The Political Economic Sources of Policy Non-design, Policy Accumulation, and Decay in Policy Capacity DOI
Mehmet Kerem Çoban

Administration & Society, Год журнала: 2023, Номер 55(6), С. 1035 - 1065

Опубликована: Апрель 3, 2023

This article problematizes the political economic drivers of policy (non-)design, instrument choice, and how prolonged non-design could trigger accumulation with serious implications for capacity. Focusing on currency crisis-induced crisis in Turkey relying elite interviews secondary resources, it argues that design space, which is defined by interactions between credit-led growth model regime prioritizes loose monetary bank regulatory policies higher rates, led to haphazard response. Prolonged response triggered decay systemic organizational

Язык: Английский

Sustainable development policies and interventions: A bibliometric analysis of the contributions of the academic community DOI
Mamudu Abunga Akudugu, Matthew Chidozie Ogwu

Journal of Cleaner Production, Год журнала: 2023, Номер 434, С. 139919 - 139919

Опубликована: Ноя. 28, 2023

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

55

Policy integration and climate change adaptation DOI Creative Commons
Robbert Biesbroek

Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, Год журнала: 2021, Номер 52, С. 75 - 81

Опубликована: Авг. 13, 2021

Policy integration is considered an important mode to govern cross-cutting policy problems effectively. In the context of climate change adaptation, calls for strengthened have recently emerged ensure timely, adequate and effective actions. Though research on adaptation still in its infancy, current knowledge from studies offers a solid basis informing future work integration. This paper reviews main reasons why governments pursue integration, identifies key enabling constraining conditions, discusses evaluation adaptation.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

59

Designing for adaptation: Static and dynamic robustness in policy‐making DOI
Michael Howlett, M. Ramesh

Public Administration, Год журнала: 2022, Номер 101(1), С. 23 - 35

Опубликована: Апрель 6, 2022

Abstract Policy tools are chosen and deployed in the expectation that they will continue to work effectively over extended periods of time. This is a tall meet, given nature policy problems their contexts change constantly. To operate face these changes respond feedback from actors outputs, mixes must be robust. robustness two types: static which means adapt while goals remain unchanged, dynamic both change. The first equates with resilience—that is, ability bounce back previous state attain original altered caused by some internal or external conditions. second, however, more complex as it can involve aspects well order allow policies broadly altering form response changing circumstances. second type “dynamic robustness” focuses attention on need for agility upon requisites creation designs substantive state. article lays out concepts interrelationships kinds procedural other involved achieving either. It illustrates features differences using examples different sectoral cases.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

38

Public Inquiries and Policy Design DOI
Alastair Stark, Sophie Yates

Опубликована: Фев. 6, 2024

Public inquiries regularly produce outcomes of importance to policy design. However, the design literature has largely ignored many important ways that public can act as tools, meaning functions offer designer are not properly understood. This Element addresses this gap in two ways. First, it presents a theoretical discussion, underpinned by international empirical illustrations, explain how perform roles and be classified procedural tools. It focuses on four inquiry – catalytic, learning, processual, legitimation. Second, challenge designing have policy-facing capacities required make them effective. introduces plurality key variable influencing effectiveness, demonstrating its relevance internal operations, external environment, tool selection. Thus, combines conceptual practical insights speak academic practice orientated audiences.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

9

Multiple proximities and inter-agency collaboration within a policy network: The case of innovation policymaking in China DOI
Yutao Sun, Lin Jiang, Cong Cao

и другие.

Technovation, Год журнала: 2025, Номер 141, С. 103169 - 103169

Опубликована: Янв. 17, 2025

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

1

Toward a theorization of ideal type bureaucratic regimes: A comparative perspective from India and Pakistan DOI Creative Commons

Zahid Mumtaz,

Keerty Nakray

Administrative Theory & Praxis, Год журнала: 2025, Номер unknown, С. 1 - 29

Опубликована: Янв. 22, 2025

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

1

Mapping the use of knowledge in policymaking: barriers and facilitators from a subjectivist perspective (1990–2020) DOI Creative Commons
Giliberto Capano, Anna Malandrino

Policy Sciences, Год журнала: 2022, Номер 55(3), С. 399 - 428

Опубликована: Авг. 26, 2022

Abstract The use of knowledge and evidence in policymaking is a recurrent topic research due to its scientific policy relevance. existing expansive body literature has been scrutinised various ways grasp the dimensions utilisation policymaking, although most this monosectoral focus based on very general criteria analysis that do not completely account for complexity making. This paper overcomes limitation by enlightening epistemological divide field between an objectivist subjectivist perspective distinguishing two different focuses literature: making Based analytical distinction, presents original unprecedented systematic, intersectoral metareview considering thirty-year period 1990 2020 (approximately 1,400 were selected fine-grained analysis). offers broader more detailed map with clear idea distribution interest among fields, better classification theoretical/empirical content goals scholars adopt novel and, above all, types conditions favour or disfavour significant role policymaking. Ultimately, identifies three highly relevant components can facilitate constrain than others: values/ideology/beliefs, actors’ relationships, capacities.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

28

Policy capacity: evolving theory and missing links DOI Creative Commons
Scott Brenton, Erik Bækkeskov, Adam Hannah

и другие.

Policy Studies, Год журнала: 2022, Номер 44(3), С. 297 - 315

Опубликована: Фев. 28, 2022

We trace the evolution of understandings and applications policy capacity through a meta-analysis studies in administrative sciences that focus on definitions or conceptualizations capacity, capability competency, political resources functioning systems, variables mechanisms leading to outcomes. critique disentangle common operationalizations, such as success failure, enable more complete assessments whether state's has diminished recent times, often is suggested. Previous research concentrated two key properties "supply" responses, namely sufficiency changes over time across contexts. argue there needs be consideration societal demands governments governance systems (dis)equilibrium between demand supply generation. Using analogy battery, we propose three interconnected dimensions better capture qualities relationality demand: capital; contingent management; expectations satisfiction.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

26

Designing Behavioural Insights for Policy DOI Creative Commons
Ishani Mukherjee, Assel Mussagulova

Опубликована: Апрель 24, 2024

The diversity of knowledge surrounding behavioural insights (BI) means in the policy sciences, although visible, remains under-theorized with scant comparative and generalizable explorations procedural prerequisites for their effective design, both as stand-alone tools part dedicated 'toolkits'. While analyses content BI has proliferated, gap about needs design is growing recognizably, range responses grows practice necessitating specific capabilities, processes institutional frameworks to be place design. This Element draws on literature innovation adoption explore administrative, capacity endowments governments successful appropriate integration existing frameworks. Further, we present three illustrative cases respect experience essential facilitating

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

5

Controversial issues in crisis management. Bridging public policy and crisis management to better understand and address crises DOI Creative Commons
Giliberto Capano, Federico Toth

Risk Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy, Год журнала: 2024, Номер unknown

Опубликована: Май 2, 2024

Abstract The current body of multidisciplinary literature on crisis management still has some unresolved problems. This paper focuses the following four “controversial issues” in dealing with crises: usefulness emergency plans; early signal detection; decision‐making amid high uncertainty; and centralization/decentralization dilemma. first presents various, contradictory dimensions these controversial issues, drawing different strands organization research, public policy theory, studies. Next, issues are analyzed through lens specifically robustness capacities. theoretical application shows how can be framed differently thus overcome—at least from an analytical perspective—confirming that a bridge between very fruitful improving our understanding crises addressed.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

4