Belgian dietitians′ knowledge, perceptions and willingness‐to‐recommend of genetically modified food and organisms DOI Open Access
Mathias De Mesmaeker, Duc Tran, Vincent Verbeecke

и другие.

Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics, Год журнала: 2023, Номер unknown

Опубликована: Сен. 26, 2023

Abstract Background Dietitians play a critical role in the public's relationship with food and are often overlooked as an important stakeholder group general debate about sustainable food. Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) one type of modern source that could contribute to more system. This case study is first examine knowledge, perception willingness‐to‐recommend (WTR) genetically (GM) foods by dietitians Europe. Methods An online survey was addressed all members Flemish Association (Belgium) 2021, resulting sample 98 valid responses. Multivariate linear regression included sociodemographic, attitudinal factors independent variables explain dietitians' WTR. Results had limited knowledge GMOs; only half GM questions were answered correctly. Most (53%–76%) would recommend GMOs positive effects on human nutrition or sustainability, whereas few (19%–27%) other GMO applications. Trust information sources perceived benefits significantly influenced WTR foods. Predominant negative associated low trust such Conclusions Countering predominantly portrayal neutral factual improve trust, which turn positively influence perceptions towards GMOs. By further examining worldwide gene‐edited products, new insights be gathered into positioning this underexposed group.

Язык: Английский

Genome-edited foods DOI Open Access
Aytug Tuncel, Changtian Pan, Thorben Sprink

и другие.

Nature Reviews Bioengineering, Год журнала: 2023, Номер 1(11), С. 799 - 816

Опубликована: Окт. 4, 2023

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

25
Genetic modification strategies for enhancing plant resilience to abiotic stresses in the context of climate change DOI

Amman KhokharVoytas,

Muhammad Shahbaz, Muhammad Faisal Maqsood

и другие.

Functional & Integrative Genomics, Год журнала: 2023, Номер 23(3)

Опубликована: Авг. 29, 2023

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

23
Genome editing in food and agriculture: from regulations to consumer perspectives DOI
Alice Onek Atimango, Joshua Wesana, Stephen W. Kalule

и другие.

Current Opinion in Biotechnology, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 87, С. 103127 - 103127

Опубликована: Апрель 2, 2024

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

8
Current and future uses of genetic improvement technologies in livestock breeding programs DOI Creative Commons
Alison L. Van Eenennaam

Animal Frontiers, Год журнала: 2025, Номер 15(1), С. 80 - 90

Опубликована: Фев. 1, 2025

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

1
Show me the benefits! Determinants of behavioral intentions towards CRISPR in the United States DOI Creative Commons
Chad M. Baum, Carolin Kamrath, Stefanie Bröring

и другие.

Food Quality and Preference, Год журнала: 2023, Номер 107, С. 104842 - 104842

Опубликована: Март 3, 2023

Novel plant-breeding techniques such as CRISPR are potentially key tools in the transition to a more sustainable food and agricultural system. For potential be realized, greater attention is required outstanding questions related public societal acceptance. The current research thus employed structural model elucidate interplay of factors that influence behavioral intentions towards CRISPR, for sample 158 individuals United States. By means partial least-squares equation modeling (PLS-SEM), we established predominance perceived benefits vis-à-vis risks explaining intentions, along with indirect effects technology neophobia, social trust, environmental worldviews, all transmitted through – less so, risks. Overall, this offers insights regarding food, highlighting how consumers may interested understanding than being dissuaded about any possible signaling ways which perceptions might influenced. Indeed, strength relationship between counterpoint arguments not relevant acceptance well marks point distinction GM GE food.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

12
Assessing the Efficacy of Modified Plant Vaccine Antigens in Animal Immunization: A Systematic Review DOI
Tatyane Martins Cirilo, Ana Laura Grossi de Oliveira,

Jordânia Costa Pinto

и другие.

Food Bioscience, Год журнала: 2025, Номер unknown, С. 106178 - 106178

Опубликована: Фев. 1, 2025

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

0
Rethinking progress: harmonizing the discourse on genetically modified crops DOI Creative Commons
Abreham Bekele‐Alemu,

Obssi Dessalegn-Hora,

Tura Safawo-Jarso

и другие.

Frontiers in Plant Science, Год журнала: 2025, Номер 16

Опубликована: Март 21, 2025

Genetically modified crops (GM crops) also known as biotech are that have been altered through genetic engineering techniques and under cultivation for approximately 28 years. By October 2024, over 30 nations approved the of GM crops. The global area utilized crop production has reached 206.3 million hectares. Despite substantial growth in these crops, debate continues between proponents opponents In this article, critical concerns common ground arguments both sides were described. main issues addressed include naturalness religious perspectives, beneficial aspects, safety issues, socio-economic impacts intellectual property rights. We argue classification unnatural is a claim lacks scientific reality. similar vein, comparing technology to act playing God inappropriate. Moreover, belief do not contribute yield improvements inconsistent with empirical evidence. Additionally, foods produced from unsafe human consumption holds unseen on ground. highlighted necessity implementing rights support seed developers limited duration without violating farmers’ conclusion, consumer right know what they eat, labeling food products fosters transparency enhance autonomy.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

0
The Potential of CRISPR/Cas Technology to Enhance Crop Performance on Adverse Soil Conditions DOI Creative Commons
Humberto A. Gajardo, Olman Gómez-Espinoza, Pedro Boscariol Ferreira

и другие.

Plants, Год журнала: 2023, Номер 12(9), С. 1892 - 1892

Опубликована: Май 5, 2023

Worldwide food security is under threat in the actual scenery of global climate change because major staple crops are not adapted to hostile climatic and soil conditions. Significant efforts have been performed maintain yield crops, using traditional breeding innovative molecular techniques assist them. However, additional strategies necessary achieve future demand. Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat/CRISPR-associated protein (CRISPR/Cas) technology, as well its variants, emerged alternatives transgenic plant breeding. This novelty has helped accelerate modifications confront impact abiotic stress on agriculture systems. review summarizes current advances CRISPR/Cas applications deal with main conditions, such drought, flooding waterlogging, salinity, heavy metals, nutrient deficiencies. In addition, potential extremophytes a reservoir new mechanisms for tolerance, their orthologue identification edition shown. Moreover, challenges prospects related technology issues, legal regulations, customer acceptance will be discussed.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

10
Identifying sustainability assessment parameters for genetically engineered agrifoods DOI Creative Commons
Wei Wei, Khara Grieger, Christopher Cummings

и другие.

Plants People Planet, Год журнала: 2023, Номер 6(1), С. 29 - 43

Опубликована: Июль 22, 2023

Societal Impact Statement A diverse portfolio of genetically engineered food crops, as well animal livestock and fish, are currently being developed commercialized. To ensure their contributions to long‐term sustainability, a broad range environmental, health, ethical, societal parameters should be used in evaluations. This paper proposes set evaluate the sustainability agriculture products discusses mechanisms improve governance oversight. With such holistic evaluations, genetic engineering applications that deemed beneficial sustainable could identified an effort foster sustainability. Summary achieve international development goals, agricultural production need rely on resilient practices. Traditional breeding use new technologies, including gene editing, have potential help agrifood production. Although numerous oversight exist guarantee secure advancement utilization agrifoods, majority these heavily depend narrow assess risks safety concerning human health nontarget organisms. However, more comprehensive considered promote environmental social manner. Opinion article argues relies engineering, systems related biotechnologies incorporate broader array factors long‐term. facilitate this process, we propose agrifoods engineering. We then discuss major challenges opportunities for formalizing US policy decision‐making systems. Overall, work contributes further developing assessment framework aims minimize maximize benefits biotechnology while also fostering

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

10
Processes for regulating genetically modified and gene edited plants DOI Creative Commons
J. R. Caradus

GM crops & food, Год журнала: 2023, Номер 14(1), С. 1 - 41

Опубликована: Сен. 10, 2023

Innovation in agriculture has been essential improving productivity of crops and forages to support a growing population, living standards while contributing toward maintaining environment integrity, human health, wellbeing through provision more nutritious, varied, abundant food sources. A crucial part that innovation involved range techniques for both expanding exploiting the genetic potential plants. However, some used generating new variation plant breeders exploit are deemed higher risk than others despite end products processes at times being all intents purposes identical benefits they provide. As result, public concerns often triggered by poor communication from innovators, resulting mistrust suspicion has, turn, caused development regulatory systems. The logic motivations modes regulation reviewed how use these technologies can be delivered efficiently effectively is discussed.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

10