Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 and its relationship with public interest in mental health: a study between 2020-2022 in Spain DOI
Juan Antonio Becerra‐García, Sara Barbeito, Ana Calvo

и другие.

Psychology Health & Medicine, Год журнала: 2022, Номер 28(6), С. 1460 - 1469

Опубликована: Дек. 18, 2022

The possible relationship between vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) and mental health has been largely unexplored. We investigated variations in public interest issues the different periods of campaign Spain before initiation campaign. Using Google Trends, we explored relative search volume (RSV) for terms 'anxiety', 'depression', 'stress', 'insomnia', 'suicide' 03/01/2020 01/15/2022. RSV was compared these with respect to four periods: pre-vaccination pandemic period; period running from until 50% population fully vaccinated (FV); FV 70% FV; after FV. Differences indices were observed studied 'anxiety'(F = 6.07; p 0.001; ƞ2 0.16), 'stress' (F 7.77; < 0.19), 'insomnia' 3.80; 0.013; 0.11). A lower found two previous periods. also achieving milestone relation prior In conclusion, there is less need information on specific topics Spain, reaching this may have had a positive impact anxiety, stress, insomnia levels population, as reflected fewer web searches psychopathological processes. promotion COVID-19 could take into account changes preliminary study once large percentage vaccinated.

Язык: Английский

COVID-19 vaccinations and risk spillovers: Evidence from Asia-Pacific stock markets DOI Open Access
Yanshuang Li, Yujie Shi, Yongdong Shi

и другие.

Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Год журнала: 2023, Номер 79, С. 102004 - 102004

Опубликована: Март 15, 2023

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

20
Factors Influencing the Acceptance and Adoption of Mobile Health Apps by Physicians During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Systematic Review DOI Creative Commons
Sultan Alsahli, Su-yin Hor, Mary Lam

и другие.

JMIR mhealth and uhealth, Год журнала: 2023, Номер 11, С. e50419 - e50419

Опубликована: Окт. 4, 2023

Background During the COVID-19 pandemic, provision of and access to health care have been uniquely challenging, particularly during lockdowns or when dealing with cases. Health professionals had provide patients necessary care. However, delivering services while reducing face-to-face interaction puts an immense strain on systems that are already overburdened. Against this backdrop, it is now more critical than ever ensure accessibility services. Such has made increasingly available through mobile (mHealth) apps. These apps potential significantly improve outcomes expectations address some challenges confronting worldwide. Despite advantages mHealth, its acceptance adoption remain low. Hence, organizations must consider perceptions opinions physicians if technology be successfully implemented. Objective The objective systematic review was explore synthesize scientific literature factors influencing mHealth among pandemic. Methods A studies published between March 2020 December 2022 conducted using MEDLINE, Scopus, Embase, ProQuest databases. database search yielded initial sample 455 publications for analysis, which 9 (2%) met inclusion criteria. methodology based PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items Systematic Reviews Meta-Analyses). Results by were divided into perceived barriers facilitators, further grouped following 3 major thematic categories: technological, individual, organizational respectively. technological accessibility, technical issues, usefulness, data management; individual patient barriers, time workload pressure, literacy, knowledge peer support; financial factors, management support engagement, security, telemonitoring policy, collaboration. facilitators uptake clinical patient-related care, intrinsic motivation, collaboration, sharing (individual); workflow-related determinants, support, recommendation services, evidence-based guidelines. Conclusions This summarized evidence main findings highlighted importance addressing readiness adequate resources, shifting focus from patient-centered seamless integration routine practice beyond Trial Registration PROSPERO CRD42022356125; https://tinyurl.com/2mmhn5yu

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

11
COVID-19 and Mental Illnesses in Vaccinated and Unvaccinated People DOI Creative Commons
Venexia Walker, Praveetha Patalay,

Jose Ignacio Cuitun Coronado

и другие.

JAMA Psychiatry, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 81(11), С. 1071 - 1071

Опубликована: Авг. 21, 2024

Associations have been found between COVID-19 and subsequent mental illness in both hospital- population-based studies. However, evidence regarding which illnesses are associated with by vaccination status these populations is limited.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

4
Global perspectives on COVID-19 vaccination: Impacts on well-being and inequality DOI Creative Commons
David Leblang, Michael D. Smith, Dennis Wesselbaum

и другие.

Vaccine, Год журнала: 2025, Номер 52, С. 126906 - 126906

Опубликована: Фев. 22, 2025

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

0
School-Based Disease Prevention and Control Programs: A Comprehensive Analysis of Health, Academic Outcomes, and Mediating Factors DOI
Priscilla Adomako Gyasi, Binghai Sun,

Lulin Zhou

и другие.

Journal of Prevention, Год журнала: 2025, Номер unknown

Опубликована: Апрель 16, 2025

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

0
Association between receiving Covid‐19 vaccine and menstrual cycle patterns among childbearing women: A cross‐sectional study DOI Creative Commons
Halah Z. AlRawi, Alaa AlQurashi,

Doaa AlDahan

и другие.

Health Science Reports, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 7(5)

Опубликована: Май 1, 2024

Abstract Background and Aims Many women reported experiencing abnormalities in their cycle after being vaccinated with Covid‐19 vaccination. To understand this issue further, our study aimed to evaluate the menstrual patterns among of childbearing age receiving COVID‐19 vaccinations. Methods A cross‐sectional was conducted investigate impact vaccine on aged 18 years above Saudi Arabia. self‐administered online questionnaire distributed participants who had received at least one dose vaccine. The included questions about participants' demographic characteristics, medical history, vaccine‐related adverse events. Results 383 female an average 30.8 ± 8.1 years. majority participants, 92.7%, were Saudi, more than half, 51.4%, single. Of 78.9% disease‐free, a 67.9% no history Coronavirus Disease 2019 infection. significant proportion postvaccination changes cycle. Specifically, 43.1% first dose, 38.4% second ( p = 0.044). severity premenstrual symptoms increased from 44 (11.5%) 113 (29.5%) dose. Reported pain (WONG‐BAKER) scale also significantly elevated 34 (8.9%) 87 (22.7%) < 0.001) Conclusion relatively high prevalence irregularities by women, particularly young adults. These findings suggest need further research explore underlying causes these develop interventions that may help mitigate women's health. It is recommended observe long‐term cycles seek follow‐up consultation healthcare providers ensure any potential health concerns are addressed promptly.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

3
The Societal Value of Vaccines: Expert-Based Conceptual Framework and Methods Using COVID-19 Vaccines as a Case Study DOI Creative Commons
Manuela Di Fusco, Diana Mendes, Lotte Steuten

и другие.

Vaccines, Год журнала: 2023, Номер 11(2), С. 234 - 234

Опубликована: Янв. 20, 2023

Health technology assessments (HTAs) of vaccines typically focus on the direct health benefits to individuals and healthcare systems. COVID-19 highlighted widespread societal impact infectious diseases value in averting adverse clinical consequences maintaining or resuming social economic activities. Using as a case study, this research work aimed set forth conceptual framework capturing broader elements identify appropriate methods quantify not routinely considered HTAs. A two-step approach was adopted, combining targeted literature review three rounds expert elicitation based modified Delphi method, leading 30 related effects, impact, public finances, uncertainty value. When applying post-pandemic settings, 13 were consensually rated highly important by experts for consideration The reviewed over 10 that could be leveraged provided technical forward-looking recommendations. Limitations identified discussed. This study supplements ongoing efforts towards recognition full vaccines.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

7
The Effect of Risk and Protective Factors on Primary School Students’ COVID-19 Anxiety: Back to School After the Pandemic DOI Open Access
Durmuş Burak

Child Indicators Research, Год журнала: 2022, Номер 16(1), С. 29 - 51

Опубликована: Окт. 15, 2022

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

11
Gender Differences of the Effect of Vaccination on Perceptions of COVID-19 and Mental Health in Japan DOI Creative Commons
Eiji Yamamura, Youki Kohsaka,

Yoshiro Tsutsui

и другие.

Vaccines, Год журнала: 2023, Номер 11(4), С. 822 - 822

Опубликована: Апрель 10, 2023

Vaccination has been promoted to mitigate the spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). is expected reduce probability and alleviate seriousness COVID-19 infection. Accordingly, this might significantly change an individual's subjective well-being mental health. We observed same individuals on a monthly basis from March 2020 September 2021 in all parts Japan. Then, large sample panel data (N = 54,007) were independently constructed. Using data, we compared individuals' perceptions COVID-19, well-being, health before after vaccination. Furthermore, effect vaccination for females males. used fixed-effects model control individual time-invariant characteristics. The major findings as follows: First, vaccinated people perceived getting infected be lower than This was not only when whole but also subsamples males subsample females. Second, improved. results using females, whereas improvements implies that females' quality life more likely improved by males' one. novelty work show gender difference effects.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

6
COVID-19 Vaccination Is Not Associated with Psychiatric Adverse Events: A Meta-Analysis DOI Creative Commons
Sang‐Eun Lee, Sung Ryul Shim, Jung‐Hae Youn

и другие.

Vaccines, Год журнала: 2023, Номер 11(1), С. 194 - 194

Опубликована: Янв. 16, 2023

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been a global health problem since December 2019. Vaccination widely considered the best way to prevent COVID-19 pandemic, but public concerns about safety of vaccines remain. There have many studies reporting adverse events in vaccinated. However, date, no meta-analysis association vaccination with psychiatric conducted yet. In this meta-analysis, on depression, anxiety and distress after were searched PubMed, Cochrane Embase from January 2020 April 2022. The OR depression four total sample size 462,406 is obtained as 0.88 (95% CI; 0.75, 1.03), 0.86 0.71, 1.05). there statistically significant differences between groups. mean difference two was −0.04 (95%CI; −0.05, −0.02; p < 0.0001). As result moderator analysis, married people experienced less vaccination, White people, lower than others. We also found that history infection more depressed anxious vaccination. suggest not associated worsening anxiety.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

5