Frontiers in Drug Safety and Regulation, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 3
Published: March 31, 2023
SPECIALTY GRAND CHALLENGE article Front. Drug Saf. Regul., 31 March 2023Sec. Maternal-Fetal Medicine Volume 3 - 2023 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fdsfr.2023.1187070
Language: Английский
The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 36(1)
Published: March 11, 2023
Even through the fact that pregnant women are more and severely infected with COVID-19 disease, there still doubts about vaccinating these people due to lack of sufficient evidence base information. So in this systematic review, we decided study vaccinated unvaccinated regarding maternal, fetal neonatal complications outcomes.Between 30 December 2019 15 October 2021, electronic searches were performed on databases PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, Cochrane library by searching English free full text. Keywords searched included these: maternal outcome, pregnancy, vaccination. Among 451 articles, finally, seven studies pregnancy outcomes compared for review purposes.In 30257 their third trimester 132339 terms age, root delivery, adverse outcomes. There no significant differences between two groups of: IUFD, 1 min Apgar score, C/S rate, NICU admission groups, however, rate SGA, also jaundice, asphyxia, hypoglycemia was group comparing as a result. them, chance preterm labor pain reported among patients. Emphasizing that, except 7.3% case population, everyone second trimesters had been mRNA vaccines.COVID-19 vaccination during appears be right choice immediate impact antibodies developing fetus formation prophylaxis, well absence both mothers.
Language: Английский
Citations
2
Patient Education and Counseling, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 115, P. 107929 - 107929
Published: July 31, 2023
We examined Italian pregnant women's attitudes about the diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis (DTP) vaccine, seasonal influenza, Covid-19 vaccines, healthcare professionals' (HP) communication, reasons potential predictors for non-adherence.From August 2021 to January 2022, we carried out a cross-sectional study in Italy using an online self-administered questionnaire addressed women of age pregnant, designed LimeSurvey disseminated through social media. Questions explored vaccination attitude/perceptions, satisfaction, trust HPs' information. Thematic analysis free-text responses was performed MaxQDA 2022. Statistical analyses were STATA.1594 obtained. 52% hesitated be vaccinated against while pregnant. Information received by HPs deemed incomplete 56% participants, unclear 52%, untrustworthy 46%; 49% felt unsupported their decision-making process. This variable one predictor vaccine hesitancy together with concern safety multivariate model. The open-ended questions revealed pervasive feeling dissatisfaction.The perceived lack adequate communication support affected process on vaccination.HPs need understand communicate importance during pregnancy, learning better tailor messages.
Language: Английский
Citations
2
SSRN Electronic Journal, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: unknown
Published: Jan. 1, 2022
Background: Since there is no available data on the trends of caesarean section (CS) rates in pregnant women with COVID-19 through pandemic, we aimed to analyse rate a large cohort according Robson Ten Group Classification System deliveries.Methods: We prospectively enrolled diagnosis who delivered our Center between March 2020 and November 2021. Deliveries were classified group classification three time periods: 1) deliveries from December 2020; 2) January 2021 April 2021; 3) May 2021.We compared pregnancy characteristics incidence category total population periods.Findings: included analysis 457 patients matching inclusion criteria . found that overall CS significantly decreased over period 1 3 (152/222, 68.5% vs 81/134, 60.4% 58/101, 57.4%, χ 2 =4.261, p=0.039). (48/80, 60% 27/47,57.4% 8/24, 33.3%, χ2 =4.097, p=0.043) (13/42, 31% 6/33, 18.2% 2/22, 9.1%, =4.335, p=0.037). also induction labor increased (8/222, 3.6% 12/134, 9% 11/101, 10.9%, =7.245, p=0.027).Interpretation Our provide an overview temporal changes management obstetric outcome confirming working high-volume referral center for improved standards obstetrical assistance time.Funding: None declare. Declaration Interest: Authors declare conflict interestEthical Approval: The study has been approved by local IRL (Protocol #145/20, 3, 2020)
Language: Английский
Citations
3
Vaccines, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 11(2), P. 390 - 390
Published: Feb. 8, 2023
Pregnant and postpartum women have an increased risk of severe complications from COVID-19. Many clinical guidelines recommend vaccination these populations, it is therefore critical to understand their attitudes toward COVID-19 vaccines. We conducted a cross-sectional online survey in November 2020 currently pregnant ≤1-year Brazil, India, the United Kingdom (UK), States (US) that assessed openness vaccines reasons for vaccine hesitancy. Logistic regression analyses were evaluate receiving vaccine. Out 2010 respondents, 67% open themselves. Among participants, 72% 57% willing receive vaccine, respectively. Vaccine varied significantly by country: India (87%), Brazil (71%), UK (59%), US (52%). Across all among 33% who unsure/not most common reason cited was safety/side effect concerns (51%). Participants similarly children/other family members Presence comorbidity, positive test result, pregnancy associated with acceptance. Targeted outreach address women’s about needed.
Language: Английский
Citations
1
Frontiers in Drug Safety and Regulation, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 3
Published: March 31, 2023
SPECIALTY GRAND CHALLENGE article Front. Drug Saf. Regul., 31 March 2023Sec. Maternal-Fetal Medicine Volume 3 - 2023 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fdsfr.2023.1187070
Language: Английский
Citations
1