Ecology and Society,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
26(2)
Published: Jan. 1, 2021
Climate
change
and
social
conflicts
put
modern
agricultural
systems
under
pressure,
necessitating
systemic
transformations
of
these
towards
sustainability.At
the
core
sustainability
challenges
to
agriculture
lie
seed
we
use
produce
plants
giving
us
food,
feed
fiber.To
achieve
high
crop
yields,
farmers
need
varieties
with
right
combination
characteristics,
called
traits,
which
fit
pedo-climatic
conditions
their
farms
other
preferences
regarding
product
qualities.The
route
from
developing
a
trait
in
plant
that
such
however,
is
long
novel
traits
pass
through
complex
social-ecological
system
reach
farm
gate.Each
chapter
this
thesis
engages
different
organizing
principles
socialecological
what
they
mean
for
governance
breeding
within
systems.Seed
entail
all
activities
along
supply
chain
needed
creating
(new)
on
farms.These
depend
sustained
flows
genetic
material
cropping
system.The
various
are
structured
by
rules,
norms
strategies,
also
referred
as
institutions
(Ostrom
2005).Institutions
be
designed
consciously
sustainable
outcomes.The
aggregated
processes
creating,
maintaining,
directing,
recognizing,
enforcing
system.Overall
inquires
how
best
govern
more
outcomes
systems.Hence,
first
ask
providing
appropriating
diversity
underlying
resource.We
found
provisioning
symmetric
credible
information
between
actor
groups
will
grant
smoothly
running
system.Second,
further
unpack
around
nested
adjacent
action
situations
provide
set
diagnostic
questions
untangle
multi-tiered
variables
resource
mid
large-scale
SESs.Third,
develop
heuristic
showing
Genetics,
Environment,
Management
Social
(GxExMxS)
viii
elements,
considered
when
governing
research
premise
mission-oriented
governance.Fourth,
question
whether
pest
shocks
lead
increase
multiplication
area
resistant
varieties.Using
data
variety
trials
matched
per
variety.The
no-effect
hypothesis
could
not
refuted.
Sustainability Science,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
18(1), P. 265 - 283
Published: Aug. 15, 2022
The
concept
of
commoning
is
continuing
to
gain
scholarly
interest,
with
multiple
definitions
and
interpretations
across
different
research
communities.
In
this
article,
we
define
as
the
actions
by
groups
shared
interests
towards
creating
social
relational
processes
basis
governance
strategy.
Perhaps
it
can
be
more
simply
defined
collective
ways
relating
governing.
This
article
addresses
two
specific
gaps
in
literature:
(1)
bridge
disparate
strands
literature
on
briefly
reviewing
each
arguing
for
integration
through
epistemic
pluralism,
(2)
explicitly
examine
how
power
manifest
bringing
a
framework
(i.e.,
over,
with,
to,
within)
understand
links
between
case
studies.
cases
are
tourism
Gili
Trawangan,
Indonesia
aquatic
food
production
systems
Bulacan,
Philippines.
We
preface
analysis
argument
that
an
integral
part
concept,
but
has
yet
analytically
integrated
applications
broader
institutional
development
or
within
networks
action
situations
approach.
argue
making
explicit
coupled
network
qualitative
way,
advancing
key
feature
which
introduce
rooted
analytical
pluralism
governance.
discussion,
expand
study
reveals
four
dynamics,
they
improve
understanding
pluralistic
perhaps
bridging
concept.
Policy Studies Journal,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
52(2), P. 319 - 348
Published: Nov. 8, 2023
Abstract
Polycentric
governance
(PG)
describes
systems
characterized
by
multiple,
interdependent
centers
of
decision‐making,
offering
an
alternative
to
centralized
models.
PG
is
often
assumed
be
effective
at
helping
policy
actors
address
complex
collective
action
problems,
but
burgeoning
empirical
literature
on
shows
that
it
not
a
panacea
–
associated
with
both
positive
and
negative
outcomes.
In
this
article,
we
ask:
what
do
know
about
why
performs
well
in
some
cases
others?
We
start
systematic
review,
synthesizing
findings
provide
support
for
features
are
theorized
accompany
PG.
Our
review
reveals
critical
gap
relation
our
understanding
PG:
the
existing
largely
fails
change
evolution
over
time
systems,
undermining
works
or
does
not–
across
different
contexts
time.
To
fill
gap,
propose
“Context
Operations
Outcomes
Feedbacks”
(COOF)
framework
draws
explicit
attention
interplay
between
context,
operational
arrangements,
outcomes
identifies
feedback
pathways
adjustment
mechanisms
drive
dynamic
Sustainability Science,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
18(1), P. 79 - 96
Published: Sept. 20, 2022
Abstract
Overcoming
complex
environmental
challenges
demands
different
forms
of
stakeholder
participation
and
collective
action.
While
informative
relevant
for
participatory
interventions,
the
literatures
on
action
governance
have
largely
remained
disconnected.
We
illustrate
how
institutional
analysis
development
(IAD),
network
(adjacent)
situation
(NAS)
social–ecological
system
(SES)
frameworks
can
be
combined
to
provide
a
coherent
approach
that
integrates
these
literatures,
applies
their
insights
bridges
this
disconnect.
compare
two
similar
one
in
Colombia
Peru,
whose
design
implementation
we
supported.
Transdisciplinary
nature,
both
sought
foster
watershed
management.
The
allow
us
demarcate,
characterise
reflect
upon
situations
(ASs)
choice,
coordination
knowledge
generation
constituted
each
intervention
(i.e.
constituent
NAS)
other
operational
ASs
lay
outside
boundaries
interventions.
These
may
not
linked
another
or
intervention’s
NAS,
but
they
influence
outcomes
interest
nevertheless,
thereby
shaping
potential
interventions
sustainable
natural
resource
framework
then
suggests,
our
comparative
illustrates,
organisers
researchers
such
as
multi-actor
deliberative
platforms
transdisciplinary
research
projects,
should
carefully
consider,
address
constellation
actors,
contexts
co-determining
interest.
Our
study
demonstrates
IAD,
SES
NAS
support
endeavour.
Sustainability Science,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
18(1), P. 135 - 152
Published: June 18, 2022
Abstract
In
the
twenty-first
century,
world´s
demand
for
natural
resources
is
more
pressing
and
deeply
interconnected
than
ever
before.
The
Water-Energy-Food
(WEF)
nexus
has
gained
growing
interest
as
a
promising
concept
complex
resource
management
challenges.
However,
knowledge
about
root
causes
of
cross-sectoral
coordination
problems
how
they
can
be
shifted
towards
sustainability
still
lacking.
This
paper
fills
this
gap
by
conceptualising
WEF
case
with
Networks
Action
Situations
approach
combined
systems
thinking.
allows
deep
analysis
gaps,
facilitates
joint
understanding
system
dynamics
to
identify
leverage
points
shifting
sustainability,
envision
impact
potential
interventions
on
network
action
situations
their
outcome.
value
reciprocal
benefits
introduced
are
illustrated
in
Switzerland,
Europe.
results
show
between
different
sectors
that
not
all
were
considered
equally.
leads
prioritization
energy
production
over
water-bound
biodiversity
food
production.
outcome
focus
mitigate
climate
change
awareness
but
much
less
impacts
Swiss
water
bodies.
study
identifies
five
interventions,
which
expected
ensure
shared
systemic
problem
balanced
resulting
sustainable
equitable
provision
utilization
resources.
Journal of Environmental Management,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
356, P. 120389 - 120389
Published: March 13, 2024
Groundwater
resources
play
an
important
role
for
irrigation,
particularly
in
arid
and
semi-arid
regions,
where
groundwater
depletion
poses
a
critical
threat
to
agricultural
production
associated
local
livelihoods.
However,
the
relationship
between
use,
farming,
poverty,
with
regards
informal
mechanisms
of
management,
remains
poorly
understood.
Here,
we
assess
this
by
developing
behavioural
model
user
groups,
empirically
grounded
politically
fragile
context
Tunisia.
The
integrates
biophysical
aquifer
dynamics,
institutional
governance,
farmer
decision-making,
all
which
are
co-occurring
under
conditions
illicit
extraction.
paper
examines
how
community-level
norms
drive
distributional
outcomes
behaviours
traces
pathways
system
collapse
-
whether
hydrogeological
or
financial.
Through
model,
explore
varying
levels
trust
leadership,
ecological
conditions,
strategies
can
delay
avoid
social-ecological
system.
Results
indicate
limits
collective
action
path-dependent
depletion,
ultimately
leads
groups
independent
social
norms.
Despite
inevitable
most
common
cause
water
group
failure
is
bankruptcy,
linked
erosion
regarding
fee
payment.
Social
norms,
however,
serve
financial
groups.
In
Tunisia,
low
government
result
penalties
withdrawals.
absence
alternative
irrigation
sources,
serves
as
temporary
buffer
against
income-poverty.
These
results
highlight
need
polycentric
coordination
at
aquifer-level
well
income
diversification
beyond
agriculture
sustain
Policy Studies Journal,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Feb. 11, 2025
Abstract
Electric
utilities,
challenged
by
a
rapidly
unfolding
energy
transition,
use
many
informal
institutions
to
bridge
across
technologies
and
sectors.
Little
is
known,
however,
about
how
electric
utility
systems
other
polycentric
systems'
institutions‐in‐use
vary
evolve
over
time.
We
novel
engaged
research
method,
the
Nominal
Group
Technique,
solicit
current,
future,
potential
from
66
staff
board
members
18
utilities
in
shared
system
Minnesota.
Our
questions
focus
on
favored
for
distributed
resources
like
solar,
vehicles,
batteries.
Generating
578
ideas,
we
parse
each
into
institutional
statements
using
Institutional
Grammar.
then
identify
configurations
current
desired
feedback
pathways
different
infrastructures
actor
groups.
results
demonstrate
importance
of
structure
context‐related
adjustment
mechanisms
designing
change
infrastructure
information
payoff
rules.
Theoretically,
advance
understanding
theories
governance
systems,
toward
linear,
parallel,
recursive,
conjunctive
dynamics
that
expand
beyond
evolutionary
theories.
methods
point
as
way
help
converse
between
theory
practice,
particularly
institutionally
technologically
complex
periods
transition.
摘要
面对快速展开的能源转型挑战,电力公司使用许多非正式制度来连接技术和部门。然而,研究不足的是,电力公司系统和其他多中心系统的现行制度如何随时间推移而变化和发展。我们使用一种新颖的参与式研究方法(即名义团体技术),从明尼苏达州的一个共享电力系统中的18家电力公司的66名员工和董事会成员那里征集当前、未来和潜在的现行制度。我们的问题聚焦于太阳能、电动汽车和电池等分布式能源资源所偏好的制度。我们生成了578个想法,并使用制度语法将每个想法解析为制度陈述,以帮助确定不同基础设施和行动者群体中当前和期望的反馈途径的制度配置。我们的研究结果表明,结构和与情境相关的调整机制在“设计共享基础设施系统变革”方面具有潜在重要性,信息和回报规则也具有潜在重要性。我们从理论上增进了对多中心治理系统中变革理论的理解,即朝着“超越进化变革理论的线性、并行、递归和联合动态”发展。我们的方法将参与式研究方法作为一种方式来帮助理论与实践之间的交流,特别针对在转型期间具备复杂制度和复杂技术的系统。
Resumen
Las
empresas
eléctricas,
ante
el
desafío
de
una
transición
energética
que
se
desarrolla
rápidamente,
utilizan
muchas
instituciones
informales
para
tender
puentes
entre
tecnologías
y
sectores.
Pero
sabe
poco
sobre
cómo
varían
evolucionan
con
tiempo
las
en
uso
los
sistemas
servicios
eléctricos
otros
policéntricos.
Utilizamos
un
novedoso
método
investigación
comprometida,
la
Técnica
Grupo
Nominal,
solicitar
actuales,
futuras
potenciales
miembros
del
personal
junta
directiva
eléctricas
sistema
eléctrico
compartido
Nuestras
preguntas
centran
favoritas
recursos
energéticos
distribuidos,
como
energía
vehículos
baterías.
Generamos
ideas
analizamos
declaraciones
institucionales
utilizando
Gramática
Institucional,
ayudar
identificar
configuraciones
vías
retroalimentación
actuales
deseadas
diferentes
infraestructuras
grupos
actores.
Nuestros
resultados
demuestran
importancia
potencial
estructura
mecanismos
ajuste
relacionados
contexto
diseño
cambios
infraestructura
compartida
información
reglas
recompensa.
Teóricamente,
avanzamos
comprensión
teorías
cambio
gobernanza
policéntrica,
hacia
dinámicas
lineales,
paralelas,
recursivas
conjuntivas
expanden
más
allá
evolutivo.
métodos
apuntan
comprometidos
forma
conversar
teoría
práctica,
particularmente
institucional
tecnológicamente
complejos
períodos
transición.
Journal of Environmental Management,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
331, P. 117184 - 117184
Published: Feb. 2, 2023
Solving
humanity's
social-environmental
challenges
calls
for
collective
action
by
relevant
actors.
Hence,
involving
these
actors
in
the
policy
process
has
been
deemed
both
necessary
and
promising.
But
how
to
what
extent
can
participatory
interventions
(PIs)
foster
sustainable
environmental
natural
resource
management?
Lab
lab-in-the-field
experiments
on
co-operation
context
of
(i.e.
social
dilemmas)
case
study
research
processes
offer
insights
into
this
question
but
have
hitherto
mainly
remained
unconnected.
This
article
reviews
from
two
streams
literature
tandem,
synthesising
analysing
them
using
institutional
analysis
development
(IAD)
framework
combination
with
network
situations
(NAS)
social-ecological
systems
(SES)
framework.
We
thus
perform
an
integrative
interpretative
narrative
review
draw
a
richer
more
nuanced
picture
PIs:
their
potential
impacts,
(institutional
behavioural)
mechanisms
challenges,
caveats
recommendations
design
implementation.
Our
shows
that
PIs
indeed
(a)
helping
craft
suitable
legitimate
arrangements
(b)
addressing
and/or
influencing
actors'
attributes
relevance
action,
namely
individual
shared
understandings,
beliefs
preferences.
To
fulfil
potential,
organisers
sponsors
must
address
link
broader
through
soundly
designed
implemented
processes.
Complementary
follow-up,
enforcement
conflict
resolution
are
nurture,
reassure
sustain
preferences
undergird
trust-building
action.
The
conceptual
developed
help
researchers
practitioners
further
assess
insights,
disentangle
PIs'
integrate
practice
governance