Art
promotes
knowledge
and
understanding.
Philosophers
have
debated
this
proposition,
which
is
referred
to
as
aesthetic
cognitivism.
Despite
its
intuitive
appeal,
few
empirical
investigations
tested
the
validity
of
claim.
In
our
review,
we
outline
philosophical
arguments
for
against
Then,
discuss
how
aesthetics
neuroscience
can
contribute
conversations
about
cognitivism,
with
a
focus
on
visual
art.
We
propose
that
engagement
necessary
acquire
new
understanding,
describe
motivational
states
associated
engagement,
posit
who
most
likely
experience
these
engage
conclude
discussion
cognitivism
might
be
measured
modeled.
By
grounding
in
aesthetics,
researchers
construct
testable
hypotheses
art’s
role
promoting
Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Jan. 12, 2023
Aesthetic
cognitivism
refers
to
the
proposition
that
art
promotes
knowledge
and
understanding.Despite
its
intuitive
appeal,
few
empirical
investigations
have
tested
validity
of
this
philosophical
claim.In
our
review,
we
outline
prior
arguments
for
against
aesthetic
cognitivism.Then,
with
a
focus
on
visual
art,
discuss
how
aesthetics
neuroscience
can
contribute
conversations
about
cognitivism.We
propose
engagement
is
necessary
acquire
new
understanding,
describe
motivational
states
associated
learning,
posit
who
most
likely
experience
these
gain
understanding
from
art.Throughout
paper,
how,
when,
what
derived
might
be
measured
modeled.By
grounding
in
aesthetics,
researchers
generate
test
hypotheses
art's
role
promoting
understanding.
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
1518(1), P. 151 - 165
Published: Oct. 26, 2022
Abstract
Evidence
dating
back
a
century
shows
that
humans
are
sensitive
to
and
exhibit
preference
for
visual
curvature.
This
effect
has
been
observed
in
different
age
groups,
human
cultures,
primate
species,
suggesting
curvature
could
be
universal.
At
the
same
time,
several
studies
have
found
is
modulated
by
contextual
individual
factors,
casting
doubt
on
this
hypothesis.
To
resolve
these
conflicting
findings,
we
conducted
systematic
meta‐analysis
of
investigated
Our
included
61
which
provided
106
independent
samples
309
sizes.
The
results
three‐level
random
effects
model
revealed
Hedges’
g
0.39—consistent
with
medium
size.
Further
analyses
moderated
four
factors:
presentation
stimulus
type,
expertise,
task.
Together,
our
suggest
reliable
but
not
universal
phenomenon
influenced
factors
other
than
perceptual
information.
Food Quality and Preference,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
115, P. 105110 - 105110
Published: Jan. 20, 2024
People
generally
associate
curved
and
symmetrical
shapes
with
sweetness,
while
associating
angular
asymmetrical
the
other
basic
tastes
(e.g.,
sour,
bitter).
However,
these
group-level
taste-shape
correspondences
likely
conceal
important
variation
at
an
individual-level.
We
examined
extent
to
which
individuals
vary
in
their
sensitivity
crossmodal
correspondence
between
curvature
symmetry,
on
one
hand,
five
taste
qualities
(sweet,
bitter,
salty,
umami),
other.
In
Experiment
1,
participants
matched
(curved
vs.
angular,
asymmetrical)
words.
2,
performed
a
similar
task,
though
this
time
using
actual
tastants.
Given
that
people
differ
hedonic
experience
of
such
tastes,
we
also
measured
participants’
liking
for
each
shape
separately.
The
results
replicate
general
curved-sweet
symmetrical-sweet
stimuli.
Furthermore,
tended
match
sour
bitter
coexist
alongside
substantial
level
individual.
While
some
consistently
specific
stimuli,
others
or
else
did
not
show
correspondences.
Liking
stimuli
was
higher
than
differed
considerably
visual
features
affected
liking.
Overall,
our
findings
highlight
individual
differences
are
associated
degree
like
tastes.
Scientific Reports,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
13(1)
Published: Aug. 10, 2023
Creativity
is
a
compelling
yet
elusive
phenomenon,
especially
when
manifested
in
visual
art,
where
its
evaluation
often
subjective
and
complex
process.
Understanding
how
individuals
judge
creativity
art
particularly
intriguing
question.
Conventional
linear
approaches
fail
to
capture
the
intricate
nature
of
human
behavior
underlying
such
judgments.
Therefore,
this
study,
we
employed
interpretable
machine
learning
probe
associations
between
17
art-attributes
judgments
across
diverse
range
artworks.
A
cohort
78
non-art
expert
participants
assessed
54
artworks
varying
styles
motifs.
The
applied
Random
Forests
regressor
models
accounted
for
30%
variability
given
our
set
art-attributes.
Our
analyses
revealed
symbolism,
emotionality,
imaginativeness
as
primary
attributes
influencing
Abstractness,
valence,
complexity
also
had
an
impact,
albeit
lesser
degree.
Notably,
observed
non-linearity
relationship
art-attribute
scores
judgments,
indicating
that
changes
did
not
consistently
correspond
Employing
statistical
learning,
investigation
presents
first
attribute-integrating
quantitative
model
factors
contribute
among
novice
raters.
research
represents
significant
stride
forward
building
groundwork
causal
future
investigations
offering
implications
practical
applications.
Beyond
enhancing
comprehension
interplay
specificity
used
evaluating
creativity,
work
introduces
innovative
approach
field
judgment.
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
379(1895)
Published: Dec. 18, 2023
Listening
to
music,
watching
a
sunset-many
sensory
experiences
are
valuable
us,
degree
that
differs
significantly
between
individuals,
and
within
an
individual
over
time.
We
have
theorized
(Brielmann
&
Dayan
2022
Symmetry,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
14(2), P. 423 - 423
Published: Feb. 20, 2022
Humans,
like
other
species,
have
a
preference
for
symmetrical
visual
stimuli,
that
is
influenced
by
factors
such
as
age,
sex,
and
artistic
training.
In
particular,
training
seems
to
decrease
the
rejection
of
asymmetry
in
abstract
stimuli.
However,
it
not
known
whether
same
trend
would
be
observed
relation
concrete
stimuli
human
faces.
this
article,
we
investigated
role
expertise
arts,
music,
dance,
perceived
beauty
attractiveness
faces
with
different
asymmetries.
With
objective,
100
photographs
degrees
were
evaluated
116
participants
levels
art
expertise.
Expertise
arts
dance
was
associated
extent
which
facial
ratings
assigned
The
greater
more
indifferent
participant
evaluate
beauty.
effect
found
music
neither
ratings.
These
findings
are
important
help
understand
how
face
aesthetic
evaluation
modified
difference
between
evaluations.
British Journal of Psychology,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
114(1), P. 1 - 20
Published: Aug. 15, 2022
Aesthetic
and
moral
evaluations
engage
appetitive
defensive
emotions.
While
the
role
played
by
pleasure
in
positive
aesthetic
judgements
has
been
extensively
researched,
little
is
known
about
how
emotions
influence
negative
judgements.
Specifically,
it
unknown
which
such
tap
into,
whether
both
kinds
of
judgement
share
a
common
emotional
root.
Here,
we
investigated
participants'
individual
sensitivity
to
disgust,
fear,
anger
sadness
predicted
subjective
stimuli.
Bayesian
modelling
revealed
that
participants
who
were
more
sensitive
fear
found
conventional
transgressions
wrong.
In
contrast,
disgust
disliked
asymmetrical
geometric
patterns
untidy
rooms
more.
These
findings
suggest
multiple
emotions,
not
just
they
may
rely
on
different
as
part
their
computational
mechanism.