Research Square (Research Square), Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: unknown
Published: Dec. 14, 2022
Language: Английский
Research Square (Research Square), Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: unknown
Published: Dec. 14, 2022
Language: Английский
Clinical Microbiology Reviews, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 37(2)
Published: May 22, 2024
SUMMARYThis narrative review and meta-analysis summarizes a broad evidence base on the benefits-and also practicalities, disbenefits, harms personal, sociocultural environmental impacts-of masks masking. Our synthesis of from over 100 published reviews selected primary studies, including re-analyzing contested meta-analyses key clinical trials, produced seven findings. First, there is strong consistent for airborne transmission severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) other pathogens. Second, are, if correctly consistently worn, effective in reducing diseases show dose-response effect. Third, respirators are significantly more than medical or cloth masks. Fourth, mask mandates overall, community Fifth, important symbols; non-adherence to masking sometimes linked political ideological beliefs widely circulated mis- disinformation. Sixth, while much that not generally harmful general population, may be relatively contraindicated individuals with certain conditions, who require exemption. Furthermore, groups (notably D/deaf people) disadvantaged when others masked. Finally, risks environment single-use respirators. We propose an agenda future research, improved characterization situations which should recommended mandated; attention comfort acceptability; generalized disability-focused communication support settings where worn; development testing novel materials designs filtration, breathability, impact.
Language: Английский
Citations
30Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 275, P. 115858 - 115858
Published: March 26, 2024
From 2020 to 2023 many people around the world were forced wear masks for large proportions of day based on mandates and laws. We aimed study potential face content release inanimate toxins.
Language: Английский
Citations
7Frontiers in Public Health, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 11
Published: April 5, 2023
As face masks became mandatory in most countries during the COVID-19 pandemic, adverse effects require substantiated investigation.
Language: Английский
Citations
12Environmental Health Insights, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: 16
Published: Jan. 1, 2022
Face masks are recommended based on the assumption that they protect against SARS-CoV-2 transmission, however studies their potential side effects still lacking. We aimed to evaluate inhaled air carbon dioxide (CO
Language: Английский
Citations
17Archives of Disease in Childhood, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 109(3), P. e1 - e7
Published: Dec. 2, 2023
Background Mask mandates for children during the COVID-19 pandemic varied in different locations. A risk-benefit analysis of this intervention has not yet been performed. In study, we performed a systematic review to assess research on effectiveness mask wearing children. Methods We database searches up February 2023. The studies were screened by title and abstract, included further as full-text references. risk-of-bias was two independent reviewers adjudicated third reviewer. Results 597 22 final analysis. There no randomised controlled trials assessing benefits reduce SARS-CoV-2 infection or transmission. six observational reporting an association between child masking lower rate antibody seropositivity had critical (n=5) serious (n=1) risk bias; all potentially confounded important differences masked unmasked groups shown have non-significant results when reanalysed. Sixteen other found Conclusions Real-world against transmission demonstrated with high-quality evidence. current body scientific data does support protection COVID-19.
Language: Английский
Citations
10The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 1 - 7
Published: April 14, 2025
Abstract Retracted research publications reached an all-time high in 2023, and COVID-19 may have higher retraction rates than other publications. To better understand the impact of on literature, we analyzed 244 retracted related to PubMed database reasons for their retraction. Peer-review manipulation (18.4%) error (20.9%) were most common retraction, with time occurring far more quickly past (13.2 mos, compared 32.9 mos a 2012 study). Publications focused controversial topics rapidly (mean 10.8 mos) but continued receive media attention, suggesting that alone be insufficient prevent spread scientific misinformation. More half retractions resulted from problems could been detected prior publication, including compromise peer review process, plagiarism, authorship issues, lack ethics approvals, or journal errors, robust screening by journals can help mitigate recent rise retractions.
Language: Английский
Citations
0Journal of Breath Research, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 17(4), P. 042001 - 042001
Published: Aug. 7, 2023
Abstract In this perspective, we review the evidence for efficacy of face masks to reduce transmission respiratory viruses, specifically severe acute syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), and consider value mandating universal mask wearing against widespread negative impacts that have been associated with such measures. Before SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, it was considered there little no benefit in healthy people as prophylaxis becoming infected or unwitting vectors viral transmission. This accepted policy hastily reversed early on when districts countries throughout world imposed stringent masking mandates. Now, more than three years since start amassed studies investigated use (or other pathogens) led conclusions are largely inconsistent contradictory. There is statistically significant unambiguous scientific justify mandatory general, populations intention lessening spread. Even if could potentially individual cases, needs be balanced physical, psychological social harms forced wearing, not mention impact innumerable disposed entering our fragile environment. Given lack unequivocal proof any effect reducing transmission, together evident environment through masks, opinion general population unjustifiable must abandoned future pandemic countermeasures policies.
Language: Английский
Citations
6PeerJ, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 11, P. e15474 - e15474
Published: June 16, 2023
Surgical masks remain a focal part of the CDC guidelines to decrease COVID-19 transmission. Evidence refuting significant effects masking on ventilation is mostly limited small studies, with paucity studies children, and none comparing children adults.
Language: Английский
Citations
5ERJ Open Research, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 9(4), P. 00186 - 2023
Published: June 8, 2023
Background The COVID-19 pandemic has changed worldwide hygiene practices. In particular, the use of filtering face piece (FFP) masks markedly increased. Concerns have been raised regarding possible negative respiratory effects wearing FFP masks. aim this study was to investigate gas exchange and subjective breathing effort in hospital personnel FFP2 or FFP3 Methods prospective, single-centre, crossover study, 200 workers were assigned alternately wear for 1 h during routine activities. Capillary blood analysis performed evaluate while primary end-point change capillary partial pressure carbon dioxide ( P cCO 2 ). addition, oxygen cO ), rate assessed at end each hour. Changes between time points groups estimated using univariate multivariate models. Results increased from 36.8±3.5 37.2±3.3 mmHg (p=0.047) 37.4±3.2 (p=0.003) individuals masks, respectively. Age (p=0.021) male sex (p<0.001) significantly associated with . Similarly, 70.7±8.4 73.4±8.8 72.8±8.5 (p=0.004) Respiratory (p<0.001 all analyses). order did not affect results. Conclusions An hour values, healthcare performing
Language: Английский
Citations
2Prosiding SNF (Seminar Nasional Fisika), Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: unknown
Published: Jan. 1, 2024
Abstrak Seiring dengan perkembangan zaman, berbagai kegiatan indrustrialisasi dan urbanisasi dapat memicu peningkatan gas CH4 CO2 yang memperburuk kualitas udara di lingkungan. Salah satu upaya untuk mengetahui adalah melakukan monitoring konsentrasi udara. Konsentrasi diukur menggunakan sensor MQ-4 sedangkan MG-811. Dalam penggunaannya, perlu dilakukan karakterisasi pengujian tujuan mendapatkan persamaan kalibrasi, kesalahan relatif pengukuran, rentang kerja dari masing-masing sensor. Maka pada penelitian ini proses membandingkan hasil keluaran Analyzer G2203 MG-811 G2301 Picarro. Adapun menunjukkan bahwa memiliki rata-rata sebesar 0,066%. Sedangkan 0,047%. pengukuran sampel berupa asap kendaraan bermotor variasi waktu. bekerja baik dalam 1,885-1,914 PPM, 406,311-409,169 PPM. Hasil tersebut selanjutnya akan digunakan pengembangan sistem Kata-kata kunci: metana, karbon dioksida, MQ-4, MG-811, gas. Abstract Along with times, various industrialization and urbanization activities can trigger an increase in gases which improve air quality environment. One effort to determine is monitor concentrations air. Concentration of be measured using In use, it necessary characterize sensors test aim obtaining equations, relative measurement errors, working distance each So, this research characterization process was carried out by comparing output results Characterization show that has average error 0,066% While testing done measuring samples form motorized vehicle smoke time variations. The work well range while These will then used development a system for Keywords: methane, carbon dioxide, concentration.
Citations
0