You’re Just My Type: Mate Choice and Behavioral Types
Trends in Ecology & Evolution,
Journal Year:
2020,
Volume and Issue:
35(9), P. 823 - 833
Published: May 22, 2020
Language: Английский
Aggression, rank and power: why hens (and other animals) do not always peck according to their strength
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
377(1845)
Published: Jan. 10, 2022
Thorlief
Schjelderup-Ebbe's
seminal
paper
on
the
'pecking'
order
of
chickens
inspired
numerous
ethologists
to
research
and
debate
phenomenon
dominance.
The
expansion
dominance
broader
concept
power
facilitated
disentangling
aggression,
strength,
rank
power.
Aggression
is
only
one
means
coercing
other
individuals,
can
sometimes
highlight
a
lack
fitness
advantages
aggression
may
outweigh
costs
during
periods
uncertainty.
Effective
instruments
also
include
incentives
refusals
act.
Moreover,
stability
relationship
might
vary
with
used
if
different
in
number
types
outcomes
achieved,
as
well
speed
accomplishing
those
outcomes.
In
well-established
relationships,
actions
or
physiological
responses
subordinate
individual
even
be
indicator
differential.
A
focus
fighting
provides
an
incomplete
understanding
landscape
that
individuals
actually
experience.
Multiple
methods
for
constructing
hierarchies
exist
but
greater
attention
implications
data
these
constructions
needed.
Many
shifts
our
were
foreshadowed
discussion
about
deviations
from
linear
hierarchy
chickens.
This
article
part
theme
issue
'The
centennial
pecking
order:
current
state
future
prospects
study
hierarchies'.
Language: Английский
Workload Distribution and Division of Labor in Cooperative Societies
The Quarterly Review of Biology,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
97(3), P. 183 - 210
Published: Aug. 17, 2022
Cooperative
groups
are
ubiquitous
in
animals,
as
the
challenges
of
allocating
labor
to
accomplish
cooperative
tasks,
including
territory
defense,
hunting,
and
brood
care.
Individual
contributions
can
differ
two
ways,
both
which
influence
fitness:
group
members
vary
overall
helpfulness
(workload)
or
they
specialize
on
different
tasks
(division
labor).
In
this
review,
we
encourage
additional,
simultaneous
study
workload
distribution
division
labor.
Historically,
has
been
studied
contexts
collective
action
offspring
Both
areas
research
aim
understand
how
shared
benefits
emerge
from
individual
contributions,
but
remain
poorly
integrated.
We
argue
that
each
these
literatures
strengths
could
benefit
other,
highlight
potential
crosstalk.
Next,
review
literature
taxa
other
than
eusocial
insects,
discuss
parallels
differences
between
insects
more
work
cooperative,
noninsect
taxa.
Rigorous
will
expand
our
understanding
causes
consequences
variation
evolutionary
stability
social
living.
Language: Английский
Aggressive males are more attractive to females and more likely to win contests in jumping spiders
Bernetta Zi Wei Kwek,
No information about this author
Min Tan,
No information about this author
Long Yu
No information about this author
et al.
Animal Behaviour,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
179, P. 51 - 63
Published: July 23, 2021
Language: Английский
Testing the Sexual and Social Benefits of Cooperation in Animals
Trends in Ecology & Evolution,
Journal Year:
2018,
Volume and Issue:
34(2), P. 112 - 120
Published: Dec. 7, 2018
Language: Английский
The smell of cooperativeness: Do human body odours advertise cooperative behaviours?
Arnaud Tognetti,
No information about this author
Valérie Durand,
No information about this author
Dimitri Dubois
No information about this author
et al.
British Journal of Psychology,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
113(2), P. 531 - 546
Published: Dec. 9, 2021
Several
physical
features
influence
the
perception
of
how
cooperative
a
potential
partner
is.
While
previous
work
focused
on
face
and
voice,
it
remains
unknown
whether
body
odours
judgements
cooperativeness
if
odour-based
are
accurate.
Here,
we
first
collected
axillary
uncooperative
male
donors
through
public
good
game
used
them
as
olfactory
stimuli
in
series
tasks
examining
they
decision-making
an
incentivized
economic
ratings
cooperativeness.
Our
results
show
that
having
access
to
donor's
provided
strategic
advantage
women
during
decisions
(but
not
men):
with
age,
were
more
likely
cooperate
men
avoid
interacting
men.
Ratings
nonetheless
unrelated
donors'
actual
Finally,
while
masculine
intense
judged
less
cooperative,
found
no
evidence
was
associated
or
odour.
Overall,
our
findings
suggest
that,
faces
voices,
perceived
might
be
accurately
non-aware
manner
cues
cooperativeness,
at
least
by
women.
Language: Английский