A framework for implementing evidence in policymaking: Perspectives and phases of evidence evaluation in the science-policy interaction DOI Creative Commons
Hiroyuki Kano, Takehiko I. Hayashi

Environmental Science & Policy, Journal Year: 2020, Volume and Issue: 116, P. 86 - 95

Published: Nov. 27, 2020

The use of scientific knowledge in policymaking has been a subject debate the environmental sector. An essential task for effective evidence is scientists and policymakers to share common understanding how should be produced used. purpose this study establish reference framework that enables align their sights deal with policymaking. To develop framework, we introduced five perspectives cover domains science, policy, science-policy interface as: (1) methodological rigorousness; (2) consistency; (3) proximity; (4) social appropriateness; (5) legitimacy. We then examined issues from these will transit through three phases interaction between investigation political institutionalization via: pre-institutionalization phase, which academic framing an issue was unclear; mid-institutionalization established advanced; post-institutionalization were recursively defined within evaluation system itself. encourages shift each phase institutionalization. A case on mercury pollution shows serves as checklist comprehensive evidence, provides specific guidance appropriately promotes evidence-based its implementation.

Language: Английский

Leveraging windows of opportunity for expertise to matter in global environmental governance: insights from the United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification DOI Creative Commons
Sara Velander, Matteo De Donà

Frontiers in Climate, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 5

Published: Jan. 11, 2024

Introduction Whether and under what conditions scientific knowledge provided by experts actually leads to political action is a question that academic research in various fields have focused on at length, without reaching definitive answer. The position of expertise especially delicate within the global environmental governance sphere containing multiple values, worldviews epistemological standpoints. Methods Firstly, we developed theoretical model examine how contextual factors, like institutional design boundary work dynamics, contribute influencing governance. Secondly, applied this case Science Policy Interface United Nations Convention Combat Desertification (UNCCD SPI), using data from semi-structured interviews with SPI stakeholders participant observation meetings. Results We identified specific dimensions mandate enabled matter: inclusive membership practitioners, close interaction between actors, coordination other advisory bodies, regular reviews, small group size. However, after underpinning prevailing differences power member states their interactions, found international decision-making its national-level implementation remain ultimately inevitably subordinated making it less likely for significant impact. Discussion International sustainable development can only take advantage rare “windows opportunity” intergovernmental processes concede influence policy.

Language: Английский

Citations

4

Towards a credible, relevant and legitimate implementation framework for the EU no net land take objective DOI
Antoine Decoville, Valérie Feltgen

Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 1 - 21

Published: Jan. 2, 2025

The European Union's objective of halting the net artificialisation land by 2050, known as 'No Net Land Take' (NNLT) objective, represents a paradigm shift in terms spatial planning. However, ambition this contrasts with absence clear, coherent, multi-scalar and legally anchored framework. This article draws on concepts credibility, relevance legitimacy used science-policy interface debate to show need for region-specific strategies. To end, two original indicators are presented. first presents rate soil sealing within artificial areas, shows potential internal densification, which varies from 27 90% at NUTS 3 level. indicator is compared projected demographic growth up illustrating diverse challenges faced across Europe.

Language: Английский

Citations

0

A tale of two panels: learning and coordinating across IPCC, IPBES, and other science-policy interfaces DOI Creative Commons
Pamela McElwee

Climatic Change, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 178(3)

Published: March 1, 2025

Language: Английский

Citations

0

Principles for evaluating knowledge co-production in natural resource management: Incorporating decision-maker values DOI
Ruth A. O’Connor, Jeanne Nel, Dirk J. Roux

et al.

Journal of Environmental Management, Journal Year: 2019, Volume and Issue: 249, P. 109392 - 109392

Published: Aug. 22, 2019

Language: Английский

Citations

34

Improving scientific impact: How to practice science that influences environmental policy and management DOI Creative Commons
Jonathan R. B. Fisher, Stephen A. Wood, Mark A. Bradford

et al.

Conservation Science and Practice, Journal Year: 2020, Volume and Issue: 2(7)

Published: May 7, 2020

Abstract Scientists devote substantial time and resources to research intended help solve environmental problems. Environmental managers policymakers must decide how use the best available evidence prioritize actions leading desired outcomes. Yet decision‐makers can face barriers using scientific inform action. They may be unaware of evidence, lack access it, not understand or view it as irrelevant. These mean a valuable resource (evidence) is underused. We outline set practical steps for scientists who want improve impact their has on decision‐making: (a) identify audience; (b) clarify need evidence; (c) gather “just enough” (d) share discuss evidence. are guidelines, strict recipe success. But, we believe that regularly following these recommendations should increase chance being considered used in decision‐making. Our goal this article accessible anyone, rather than comprehensive review topic.

Language: Английский

Citations

29

Balancing scales: Enhancing local applications of adaptation pathways DOI
Nicholas A. Cradock-Henry, Bob Frame

Environmental Science & Policy, Journal Year: 2021, Volume and Issue: 121, P. 42 - 48

Published: April 9, 2021

Language: Английский

Citations

26

A Stakeholder-Engaged Approach to Anticipating Forest Disturbance Impacts in the Colorado River Basin under Climate Change DOI Creative Commons
Kristen M. Whitney, Enrique R. Vivoni, Zhaocheng Wang

et al.

Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 149(7)

Published: April 18, 2023

Accelerated climate change and forest disturbances (e.g., wildfire, mortality, thinning) are anticipated to significantly impact water resources in the Colorado River Basin (CRB), need for actionable information from hydrologic research is growing rapidly. We designed a stakeholder engagement modeling process assess of these changes on CRB hydrology. used variable infiltration capacity model simulate alternative futures (a top-down structure) with scenarios incremental bottom-up assessment). Forcings were derived outputs that represent warm wet (warm/wet) hot dry (hot/dry) future bookends. During process, we incorporated feedback managers capture their perspectives our create decision-relevant analyses. Results showed improved streamflow conditions permanent by end 21st century (CRB mean annual up 12% larger than without disturbance) due smaller snowpack reductions evapotranspiration losses. Larger reversed warming-driven declines supply efficiency (average runoff baseflow, per unit precipitation) only under warm/wet climate. Forest did not induce recovery hot/dry overriding effect increasing water-limited conditions.

Language: Английский

Citations

10

From frustration to fruition in applied conservation research and practice: ten revelations DOI
Steven J. Cooke

Socio-Ecological Practice Research, Journal Year: 2018, Volume and Issue: 1(1), P. 15 - 23

Published: Dec. 14, 2018

Language: Английский

Citations

30

Mediating the science-policy interface: Insights from the urban water sector in Melbourne, Australia DOI

G. Dunn,

Joannette J. Bos, Rebekah Ruth Brown

et al.

Environmental Science & Policy, Journal Year: 2018, Volume and Issue: 82, P. 143 - 150

Published: Feb. 10, 2018

Language: Английский

Citations

28

A set of organized indicators to conciliate scientific knowledge, offset policies requirements and operational constraints in the context of biodiversity offsets DOI
Lucie Bezombes, Stéphanie Gaucherand, Thomas Spiegelberger

et al.

Ecological Indicators, Journal Year: 2018, Volume and Issue: 93, P. 1244 - 1252

Published: June 21, 2018

Language: Английский

Citations

28