The
processing
of
visual
information
by
retinal
starburst
amacrine
cells
(SACs)
involves
transforming
excitatory
input
from
bipolar
(BCs)
into
directional
calcium
output.
While
previous
studies
have
suggested
that
an
asymmetry
in
the
kinetic
properties
along
soma-dendritic
axes
postsynaptic
cell
could
enhance
tuning
at
level
individual
branches,
it
remains
unclear
whether
biologically
relevant
presynaptic
kinetics
contribute
to
direction
selectivity
when
stimulation
engages
entire
dendritic
tree.
To
address
this
question,
we
built
multicompartmental
models
bipolar–SAC
circuit
and
trained
them
boost
tuning.
We
report
despite
significant
crosstalk
dissimilar
preferences
dendrites
occur
during
whole-cell
stimulation,
rules
guide
BC
leading
optimal
are
similar
single-dendrite
condition.
correlate
model
predictions
empirical
findings,
utilized
two-photon
glutamate
imaging
study
dynamics
release
onto
ON-
OFF-starburst
murine
retina.
reveal
diverse
response
motion
both
populations;
algorithms
on
experimental
data
differences
temporal
likely
correspond
heterogeneous
receptive
field
(RF)
among
different
types,
including
spatial
extent
center
surround
components.
In
addition,
demonstrate
architecture
composed
units
with
experimentally
recorded
drive
but
not
levels
replicate
suggesting
other
DS
mechanisms
required
explain
SAC
function.
Our
provides
new
insights
complex
underlying
highlights
potential
contribution
computation
cells.
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory),
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Nov. 15, 2023
Abstract
Spontaneous
retinal
waves
are
a
critical
driving
force
for
the
self-organization
of
mouse
visual
system
prior
to
eye-opening.
Classically
characterized
as
taking
place
in
three
distinct
stages
defined
by
their
primary
excitatory
drive,
Stage
II
during
first
postnatal
week
propagated
through
volume
transmission
acetylcholine
while
III
second
depend
on
glutamatergic
from
bipolar
cells.
However,
both
late
and
early
share
defining
propagation
bias
toward
temporal-to-nasal
direction
despite
developmental
changes
underlying
cholinergic
networks.
Here,
we
leverage
genetic
pharmacological
manipulations
investigate
relationship
between
neurotransmission
transition
vivo.
We
find
that
network
continues
play
vital
role
after
mode
glutamate.
In
absence
waves,
compensatory
activity
persists
but
lacks
typically
observed
waves.
gap
junction-mediated
associated
with
I
throughout
window
which
usually
emerge
spatiotemporal
profile
normal
including
bias.
Finally,
show
signaling
β2
subunit-containing
nicotinic
receptors,
essential
wave
propagation,
is
also
directionality.
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory),
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Aug. 5, 2023
The
processing
of
visual
information
by
retinal
starburst
amacrine
cells
(SACs)
involves
transforming
excitatory
input
from
bipolar
(BCs)
into
directional
calcium
output.
While
previous
studies
have
suggested
that
an
asymmetry
in
the
kinetic
properties
along
soma-dendritic
axes
postsynaptic
cell
could
enhance
tuning
at
level
individual
branches,
it
remains
unclear
whether
biologically
relevant
presynaptic
kinetics
contribute
to
direction
selectivity
when
stimulation
engages
entire
dendritic
tree.
To
address
this
question,
we
built
multicompartmental
models
bipolar-SAC
circuit
and
trained
them
boost
tuning.
We
report
despite
significant
crosstalk
dissimilar
preferences
dendrites
occur
during
whole-cell
stimulation,
rules
guide
BC
leading
optimal
are
similar
single-dendrite
condition.
correlate
model
predictions
empirical
findings,
utilized
two-photon
glutamate
imaging
study
dynamics
release
onto
ON-
OFF-starburst
murine
retina.
reveal
diverse
response
motion
both
populations;
algorithms
on
experimental
data
differences
temporal
likely
correspond
heterogeneous
receptive
field
(RF)
among
different
types,
including
spatial
extent
center
surround
components.
In
addition,
demonstrate
architecture
composed
units
with
experimentally
recorded
drive
but
not
levels
replicate
suggesting
other
DS
mechanisms
required
explain
SAC
function.
Our
provides
new
insights
complex
underlying
highlights
potential
contribution
computation
cells.
Frontiers in Ophthalmology,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
3
Published: Aug. 29, 2023
The
retina
is
comprised
of
diverse
neural
networks,
signaling
from
photoreceptors
to
ganglion
cells
encode
images.
synaptic
connections
between
these
retinal
neurons
are
crucial
points
for
information
transfer;
however,
the
input-output
relations
many
synapses
understudied.
Starburst
amacrine
in
known
contribute
motion
detection
circuits,
providing
a
unique
window
understanding
computations.
We
examined
dual
transmitter
release
GABA
and
acetylcholine
starburst
by
optogenetic
activation
cells,
conducted
patch
clamp
recordings
postsynaptic
record
excitatory
inhibitory
currents
(EPSCs
IPSCs).
As
exhibit
distinct
kinetics
response
objects
moving
preferred
or
null
direction,
we
mimicked
their
depolarization
using
stimuli
varying
slopes
rising
phase.
amplitudes
EPSCs
IPSCs
were
reduced
as
stimulus
speed
was
prolonged.
However,
sensitivity
slope
differed.
EPSC
consistently
steepness
phase
fell.
By
contrast,
less
sensitive
rise
maintained
until
became
shallow.
These
results
indicate
that
mechanisms
which
could
cells’
direction
selectivity.
The
processing
of
visual
information
by
retinal
starburst
amacrine
cells
(SACs)
involves
transforming
excitatory
input
from
bipolar
(BCs)
into
directional
calcium
output.
While
previous
studies
have
suggested
that
an
asymmetry
in
the
kinetic
properties
along
soma-dendritic
axes
postsynaptic
cell
could
enhance
tuning
at
level
individual
branches,
it
remains
unclear
whether
biologically
relevant
presynaptic
kinetics
contribute
to
direction
selectivity
when
stimulation
engages
entire
dendritic
tree.
To
address
this
question,
we
built
multicompartmental
models
bipolar–SAC
circuit
and
trained
them
boost
tuning.
We
report
despite
significant
crosstalk
dissimilar
preferences
dendrites
occur
during
whole-cell
stimulation,
rules
guide
BC
leading
optimal
are
similar
single-dendrite
condition.
correlate
model
predictions
empirical
findings,
utilized
two-photon
glutamate
imaging
study
dynamics
release
onto
ON-
OFF-starburst
murine
retina.
reveal
diverse
response
motion
both
populations;
algorithms
on
experimental
data
differences
temporal
likely
correspond
heterogeneous
receptive
field
(RF)
among
different
types,
including
spatial
extent
center
surround
components.
In
addition,
demonstrate
architecture
composed
units
with
experimentally
recorded
drive
but
not
levels
replicate
suggesting
other
DS
mechanisms
required
explain
SAC
function.
Our
provides
new
insights
complex
underlying
highlights
potential
contribution
computation
cells.
The
processing
of
visual
information
by
retinal
starburst
amacrine
cells
(SACs)
involves
transforming
excitatory
input
from
bipolar
(BCs)
into
directional
calcium
output.
While
previous
studies
have
suggested
that
an
asymmetry
in
the
kinetic
properties
along
soma-dendritic
axes
postsynaptic
cell
could
enhance
tuning
at
level
individual
branches,
it
remains
unclear
whether
biologically
relevant
presynaptic
kinetics
contribute
to
direction
selectivity
when
stimulation
engages
entire
dendritic
tree.
To
address
this
question,
we
built
multicompartmental
models
bipolar–SAC
circuit
and
trained
them
boost
tuning.
We
report
despite
significant
crosstalk
dissimilar
preferences
dendrites
occur
during
whole-cell
stimulation,
rules
guide
BC
leading
optimal
are
similar
single-dendrite
condition.
correlate
model
predictions
empirical
findings,
utilized
two-photon
glutamate
imaging
study
dynamics
release
onto
ON-
OFF-starburst
murine
retina.
reveal
diverse
response
motion
both
populations;
algorithms
on
experimental
data
differences
temporal
likely
correspond
heterogeneous
receptive
field
(RF)
among
different
types,
including
spatial
extent
center
surround
components.
In
addition,
demonstrate
architecture
composed
units
with
experimentally
recorded
drive
but
not
levels
replicate
suggesting
other
DS
mechanisms
required
explain
SAC
function.
Our
provides
new
insights
complex
underlying
highlights
potential
contribution
computation
cells.