Surgery-based radiation-free multimodality treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer
Che-Wei Chang,
No information about this author
Szu‐Ting Yang,
No information about this author
Hung‐Hsien Liu
No information about this author
et al.
Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
63(5), P. 651 - 664
Published: Sept. 1, 2024
The
current
review
described
a
55-year
woman
using
28
months
to
finish
her
surgery-based
radiation-free
multimodality
treatment
journey
fight
International
Federation
of
Gynaecology
&
Obstetrics
(FIGO)
2018
clinical
stage
IIA2
(cT2aN0M0)
squamous
cell
carcinoma
(SCC)
the
cervix.
She
received
six
cycles
perioperative
adjuvant
therapy,
including
three
neoadjuvant
therapy
(NAT)
and
postoperative
by
combination
dose-dense
chemotherapy
(CT,
weekly
paclitaxel
80
mg/m
Language: Английский
Neoadjuvant Chemoimmunotherapy for Resectable Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Annals of Surgical Oncology,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: March 18, 2025
Language: Английский
Suicide among patients with oral cancer: A population-based study
Cancer Epidemiology,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
92, P. 102625 - 102625
Published: Aug. 1, 2024
Language: Английский
Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: Systematic review and meta-analysis
Xun Zhu,
No information about this author
Jie Qiu,
No information about this author
Zhang Ya
No information about this author
et al.
Pharmacological Research,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
212, P. 107598 - 107598
Published: Jan. 11, 2025
Neoadjuvant
chemoimmunotherapy
emerged
as
a
promising
treatment
for
locally
advanced
squamous
cell
carcinoma
of
the
head
and
neck
(LA-SCCHN).
However,
comparison
clinical
outcomes
with
neoadjuvant
chemotherapy
was
lacking.
To
provide
evidence
supporting
decision-making
in
LA-SCCHN
treatment.
Literature
retrieved
from
PubMed,
Web
Science,
Embase,
Cochrane
Library
studies
on
efficacy
safety
published
before
August
10,
2024.
The
study
registered
PROSPERO
(CRD42024573816).
A
total
28
trials
2021
patients
were
included.
group
had
significantly
higher
pathologic
complete
response
(pCR)
(33
%
vs.
18
%,
P
=
0.04)
partial
(PR)
(65
38
<
0.01).
No
significant
differences
found
overall
survival
(OS)
(hazard
ratio:
0.85,
95
CI:
0.77-0.93)
progression-free
(PFS)
0.72,
0.61-0.86).
Regarding
outcomes,
single-arm
trials,
grade
3-4
treatment-related
adverse
events
(TRAEs)
occurred
14
13
group,
5
TRAEs
at
0
4
respectively,
showing
no
difference
(P
0.80;
0.08).
In
both
RCTs
non-RCT,
Risk
Ratio
(RR)
(RR:
1.42,
0.87-2.31).
has
shown
LA-SCCHN,
but
further
randomized
are
needed
to
confirm
long-term
benefits.
Language: Английский
Extracellular Vesicles: Hermes Between Cancers and Lymph Nodes
Cancer Letters,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
unknown, P. 217735 - 217735
Published: April 1, 2025
Language: Английский
Neck management in cT1‐2N0 oral squamous cell carcinoma: Act or watchful wait?
International Journal of Cancer,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: April 23, 2025
Abstract
The
controversy
over
neck
management
for
cT1‐2N0
OSCC
patients
has
persisted
two
decades.
While
selective
dissection
(SND)
been
deemed
effective,
only
30%
of
actually
exhibit
lymph
node
metastasis
(LNM).
SND‐related
complications,
such
as
shoulder
dysfunction
and
lymphedema,
significantly
impact
patient
quality
life,
suggesting
that
70%
may
not
benefit
from
SND.
Current
guidelines
advocate
observation,
sentinel
biopsy
(SLNB),
SND,
but
the
appropriate
scenarios
each
strategy
need
further
exploration.
Risk
stratification
assessment
can
inform
treatment
decisions
in
early‐stage
OSCC.
This
review
explores
histological
risk
factors,
SLNB,
gene
expression
profiles,
biomarkers
stratification.
Additionally,
we
assess
potential
value
postoperative
radiotherapy
(PORT)
immunotherapy,
particularly
immune
checkpoint
blockade
(ICB),
Risk‐stratified
approaches
align
with
personalized
medicine
precision
surgery
trends,
while
PORT
ICB
offer
more
reliable
options.
comprehensive
systematically
synthesizes
past
selection
therapeutic
strategies
patients,
alongside
their
respective
strengths
limitations.
We
aspire
to
contribute
optimization
ultimately
enhancing
both
survival
outcomes
life.
Language: Английский