Multicriteria Methods for Group Decision Processes: An Overview DOI
Ahti Salo, Raimo P. Hämäläinen,

Tuomas J. Lahtinen

et al.

Springer eBooks, Journal Year: 2021, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 1 - 29

Published: Jan. 1, 2021

Language: Английский

Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals Requires Transdisciplinary Innovation at the Local Scale DOI Creative Commons
Enayat A. Moallemi, Shirin Malekpour, Michalis Hadjikakou

et al.

One Earth, Journal Year: 2020, Volume and Issue: 3(3), P. 300 - 313

Published: Sept. 1, 2020

Language: Английский

Citations

217

Position paper: Open web-distributed integrated geographic modelling and simulation to enable broader participation and applications DOI Creative Commons
Min Chen, Alexey Voinov, Daniel P. Ames

et al.

Earth-Science Reviews, Journal Year: 2020, Volume and Issue: 207, P. 103223 - 103223

Published: June 6, 2020

Integrated geographic modelling and simulation is a computational means to improve understanding of the environment. With development Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) web technologies, it possible conduct open, extensible integrated across network in which resources can be accessed integrated, further distributed simulations performed. This open web-distributed approach likely enhance use existing attract diverse participants. this approach, participants from different physical locations or domains expertise perform comprehensive tasks collaboratively. paper reviews past systems, highlighting associated challenges when moving an system. A conceptual framework proposed introduce roadmap system design perspective, with potential cases provided. The four components - set standards, resource sharing environment, collaborative environment are also discussed detail goal advancing emerging field.

Language: Английский

Citations

118

Exploratory modeling for analyzing coupled human-natural systems under uncertainty DOI
Enayat A. Moallemi, Jan Kwakkel, Fjalar J. de Haan

et al.

Global Environmental Change, Journal Year: 2020, Volume and Issue: 65, P. 102186 - 102186

Published: Nov. 1, 2020

Language: Английский

Citations

116

Knowledge co-production for decision-making in human-natural systems under uncertainty DOI Creative Commons
Enayat A. Moallemi, Fateme Zare, Aniek Hebinck

et al.

Global Environmental Change, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 82, P. 102727 - 102727

Published: July 4, 2023

Decision-making under uncertainty is important for managing human-natural systems in a changing world. A major source of linked to the multi-actor settings decisions with poorly understood values, complex relationships, and conflicting management approaches. Despite general agreement across disciplines on co-producing knowledge viable inclusive outcomes context, there still limited conceptual clarity no systematic understanding what co-production means decision-making how it can be approached. Here, we use content analysis clustering systematically analyse 50 cases multiple time spatial scales 26 countries 9 different sectors last decade serve two aims. The first synthesise key recurring strategies that underpin high quality decision many diverse features. second identify deficits opportunities leverage existing towards flourishing support decision-making. We find four emerge centred around: promoting innovation robust equitable decisions; broadening span interacting systems; fostering social learning participation; improving pathways impact. Additionally, five areas should addressed improve are identified relation to: participation diversity; collaborative action; power relationships; governance inclusivity; transformative change. Characterising emergent their improvement help guide future works more pluralistic integrated science practice.

Language: Английский

Citations

32

Convergent and Transdisciplinary Integration: On the Future of Integrated Modeling of Human‐Water Systems DOI Creative Commons
Saman Razavi, Ashleigh Duffy, Leila Eamen

et al.

Water Resources Research, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 61(2)

Published: Feb. 1, 2025

Abstract The notion of convergent and transdisciplinary integration, which is about braiding together different knowledge systems, becoming the mantra numerous initiatives aimed at tackling pressing water challenges. Yet, transition from rhetoric to actual implementation impeded by incongruence in semantics, methodologies, discourse among disciplinary scientists societal actors. Here, we embrace “integrated modeling”—both quantitatively qualitatively—as a vital exploratory instrument advance such providing means navigate complexity manage uncertainty associated with understanding, diagnosing, predicting, governing human‐water systems. From this standpoint, confront barriers offering seven focused reviews syntheses existing missing links across frontiers distinguishing surface groundwater hydrology, engineering, social sciences, economics, Indigenous place‐based knowledge, studies other interconnected natural systems as atmosphere, cryosphere, ecosphere. While there are, arguably, no bounds pursuit inclusivity representing spectrum human processes around resources, advocate that integrated modeling can provide approach delineating scope through lens three fundamental questions: (a) What “purpose”? (b) constitutes sound “boundary judgment”? (c) are “critical uncertainties” their compounding effects? More broadly, call for investigating what warranted “systems complexity,” opposed unjustified “computational complexity” when complex human‐natural careful attention interdependencies feedbacks, scaling issues, nonlinear dynamics thresholds, hysteresis, time lags, legacy effects.

Language: Английский

Citations

1

Evaluating Participatory Modeling Methods for Co‐creating Pathways to Sustainability DOI Creative Commons
Enayat A. Moallemi, Fjalar J. de Haan, Michalis Hadjikakou

et al.

Earth s Future, Journal Year: 2021, Volume and Issue: 9(3)

Published: Feb. 8, 2021

The achievement of global sustainability agendas, such as the Sustainable Development Goals, relies on transformational change across society, economy, and environment that are co-created in a transdisciplinary exercise by all stakeholders. Within this context, environmental societal is increasingly understood represented via participatory modeling for genuine engagement with multiple collaborators process. Despite diversity methods to promote co-creation, it remains uncertain what extent modes participation different contexts, how select suitable use given situation. Based review available specification potential contextual requirements, we propose unifying framework guide backgrounds can work together evaluate suitability co-creating pathways. evaluation method promises integration concepts approaches necessary address complexities problems at hand while ensuring robust methodologies based well-tested evidence negotiated among participants. Using two illustrative case studies, demonstrate explore choice varying contexts. insights gained inform creative pathway development through tailored combinations best serve specific context particular studies.

Language: Английский

Citations

50

Fit-for-purpose environmental modeling: Targeting the intersection of usability, reliability and feasibility DOI
Serena H. Hamilton, Carmel Pollino, Danial Stratford

et al.

Environmental Modelling & Software, Journal Year: 2021, Volume and Issue: 148, P. 105278 - 105278

Published: Dec. 11, 2021

Language: Английский

Citations

45

Eight Archetypes of Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) Synergies and Trade‐Offs DOI
Enayat A. Moallemi, Seyed Hossein Hosseini,

S. Eker

et al.

Earth s Future, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: 10(9)

Published: Aug. 31, 2022

Abstract Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) is contingent on managing complex interactions that create synergies and trade‐offs between different goals. It is, therefore, important to improve our understanding of them, their underlying causal drivers, future behaviors, policy implications. Prominent methods interaction analysis focus modeling or data‐driven statistical correlation are often insufficient for giving an integrated view drivers complexity. These also usually too technically heavily provide decision‐makers with simple practical tools easily actionable understandable results. Here, we introduce a flexible systemic approach, termed archetype analysis, generalizes number recurring patterns among SDGs unique We review eight archetypes as thinking aids analyze some trade‐offs, supported by several empirical examples related (e.g., poverty, food, well‐being, water, energy, housing, climate, land use) demonstrate how they can be operationalized in practice. The aimed help researchers policymakers diagnostic tool identify fundamental mechanisms barriers resistance SDG progress, comparative enhance knowledge transfer cases similar prospective design synergistic policies sustainable development.

Language: Английский

Citations

29

Geographic modeling and simulation systems for geographic research in the new era: Some thoughts on their development and construction DOI Creative Commons
Min Chen,

Guonian Lv,

Chenghu Zhou

et al.

Science China Earth Sciences, Journal Year: 2021, Volume and Issue: 64(8), P. 1207 - 1223

Published: June 29, 2021

Abstract Regionality, comprehensiveness, and complexity are regarded as the basic characteristics of geography. The exploration their core connotations is an essential way to achieve breakthroughs in geography new era. This paper focuses on important method geographic research: Geographic modeling simulation. First, we clarify research requirements said three its potential address geo-problems Then, supporting capabilities existing simulation systems for summarized from perspectives: Model resources, processes, operational architecture. Finally, discern avenues future study regional, comprehensive complex Based these analyses, propose implementation architecture discuss module composition functional realization, which could provide theoretical technical support better serve development

Language: Английский

Citations

34

Presenting a comprehensive multi-scale evaluation framework for participatory modelling programs: A scoping review DOI Creative Commons
Grace Yeeun Lee, Ian B. Hickie, Jo‐An Occhipinti

et al.

PLoS ONE, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: 17(4), P. e0266125 - e0266125

Published: April 22, 2022

Introduction Systems modelling and simulation can improve understanding of complex systems to support decision making, better managing system challenges. Advances in technology have facilitated accessibility by diverse stakeholders, allowing them engage with contribute the development models (participatory modelling). However, despite its increasing applications across a range disciplines, there is growing need evaluation efforts effectively report on quality, importance, value participatory modelling. This paper aims identify assess frameworks, criteria, and/or processes, as well synthesize findings into comprehensive multi-scale framework for programs. Materials methods A scoping review approach was utilized, which involved systematic literature search via Scopus consultation experts appraise records that described an framework, process context registered Open Science Framework. Results The identified 11 studies, varied purposes, terminologies, levels examination, time points. studies highlighted areas overlap opportunities further development, prompted programs disciplines methods. consists four categories ( Feasibility , Value Change/Action Sustainability ) 30 broken down project-, individual-, group- system-level impacts. Discussion & conclusion presented novel brings together significant knowledge base flexible, cross-sectoral effort considers whole process. Developed through rigorous synthesis multidisciplinary expertise from existing application provide opportunity understand practical future implications such aspects are particularly important policy decisions, community learning, ongoing improvement

Language: Английский

Citations

20