Research Square (Research Square),
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Dec. 13, 2022
Abstract
Deep
fertilization
has
been
tested
widely
for
nitrogen
(N)
use
efficiency
but
there
is
little
evidence
of
its
impact
on
N
leaching
and
the
interplay
between
climate
factors
crop
use.
In
this
study,
we
effect
three
fertilizer
placements
greenhouse
gas
(GHG)
emissions,
leaching,
growth
in
a
lysimeter
experiment
over
33-month
period
comprised
years
with
spring-sown
cereals
(S1,
S2,
S3)
preceding
11-month
(F1)
subsequent
15-month
(F2)
fallow
period.
addition
to
control
no
(Control),
100
kg
ha
−
1
year
ammonium
nitrate
was
placed
at
0.2
m
(Deep),
0.07
(Shallow),
or
halved
(Mixed).
reduced
leachate
amount
each
except
F1,
significant
reductions
(p
<
0.05)
drought
(S2)
cumulatively
S1-S3.
Overall,
water
flow
by
22,
25
34%
compared
Shallow,
Mixed
Control,
respectively.
across
S1-S3
further
loads
15%
significantly
lowest
among
fertilized
treatments
S1
S2.
S3,
increased
grain
yields
28
22%
Shallow
Mixed,
respectively,
while
maintaining
high
content
nearly
doubling
agronomic
(AE
)
recovery
(RE
).
placement
promising
mitigation
practice
that
should
be
investigated.
Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
126(2-3), P. 213 - 228
Published: May 14, 2023
Abstract
Deep
fertilization
has
been
tested
widely
for
nitrogen
(N)
use
efficiency
but
there
is
little
evidence
of
its
impact
on
N
leaching
and
the
interplay
between
climate
factors
crop
use.
In
this
study,
we
effect
three
fertilizer
placements
leaching,
growth,
greenhouse
gas
(GHG)
emissions
in
a
lysimeter
experiment
over
consecutive
years
with
spring-sown
cereals
(S1,
S2,
S3).
Leaching
was
additionally
monitored
an
11-month
fallow
period
(F1)
preceding
S1
15-month
(F2)
following
S3.
addition
to
control
no
(Control),
100
kg
ha
−1
year
ammonium
nitrate
placed
at
0.2
m
(Deep),
0.07
(Shallow),
or
halved
(Mixed).
reduced
leachate
amount
each
cropping
period,
significant
reductions
(
p
<
0.05)
drought
(S2)
cumulatively
S1-S3.
Overall,
by
22,
25
34%
compared
Shallow,
Mixed
Control,
respectively.
across
S1-S3
further
loads
15%
significantly
lowest
among
fertilized
treatments
S2.
S3,
increased
grain
yields
28
22%
Shallow
Mixed,
respectively,
while
nearly
doubling
agronomic
(AE
)
recovery
(RE
).
placement
promising
mitigation
practice
that
should
be
investigated.
Journal of Integrative Agriculture,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: May 1, 2024
Nitrogen
(N)
serves
as
an
essential
nutrient
for
yield
formation
across
diverse
crop
types.
However,
agricultural
production
encounters
numerous
challenges,
notably
high
N
fertilizer
rates
coupled
with
low
use
efficiency
and
serious
environmental
pollution.
Deep
placement
of
nitrogen
(DPNF)
is
agronomic
measure
that
shows
promise
in
addressing
these
issues.
This
review
aims
to
offer
a
comprehensive
understanding
DPNF,
beginning
succinct
overview
its
development
methodologies
implementation.
Subsequently,
the
optimal
fertilization
depth
influencing
factors
different
crops
are
analyzed
discussed.
Additionally,
it
investigates
regulation
mechanism
underlying
DPNF
on
development,
yield,
greenhouse
gas
emissions.
Finally,
delineates
limitations
challenges
this
technology
provides
suggestions
improvement
application.
valuable
insight
reference
promotion
adoption
practice.
Agronomy,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
15(5), P. 1103 - 1103
Published: April 30, 2025
It
is
unclear
whether
enhanced
efficiency
fertilizer
(EEF)
or
deep
fertilization
strategies
(DF)
can
simultaneously
improve
crop
productivity
and
reduce
gaseous
nitrogen
losses.
The
DF
strategy’s
investment
cost
lower
than
that
of
EEF’s,
with
more
potential
for
large-scale
promotion.
However,
there
still
a
need
comprehensive
comparison
evaluation
EEF’s
effects
on
Here,
we
examine
the
EEF
yield,
use
(NUE),
nitrous
oxide
(N2O)
ammonia
(NH3)
emissions
by
meta-analysis
published
studies.
We
collected
peer-reviewed
articles
in
recent
decades
conducted
global
meta-analysis,
explored
their
responses
to
different
climatic,
field
management
practices,
environmental
factors.
results
showed
compared
urea
application
surface,
significantly
increased
yields
7.52%
13.88%
NUE
25.84%
36.27%
reduced
N2O
37.98%
34.18%
NH3
42.37%
69.68%,
respectively.
strategy
superior
EEF.
Due
differences
climatic
factors,
soil
properties,
improving
loss
vary.
most
cases,
beneficial
Compared
EEF,
yield
84.63%
volatilization
64.47%,
yield-scaled
emission
13.32%,
60.23%.
Therefore,
emphasize
achieve
higher
yields,
utilization
efficiency,
nitrogen,
which
sustainable
development
agricultural
ecosystems.
research
provide
valuable
information
costs
under
an
effective
type
management.
