%)
CLINITEST.
After
applying
viral
load
cut-off
(≥5.2
log10
E-gene
copies/mL),
increased
48.3%
(37.6-59.2%),
37.8%
(22.5-55.2%),
40.0%
(29.5-51.2%),
respectively.
Specificities
>99%
all
most
analyses.The
when
very
low.
Antigen
self-testing
may
only
detect
minority
infections
that
point
time.
Repeated
case
negative
is
advocated
improve
yield,
should
be
advised
re-test
symptoms
develop.
Frontiers in Microbiology,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
13
Published: Jan. 13, 2023
In
2022,
a
new
coronavirus
variant
(Omicron)
infection
epidemic
broke
out
in
Shanghai,
China.
However,
it
is
unclear
whether
the
duration
of
this
omicron
different
from
that
prototype
strain.We
retrospectively
analyzed
157
cases
Omicron
Taizhou
Public
Health
Center
March
29,
to
April
18,
and
observed
dynamics
nucleic
acid
Ct
values
during
admission
discharge
patients.
Clinical
laboratory
indicators
these
patients
were
also
obtained.Compared
strain,
showed
broad
population
susceptibility
infected
individuals
(regardless
age
presence
underlying
disease)
had
slight
damage
immune
system
renal
function;
viral
loads
peaked
was
2-3
days
disease
onset;
median
15-18
days;
value
nasopharyngeal
swabs
lower
than
throat
swabs,
oropharyngeal
unstable
recovery
period.Therefore,
we
found
time
peak
load
after
onset
disease,
symptomatic
higher
longer
hospitalization
time.
This
finding
will
provide
basis
for
understanding
variants
formulating
national
prevention
control
strategy.
Viruses,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
14(2), P. 313 - 313
Published: Feb. 2, 2022
Efficient,
wide-scale
testing
for
SARS-CoV-2
is
crucial
monitoring
the
incidence
of
infection
in
community.
The
gold
standard
COVID-19
diagnosis
molecular
analysis
epithelial
secretions
from
upper
respiratory
system
captured
by
nasopharyngeal
(NP)
or
oropharyngeal
swabs.
Given
ease
collection,
saliva
has
been
proposed
as
a
possible
substitute
to
support
at
population
level.
Here,
we
used
novel
collection
device
designed
favour
safe
and
correct
acquisition
sample,
well
processivity
downstream
analysis.
We
tested
1003
swabs
paired
samples
self-collected
individuals
recruited
public
drive-through
facility.
An
overall
moderate
concordance
(68%)
between
two
tests
was
found,
with
evidence
that
neither
can
diagnose
100%
cases.
While
methods
performed
equally
symptomatic
individuals,
their
discordance
mainly
restricted
convalescent
subjects.
test
least
effective
NP
asymptomatic
contact
tracing.
Our
study
describes
strategy
samples,
which
reliable
screening
community
particularly
PLoS ONE,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
17(8), P. e0267766 - e0267766
Published: Aug. 8, 2022
Widespread
use
of
at-home
rapid
COVID-19
antigen
tests
has
been
proposed
as
an
important
public
health
intervention
to
interrupt
chains
transmission.
Antigen
may
be
preferred
over
PCR
because
they
provide
on-demand
results
for
relatively
low
cost
and
can
identify
people
when
are
most
likely
infectious,
particularly
used
daily.
Yet
the
extent
which
a
frequent
testing
will
result
in
positive
impact
depend
on
high
acceptability
adherence
such
regimens.We
conducted
mixed-methods
study
assessing
daily
mobile-app
connected
regimen
among
employees
US-based
media
company.
Acceptability
was
assessed
across
seven
domains
Theoretical
Framework
Acceptability.Among
31
participants,
generally
high,
with
participants
reporting
perceived
effectiveness,
coherence,
self-efficacy;
affective
attitude;
acceptable
degree
burden
opportunity
cost;
ethical.
71%
reported
preference
test
using
than
weekly
employment-based
PCR.
Mean
21-day
88%
43%
achieving
100%
adherence,
48%
at
least
every
other
day,
10%
less
day.Despite
overall
we
identified
three
implementation
challenges
that
must
addressed
serial
implemented
scale
have
impact.
First,
users
need
guidance
how
adapt
frequencies
different
epidemiological
conditions.
Second,
institutions
guidelines
safely
store
share
results.
Third,
strategies
prioritize
equity
protect
those
vulnerable
COVID-19.
medRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory),
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Feb. 10, 2023
Rapid
Antigen
Tests
(RAT)
have
become
an
invaluable
tool
for
combating
the
COVID-19
pandemic.
However,
concerns
been
raised
regarding
ability
of
existing
RATs
to
effectively
detect
emerging
SARS-CoV-2
variants.
We
compared
performance
eight
commercially
available,
emergency
use
authorized
against
Delta
and
Omicron
variants
using
individual
patient
serially
diluted
pooled
clinical
samples.
The
exhibited
lower
sensitivity
samples
when
PCR
Cycle
threshold
(C
The Journal of Infectious Diseases,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
230(2), P. 363 - 373
Published: March 26, 2024
SARS-CoV-2
antigen-detection
rapid
diagnostic
tests
(Ag-RDTs)
have
become
widely
utilized
but
longitudinal
characterization
of
their
community-based
performance
remains
incompletely
understood.
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM),
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
60(10), P. e225 - e227
Published: Aug. 8, 2022
Article
Ct
values
of
different
SARS
CoV2
variants:
a
single
center
observational
study
from
Innsbruck,
Austria
was
published
on
September
1,
2022
in
the
journal
Clinical
Chemistry
and
Laboratory
Medicine
(CCLM)
(volume
60,
issue
10).
Laboratory Medicine,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
54(2), P. e54 - e57
Published: Sept. 6, 2022
Independent
assessment
of
SARS-CoV-2
antigen
(COV2Ag)
tests
remains
important
as
varying
performance
between
assays
is
common.
We
assessed
the
a
new
high-throughput
COV2Ag
test
compared
to
nucleic
acid
amplification
(NAAT).A
total
347
nasopharyngeal
samples
collected
from
January
October
2021
were
by
NAAT
part
standard-of-care
testing
(CDC
LDT
or
GeneXpert
System,
Cepheid)
and
using
ADVIA
Centaur
CoV2Ag
assay
(Siemens
Healthineers).Among
positive
specimens
we
found
82.4%
agreement
in
negative
97.3%
(overall
85.6%).
In
symptomatic
persons,
agreed
with
90.0%
(n
=
291),
asymptomatic
62.5%
56).
Agreement
increased
at
lower
cycle
threshold
(Ct)
values.The
exceeded
World
Health
Organization
minimum
requirements
≥
80%
sensitivity
97%
specificity.
The
helpful
for
large
scale
screening
efforts
due
reduced
wait
times.
JAMA Network Open,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
5(10), P. e2237149 - e2237149
Published: Oct. 18, 2022
Importance
The
US
Centers
for
Disease
Control
and
Prevention
shortened
the
recommended
isolation
period
SARS-CoV-2
infection
from
10
days
to
5
in
December
2021.
It
is
unknown
whether
an
individual
with
may
still
have
a
positive
result
rapid
antigen
test
potentially
be
contagious
at
end
of
this
period.
Objective
To
estimate
proportion
individuals
whose
starting
7
postdiagnosis.
Design,
Setting,
Participants
This
case
series
analyzed
student
athletes
National
Collegiate
Athletic
Association
Division
I
university
campus
who
tested
between
January
3
May
6,
2022.
Individuals
underwent
testing
postdiagnosis
determine
they
could
their
Exposures
Rapid
after
SARS-CoV-2.
Main
Outcomes
Measures
results,
symptom
status,
variant
identification
via
wastewater
analysis.
Results
A
total
264
(140
[53%]
female;
mean
[SD]
age,
20.1
[1.2]
years;
range,
18-25
years)
representing
268
infections
(177
[66%]
symptomatic,
91
[34%]
asymptomatic)
were
included
study.
Of
248
did
day
test,
67
(27%;
95%
CI,
21%-33%)
tests
positive.
Patients
symptomatic
significantly
more
likely
on
vs
those
asymptomatic
(35%;
28%-43%
11%;
5%-18%;
P
&lt;
.001).
BA.2
also
compared
BA.1
(40%;
29%-51%
21%;
15%-27%;
=
.007).
Conclusions
Relevance
In
series,
remained
27%
isolation,
suggesting
that
Prevention–recommended
5-day
insufficient
preventing
ongoing
spread
disease.
Further
studies
are
needed
these
findings
present
heterogeneous
population
subsequent
variants.