medRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory),
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Feb. 1, 2023
Abstract
Background
Recent
studies
have
identified
important
social
inequalities
in
SARS-CoV-2
infection
and
related
COVID-19
outcomes
the
Belgian
population.
The
aim
of
our
study
was
to
investigate
sociodemographic
socioeconomic
characteristics
associated
with
uptake
vaccine
Belgium.
Methods
We
conducted
a
cross-sectional
analysis
first
dose
among
5,342,110
adults
(≥18
years)
Belgium
from
December
28
th
2020
(official
starting
date
vaccination
campaign)
until
August
31
st
2021.
integrated
data
four
national
sources:
register
(vaccination
status),
Healthdata
(laboratory
test
results),
DEMOBEL
(sociodemographic/socioeconomic
data),
Common
Base
Registry
for
HealthCare
Actors
(individuals
licensed
practice
healthcare
profession
Belgium).
used
multivariable
logistic
regression
identifying
not
having
obtained
each
its
three
regions
(Flanders,
Brussels,
Wallonia).
Results
During
period,
10%
(536,716/5,342,110)
adult
population
included
sample
vaccinated
dose.
A
lower
found
young
individuals,
men,
migrants,
single
parents,
one-person
households,
disadvantaged
groups
(with
levels
income
education,
unemployed).
Overall,
disparities
were
comparable
all
regions.
Conclusions
identification
is
critical
develop
strategies
guaranteeing
more
equitable
coverage
BMC Public Health,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
24(1)
Published: July 6, 2024
Abstract
Background
Throughout
history,
vaccines
have
proven
effective
in
addressing
and
preventing
widespread
outbreaks,
leading
to
a
decrease
the
spread
fatality
rates
of
infectious
diseases.
In
time
where
vaccine
hesitancy
poses
significant
challenge
public
health,
it
is
important
identify
intricate
interplay
factors
exemplified
at
individual
societal
levels
which
influence
vaccination
behaviours.
Through
this
analysis,
we
aim
shed
new
light
on
dynamics
among
religious
groups,
contributing
broader
effort
promote
uptake,
dispel
misunderstandings,
encourage
constructive
dialogue
with
these
groups.
Methods
We
used
PRISMA-ScR
(Preferred
Reporting
Items
for
Systematic
reviews
Meta-Analyses
extension
Scoping
Reviews)
using
20-point
checklist
guide
review.
The
inclusion
criteria
our
study
were
that
literature
should
be
English,
concerned
as
focus
study,
impact
religiosity
or
beliefs
either
an
outcome
control
variable,
concerning
population
levels,
peer-reviewed.
Results
analysed
14
peer-reviewed
articles
included
components
related
their
published
until
September
2023.
All
approximately
last
decade
between
2012
2023,
only
4
before
2020.
Out
studies
review,
twelve
utilized
quantitative
methods,
while
remaining
two
employed
qualitative
approaches.
Among
found
various
approaches
categorizing
belief
identity.
most
when
religion
uniformly
regarded
sole
determinant
hesitancy,
consistently
emerges
factor
hesitancy.
review
reported
sociodemographic
some
degree
within
sample
populations.
Our
analysis
underscored
need
nuanced
Conclusion
Vaccine
complex
issue
driven
by
myriad
commonly
associated
driver
higher
American Journal of Public Health,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
115(3), P. 414 - 424
Published: Feb. 12, 2025
Objectives.
To
identify
factors
associated
with
persistent
COVID-19
vaccine
refusal
among
Nebraska
residents
6
months
after
an
initial
diagnosis.
Methods.
Using
case
investigation
surveillance
data
and
vaccination
records
from
the
Department
of
Health
Human
Services,
a
cohort
16
344
unvaccinated,
COVID-19‒confirmed
individuals
(May
2021‒February
2023)
were
asked
for
their
reason
nonvaccination
(RNV),
then
followed
to
assess
subsequent
status.
We
used
modified
Poisson
regression
estimate
risk
unvaccinated
status
at
follow-up
against
predictors,
including
RNV,
demographic
characteristics,
adherence
mitigation
measures,
hospitalization,
rurality.
Results.
Compared
those
whose
RNV
was
missed
opportunity/lack
convenience,
who
cited
religious
exemption
(adjusted
incidence
ratio
[AIRR
=
1.36;
95%
confidence
interval
[CI]
1.31,
1.41),
philosophical
objection
(AIRR
1.28;
CI
1.24,
1.34),
or
institutional
confidence/complacency
concerns
1.26;
1.19,
1.33)
showed
greatest
nonvaccination.
Older
age,
nonadherence
higher
rurality
are
positively
Minority
hospitalization
correlated
vaccination.
Conclusions.
Ideology-centered
objections
held
significant
weight
previously
infected
displayed
sustained
reluctance
toward
Distinguishing
sources
misinformation
ideologically
similar
communities
could
instigate
reconsideration
(
Am
J
Public
Health.
2025;115(3):414–424.
https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2024.307921
)
American Journal of Public Health,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
113(6), P. 680 - 688
Published: April 13, 2023
Objectives.
To
analyze
rural–urban
differences
in
COVID-19
vaccination
uptake,
hesitancy,
and
trust
information
sources
the
United
States.
Methods.
We
used
data
from
a
large
survey
of
Facebook
users.
computed
vaccination,
decline
rates
proportions
among
individuals
hesitant
toward
for
rural
urban
regions
each
state
May
2021
to
April
2022.
Results.
In
48
states
with
adequate
data,
on
average,
two
thirds
showed
statistically
significant
monthly
between
regions,
having
lower
rate
at
all
times.
Far
fewer
when
comparing
hesitancy
versus
regions.
Doctors
health
professionals
received
highest
level
trust.
Friends
family
were
also
most
trusted
areas
where
uptake
was
low.
Conclusions.
Rural–urban
difference
those
still
unvaccinated
much
smaller
than
rates,
suggesting
that
access
vaccines
may
be
another
contributor
areas.
(Am
J
Public
Health.
2023;113(6):680–688.
https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2023.307274
)
Frontiers in Psychiatry,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
14
Published: May 19, 2023
The
COVID-19
pandemic
has
had
global
impacts
on
social
interactions
and
religious
activities,
leading
to
a
complex
relationship
between
religion
public
health
policies.
This
article
reviews
impact
of
the
activities
beliefs
in
relation
spread
virus,
as
well
potential
leaders
faith
communities
mitigating
through
measures
community
engagement.A
literature
review
was
conducted
using
PubMed
Google
Scholar,
with
search
terms
including
"religion,"
"COVID-19,"
"pandemic,"
"coronavirus,"
"spirituality."
We
included
English
articles
published
January
2020
September
2022,
focusing
intersection
COVID-19.We
identified
two
main
themes
emerging,
selected
32
studies
divided
15
focused
practices,
beliefs,
COVID-19,
while
17
explored
role
coping
COVID-19.
Religious
were
found
correlate
virus
spread,
particularly
early
days
pandemic.
religiosity
adherence
government
guidelines
mixed,
some
suggesting
increased
contributed
misconceptions
about
resistance
restrictions.
also
associated
vaccine
hesitancy,
conservative
beliefs.
On
other
hand,
played
crucial
adapting
measures,
maintaining
sense
belonging,
fostering
emotional
resilience,
upholding
compliance
measures.
importance
collaboration
leaders,
institutions,
officials
addressing
emphasized.This
highlights
essential
faith-based
organizations,
promoting
education,
preparedness,
response
efforts
during
Engaging
can
improve
control
prevention
efforts.
Collaboration
governments,
healthcare
professionals
is
necessary
combat
hesitancy
ensure
successful
vaccination
campaigns.
insights
from
this
guide
future
research,
policy
development,
interventions
minimize
outcomes
for
individuals
affected.
Cureus,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Aug. 9, 2023
Prior
studies
have
shown
that
political
affiliation
affected
COVID-19
vaccine
hesitancy.
This
study
re-examined
the
data
to
see
if
these
findings
hold
after
controlling
for
alternative
explanations.
The
dependent
variable
in
was
vaccination
rates
3,109
counties
United
States
as
of
April
2022.
examined
36
possible
explanations
hesitancy,
including
demographic,
social,
economic,
environmental,
and
medical
variables
known
affect
County-level
measured
a
percent
voters
county
who
were
affiliated
with
Democratic
or
Republican
parties.
Data
analyzed
using
temporally
constrained
multiple
mediation
network,
which
allowed
identification
both
direct
indirect
predictors
rates.
Despite
there
statistically
significant
relationship
between
percentage
supporters
higher
affiliation,
lower
It
is
Party
has
played
an
organizing
role
encouraging
hesitancy
patient
harm.
Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
78(3), P. 176 - 183
Published: Dec. 26, 2023
Background
Recent
studies
have
identified
important
social
inequalities
in
SARS-CoV-2
infections
and
related
COVID-19
outcomes
the
Belgian
population.
The
aim
of
our
study
was
to
investigate
sociodemographic
socioeconomic
characteristics
associated
with
uptake
vaccine
Belgium.
Methods
We
conducted
a
cross-sectional
analysis
first
dose
among
5
342
110
adults
(≥18
years)
Belgium
on
31
August
2021.
integrated
data
from
four
national
sources:
register
(vaccination
status),
Healthdata
(laboratory
test
results),
DEMOBEL
(sociodemographic/socioeconomic
data)
Common
Base
Register
for
HealthCare
Actors
(individuals
licensed
practice
healthcare
profession
Belgium).
used
multivariable
logistic
regression
identifying
not
having
obtained
each
its
three
regions
(Flanders,
Brussels
Wallonia).
Results
During
period,
10%
(536
716/5
110)
adult
population
included
sample
vaccinated
dose.
A
lower
found
young
individuals,
men,
migrants,
single
parents,
one-person
households
disadvantaged
groups
(with
levels
income
education,
unemployed).
Overall,
disparities
were
comparable
all
regions.
Conclusions
identification
vaccination
is
critical
develop
strategies
guaranteeing
more
equitable
coverage
Health Promotion Practice,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Jan. 7, 2025
As
the
COVID-19
pandemic
recedes,
SARS-CoV-2
vaccination
is
crucial
for
reducing
transmission
and
severity,
but
vaccine
hesitancy
remains
a
challenge.
The
study
explored
community
actions
initiatives
addressing
among
Somali
immigrant
communities
in
cities
Upper
Midwest,
USA,
Western
Norway,
focusing
on
trust
factors
comparing
members
of
diaspora
two
distinct
social
cultural
contexts.
Qualitative
collective
case
studies
were
conducted,
involving
14
semi-structured
interviews
with
key
informants
from
Midwest
Norway
knowledgeable
about
designed
to
address
hesitancy.
Data
coded
NVivo
12
analyzed
thematically,
guided
by
Bergen
Model
Collaborative
Functioning
Socioecological
identify
basic
organizational
themes.
findings
illustrate
critical
sociopolitical
influences
hesitancy,
like
racial
tensions
following
George
Floyd’s
murder
Minneapolis
mistrust
toward
government
Norway.
Effective
strategies
included
maintaining
long-term
relationships
culturally
tailored
outreach
communication
reduce
Conversely,
Norway’s
less
community-centric
approach,
translation
services
without
deeper
engagement,
faced
challenges
trust-building.
highlights
essential
role
affirming
approaches
health
communities.
Trust,
fostered
through
involvement
understanding
contexts,
pivotal
This
research
offers
insights
into
designing
implementing
effective
promotion
populations’
unique
needs.
It
emphasizes
necessity
integrating
socioecological
perspectives
community-specific
interventions
practice
policy.
BACKGROUND
Vaccine
hesitancy
hinders
the
management
of
preventable
illnesses.
Currently,
there
are
gaps
in
public
health
research
on
vaccine
among
Muslim-Americans.
OBJECTIVE
We
aimed
to
understand
extent
American-Muslims,
and
factors
for
care
decision
making
regarding
vaccination.
METHODS
Participants
were
recruited
through
Facebook
group
posts.
Seventy-three
participants
completed
online
Qualtrics
survey.
Sixty-three
met
inclusion
criteria.
Participants’
responses
collapsed
into
following
belief
scores:
political
leaning,
religiosity,
trust
institutions,
hesitancy.
RESULTS
who
older
age,
had
attained
higher
levels
education,
employed,
unmarried,
identified
with
Sunni
sect
less
hesitant.
Most
(36.5%)
more
likely
accept
a
if
it
no
reported
safety
issues.
be
hesitant
about
vaccines
concerns
or
poor
efficacy.
CONCLUSIONS
Results
both
align
contradict
previous
studies
conducted
Muslim
majority
religiously
heterogenous
countries.
This
study
found
an
association
between
Islamic
attitudes
towards
vaccines.
Follow
up
necessary
gauge
larger,
diverse
population
Based
this
study’s
findings,
healthcare
professionals
can
better
promote
by
addressing
their
patient’s
institutions.
Monitoring obŝestvennogo mneniâ: èkonomičeskie i socialʹnye peremeny,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
2, P. 53 - 77
Published: May 7, 2024
В
ходе
пандемии
COVID-19
многие
люди,
в
том
числе
России,
не
воспринимали
угрозу,
исходящую
от
нового
вируса,
всерьез
и
игнорировали
базовые
меры
предосторожности,
такие
как
ношение
масок
соблюдение
социальной
дистанции.
силу
очевидной
опасности,
которую
подобные
взгляды
провоцируемое
ими
безответственное
поведение
представляют
для
других
людей,
феномен
ковид-скептицизма
стал
объектом
пристального
интереса
социологов
специалистов
сфере
общественного
здоровья.
Однако
большинство
научных
работ
по
теме
фокусируются
на
установлении
коррелятов
статической,
кросс-секционной
перспективе.
Настоящее
исследование
направлено
выявление
социально-демографических
личностных
факторов
изменчивости
индивидуальных
установок
отношению
к
коронавирусу
российском
контексте
пытается
ответить
вопрос,
какие
характеристики
отличают
тех,
кто
перестает
быть
ковид-скептиками
с
течением
времени,
чьи
установки
меняются
обратном
направлении.
Для
этого
используются
данные
двух
волн
российской
части
лонгитюдного
международного
онлайн-опроса
«Ценности
кризисе»
(июнь
2020
г.
апрель
—
май
2021
г.).
Доля
скептиков
среди
участников
опроса,
принявших
участие
обеих
волнах,
чуть
менее
чем
за
год
сократилась
37,4%
до
31,6%.
Среди
повторно
опрошенных
15,4%
перестали
ковид-скептиками,
а
9,6%
стали
ими.
Те,
отказывается
скептической
позиции,
старше
ее
принимает,
имеют
более
высокий
доход,
больше
тревожатся
поводу
здоровья
собственного,
так
близких.
Кроме
того,
бывшие
скептики
большей
степени
(по
сравнению
новыми)
поддерживают
ценности
равенства
выбора
(подвиды
эмансипативных
ценностей
К.
Вельцеля).
Переход
из
группы
нескептиков
группу
(равно
наоборот)
также
тесно
ассоциируется
со
снижением
(ростом)
институционального
доверия.
Благодарность.
Статья
подготовлена
рамках
гранта,
предоставленного
Министерством
науки
высшего
образования
Российской
Федерации
(№
соглашения
о
предоставлении
гранта:
075-15-2022-325).