Winners and losers of land use change: A systematic review of interactions between the world’s crane species (Gruidae) and the agricultural sector DOI Creative Commons
Karoline Hemminger, Hannes König, Johan Månsson

et al.

Ecology and Evolution, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: 12(3)

Published: March 1, 2022

While agricultural intensification and expansion are major factors driving loss degradation of natural habitat species decline, some wildlife also benefit from agriculturally managed habitats. This may lead to high population densities with impacts on both human livelihoods conservation. Cranes a group 15 worldwide, affected negatively positively by practices. eleven face critical declines, numbers common cranes (

Language: Английский

Spatiotemporal evolution of habitat quality and its response to landscape patterns in karst mountainous cities: a case study of Guiyang City in China DOI
Zhijie Wang, Shujun Liu,

Yuan Su

et al.

Environmental Science and Pollution Research, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 30(53), P. 114391 - 114405

Published: Oct. 20, 2023

Language: Английский

Citations

11

Insect biomass shows a stronger decrease than species richness along urban gradients DOI Creative Commons
Cecilie S. Svenningsen, Birte Peters, Diana E. Bowler

et al.

Insect Conservation and Diversity, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 17(2), P. 182 - 188

Published: March 1, 2024

Abstract Anthropogenic land cover change is a major driver of biodiversity loss, with urbanisation and farmland practices responsible for some the most drastic modifications natural habitats. The relative importance different covers shaping insect communities, however, unclear. This study examines effect urban covers, along heterogeneity, at landscape scale on species richness, evenness biomass flying insects using citizen science carnet sampling across Denmark. Increasing had negative richness but an even stronger biomass. Increased heterogeneity did not mitigate cover. Insect assemblages also became more increased Farmland no significant or Based our findings, has strong impact indicating that could contribute to declines. Moreover, findings indicate loss occurs through than species, which may affect ecosystem‐level consequences urbanisation.

Language: Английский

Citations

4

Agricultural diversification across spatial levels – A contribution to resilience and sustainability? DOI Creative Commons
Marie Arndt, Katharina Helming

Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 385, P. 109547 - 109547

Published: Feb. 21, 2025

Language: Английский

Citations

0

Herbaceous covers in traditional olive orchards maintain bird and butterfly diversity in central Spain DOI

Virginia de la Torre,

Miguel Ángel Díaz-Portero, Sandra Goded

et al.

European Journal of Wildlife Research, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 71(2)

Published: Feb. 28, 2025

Language: Английский

Citations

0

Winners and losers of land use change: A systematic review of interactions between the world’s crane species (Gruidae) and the agricultural sector DOI Creative Commons
Karoline Hemminger, Hannes König, Johan Månsson

et al.

Ecology and Evolution, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: 12(3)

Published: March 1, 2022

While agricultural intensification and expansion are major factors driving loss degradation of natural habitat species decline, some wildlife also benefit from agriculturally managed habitats. This may lead to high population densities with impacts on both human livelihoods conservation. Cranes a group 15 worldwide, affected negatively positively by practices. eleven face critical declines, numbers common cranes (

Language: Английский

Citations

18