Health risk assessment of heavy metals in groundwater sources: carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic evaluation DOI Creative Commons
Kshipra Kapoor, Shakti Kumar, Dinesh Kumar Vishwakarma

et al.

Journal of Water and Health, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 22(10), P. 1972 - 1987

Published: Sept. 21, 2024

ABSTRACT Persistent exposure to arsenic, chromium, cadmium, lead, and selenium in drinking water above permissible levels poses significant health risks, including increased incidences of skin, lung, bladder, kidney cancers. This study evaluated 34 samples from Rupnagar district, Punjab, for heavy metal content. Health risks were assessed using hazard quotient (HQ) chronic daily intake metrics. Aluminium concentrations highest Block Nurpur Bedi (36.43 mg/L). Arsenic Ropar Anandpur Sahib 0.09 0.068 mg/L, respectively. Cadmium was (0.041 Morinda had the concentration (0.0038 Lead detected across all blocks, peaking Chamkaur (2.176 The HQ exceeded unity nearly areas, indicating aluminium, lead. index (2.66) adults. Incremental Life Cancer Risk (ILCR) values indicated a high cancer risk lead blocks. One-way analysis variance revealed differences among Fe, As, Al (p < 0.05). findings underscore need targeted treatment technologies policies mitigate contamination its impacts Punjab.

Language: Английский

Environmental chemistry, toxicity and health risk assessment of groundwater: Environmental persistence and management strategies DOI

D. Karunanidhi,

T. Subramani,

K. Srinivasamoorthy

et al.

Environmental Research, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: 214, P. 113884 - 113884

Published: July 16, 2022

Language: Английский

Citations

18
Modeling, quality assessment, and Sobol sensitivity of water resources and distribution system in Shiraz: A probabilistic human health risk assessment DOI
Amin Mohammadpour, Mohammad Reza Samaei, Mohammad Ali Baghapour

et al.

Chemosphere, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 341, P. 139987 - 139987

Published: Aug. 30, 2023

Language: Английский

Citations

10
microRNAomic profiling of maize root reveals multifaceted mechanisms to cope with Cr (VI) stress DOI
Ayan Adhikari, Doyel Roy, Sinchan Adhikari

et al.

Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 198, P. 107693 - 107693

Published: April 8, 2023

Language: Английский

Citations

9
Evaluation Health Risks and Sorption of Hexavalent Chromium (Cr(VI) by Biochar and Iron Doped Zinc Oxide Modified Biochar (Fe-ZnO@BC) Using Trifolium: A Green Synthesis Technique DOI
Shah Jehan,

Seema Anjum Khattak,

Muhammad Waqas

et al.

Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 112(4)

Published: April 1, 2024

Language: Английский

Citations

3
Health risk assessment of heavy metals in groundwater sources: carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic evaluation DOI Creative Commons
Kshipra Kapoor, Shakti Kumar, Dinesh Kumar Vishwakarma

et al.

Journal of Water and Health, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 22(10), P. 1972 - 1987

Published: Sept. 21, 2024

ABSTRACT Persistent exposure to arsenic, chromium, cadmium, lead, and selenium in drinking water above permissible levels poses significant health risks, including increased incidences of skin, lung, bladder, kidney cancers. This study evaluated 34 samples from Rupnagar district, Punjab, for heavy metal content. Health risks were assessed using hazard quotient (HQ) chronic daily intake metrics. Aluminium concentrations highest Block Nurpur Bedi (36.43 mg/L). Arsenic Ropar Anandpur Sahib 0.09 0.068 mg/L, respectively. Cadmium was (0.041 Morinda had the concentration (0.0038 Lead detected across all blocks, peaking Chamkaur (2.176 The HQ exceeded unity nearly areas, indicating aluminium, lead. index (2.66) adults. Incremental Life Cancer Risk (ILCR) values indicated a high cancer risk lead blocks. One-way analysis variance revealed differences among Fe, As, Al (p < 0.05). findings underscore need targeted treatment technologies policies mitigate contamination its impacts Punjab.

Language: Английский

Citations

3