La radiologia medica,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
128(12), P. 1483 - 1496
Published: Sept. 25, 2023
Abstract
Objective
To
investigate
the
value
of
Computed
Tomography
(CT)
radiomics
derived
from
different
peritumoral
volumes
interest
(VOIs)
in
predicting
epidermal
growth
factor
receptor
(EGFR)
mutation
status
lung
adenocarcinoma
patients.
Materials
and
methods
A
retrospective
cohort
779
patients
who
had
pathologically
confirmed
were
enrolled.
640
randomly
divided
into
a
training
set,
validation
an
internal
testing
set
(3:1:1),
remaining
139
defined
as
external
set.
The
intratumoral
VOI
(VOI_I)
was
manually
delineated
on
thin-slice
CT
images,
seven
VOIs
(VOI_P)
automatically
generated
with
1,
2,
3,
4,
5,
10,
15
mm
expansion
along
VOI_I.
1454
radiomic
features
extracted
each
VOI.
t
-test,
least
absolute
shrinkage
selection
operator
(LASSO),
minimum
redundancy
maximum
relevance
(mRMR)
algorithm
used
for
feature
selection,
followed
by
construction
models
(VOI_I
model,
VOI_P
model
combined
model).
performance
evaluated
area
under
curve
(AUC).
Results
399
classified
EGFR
mutant
(EGFR+),
while
380
wild-type
(EGFR−).
In
sets,
VOI4
(intratumoral
4
mm)
achieved
best
predictive
performance,
AUCs
0.877,
0.727,
0.701,
respectively,
outperforming
VOI_I
(AUCs
0.728,
0.698,
0.653,
respectively).
Conclusions
Radiomics
region
can
add
extra
patients,
optimal
range
mm.
Radiology,
Journal Year:
2020,
Volume and Issue:
295(2), P. 328 - 338
Published: March 10, 2020
The
image
biomarker
standardisation
initiative
(IBSI)
is
an
independent
international
collaboration
which
works
towards
standardising
the
extraction
of
biomarkers
from
acquired
imaging
for
purpose
high-throughput
quantitative
analysis
(radiomics).
Lack
reproducibility
and
validation
studies
considered
to
be
a
major
challenge
field.
Part
this
lies
in
scantiness
consensus-based
guidelines
definitions
process
translating
into
biomarkers.
IBSI
therefore
seeks
provide
nomenclature
definitions,
benchmark
data
sets,
values
verify
processing
calculations,
as
well
reporting
guidelines,
analysis.
Journal of Nuclear Medicine,
Journal Year:
2020,
Volume and Issue:
61(4), P. 488 - 495
Published: Feb. 14, 2020
Radiomics
is
a
rapidly
evolving
field
of
research
concerned
with
the
extraction
quantitative
metrics—the
so-called
radiomic
features—within
medical
images.
Radiomic
features
capture
tissue
and
lesion
characteristics
such
as
heterogeneity
shape
may,
alone
or
in
combination
demographic,
histologic,
genomic,
proteomic
data,
be
used
for
clinical
problem
solving.
The
goal
this
continuing
education
article
to
provide
an
introduction
field,
covering
basic
radiomics
workflow:
feature
calculation
selection,
dimensionality
reduction,
data
processing.
Potential
applications
nuclear
medicine
that
include
PET
radiomics-based
prediction
treatment
response
survival
will
discussed.
Current
limitations
radiomics,
sensitivity
acquisition
parameter
variations,
common
pitfalls
also
covered.
Insights into Imaging,
Journal Year:
2020,
Volume and Issue:
11(1)
Published: Aug. 12, 2020
Abstract
Radiomics
is
a
quantitative
approach
to
medical
imaging,
which
aims
at
enhancing
the
existing
data
available
clinicians
by
means
of
advanced
mathematical
analysis.
Through
extraction
spatial
distribution
signal
intensities
and
pixel
interrelationships,
radiomics
quantifies
textural
information
using
analysis
methods
from
field
artificial
intelligence.
Various
studies
different
fields
in
imaging
have
been
published
so
far,
highlighting
potential
enhance
clinical
decision-making.
However,
faces
several
important
challenges,
are
mainly
caused
various
technical
factors
influencing
extracted
radiomic
features.
The
aim
present
review
twofold:
first,
we
typical
workflow
deliver
practical
“how-to”
guide
for
Second,
discuss
current
limitations
radiomics,
suggest
improvements,
summarize
relevant
literature
on
subject.
Insights into Imaging,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
14(1)
Published: May 4, 2023
Even
though
radiomics
can
hold
great
potential
for
supporting
clinical
decision-making,
its
current
use
is
mostly
limited
to
academic
research,
without
applications
in
routine
practice.
The
workflow
of
complex
due
several
methodological
steps
and
nuances,
which
often
leads
inadequate
reporting
evaluation,
poor
reproducibility.
Available
guidelines
checklists
artificial
intelligence
predictive
modeling
include
relevant
good
practices,
but
they
are
not
tailored
radiomic
research.
There
a
clear
need
complete
checklist
study
planning,
manuscript
writing,
evaluation
during
the
review
process
facilitate
repeatability
reproducibility
studies.
We
here
present
documentation
standard
research
that
guide
authors
reviewers.
Our
motivation
improve
quality
reliability
and,
turn,
name
CLEAR
(CheckList
EvaluAtion
Radiomics
research),
convey
idea
being
more
transparent.
With
58
items,
should
be
considered
standardization
tool
providing
minimum
requirements
presenting
In
addition
dynamic
online
version
checklist,
public
repository
has
also
been
set
up
allow
community
comment
on
items
adapt
future
versions.
Prepared
revised
by
an
international
group
experts
using
modified
Delphi
method,
we
hope
will
serve
well
as
single
scientific
reviewers
literature.
Physica Medica,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
83, P. 108 - 121
Published: March 1, 2021
Over
the
last
decade
there
has
been
an
extensive
evolution
in
Artificial
Intelligence
(AI)
field.
Modern
radiation
oncology
is
based
on
exploitation
of
advanced
computational
methods
aiming
to
personalization
and
high
diagnostic
therapeutic
precision.
The
quantity
available
imaging
data
increased
developments
Machine
Learning
(ML),
particularly
Deep
(DL),
triggered
research
uncovering
"hidden"
biomarkers
quantitative
features
from
anatomical
functional
medical
images.
Neural
Networks
(DNN)
have
achieved
outstanding
performance
broad
implementation
image
processing
tasks.
Lately,
DNNs
considered
for
radiomics
their
potentials
explainable
AI
(XAI)
may
help
classification
prediction
clinical
practice.
However,
most
them
are
using
limited
datasets
lack
generalized
applicability.
In
this
study
we
review
basics
feature
extraction,
analysis,
major
interpretability
that
enable
AI.
Furthermore,
discuss
crucial
requirement
multicenter
recruitment
large
datasets,
increasing
variability,
so
as
establish
potential
value
development
robust
models.
Insights into Imaging,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
15(1)
Published: Jan. 17, 2024
Abstract
Purpose
To
propose
a
new
quality
scoring
tool,
METhodological
RadiomICs
Score
(METRICS),
to
assess
and
improve
research
of
radiomics
studies.
Methods
We
conducted
an
online
modified
Delphi
study
with
group
international
experts.
It
was
performed
in
three
consecutive
stages:
Stage#1,
item
preparation;
Stage#2,
panel
discussion
among
EuSoMII
Auditing
Group
members
identify
the
items
be
voted;
Stage#3,
four
rounds
exercise
by
panelists
determine
eligible
for
METRICS
their
weights.
The
consensus
threshold
75%.
Based
on
median
ranks
derived
from
expert
opinion
rank-sum
based
conversion
importance
scores,
category
weights
were
calculated.
Result
In
total,
59
19
countries
participated
selection
ranking
categories.
Final
tool
included
30
within
9
According
weights,
categories
descending
order
importance:
design,
imaging
data,
image
processing
feature
extraction,
metrics
comparison,
testing,
processing,
preparation
modeling,
segmentation,
open
science.
A
web
application
repository
developed
streamline
calculation
score
collect
feedback
community.
Conclusion
this
work,
we
assessing
methodological
research,
large
protocol.
With
its
conditional
format
cover
variations,
it
provides
well-constructed
framework
key
concepts
radiomic
papers.
Critical
relevance
statement
assessment
is
made
available
domain
experts,
transparent
methodology,
aiming
at
evaluating
improving
machine
learning.
Key
points
•
METRICS,
proposed
presents
opinion-based
methodology
first
time.
accounts
varying
use
cases,
handcrafted
entirely
deep
learning-based
pipelines.
has
been
help
(
https://metricsscore.github.io/metrics/METRICS.html
)
created
community
https://github.com/metricsscore/metrics
).
Graphical
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
50(2), P. 352 - 375
Published: Nov. 3, 2022
The
purpose
of
this
guideline
is
to
provide
comprehensive
information
on
best
practices
for
robust
radiomics
analyses
both
hand-crafted
and
deep
learning-based
approaches.
Theranostics,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
12(16), P. 6931 - 6954
Published: Jan. 1, 2022
Pancreatic
cancer
is
the
deadliest
disease,
with
a
five-year
overall
survival
rate
of
just
11%.The
pancreatic
patients
diagnosed
early
screening
have
median
nearly
ten
years,
compared
1.5
years
for
those
not
screening.Therefore,
diagnosis
and
treatment
are
particularly
critical.However,
as
rare
general
cost
high,
accuracy
existing
tumor
markers
enough,
efficacy
methods
exact.In
terms
diagnosis,
artificial
intelligence
technology
can
quickly
locate
high-risk
groups
through
medical
images,
pathological
examination,
biomarkers,
other
aspects,
then
lesions
early.At
same
time,
algorithm
also
be
used
to
predict
recurrence
risk,
metastasis,
therapy
response
which
could
affect
prognosis.In
addition,
widely
in
health
records,
estimating
imaging
parameters,
developing
computer-aided
systems,
etc.
Advances
AI
applications
will
require
concerted
effort
among
clinicians,
basic
scientists,
statisticians,
engineers.Although
it
has
some
limitations,
play
an
essential
role
overcoming
foreseeable
future
due
its
mighty
computing
power.
Computers in Biology and Medicine,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
142, P. 105230 - 105230
Published: Jan. 11, 2022
To
investigate
the
impact
of
harmonization
on
performance
CT,
PET,
and
fused
PET/CT
radiomic
features
toward
prediction
mutations
status,
for
epidermal
growth
factor
receptor
(EGFR)
Kirsten
rat
sarcoma
viral
oncogene
(KRAS)
genes
in
non-small
cell
lung
cancer
(NSCLC)
patients.Radiomic
were
extracted
from
tumors
delineated
wavelet
images
obtained
136
histologically
proven
NSCLC
patients.
Univariate
multivariate
predictive
models
developed
using
before
after
ComBat
to
predict
EGFR
KRAS
mutation
statuses.
Multivariate
built
minimum
redundancy
maximum
relevance
feature
selection
random
forest
classifier.
We
utilized
70/30%
splitting
patient
datasets
training/testing,
respectively,
repeated
procedure
10
times.
The
area
under
receiver
operator
characteristic
curve
(AUC),
accuracy,
sensitivity,
specificity
used
assess
model
performance.
(univariate
multivariate),
was
compared
statistical
analyses.While
most
univariate
modeling
significantly
improved
prediction,
did
not
show
any
significant
difference
prediction.
Average
AUCs
all
both
(q-value
<
0.05)
following
harmonization.
mean
ranges
increased
0.87-0.90
0.92-0.94
EGFR,
0.85-0.90
0.91-0.94
KRAS.
highest
achieved
by
harmonized
F_R0.66_W0.75
with
AUC
0.94,
0.93
KRAS,
respectively.Our
results
demonstrated
that
regarding
modelling,
while
had
generally
a
better
status
its
effect
is
feature-dependent.
Hence,
no
systematic
observed.
Regarding
models,
radiomics
more
successful
statuses
Thus,
eliminating
batch
multi-centric
sets,
promising
tool
developing
robust
reproducible
vast
variant
datasets.