Administration & Society,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
55(6), P. 1035 - 1065
Published: April 3, 2023
This
article
problematizes
the
political
economic
drivers
of
policy
(non-)design,
instrument
choice,
and
how
prolonged
non-design
could
trigger
accumulation
with
serious
implications
for
capacity.
Focusing
on
currency
crisis-induced
crisis
in
Turkey
relying
elite
interviews
secondary
resources,
it
argues
that
design
space,
which
is
defined
by
interactions
between
credit-led
growth
model
regime
prioritizes
loose
monetary
bank
regulatory
policies
higher
rates,
led
to
haphazard
response.
Prolonged
response
triggered
decay
systemic
organizational
Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
52, P. 75 - 81
Published: Aug. 13, 2021
Policy
integration
is
considered
an
important
mode
to
govern
cross-cutting
policy
problems
effectively.
In
the
context
of
climate
change
adaptation,
calls
for
strengthened
have
recently
emerged
ensure
timely,
adequate
and
effective
actions.
Though
research
on
adaptation
still
in
its
infancy,
current
knowledge
from
studies
offers
a
solid
basis
informing
future
work
integration.
This
paper
reviews
main
reasons
why
governments
pursue
integration,
identifies
key
enabling
constraining
conditions,
discusses
evaluation
adaptation.
Public Administration,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
101(1), P. 23 - 35
Published: April 6, 2022
Abstract
Policy
tools
are
chosen
and
deployed
in
the
expectation
that
they
will
continue
to
work
effectively
over
extended
periods
of
time.
This
is
a
tall
meet,
given
nature
policy
problems
their
contexts
change
constantly.
To
operate
face
these
changes
respond
feedback
from
actors
outputs,
mixes
must
be
robust.
robustness
two
types:
static
which
means
adapt
while
goals
remain
unchanged,
dynamic
both
change.
The
first
equates
with
resilience—that
is,
ability
bounce
back
previous
state
attain
original
altered
caused
by
some
internal
or
external
conditions.
second,
however,
more
complex
as
it
can
involve
aspects
well
order
allow
policies
broadly
altering
form
response
changing
circumstances.
second
type
“dynamic
robustness”
focuses
attention
on
need
for
agility
upon
requisites
creation
designs
substantive
state.
article
lays
out
concepts
interrelationships
kinds
procedural
other
involved
achieving
either.
It
illustrates
features
differences
using
examples
different
sectoral
cases.
Public
inquiries
regularly
produce
outcomes
of
importance
to
policy
design.
However,
the
design
literature
has
largely
ignored
many
important
ways
that
public
can
act
as
tools,
meaning
functions
offer
designer
are
not
properly
understood.
This
Element
addresses
this
gap
in
two
ways.
First,
it
presents
a
theoretical
discussion,
underpinned
by
international
empirical
illustrations,
explain
how
perform
roles
and
be
classified
procedural
tools.
It
focuses
on
four
inquiry
–
catalytic,
learning,
processual,
legitimation.
Second,
challenge
designing
have
policy-facing
capacities
required
make
them
effective.
introduces
plurality
key
variable
influencing
effectiveness,
demonstrating
its
relevance
internal
operations,
external
environment,
tool
selection.
Thus,
combines
conceptual
practical
insights
speak
academic
practice
orientated
audiences.
Policy Sciences,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
55(3), P. 399 - 428
Published: Aug. 26, 2022
Abstract
The
use
of
knowledge
and
evidence
in
policymaking
is
a
recurrent
topic
research
due
to
its
scientific
policy
relevance.
existing
expansive
body
literature
has
been
scrutinised
various
ways
grasp
the
dimensions
utilisation
policymaking,
although
most
this
monosectoral
focus
based
on
very
general
criteria
analysis
that
do
not
completely
account
for
complexity
making.
This
paper
overcomes
limitation
by
enlightening
epistemological
divide
field
between
an
objectivist
subjectivist
perspective
distinguishing
two
different
focuses
literature:
making
Based
analytical
distinction,
presents
original
unprecedented
systematic,
intersectoral
metareview
considering
thirty-year
period
1990
2020
(approximately
1,400
were
selected
fine-grained
analysis).
offers
broader
more
detailed
map
with
clear
idea
distribution
interest
among
fields,
better
classification
theoretical/empirical
content
goals
scholars
adopt
novel
and,
above
all,
types
conditions
favour
or
disfavour
significant
role
policymaking.
Ultimately,
identifies
three
highly
relevant
components
can
facilitate
constrain
than
others:
values/ideology/beliefs,
actors’
relationships,
capacities.
Policy Studies,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
44(3), P. 297 - 315
Published: Feb. 28, 2022
We
trace
the
evolution
of
understandings
and
applications
policy
capacity
through
a
meta-analysis
studies
in
administrative
sciences
that
focus
on
definitions
or
conceptualizations
capacity,
capability
competency,
political
resources
functioning
systems,
variables
mechanisms
leading
to
outcomes.
critique
disentangle
common
operationalizations,
such
as
success
failure,
enable
more
complete
assessments
whether
state's
has
diminished
recent
times,
often
is
suggested.
Previous
research
concentrated
two
key
properties
"supply"
responses,
namely
sufficiency
changes
over
time
across
contexts.
argue
there
needs
be
consideration
societal
demands
governments
governance
systems
(dis)equilibrium
between
demand
supply
generation.
Using
analogy
battery,
we
propose
three
interconnected
dimensions
better
capture
qualities
relationality
demand:
capital;
contingent
management;
expectations
satisfiction.
The
diversity
of
knowledge
surrounding
behavioural
insights
(BI)
means
in
the
policy
sciences,
although
visible,
remains
under-theorized
with
scant
comparative
and
generalizable
explorations
procedural
prerequisites
for
their
effective
design,
both
as
stand-alone
tools
part
dedicated
'toolkits'.
While
analyses
content
BI
has
proliferated,
gap
about
needs
design
is
growing
recognizably,
range
responses
grows
practice
necessitating
specific
capabilities,
processes
institutional
frameworks
to
be
place
design.
This
Element
draws
on
literature
innovation
adoption
explore
administrative,
capacity
endowments
governments
successful
appropriate
integration
existing
frameworks.
Further,
we
present
three
illustrative
cases
respect
experience
essential
facilitating
Risk Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: May 2, 2024
Abstract
The
current
body
of
multidisciplinary
literature
on
crisis
management
still
has
some
unresolved
problems.
This
paper
focuses
the
following
four
“controversial
issues”
in
dealing
with
crises:
usefulness
emergency
plans;
early
signal
detection;
decision‐making
amid
high
uncertainty;
and
centralization/decentralization
dilemma.
first
presents
various,
contradictory
dimensions
these
controversial
issues,
drawing
different
strands
organization
research,
public
policy
theory,
studies.
Next,
issues
are
analyzed
through
lens
specifically
robustness
capacities.
theoretical
application
shows
how
can
be
framed
differently
thus
overcome—at
least
from
an
analytical
perspective—confirming
that
a
bridge
between
very
fruitful
improving
our
understanding
crises
addressed.