Health Promotion International,
Год журнала:
2023,
Номер
38(2)
Опубликована: Апрель 1, 2023
Summary
As
we
head
into
the
third
year
of
COVID-19
pandemic,
there
is
an
increasing
need
to
consider
long-term
mental
health
outcomes
care
workers
(HCWs)
who
have
experienced
overwhelming
work
pressure,
economic
and
social
deprivation,
burnout,
post-traumatic
stress
disorder
(PTSD).
This
scoping
umbrella
review
summarizes
published
evidence
syntheses
on
HCWs
worldwide.
We
analyzed
39
representing
findings
from
1297
primary
studies.
found
several
persistent
fears
concerns
(job-related
fears,
fear
stigmatization,
worries
about
infection-related
fears)
that
shaped
HCW
experiences
in
delivering
care.
also
describe
risk
factors
(job-related,
factors,
poor
physical
health,
inadequate
coping
strategies)
protective
(individual
external
factors).
first
comprehensively
documenting
various
faced
during
pandemic.
continue
they
may
infect
their
family
friends
since
regularly
interact
with
patients.
places
a
precarious
situation
requiring
them
balance
potential
deprivation
isolation.
Encyclopedia,
Год журнала:
2021,
Номер
1(2), С. 433 - 444
Опубликована: Май 31, 2021
Coronavirus
disease
2019
(COVID-19)
is
caused
by
the
novel
severe
acute
respiratory
syndrome
coronavirus
2
(SARS-CoV-2),
which
appeared
in
late
2019,
generating
a
pandemic
crisis
with
high
numbers
of
COVID-19-related
infected
individuals
and
deaths
manifold
countries
worldwide.
Lessons
learned
from
COVID-19
can
be
used
to
prevent
threats
designing
strategies
support
different
policy
responses,
not
limited
health
system,
directed
reduce
risks
emergence
viral
agents,
diffusion
infectious
diseases
negative
impact
society.
Frontiers in Psychiatry,
Год журнала:
2021,
Номер
11
Опубликована: Янв. 28, 2021
Objective:
Health-care
workers
(HCW)
are
at
risk
for
psychological
distress
during
an
infectious
disease
outbreak,
such
as
the
coronavirus
pandemic,
due
to
demands
of
dealing
with
a
public
health
emergency.
This
rapid
systematic
review
examined
factors
associated
among
HCW
outbreak.
Method:
We
systematically
reviewed
literature
on
(demographic
characteristics,
occupational,
social,
psychological,
and
infection-related
factors)
in
outbreak
(COVID-19,
SARS,
MERS,
H1N1,
H7N9,
Ebola).
Four
electronic
databases
were
searched
(2000
15
November
2020)
relevant
peer-reviewed
research
according
pre-registered
protocol.
A
narrative
synthesis
was
conducted
identify
fixed,
modifiable,
linked
psychiatric
morbidity.
Results:
From
4,621
records
identified,
138
data
from
143,246
139
studies
included.
All
but
two
cross-sectional.
The
majority
COVID-19
(k
=
107,
N
34,334)
SARS
21,
18,096).
Consistent
evidence
indicated
that
being
female,
nurse,
experiencing
stigma,
maladaptive
coping,
having
contact
or
infected
patients,
quarantine,
HCW.
Personal
organizational
social
support,
perceiving
control,
positive
work
attitudes,
sufficient
information
about
proper
protection,
training,
resources,
less
distress.
Conclusions:
highlights
key
who
most
modifying
reduce
improve
resilience.
Recommendations
increased
receive
early
interventions
ongoing
monitoring
because
there
is
can
persist
up
3
years
after
Further
needs
track
associations
resilience
over
time
extent
which
certain
inter-related
contribute
sustained
transient
AIMS Public Health,
Год журнала:
2023,
Номер
10(1), С. 145 - 168
Опубликована: Янв. 1, 2023
<abstract>
<p>Scholars
and
experts
argue
that
future
pandemics
and/or
epidemics
are
inevitable
events,
the
problem
is
not
whether
they
will
occur,
but
when
a
new
health
emergency
emerge.
In
this
uncertain
scenario,
one
of
most
important
questions
an
accurate
prevention,
preparedness
prediction
for
next
pandemic.
The
main
goal
study
twofold:
first,
clarification
sources
factors
may
trigger
pandemic
threats;
second,
examination
models
on-going
pandemics,
showing
pros
cons.
Results,
based
on
in-depth
systematic
review,
show
vital
role
environmental
in
spread
Coronavirus
Disease
2019
(COVID-19),
many
limitations
epidemiologic
because
complex
interactions
between
viral
agent
SARS-CoV-2,
environment
society
have
generated
variants
sub-variants
with
rapid
transmission.
insights
here
are,
whenever
possible,
to
clarify
these
aspects
associated
public
order
provide
lessons
learned
policy
reduce
risks
emergence
diffusion
having
negative
societal
impact.</p>
</abstract>
Frontiers in Psychiatry,
Год журнала:
2023,
Номер
14
Опубликована: Март 8, 2023
Background
The
mental
health
impacts
of
the
COVID-19
pandemic
remain
a
public
concern.
High
quality
synthesis
extensive
global
literature
is
needed
to
quantify
this
impact
and
identify
factors
associated
with
adverse
outcomes.
Methods
We
conducted
rigorous
umbrella
review
meta-review
present
(a)
pooled
prevalence
probable
depression,
anxiety,
stress,
psychological
distress,
post-traumatic
(b)
standardised
mean
difference
in
depression
anxiety
pre-versus-during
period,
(c)
comprehensive
narrative
poorer
Databases
searched
included
Scopus,
Embase,
PsycINFO,
MEDLINE
dated
March
2022.
Eligibility
criteria
systematic
reviews
and/or
meta-analyses,
published
post-November
2019,
reporting
data
English
on
outcomes
during
pandemic.
Findings
Three
hundred
thirty-eight
were
included,
158
which
incorporated
meta-analyses.
Meta-review
symptoms
ranged
from
24.4%
(95%CI:
18–31%,
I
2
:
99.98%)
for
general
populations
41.1%
23–61%,
99.65%)
vulnerable
populations.
Prevalence
depressive
22.9%
17–30%,
99.99%)
32.5%
17–52%,
99.35)
distress
PTSD/PTSS
39.1%
34–44%;
99.91%),
44.2%
32–58%;
99.95%),
18.8%
15–23%;
99.87%),
respectively.
comparing
pre-COVID-19
revealed
standard
differences
0.20
(95%CI
=
0.07–0.33)
0.29
0.12–0.45),
Conclusion
This
first
synthesise
longitudinal
show
that
significantly
higher
than
pre-COVID-19,
provide
some
evidence
adolescents,
pregnant
postpartum
people,
those
hospitalised
experienced
heightened
health.
Policymakers
can
modify
future
responses
accordingly
mitigate
such
measures
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,
Год журнала:
2021,
Номер
18(14), С. 7316 - 7316
Опубликована: Июль 8, 2021
The
COVID-19
pandemic
has
severely
tested
the
mental
health
of
frontline
care
workers.
A
repeated
cross-sectional
study
can
provide
information
on
how
their
evolved
during
various
phases
pandemic.
intensivists
a
hub
hospital
in
Rome
were
investigated
with
baseline
survey
first
wave
April
2020,
and
they
contacted
again
December
second
wave.
Of
205
eligible
workers,
152
responded
to
an
online
questionnaire
designed
measure
procedural
justice,
occupational
stress
(effort/reward
imbalance),
sleep
quality,
anxiety,
depression,
burnout,
job
satisfaction,
happiness,
turnover
intention.
Workers
reported
further
increase
workload
compassion
fatigue,
which
had
already
risen
wave,
marked
reduction
time
devoted
meditation
activities.
low
level
confidence
adequacy
safety
procedures
need
work
isolation,
together
increased
lack
for
meditation,
most
significant
predictors
stepwise
linear
regression
model.
Occupational
was,
turn,
predictor
insomnia,
intention
leave
hospital.
number
workers
manifesting
symptoms
depression
significantly
exceed
60%.
Action
prevent
risks
enhance
individual
resilience
cannot
be
postponed.
PLoS ONE,
Год журнала:
2021,
Номер
16(8), С. e0254821 - e0254821
Опубликована: Авг. 4, 2021
Introduction
Although
most
countries
and
healthcare
systems
worldwide
have
been
affected
by
the
COVID-19
pandemic,
some
groups
of
population
may
be
more
vulnerable
to
detrimental
effects
pandemic
on
mental
health
than
others.
The
aim
this
systematic
review
was
synthesise
evidence
currently
available
from
reviews
impact
other
coronavirus
outbreaks
for
thought
at
increased
risk
impacts.
Materials
methods
We
conducted
a
adults
children
residing
in
country
outbreak
belonging
group
considered
experiencing
inequalities.
Data
were
collected
symptoms
or
diagnoses
any
condition,
quality
life,
suicide
attempted
suicide.
protocol
registered
online
PROSPERO
database
prior
commencing
(
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=194264
).
Results
included
25
reviews.
Most
primary
studies
hospital
workers
multiple
countries.
Reviews
reported
variable
estimates
burden
problems
among
acute
workers,
patients
with
physical
comorbidities,
adolescents.
No
evaluations
interventions
identified.
Risk-
protective
factors,
mostly
showed
importance
personal
work
environment,
social
networks
health.
Conclusions
This
based
early
months
shows
lack
impacts
population.
Frontiers in Public Health,
Год журнала:
2021,
Номер
9
Опубликована: Окт. 26, 2021
Nurses
caring
for
patients
who
contract
coronavirus
disease
2019
(COVID-19)
have
experienced
significant
traumas
in
the
form
of
increased
workloads,
negative
patient
outcomes,
and
less
social
support
system
access.
should
be
provided
with
information
regarding
early
detection,
coping
skills
treatment
anxiety,
depression,
post-traumatic
stress
syndrome
(PTSS)/post-traumatic
disorder
(PTSD),
other
mental
health
disorders.
Early
intervention
is
important
as
disorders
can
cause
dysfunction,
internal
suffering,
most
extreme
situations,
lead
to
death
if
not
properly
cared
for.
Healthcare
corporations
consider
providing
coverage
employees
experience
COVID-19
traumas.
With
implementation
healthy
therapeutic
intervention,
nurses
will
able
let
go
impacts
that
pandemic
has
caused
reintegrate
into
their
roles
entrusted
care
providers.
The
current
paper
evaluates
encountered
by
era
based
on
medical
literature
aims
provide
practical
strategies.
International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances,
Год журнала:
2021,
Номер
3, С. 100037 - 100037
Опубликована: Июль 17, 2021
Frontline
nurses
have
been
directly
exposed
to
the
SARS-CoV-2
virus
and
come
in
close
contact
with
patients
during
COVID-19
pandemic.
Nurses
execute
tasks
related
disease
control
face
multiple
psychosocial
challenges
their
frontline
work,
potentially
affecting
mental
well-being
ability
satisfyingly
perform
tasks.
To
explore
experiences
of
working
hospital-based
settings
The
qualitative
systematic
review
followed
Preferred
Reporting
Items
for
Systematic
Reviews
Meta-Analyses
(PRISMA)
recommendations.
Registered
PROSPERO
(CRD42021259111).
Literature
searches
were
performed
through
PubMed,
CINAHL,
WHO
database.
Inclusion
criteria
were:
All
types
having
direct
or
taking
care
patients;
Primary,
secondary,
tertiary
health-care
services
admitting
treating
Experiences,
perceptions,
feelings,
views
aspects
from
identified
population
group;
Qualitative
studies;
Mixed
methods
Language
English;
Published
date
2019–2021.
Exclusion
Commentaries;
Reviews;
Discussion
papers;
Quantitative
other
than
2018
earlier;
Studies
without
an
ethical
approval
statement.
studies
screened
selected
based
on
inclusion
exclusion
criteria.
Quality
appraisal
was
conducted
according
Critical
Appraisal
Skills
Program
study
checklist.
Data
extracted
included
a
thematic
synthesis
made.
A
total
28
review.
1141
12
countries
synthesised.
Three
themes
constructed:
'Nurses'
emotional,
physical
reactions
COVID-19′,
'Internally
externally
supported
coping
strategies',
'A
call
future
help
support'.
pandemic
experienced
psychological,
social,
emotional
distress
work
demands,
social
relationships,
personal
life.
results
pointed
need
increased
psychological
support
cope
stress
maintain
well-being,
which
may
subsequently
affect
nursing
outcomes.
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,
Год журнала:
2022,
Номер
19(11), С. 6826 - 6826
Опубликована: Июнь 2, 2022
The
current
study
on
the
intention
to
leave
organization
among
nurses
and
midwives
aligns
with
broader
direction
of
research
consequences
demanding
jobs.
This
is
particularly
important
in
context
COVID-19
pandemic,
which
began
2020
ongoing.
aim
was
identify
levels
job
satisfaction
a
sample
390
Polish
midwives.
A
multiple
stepwise
linear
regression
carried
out
establish
variables
are
predictors
organization.
following
measures
were
used
study:
Nurses'
Occupational
Stressor
Scale,
Brief
Resilience
Coping
Turnover
Intention
Job
Satisfaction
an
occupational
questionnaire
(number
workplaces,
weekly
number
evening
night
shifts,
working
at
unit
dedicated
treating
COVID-19,
as
supervisor/executive).
showed
that
almost
25%
reported
high
turnover
intention,
similar
proportion
low
satisfaction.
related
nurses'
In
predictive
models
for
satisfaction,
organizational
factor
workplaces
significant
(positively
related),
while
experience
negative
predictor
leave.
practical
implications
results
need
continue
this
topic
also
discussed.