Автор исследует особенности применения смарт-контрактов в сделках с виртуальным имуществом с учетом того, что смарт-контракт является способом исполнения тех обязательств, в которых передача имущественного предоставления происходит в виртуальном мире с помощью соответствующих технических средств. Следует признать, что перечень виртуального имущества является открытым, в настоящий момент он включает в себя, например, криптовалюту, доменные имена, «игровое имущество», виртуальные токены.
Актуален вопрос о правовой природе объектов, относящихся к виртуальному имуществу: являются ли они новым самостоятельным видом имущества, требующим установления специальных правовых режимов, или представляют собой разновидность известных имущественных прав?
В работе также отмечается, что смарт-контракты отличаются как уязвимостями в компьютерном коде, так и …
Lex Russica,
Journal Year:
2020,
Volume and Issue:
4, P. 9 - 20
Published: April 14, 2020
With
the
rapid
development
of
new
technologies
taking
place
during
4th
Industrial
Revolution,
types
disputes
significant
specificity
have
gradually
begun
to
emerge.
Among
such
cases
a
special
category
has
been
formed
by
arising
from
smart
contracts
based
on
block
chain
technology.
There
are
two
possible
ways
resolve
disputes.
Under
first
approach,
they
subject
consideration
traditional
arbitration
institutions,
guided
usual
rules
and
guidelines
(blockchain
arbitration).
The
second
approach
involves
need
create
innovative
applications
blockchain
technology
designed
in
digital
decentralized
environment
(
Such
applications,
turn,
divided
into
groups.
group
consists
projects
involving
creation
combining
advantages
international
commercial
technology;
includes
establishment
quasi-judicial
system
for
dispute
resolution.
paper
attempts
analyze
most
interesting
related
each
listed
groups
assess
prospects
their
development.
Based
results
analysis,
author
comes
conclusion
that
implementation
will
lead
emergence
many
issues
(among
which
problem
choice
applicable
law,
determination
arbitration,
arbitrability,
as
well
possibility
recognition
enforcement
awards
made
arbitral
tribunal).
influence
technologies,
is
gaining
direction
its
In
future,
require
not
only
rationalization
existing
resolution
mechanisms,
but
also
fundamental
rethinking.
Lex Russica,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
76(6), P. 128 - 137
Published: June 15, 2023
The
author
examines
the
essence,
features
of
implementation,
and
prospects
transformation
content
good
faith
principle
in
connection
with
need
to
regulate
civil
relations
digital
environment.
In
particular,
based
on
historical
doctrinal
aspects,
concludes
that
principles
appliesin
context
current
legislation.
claims
this
category
is
a
law,
despite
doubts
some
researchers.
At
same
time,
conscientiousness
most
important
evaluation
domestic
elevated
rank
basic
Based
results
consideration
individual
model
real-world
examples
from
practice,
remains
an
actual
necessary
tool
can
be
used
both
legislative
law
enforcement
activities
when
solving
legal
problems
regulation
related
use
technologies.
case,
specific
may
identified.
They
are
particular
as
follow.
There
increase
standard
providing
information
counterparty
(in
environment,
requirements
for
information,
well
its
content,
become
higher).
future,
it
possible
tighten
consequences
failure
provide
paragraph
3
Article
307
Civil
Code
Russian
Federation
(clearly
not
reported
during
«live»
interaction,
example,
about
obvious
shortcomings
product.
However,
situation
different
online
space.
It
consider
site
interface
circumstance
affecting
assessment
behavior
regard,
font,
colors,
distractions
subject
evaluation).
Вестник Пермского университета Юридические науки,
Journal Year:
2020,
Volume and Issue:
49, P. 502 - 523
Published: Jan. 1, 2020
Introduction:
the
article
is
focused
on
analysis
of
relations
in
field
digital
technologies,
specifically
virtual
and
augmented
reality
(VR,
AR).
The
progress
these
especially
context
limited
real
contacts
during
pandemic,
their
wide
application
different
spheres
make
it
necessary
to
create
relevant
legal
framework.
One
most
important
issues
correlation
between
mechanisms
for
VR/AR
technologies
rules
protection
intellectual
rights
results
activity
property
designations.
discusses
specific
features
regime
technologies;
studies
peculiarities
smart
contracts
as
applied
transactions;
defines
types
objects
used
within
question
protection;
attempts
develop
designations
considered
sphere.
Purpose:
identify
Russian
foreign
regulation
law
enforcement
practice
with
regard
arising
connection
use
objects,
well
created
through
using
protected
by
rules.
Methods:
dialectical,
formal-logical,
functional
other
general
scientific
research
methods,
special
methods:
comparative
formal-legal.
Results:
existing
bases
formation
its
functioning
have
been
studied.
On
basis
experience,
comparative,
formal
analysis,
there
identified:
possibilities
introducing
separate
elements
provided
such
VR/AR;
relation
transactions
property;
problems
authors
holders.
Conclusions:
having
analyzed
history
approaches
developed
practice,
we
came
a
conclusion
that
today
are
all
prerequisites
determination
certain
(with
both
received
product
technologies),
which
particularly
concerns
way
patent
objects.
For
instance,
accordance
subitem
1
Item
2
Article
1358
Civil
Code
Federation,
importation
into
territory
manufacture,
application,
offer
sell,
sale,
introduction
civil
circulation
or
storage
purposes
an
invention
utility
model
industrial
design
be
infringement
exclusive
right
invention,
design.
Here
arises
what
extent
falls
under
category
‘product’.
To
solve
problem
accounting
products,
apply
expansive
interpretation
mentioned
categories,
can
implemented
Administrative
Regulations
defined
new
method
Code.
Legal Issues in the Digital Age,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
5(3), P. 4 - 30
Published: Oct. 2, 2024
Aspects
of
cross-sectoral
influence
on
the
spheres
private
and
its
public
regulation
construct
obligation
in
digital
environment
using
example
utility
rights.
Specific
relationships
form
exercise
rights
under
derivative
financial
instruments,
including
an
contract
between
a
forex
dealer
individual,
others
that
involve
technical
electronic
means.
Provisions
changing
norms
Russian
Federation
Civil
Code
regarding
new
objects
civil
rights:
rights,
instruments
or
their
analogues
—
obligations.
The
criteria
for
are
considered
conclusions
formulated
about
possibility
identifying
properties
obligation:
reciprocity,
conditionality,
potestativeness.
A
special
element
is
highlighted
relation
to
obligations
environment.
Obligations
presented
as
category
indefinite
obligations,
based
contract.
results
action
Federal
Law
No.
34-FZ,
well
legislation
general
practice
terms
determining
legal
status
participants
relations
analysed.
information
intermediary
determines
it
does
not
have
right
refer
conditions
exemption
from
liability
violation
intellectual
Article
1253.1
will
be
involved
compensation
damage
grounds
common
entrepreneurs,
provided
401.
National Technical University of Ukraine Journal Political science Sociology Law,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
3(47), P. 101 - 105
Published: Jan. 29, 2021
The
article
examines
the
concepts,
legal
nature
of
smart
contracts,
as
well
advantages
and
disadvantages
contracts
a
basis
for
ownership.
technical
aspect
concept
contract
is
considered.
Models
using
are
described.
Approaches
to
determining
presented.
It
concluded
that
two
models
must
be
considered
when
contracts.
first
model
external,
program
code
does
not
replace
agreement,
but
only
automates
its
execution.
second
internal,
completely
or
partially
replaces
terms
agreement.
Among
grounds
emergence
property
rights
can
identified,
all,
inability
change
interference
in
work.
However,
at
same
time,
this
feature
disadvantage
contract,
it
allow
take
into
account
objective
circumstances
may
affect
implementation
problem
oracles
also
noted
use
actually
means
involvement
third
party
transaction
with
all
risks
arise
from
it.
involving
notaries
state
registrars
transactions
on
acquisition
analyzed.
problems
lack
regulation
particular,
related
transnational
nature,
investigated.
protection
parties
analyzed,
errors
outside
interference.
Temporary
solutions
regarding
general
recommendations
legislative
definition
proposed.
SHS Web of Conferences,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
134, P. 00016 - 00016
Published: Jan. 1, 2022
The
article
is
devoted
to
a
topic
of
great
scientific
and
practical
importance
in
the
modern
context
creating
digital
economy
ecosystemб
smart
contract
phenomenon.
focuses
on
foreign
civilistic
doctrine
study.
main
discussion
questions
about
legal
technological
nature
contract,
ways
its
implementation
current
law
each
country,
approaches
national
legislators
solving
this
issue
functional
are
considered.
disputable
problems
problem
contract.
also
involves
comparative
aspect:
it
analyzes
Russian
legislator
representatives
domestic
place
pandect
system
civil
comparison
with
systems
settlement
similar
issues.
It
noted
that
using
positive
experience
contracts
regulation
should
be
taken
into
account
when
correcting
regulatory
platform
Federation.
evaluates
innovation
Part
2
Article
309
Civil
Code
Federation
(RF
CC).
description
given
developers
positions
Explanatory
Note
relevant
draft
law;
investigation
performed
terms
used
version
RF
CC
regard
electronic
form
deal
In
addition,
raises
well
known
doctrine:
computer
code
credibility
distrust
counterparties
other.
Attention
paid
advantages
which
discussed
by
scientists,
as
other
related
sciences.
conclusion
article,
findings
demonstrate
authors’
view
issues
considered
article.
Actual Problems of Russian Law,
Journal Year:
2020,
Volume and Issue:
15(6), P. 84 - 94
Published: July 11, 2020
Modern
international
hydrocarbons
turnover
is
becoming
more
autonomous
and
decentralized.
This
process
facilitated
not
only
by
the
introduction
into
contractual
practice
of
such
network
technologies
as
smart
contracts
blockchain
platforms,
but
also
wide
dissemination
sources
non-governmental
regulation
(lex
petrolea).
In
context
paradigm
private
law,
classic
problem
conflict
laws
exacerbated.
The
author
considers
conflict-of-laws
aspects
use
based
on
technology
in
cross-border
oil
gas
transactions,
taking
account
fact
that
computer
algorithms
does
create
a
new
contract,
special
form
transaction.
Such
“automated”
transactions
sector
involving
multiple
jurisdictions
uncertainty
their
legal
regime.
absence
comprehensive
substantive
regulation,
connection
with
phenomenon
lex
petrolea,
method
predominates.
shares
his
reasoning
concerning
possibility
extending
application
Regulation
No.
593/2008
European
Parliament
Council
Union
“On
Law
to
be
Applicable
obligations
(Rome
I)”
contracts.
concludes
existing
quite
applicable
transactions.
Another
question
whether
which
virtue
rule,
provides
for
an
appropriate
basis.
To
date,
legislation
has
been
passed
several
American
states.
It
predicted
future,
law
will
determine
contracts,
guide
disseminating
positive
experience
different
countries.
Actual Problems of Russian Law,
Journal Year:
2020,
Volume and Issue:
15(11), P. 180 - 189
Published: Nov. 29, 2020
The
paper
analyzes
the
legal
status
of
consumer
when
concluding
and
executing
a
smart
contract.
author
proves
existence
special
risks
for
citizens
associated
with
conclusion
execution
In
particular,
considers
risk
consumer’s
misunderstanding
terms
contract,
difference
between
contract
set
forth
in
natural
language,
including
conditions
that
infringe
on
rights
(unfair
contractual
terms),
as
well
manifestations
regulatory
operational
relation
to
Currently,
Russian
Federation,
most
foreign
jurisdictions,
there
are
no
mechanisms
aimed
at
protecting
from
these
risks.
“general”
protection
existing
jurisdiction
insufficient.
Considering
this,
proposes
each
minimizing
its
implementation
negative
impact
citizen.
following
risk-oriented
approach
regulating
relations
participation
is
proposed.
A
citizen
can
conclude
transactions
using
subject
legislative
limitation
his
potential
losses
under
transaction
(limiting
price)
introduction
proposed
regulation
discussed
paper.
Widespread
digitalization
of
the
modern
society
-
emergence
digital
devices,
introduction
Internet
Things,
development
Big
Data
processing
and
other
technologies
result
in
new
challenges.
Not
only
industrial
corporate
automation
that
has
already
been
considerably
covered
by
legislation
initiatives
but
also
everyday
life
started
to
constitute
a
critical
infrastructure
society.
This
largely
happens
because
devices
substituting
traditional
owned
citizens
are
incorporated
into
corporate,
financial
state
business
processes.
For
instance,
citizens’
becoming
source
primary
data
for
energy
utility
companies.
More
opportunities
direct
interaction
solutions
between
themselves
resulting
controversial
synergy
effect
have
emerging
recently.
The
article
addresses
specifics
light
infrastructure,
particular
necessity
special
aspects
legal
regulatory
framework
possible
trends
this
functionality.
International Comparative Jurisprudence,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Jan. 1, 2022
This
article
consists
of
a
comparative
study
approaches
to
crypto-assets
in
the
USA
and
EU,
as
well
an
exploration
reasons
behind
such
differences.
These
two
jurisdictions
vary
dramatically
their
history,
economy
legal
systems.
Therefore,
differences
regulation
regarding
Initial
Coin
Offering
are
be
expected.
Doctrinal
comparisons
rarely
shed
light
on
way
that
law
actually
operates,
but
necessary
answer
question
why
countries
do
not
enact
similar
Offering.
leads
conclusion
that,
both
jurisdictions,
there
exists
no
certainty.
Meanwhile,
failure
either
United
States
or
European
Union
regulate
market
effectively
will
have
spill
over
effects
for
other
jurisdictions.
There
is,
therefore,
urgent
need
strengthening
international
standards
crypto
assets.
this
intends
contribute
search
necessary,
appropriate,
transnational
chart
contemporary
landscape
Offerings.
The
most
favourable
form
convergence
should
provide
increased
certainty
while
protecting
consumers
fostering
substantial
investment
innovation.