Validation of the Workplace Emotional Blackmail Scale (WEBS) DOI

Yen‐Yu Chen,

Mai Pham, Changya Hu

et al.

Current Psychology, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 43(20), P. 18143 - 18158

Published: Jan. 18, 2024

Language: Английский

A meta-analytic review of family supportive supervisor behaviors (FSSBs): Work-family related antecedents, outcomes, and a theory-driven comparison of two mediating mechanisms DOI Creative Commons
Yongxing Guo, Siqi Wang, Yasin Rofcanın

et al.

Journal of Vocational Behavior, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 151, P. 103988 - 103988

Published: March 24, 2024

This quantitative review systematically integrates the antecedents and outcomes of Family-Supportive Supervisor Behaviors (FSSBs) through bivariate meta-analysis meta-analytic structural equation modeling (MASEM). Utilizing data from 231 primary studies, which are drawn 213 sources (N = 118, 100), we examined a set hypotheses exploring consequences FSSBs. We also conducted comparative analysis explanatory power two theoretical perspectives: resource-based view (operationalized as work-family conflict enrichment) social-exchange perspective leader-member exchange relationship). Our results showed that accounted for greater proportion FSSBs' impacts on work (i.e., in-role performance, job satisfaction), while predominantly elucidates influence employee wellbeing burnout). In doing this, unveiled nuanced insights into nomological network surrounding Based these results, develop future map this growing body research.

Language: Английский

Citations

12

Rational Counterattack: The Impact of Workplace Bullying on Unethical Pro-organizational and Pro-family Behaviors DOI
Zhu Yao,

Jinlian Luo,

Na Fu

et al.

Journal of Business Ethics, Journal Year: 2021, Volume and Issue: 181(3), P. 661 - 682

Published: Aug. 22, 2021

Language: Английский

Citations

43

Missed Connections Between the Leadership and Work–Life Fields: Work–Life Supportive Leadership for a Dual Agenda DOI
Ellen Ernst Kossek, Matthew B. Perrigino, Marcello Russo

et al.

Academy of Management Annals, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: 17(1), P. 181 - 217

Published: Aug. 2, 2022

The leadership and work-life balance literatures are not well-integrated; yet both examine the management of employees.Leadership theory is work-centric in conceptualizing styles underemphasizes nonwork influences on leaders' subordinates' outcomes.Work-life studies overlook regarding how support reflects but one aspect what leaders do.Competing narratives coexist over whether mutually benefits work outcomes (a synergistic "dual agenda" view) or if comes at expense other "dueling outcomes" view).Based our review 127 studies, we define supportive as a characteristic when (1) prioritize actions to provide active for employees' needs preferences managing work, family, personal life roles; (2) experienced by subordinates exhibiting such behaviors.We find clear dual agenda view that embedded within many styles.Future research can advance each field's understanding leader dynamics.For future research, direct scholars focus leadership's impact job performance outcomes, broaden their encompass domain holistically.

Language: Английский

Citations

34

You raise me up and I reciprocate: Linking empowering leadership to organizational citizenship behavior and unethical pro‐organizational behavior DOI
Honglei Wang, Yejun Zhang, Peikai Li

et al.

Applied Psychology, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: 72(2), P. 718 - 742

Published: May 11, 2022

Abstract Although empowering leadership is generally thought to be beneficial employees and organizations, an emerging stream of work shows its potential negative impact. Drawing upon social exchange theory, we propose integrated model that simultaneously examines the benefits costs leadership. Specifically, team‐level can relate both organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) unethical pro‐organizational (UPB). We also examine mediating role employee workplace status moderating felt obligation in these processes. Using data from 301 57 leaders across two time points, found linked leader‐rated OCB employee‐rated UPB through status. However, positive indirect effect on was significant only when employees' high, low. discuss theoretical practical implications findings, as well future research directions.

Language: Английский

Citations

28

The Dual Spillover Spiraling Effects of Family Incivility on Workplace Interpersonal Deviance: From the Conservation of Resources Perspective DOI Open Access
Lan Lin, Yuntao Bai

Journal of Business Ethics, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: 184(3), P. 725 - 740

Published: May 6, 2022

Language: Английский

Citations

24

Conceptualizing family business social responsibility DOI
Kathleen Randerson

Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Journal Year: 2021, Volume and Issue: 174, P. 121225 - 121225

Published: Oct. 7, 2021

Language: Английский

Citations

27

The cost of guilt: unpacking the emotional mechanism between work-to-family conflict and unethical pro-family behavior DOI
Lu Chen, Ning Chen, Yuanmei Qu

et al.

The International Journal of Human Resource Management, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 35(2), P. 220 - 255

Published: July 7, 2023

Drawing on the appraisal theory of emotions and domain specificity perspective, we explore why when work-to-family conflict leads to unethical pro-family behavior in workplace. In particular, propose that reinforces via employee felt guilt. Further, supervisor support for family issues attenuates relationship between guilt, whereas perceived forgiveness climate strengthens guilt behavior. Two time-lagged field studies conducted Pakistan China supported our hypotheses. Study 1 demonstrated mediated 2 replicated these findings provided additional boundary conditions. Specifically, buffered positive effect guilt; amplified Theoretical practical implications were discussed.

Language: Английский

Citations

9

The Interplay Between Islamic Work Ethic, Unethical Pro Behaviors, and Moral Identity Internalization: The Moderating Role of Religiosity DOI
Zaid Oqla Alqhaiwi, Tamer Koburtay, Jawad Syed

et al.

Journal of Business Ethics, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 193(2), P. 393 - 408

Published: Sept. 26, 2023

Language: Английский

Citations

9

How and when unethical pro-family behavior backfires on employees: exploring the role of emotional ambivalence and dialectical thinking DOI
Mengyu Mao, Lanxia Zhang, Jia‐Min Li

et al.

Current Psychology, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: March 6, 2025

Language: Английский

Citations

0

The effect of proactive customer service performance on employee work engagement: a moderated dual-path model in spillover perspective DOI
Bo Liu, Yun Jiang,

Jin-Jin Zhao

et al.

Tourism Review, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: March 17, 2025

Purpose In response to the need analyze spillover effects of proactive customer service performance (PCSP), this study aims draw from cognitive–affective system theory personality (CAPS) explore mechanism by which coworker PCSP affects work engagement among tourism employees. Design/methodology/approach A mixed research method was used for data collection and analysis. Study 1 a scenario experiment collected 194 samples 5-star hotel in China. 2 surveyed 393 frontline employees various companies Structural equation modeling PROCESS macro were hypothesis testing. Findings Results reveal that is positively associated with engagement, peer pressure felt obligation sequentially mediate main effect. These findings also support climate moderates cognitive path context. Originality/value This examines an underexplored phenomenon context, namely, PCSP, as well corresponding boundary conditions. addition, reveals notion affection posited CAPS influences cognition, thus giving rise serial mediating effect regard impact PCSP.

Language: Английский

Citations

0