Revisiting the Psychometric Properties of the Message Fatigue Scale: Evidence for Uni-Dimensionality and Construct Validity DOI
Lijiang Shen, Shaochun Li

Western Journal of Communication, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 1 - 22

Published: Feb. 23, 2025

Language: Английский

The empathetic refutational interview to tackle vaccine misconceptions: Four randomized experiments. DOI Creative Commons
Dawn Liu Holford, Philipp Schmid, Angelo Fasce

et al.

Health Psychology, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 43(6), P. 426 - 437

Published: March 4, 2024

We introduce and report early stage testing of a novel, multicomponent intervention that can be used by healthcare professionals (HCPs) to address false or misleading antivaccination arguments while maintaining empathy for understanding people's motivations believe misinformation: the "Empathetic Refutational Interview" (ERI).

Language: Английский

Citations

22

Moral injury and mental health among health-care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: meta-analysis DOI Creative Commons
Bruno Messina Coimbra, Cecilia Zylberstajn, Mirjam van Zuiden

et al.

European journal of psychotraumatology, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 15(1)

Published: Jan. 2, 2024

: During the COVID-19 pandemic, health-care workers (HCWs) may have been confronted with situations that culminate in moral injury (MI). MI is psychological distress result from perpetrating or witnessing actions violate one's codes. Literature suggests can be associated mental health problems.

Language: Английский

Citations

18

Determinants of COVID-19 skepticism and SARS-CoV-2 vaccine hesitancy: findings from a national population survey of U.S. adults DOI Creative Commons
Jeff Levin, Matt Bradshaw

BMC Public Health, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: 22(1)

Published: May 25, 2022

Abstract Background The enduring presence of COVID-19 skepticism and SARS-CoV-2 vaccine hesitancy is an ongoing impediment to the global response effort current pandemic. This study seeks identify determinants in U.S. adults. Methods Data are from Values Beliefs American Public Survey, conducted 2021 by Gallup Organization conjunction with Baylor University. survey used stratified random probability sampling adult population ( N = 1222). Outcome measures were respective single items assessing hesitancy. Exposure variables included political, religious, sociodemographic indicators, moderators assessed personal history losing a relative or close friend COVID-19. Results Skepticism strongly associated conservative Republican political preference religious beliefs, less so socioeconomic status. Personal experience did not mitigate effect politics on barely reduced odds for confirm that attitudes toward politically religiously conditioned, especially product preference. Conclusion about regarding vaccination highest among right. Efforts increase immunization through public education may be inadequate; resistance appears ideological. Other solutions need considered, which risk widespread pushback both motivated.

Language: Английский

Citations

62

Determinants of the COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy spectrum DOI Creative Commons
Rachael Piltch‐Loeb, Diana Silver,

Yeerae Kim

et al.

PLoS ONE, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: 17(6), P. e0267734 - e0267734

Published: June 1, 2022

Vaccine hesitancy remains an issue in the United States. This study conducted online survey [N = 3,013] using Social Science Research Solution [SSRS] Opinion Panel web panelists, representative of U.S. adults age 18 and older who use internet, with oversample rural-dwelling minority populations between April 8 22, 2021- as vaccine eligibility opened to country. We examined relationship COVID-19 exposure socio-demographics intentions [eager-to-take, wait-and-see, undecided, refuse] among unvaccinated multinomial logistic regressions [ref: fully/partially vaccinated]. Results showed varied by demographic characteristics experience during period that for was extended all adults. At time approximately 40% respondents were unvaccinated; 41% knew someone had died COVID-19, 38% experienced financial hardship a result pandemic. The vaccinated more likely be highly educated, adults, consistent States initial criteria. Political affiliation pandemic two most salient factors associated being undecided or unwilling take vaccine.

Language: Английский

Citations

45

The Role of Trust in COVID-19 Vaccine Acceptance: Considerations from a Systematic Review DOI Open Access
Alessandro Sapienza, Rino Falcone

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: 20(1), P. 665 - 665

Published: Dec. 30, 2022

The goal of this research was to provide an overview the role trust in determining COVID-19 vaccine acceptance. Trust proved be a key issue all strategic phases pandemic, decisive element for success worldwide vaccination campaign. By introducing comprehensive systematic review state-of-the-art (N = 43), we intend shed light on various forms that have been considered and how these relate citizens’ analysis shows has used extensively, with particular reference vaccine, governments, manufacturers, healthcare systems, science. A more in-depth also allowed us evaluate factors had social phenomena which they decisive. Most notably, that, different contributions, strong correlation acceptance (R 0.78, p < 0.01). Overall, emerges as complex phenomenon needs understood through strictly interlaced relations coming into play. Besides clarifying what happened previous years, considerations included work represent important useful interpretative framework help public institutions system future.

Language: Английский

Citations

41

Social and structural determinants of COVID-19 vaccine uptake among racial and ethnic groups DOI Open Access
Juan M. Peña, Matthew Schwartz, Alexandra Hernandez‐Vallant

et al.

Journal of Behavioral Medicine, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 46(1-2), P. 129 - 139

Published: Jan. 18, 2023

Language: Английский

Citations

30

When Facts Become Forbidden: The Past and Present History of Scientific Censorship DOI Creative Commons

Douglas L. Mann

JACC Basic to Translational Science, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: Feb. 1, 2025

Language: Английский

Citations

1

COVID-19 health Messaging: How Message Frame and Individual Differences in Collectivism and Perceived Risk Influence Intention for Mask Wearing and Vaccination DOI
Yangsun Hong,

Mika Hashimoto

Health Communication, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 1 - 14

Published: Feb. 25, 2025

This study examines how message frame and individual differences in collectivism perceived risk influence intention to engage precautionary measures for COVID-19. We investigate the relationships with two types of preventive that differ features relevant hypothesis like uncertainty or about outcome health behaviors: vaccination mask-wearing. conducted separate online experiments each behavior, respectively. The results reveal individuals a moderate collectivist orientation had higher wear face mask than those very low when exposed gain-framed message, but there was no difference loss-framed message. were only significant among people No such effects are found intention.

Language: Английский

Citations

1

Supporting US healthcare providers for successful vaccine communication DOI Creative Commons

Amanda J Pierz,

Lauren Rauh, Dima Masoud

et al.

BMC Health Services Research, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 23(1)

Published: May 2, 2023

Abstract Background While many healthcare providers (HCPs) have navigated patients’ vaccine concerns and questions prior to the rollout of COVID-19 vaccines, sentiments surrounding vaccines presented new distinct challenges. Objective To understand provider experience counseling patients about vaccinations, aspects pandemic environment that impacted trust, communication strategies found supportive patient education. Methods 7 focus groups were conducted recorded during December 2021 January 2022, at height Omicron wave in United States. Recordings transcribed, iterative coding analysis was applied. Results 44 group participants representing 24 US states with majority (80%) fully vaccinated time data collection. Most doctors (34%) or physician’s assistants nurse practitioners (34%). The negative impact misinformation on patient-provider both intrapersonal interpersonal levels as well barriers facilitators uptake are reported. People sources play a role health (“messengers”) persuasive messages behavior attitudes towards vaccination (“messages”) described. Providers expressed frustration need continuously address clinical appointments among who remained unvaccinated. Many value resources provided up-to-date evidence-based information guidelines continued change. Additionally, indicated patient-facing materials designed support education not frequently available, but they most valuable changing environment. Conclusions decision-making is complex hinges diverse factors such care access (i.e., convenience, expense) individual knowledge, can major navigating these their patients. But strengthen promote uptake, comprehensive infrastructure must be sustained dyad. findings provide recommendations maintain an facilitates effective provider-patient community, organizational policy levels. There for unified multisectoral response reinforce settings.

Language: Английский

Citations

19

Examining Disparities and Excess Cardiovascular Mortality Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic DOI Open Access
Scott E. Janus, Mohamed H. E. Makhlouf,

Nicole Chahine

et al.

Mayo Clinic Proceedings, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: 97(12), P. 2206 - 2214

Published: July 21, 2022

Language: Английский

Citations

25