Impact of KRAS , BRAF , PIK3CA , TP5 3 status and intraindividual mutation heterogeneity on outcome after liver resection for colorectal cancer metastases DOI Creative Commons

Inger Marie Løes,

Heike Immervoll,

Halfdan Sørbye

et al.

International Journal of Cancer, Journal Year: 2016, Volume and Issue: 139(3), P. 647 - 656

Published: March 19, 2016

We determined prognostic impact of KRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA and TP53 mutation status heterogeneity among 164 colorectal cancer (CRC) patients undergoing liver resections for metastatic disease. Mutation was by Sanger sequencing a total 422 deposits. In univariate analysis, KRAS (33.5%), BRAF (6.1%) (13.4%) mutations each predicted reduced median time to relapse (TTR) (7 vs. 22, 3 16 4 17 months; p < 0.001, 0.002 0.023, respectively). also disease-specific survival (DSS) (29 51 49 <0.001 0.008, No effect (60.4%) observed. Postoperative, but not preoperative chemotherapy improved both TTR DSS (p 0.001 both) with no interaction gene status. Among 94 harboring two or more deposits, 13 revealed across deposits at least one gene. compared homogeneous (18 37 = 0.011 all genes; 26 analyzing separately). multivariate analyses, consistently poor TRR DSS. robustly TTR, while postoperative Our findings indicate that as well predict outcome in CRC subsequent might help guide treatment decisions.

Language: Английский

The molecular landscape of head and neck cancer DOI
C. René Leemans, Peter J.F. Snijders, Ruud H. Brakenhoff

et al.

Nature reviews. Cancer, Journal Year: 2018, Volume and Issue: 18(5), P. 269 - 282

Published: March 2, 2018

Language: Английский

Citations

1111

Oral cavity and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma—an update DOI Open Access
C. Angela, Terry A. Day, Brad W. Neville

et al.

CA A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, Journal Year: 2015, Volume and Issue: 65(5), P. 401 - 421

Published: July 27, 2015

Answer questions and earn CME/CNE Oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OC‐SCC) is the most common malignancy of head neck (excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer). Recent trends have shown a dramatic rise in incidence oropharyngeal (OP‐SCC), with marked increase lesions related to human papillomavirus infection. This update presents latest evidence regarding OC‐SCC OP‐SCC. In particular, authors compare contrast tumors at these two sites respect epidemiology, etiopathogenesis, clinicopathologic presentation, clinical assessment, imaging, management, prognosis. It important for clinicians be aware differences between OP‐SCC so that appropriate patient education multidisciplinary care can provided optimize outcomes. CA Cancer J Clin 2015;65:401–421 . © 2015 American Society

Language: Английский

Citations

988

Resolving genetic heterogeneity in cancer DOI
Samra Turajlic, Andrea Sottoriva, Trevor A. Graham

et al.

Nature Reviews Genetics, Journal Year: 2019, Volume and Issue: 20(7), P. 404 - 416

Published: March 27, 2019

Language: Английский

Citations

559

Tumour heterogeneity and metastasis at single-cell resolution DOI
Devon A. Lawson, Kai Kessenbrock, Ryan T. Davis

et al.

Nature Cell Biology, Journal Year: 2018, Volume and Issue: 20(12), P. 1349 - 1360

Published: Nov. 19, 2018

Language: Английский

Citations

537

Enhancing the accuracy of next-generation sequencing for detecting rare and subclonal mutations DOI
Jesse J. Salk,

Michael W. Schmitt,

Lawrence A. Loeb

et al.

Nature Reviews Genetics, Journal Year: 2018, Volume and Issue: 19(5), P. 269 - 285

Published: March 26, 2018

Language: Английский

Citations

466

Characterizing genetic intra-tumor heterogeneity across 2,658 human cancer genomes DOI Creative Commons
Stefan C. Dentro, Ignaty Leshchiner, Kerstin Haase

et al.

Cell, Journal Year: 2021, Volume and Issue: 184(8), P. 2239 - 2254.e39

Published: April 1, 2021

Intra-tumor heterogeneity (ITH) is a mechanism of therapeutic resistance and therefore an important clinical challenge. However, the extent, origin, drivers ITH across cancer types are poorly understood. To address this, we extensively characterize whole-genome sequences 2,658 samples spanning 38 types. Nearly all informative (95.1%) contain evidence distinct subclonal expansions with frequent branching relationships between subclones. We observe positive selection driver mutations most identify type-specific patterns gene mutations, fusions, structural variants, copy number alterations as well dynamic changes in mutational processes expansions. Our results underline importance its tumor evolution provide pan-cancer resource comprehensively annotated events from sequencing data.

Language: Английский

Citations

391

Classifying the evolutionary and ecological features of neoplasms DOI Creative Commons
Carlo C. Maley, Athena Aktipis, Trevor A. Graham

et al.

Nature reviews. Cancer, Journal Year: 2017, Volume and Issue: 17(10), P. 605 - 619

Published: Sept. 15, 2017

Based on a consensus conference of experts in the evolution and ecology cancer, this article proposes framework for classifying tumours that includes four evolutionary ecological processes: neoplastic cell diversity changes over time diversity, hazards to survival available resources. Neoplasms change through process cell-level evolution, driven by genetic epigenetic alterations. However, microenvironment determines which provide adaptive benefits. There is widespread recognition importance these processes but date, no system has been proposed drawing clinically relevant distinctions between how different are evolving. On basis fields cancer ecology, we propose based components. These cells (intratumoural heterogeneity) make up an index (Evo-index), as well resources cells, (Eco-index). We review evidence demonstrating each factors describe multiple methods can be used measure them. Development classification holds promise enabling clinicians personalize optimal interventions evolvability patient's tumour. The Evo- Eco-indices common lexicon communicating about neoplasms response interventions, with potential implications clinical trials, personalized medicine basic research.

Language: Английский

Citations

374

Genomic and phenotypic heterogeneity in prostate cancer DOI
Michael C. Haffner, Wilbert Zwart, Martine P. Roudier

et al.

Nature Reviews Urology, Journal Year: 2020, Volume and Issue: 18(2), P. 79 - 92

Published: Dec. 16, 2020

Language: Английский

Citations

360

Tumor evolution: Linear, branching, neutral or punctuated? DOI
Alexander Davis, Ruli Gao, Nicholas Navin

et al.

Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Reviews on Cancer, Journal Year: 2017, Volume and Issue: 1867(2), P. 151 - 161

Published: Jan. 19, 2017

Language: Английский

Citations

328

Evolutionary Determinants of Cancer DOI Open Access
Mel Greaves

Cancer Discovery, Journal Year: 2015, Volume and Issue: 5(8), P. 806 - 820

Published: July 21, 2015

Our understanding of cancer is being transformed by exploring clonal diversity, drug resistance, and causation within an evolutionary framework. The therapeutic resilience advanced a consequence its character as complex, dynamic, adaptive ecosystem engendering robustness, underpinned genetic diversity epigenetic plasticity. risk mutation-driven escape self-renewing cells intrinsic to multicellularity but countered multiple restraints, facilitating increasing complexity longevity species. But our own species has disrupted this historical narrative rapidly escalating risk. Evolutionary principles illuminate these challenges provide new avenues explore for more effective control.

Language: Английский

Citations

323