Patients’ Experiences with Cancer Care: Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic DOI Creative Commons
Katherine Treiman, Elissa C. Kranzler, Rebecca Moultrie

и другие.

Journal of Patient Experience, Год журнала: 2022, Номер 9, С. 237437352210925 - 237437352210925

Опубликована: Янв. 1, 2022

The COVID-19 pandemic heightened the psychosocial impact of a cancer diagnosis as patients face concerns about risk infection and serious disease uncertainties on their treatment. We conducted an online survey (n = 317) focus groups 19) with to examine experiences care during pandemic. Most respondents (68%) reported one or more disruptions delays in care, including appointments switched telehealth (49%). Patients perceived both benefits (e.g., convenience) drawbacks impersonal) telehealth. For many patients, COVID-19-related restrictions bringing family members support them was major concern left feeling alone vulnerable Patients' self-reported coping positively associated age, education, income (P < .05 for each) better communication doctors sessions .001). Study findings highlight importance patient-centered help cope challenges Further research is needed develop guidelines use part care.

Язык: Английский

Sleep disturbances during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression DOI
Haitham Jahrami, Omar A. Alhaj, Ali Humood

и другие.

Sleep Medicine Reviews, Год журнала: 2022, Номер 62, С. 101591 - 101591

Опубликована: Янв. 22, 2022

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

266

Depression and Anxiety Among Patients with Cancer During COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis DOI Creative Commons
Erfan Ayubi,

Saeid Bashirian,

Salman Khazaei

и другие.

Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Год журнала: 2021, Номер 52(2), С. 499 - 507

Опубликована: Май 5, 2021

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

98

Psychological Distress Among Cancer Patients During COVID-19 Pandemic in the World: A Systematic Review DOI Creative Commons
Zohre Momenimovahed, Hamid Salehiniya, Fatemeh Hadavandsiri

и другие.

Frontiers in Psychology, Год журнала: 2021, Номер 12

Опубликована: Сен. 28, 2021

Aim: Patients with malignancies, experience high rates of psychological distress. Fear Corona-infection combined the interruptions in some treatment programs might affect health cancer patients. This review study was conducted to investigate distress among patients during COVID-19 pandemic offer system-adapted individual solutions. Materials and methods: To identify patients, a comprehensive search carried out PubMed, Web Science, Scopus. English language original articles were included this study. Articles that addressed any included. Results: At first 1,410 articles, After removing duplicate reviewing title abstract, 55 selected for review. The findings revealed greatly affects COVID-19, fear disease progression, disruption oncology services, stage, immunocompromised status most common causes which can influence patients' decisions about treatment. Conclusion: related anxiety is an expected reaction current situation. Although many people, it confuse point they refuse continue infection worsening their condition. Since end unknown, action endanger prognosis group so seems using interventions intensive counseling situation one main priorities

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

93

Utilizing IoT to design a relief supply chain network for the SARS-COV-2 pandemic DOI Open Access
Ali Zahedi, Amirhossein Salehi-Amiri, Neale R. Smith

и другие.

Applied Soft Computing, Год журнала: 2021, Номер 104, С. 107210 - 107210

Опубликована: Фев. 24, 2021

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

78

Anxiety and depression in patients with advanced cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic DOI Open Access
Berta Obispo, Patricia Cruz‐Castellanos, Paula Jiménez‐Fonseca

и другие.

Supportive Care in Cancer, Год журнала: 2022, Номер 30(4), С. 3363 - 3370

Опубликована: Янв. 6, 2022

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

53

Loneliness and symptom burden in oncology patients during the COVID‐19 pandemic DOI Open Access
Christine Miaskowski, Steven M. Paul, Karin Snowberg

и другие.

Cancer, Год журнала: 2021, Номер 127(17), С. 3246 - 3253

Опубликована: Апрель 27, 2021

Background Loneliness and social isolation are significant public health problems that being exacerbated during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Little is known about associations between loneliness symptom burden in oncology patients before Study purposes include determining prevalence of a sample patients; evaluating for differences demographic, clinical, characteristics lonely nonlonely which were associated with membership group. Methods A convenience (n = 606) completed online surveys evaluated severity loneliness, isolation, common symptoms (ie, anxiety, depression, fatigue, sleep disturbance, cognitive dysfunction, pain) patients. Parametric nonparametric tests used to evaluate scores groups. Logistic regression analysis was determine risk factors Results Of 606 patients, 53.0% categorized The group reported higher levels as well all evaluated. In multivariate model, unmarried, having anxiety depressive Conclusions findings suggest number experiencing most likely result mandate distancing procedures. these extremely high warrants clinical evaluation interventions.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

55

Experiences of breast cancer survivors during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study DOI Creative Commons
Memnun Seven, Gülcan Bağçıvan, Şeyma İnciser Paşalak

и другие.

Supportive Care in Cancer, Год журнала: 2021, Номер 29(11), С. 6481 - 6493

Опубликована: Апрель 27, 2021

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

41

Social isolation in adults with cancer: An evolutionary concept analysis DOI Creative Commons
Yanjing Liang, Guihua Hao, Mei Wu

и другие.

Frontiers in Psychology, Год журнала: 2022, Номер 13

Опубликована: Окт. 3, 2022

In extant literature, the concept of social isolation has been explored primarily in context older adults. However, people with cancer may also experience isolation, and there is a need for increased clarity regarding this phenomenon population.To conceptualize adult care.PubMed, Web Science, PsycINFO, CINAHL, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Data, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database were systematically searched using key terms "cancer," "social isolation," alienation," exclusion" studies (from earliest date available to June 2022). The main disciplines involved psychology, nursing, medicine, public health. Rodgers' evolutionary analysis was employed clarify antecedents, attributes, consequences adults cancer.A total 60 eligible articles reviewed entirely findings categorized into consequences. antecedents classified six categories: cancer-related physiological changes, cognitive beliefs, psychological wellbeing, unsatisfactory supports or relationships, restrictions associated receiving treatments, social-level barriers. Attributes characterized according behavior avoidance negative affective experiences, while attributed low therapeutic compliance, poor health conditions mental problems, quality life. White's heuristic model potential theoretical applicable cancer.This provides basis developing multidimensional assessment tools measures alleviate cancer, complex varied phenomenon. review contributes current knowledge on should further investigate relationships among attributes isolation.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

30

Experiences of people affected by cancer during the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic: an exploratory qualitative analysis of public online forums DOI Creative Commons
Sara Colomer‐Lahiguera, Karin Ribi, Hayley Dunnack Yackel

и другие.

Supportive Care in Cancer, Год журнала: 2021, Номер 29(9), С. 4979 - 4985

Опубликована: Фев. 11, 2021

Abstract Purpose Studies focusing on patients with and survivors of cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic highlight unique psychological behavioral challenges. These findings were obtained in surveys using self-report questionnaires pre-specified response options that may not capture broad range experiences individuals affected by cancer, including people informal caregivers, this unprecedented situation. Online forums produce a large amount valuable first-hand user-generated content can be used to better understand their day-to-day lives. This study, based analysis narratives online forums, aims describe categorize outbreak pandemic. Method An inductive, descriptive, thematic approach was applied publicly available from Germany, USA, UK, Ireland posted between mid-March mid-April 2020. Results 230 main posts revealed three major themes: (1) concerns related impact care, risks fears getting infected, logistic issues, economic impact; (2) adaptation challenges faced at individual societal level; (3) need for advice information about (self-)management symptoms treatment. Conclusion Our qualitative description help improve communication, education, development supportive care strategies. Furthermore, themes subthemes identified could potentially inform item future questionnaires.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

38

The cancer patient’s perspective of COVID‐19‐induced distress—A cross‐sectional study and a longitudinal comparison of HRQOL assessed before and during the pandemic DOI Creative Commons
Karin A. Koinig, C. Arnold, Jens Lehmann

и другие.

Cancer Medicine, Год журнала: 2021, Номер 10(12), С. 3928 - 3937

Опубликована: Май 10, 2021

Abstract Background To permit timely mitigation of adverse effects on overall clinical outcome, it is essential to understand how the pandemic influences distress and health‐related quality life (HRQOL) in cancer patients during coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic. Methods In this cross‐sectional study, adult patients, without COVID‐19 symptoms, completed a 13‐item questionnaire about pandemic's impacts everyday‐life; associations with age, sex, or impaired HRQOL were then assessed by binary logistic regressions. subsample assessment available from both before pandemic, we evaluated impact longitudinal changes reported within 6 months versus lockdown using McNemar's test, thresholds for importance. Results We consecutively enrolled 240 solid (50%) hematological cancers. Median age was 67 years, 46% females. The majority ranked heeding their health (80%) keeping appointment schedule hospital (78%) as important. Being younger than 60, aged 60–70 independently associated limitations everyday (OR = 3.57, p < 0.001; 2.05, 0.038); female individuals those restricted emotional functioning more distressed situation 2.47, 0.040; 3.17, 0.019); latter group also significantly concerned being patient at risk 2.21, 0.029). Interestingly, ( n 47), comparisons pre‐ revealed that not substantially affected Conclusion Particularly are COVID‐19. During first lockdown, remained predominantly resilient. This analysis highlights need mitigate situations vulnerable thereby enhance resilience pandemics.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

34