Psychological Medicine,
Journal Year:
2017,
Volume and Issue:
47(15), P. 2708 - 2719
Published: May 30, 2017
Cannabis
and
tobacco
have
contrasting
cognitive
effects.
Smoking
cannabis
with
is
prevalent
in
many
countries
although
this
may
well
influence
mental
health
outcomes,
the
possibility
has
rarely
been
investigated
human
experimental
psychopharmacological
research.The
individual
interactive
effects
of
were
evaluated
24
non-dependent
smokers
a
randomized,
placebo-controlled,
double-blind,
2
(cannabis,
placebo)
×
(tobacco,
crossover
design.
Verbal
memory
(prose
recall),
working
(WM)
performance
including
maintenance,
manipulation
attention
(N-back),
psychotomimetic,
subjective
cardiovascular
measures
recorded
on
each
four
sessions.Cannabis
alone
impaired
verbal
memory.
A
priori
contrasts
indicated
that
offset
delayed
recall.
However,
was
not
supported
by
linear
mixed
model
analysis.
load-dependently
WM.
By
contrast,
improved
WM
across
all
load
levels.
The
acute
psychotomimetic
ratings
'stoned'
'dizzy'
induced
altered
tobacco.
had
independent
increasing
heart
rate
interacting
diastolic
blood
pressure.Relative
to
placebo,
Tobacco
enhanced
WM,
independently
cannabis.
Moreover,
we
found
some
preliminary
evidence
delayed,
but
immediate,
In
unaffected
co-administration.
reducing
impairment
from
cannabis,
co-administration
perpetuate
use
despite
adverse
consequences.
JAMA Psychiatry,
Journal Year:
2016,
Volume and Issue:
73(3), P. 292 - 292
Published: Feb. 4, 2016
With
a
political
debate
about
the
potential
risks
and
benefits
of
cannabis
use
as
backdrop,
wave
legalization
liberalization
initiatives
continues
to
spread.
Four
states
(Colorado,
Washington,
Oregon,
Alaska)
District
Columbia
have
passed
laws
that
legalized
for
recreational
by
adults,
23
others
plus
now
regulate
medical
purposes.
These
policy
changes
could
trigger
broad
range
unintended
consequences,
with
profound
lasting
implications
health
social
systems
in
our
country.
Cannabis
is
emerging
one
among
many
interacting
factors
can
affect
brain
development
mental
function.
To
inform
discourse
scientific
evidence,
literature
was
reviewed
identify
what
known
not
effects
on
human
behavior,
including
cognition,
motivation,
psychosis.
Addiction,
Journal Year:
2014,
Volume and Issue:
110(1), P. 19 - 35
Published: Oct. 7, 2014
To
examine
changes
in
the
evidence
on
adverse
health
effects
of
cannabis
since
1993.A
comparison
1993
with
and
interpretation
same
outcomes
2013.Research
past
20
years
has
shown
that
driving
while
cannabis-impaired
approximately
doubles
car
crash
risk
around
one
10
regular
users
develop
dependence.
Regular
use
adolescence
risks
early
school-leaving
cognitive
impairment
psychoses
adulthood.
is
also
associated
strongly
other
illicit
drugs.
These
associations
persist
after
controlling
for
plausible
confounding
variables
longitudinal
studies.
This
suggests
a
contributory
cause
these
but
some
researchers
still
argue
relationships
are
explained
by
shared
causes
or
factors.
Cannabis
smoking
probably
increases
cardiovascular
disease
middle-aged
adults
its
respiratory
function
cancer
remain
unclear,
because
most
smokers
have
smoked
smoke
tobacco.The
epidemiological
literature
shows
accidents
can
produce
dependence,
there
consistent
between
poor
psychosocial
mental
JAMA Psychiatry,
Journal Year:
2018,
Volume and Issue:
75(6), P. 585 - 585
Published: April 18, 2018
Importance
Substantial
shifts
in
perception
and
policy
regarding
cannabis
have
recently
occurred,
with
use
of
increasing
while
its
perceived
harm
decreases.
One
possible
risk
increased
is
poorer
cognitive
functioning,
especially
youth.
Objective
To
provide
the
first
quantitative
synthesis
literature
examining
functioning
adolescents
young
adults
(with
a
mean
age
26
years
younger).
Data
Sources
PubMed,
PsycInfo,
Academic
Search
Premier,
Scopus,
bibliographies
relevant
reviews
were
searched
for
peer-reviewed,
English-language
studies
from
date
databases
began
through
May
2017.
Study
Selection
Consensus
criteria
used
to
determine
study
inclusion
abstract
manuscript
review.
Extraction
Synthesis
This
followed
Meta-analysis
Observational
Studies
Epidemiology
guidelines.
Effect
size
estimates
calculated
using
multivariate
mixed-effects
models
outcomes
classified
into
10
domains.
Main
Outcomes
Measures
Results
neurocognitive
tests
administered
cross-sectional
primary
outcomes,
we
examined
influence
priori
explanatory
variables
on
variability
effect
size.
Results
Sixty-nine
2152
users
(mean
[SD]
age,
20.6
[2.8]
years;
1472
[68.4%]
male)
6575
comparison
participants
minimal
exposure
included
20.8
[3.4];
3669
[55.8%]
male).
indicated
small
overall
(presented
as
meand)
reduced
associated
frequent
or
heavy
(d,
−0.25;
95%
CI,
−0.32
−0.17;P
<
.001).
The
magnitude
sizes
did
not
vary
by
sample
at
onset.
However,
requiring
an
abstinence
period
longer
than
72
hours
(15
studies;
n
=
928)
had
−0.08;
−0.22
0.07)
that
was
significantly
different
0
smaller
less
stringent
(54
7799;d,
−0.30;
−0.37
−0.22;P
.01).
Conclusions
Relevance
Associations
between
are
may
be
questionable
clinical
importance
most
individuals.
Furthermore,
diminishes
deficits
use.
Although
other
(eg,
psychosis)
studies,
results
indicate
previous
youth
overstated
persistence
Reported
reflect
residual
effects
acute
withdrawal.
Future
should
examine
individual
differences
susceptibility
cannabis-associated
dysfunction.
Current Pharmaceutical Design,
Journal Year:
2014,
Volume and Issue:
20(13), P. 2186 - 2193
Published: May 10, 2014
This
article
reviews
neuroimaging,
neurocognitive,
and
preclinical
findings
on
the
effects
of
cannabis
adolescent
brain.
Marijuana
is
second
most
widely
used
intoxicant
in
adolescence,
teens
who
engage
heavy
marijuana
use
often
show
disadvantages
neurocognitive
performance,
macrostructural
microstructural
brain
development,
alterations
functioning.
It
remains
unclear
whether
such
reflect
pre-existing
differences
that
lead
to
increased
substances
further
changes
architecture
behavioral
outcomes.
Future
work
should
focus
prospective
investigations
help
disentangle
dose-dependent
from
effects,
better
understand
interactive
relationships
with
other
commonly
abused
(e.g.,
alcohol)
role
regular
neurodevelopmental
trajectories.
Pharmacology & Therapeutics,
Journal Year:
2018,
Volume and Issue:
195, P. 132 - 161
Published: Oct. 20, 2018
The
laws
governing
cannabis
are
evolving
worldwide
and
associated
with
changing
patterns
of
use.
main
psychoactive
drug
in
is
Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol
(THC),
a
partial
agonist
at
the
endocannabinoid
CB1
receptor.
Acutely,
THC
produce
range
effects
on
several
neurocognitive
pharmacological
systems.
These
include
executive,
emotional,
reward
memory
processing
via
direct
interactions
system
indirect
glutamatergic,
GABAergic
dopaminergic
Cannabidiol,
non-intoxicating
cannabinoid
found
some
forms
cannabis,
may
offset
these
acute
effects.
Heavy
repeated
use,
particularly
during
adolescence,
has
been
adverse
systems,
which
increase
risk
mental
illnesses
including
addiction
psychosis.
Here,
we
provide
comprehensive
state
art
review
chronic
neuropsychopharmacology
by
synthesizing
available
neuroimaging
research
humans.
We
describe
exposure
development,
implications
for
understanding
psychosis
use
disorder,
methodological
considerations.
Greater
precise
mechanisms
underlying
also
give
rise
to
new
treatment
targets.
Pharmacotherapy The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy,
Journal Year:
2016,
Volume and Issue:
36(5), P. 511 - 535
Published: March 30, 2016
Cannabis
is
the
most
commonly
used
illicit
substance
in
United
States.
Rates
of
cannabis
use
and
disorder
(CUD)
have
increased
past
decade,
paralleling
changes
legal
political
climate
favoring
legalization.
Almost
20
million
people
12
years
or
older
report
past‐month
use,
8
daily
near‐daily
use.
Concurrently,
perception
that
poses
a
significant
risk
negative
consequences
has
decreased.
Contrary
to
this
perception,
heavy
associated
with
cognitive
impairment,
for
psychotic
disorders
other
mental
health
problems,
lower
education
attainment,
unemployment.
Clinical
trials
various
treatments
CUD
likewise
increased,
focusing
primarily
on
psychotherapy
treatments,
specifically
motivational
enhancement
therapy,
behavioral
contingency
management.
Their
findings
suggest
combination
these
three
modalities
produces
best
abstinence
outcomes,
although
rates
remain
modest
decline
after
treatment.
More
recently,
pharmacotherapy
been
conducted
as
adjunctive
interventions
psychosocial
N
‐acetylcysteine
gabapentin
are
two
promising
medications,
no
pharmacologic
treatment
emerged
clearly
efficacious.
In
review,
we
provide
detailed
summary
clinical
evaluated
treating
discuss
emerging
areas
research
cannabis‐specific
barriers
Translational Psychiatry,
Journal Year:
2016,
Volume and Issue:
6(1), P. e710 - e710
Published: Jan. 12, 2016
Abstract
Shifting
policies
towards
legalisation
of
cannabis
for
therapeutic
and
recreational
use
raise
significant
ethical
issues
health-care
providers
seeking
evidence-based
recommendations.
We
investigated
whether
heavy
is
associated
with
persistent
harms
to
the
hippocampus,
if
exposure
cannabidiol
offers
protection,
recovery
occurs
abstinence.
To
do
this,
we
assessed
111
participants:
74
long-term
regular
users
(with
an
average
15.4
years
use)
37
non-user
healthy
controls.
Cannabis
included
subgroups
participants
who
were
either
exposed
Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol
(THC)
but
not
(CBD)
or
both,
former
sustained
Participants
underwent
magnetic
resonance
imaging
from
which
three
measures
hippocampal
integrity
assessed:
(i)
volume;
(ii)
fractional
anisotropy;
(iii)
N
-acetylaspartate
(NAA).
Three
curve-fitting
models
across
entire
sample
tested
each
measure
examine
cannabis-related
are
persistent,
can
be
minimised
(protected)
by
CBD
recovered
through
These
analyses
supported
a
protection
model
volume
(
P
=0.003)
NAA
=0.001).
Further
pairwise
showed
that
had
smaller
volumes
relative
Users
11%
reduced
15%
lower
concentrations.
did
differ
controls
on
any
measure.
Ongoing
brain
health,
underpinned
chronic
THC.
However,
such
CBD,
extended
periods