Oxford University Press eBooks,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: May 25, 2023
Abstract
How
does
governing
work
today?
society
(mis)handle
pressing
challenges
such
as
armed
violence,
cultural
difference,
ecological
degradation,
economic
restructuring,
geopolitical
shifts,
global
pandemics,
migration
flows,
and
technological
change
in
ways
that
are
democratic,
effective,
fair,
peaceful,
sustainable?
This
book
addresses
this
key
question
around
the
theme
of
‘polycentrism’:
i.e.
idea
contemporary
is
dispersed,
fluctuating,
messy,
elusive,
headless.
Chapters
develop
notion
polycentrism
from
a
broad
spectrum
academic
disciplines
theoretical
approaches.
Readers
thereby
obtain
full
coverage
exciting
new
thinking
about
how
today’s
world
(mis)ruled.
The
distinguishes
four
paradigms
knowledge
polycentric
governing—organizational,
legal,
relational,
structural—and
pursues
conversations
across
divides
normally
keep
these
approaches
separate
research
communities.
These
exceptional
inter-paradigm
exchanges
focus
especially
on
issues
techniques
(how
done),
power
(what
forces
drive
governing),
legitimacy
(whether
rightful).
Comparisons
between
multiple
perspectives
highlight,
help
to
clarify,
distinctive
emphases,
potentials,
limitations
each
approach.
In
addition,
combinations
diverse
theories
generate
promising
novel
avenues
thought
polycentrism.
Through
their
engagement
with
book,
readers
can
own
understandings
today
become
more
empowered
political
subjects.
Conservation Science and Practice,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
5(3)
Published: Jan. 29, 2023
Abstract
Conservation
research
and
practice
are
increasingly
engaging
with
people
drawing
on
social
sciences
to
improve
environmental
governance.
In
doing
so,
conservation
engages
power
in
many
ways,
often
implicitly.
scientists
practitioners
exercise
when
dealing
species,
the
environment,
they
trying
address
relations
ensure
effective
outcomes
(guiding
decision‐making,
understanding
conflict,
ensuring
just
policy
management
outcomes).
However,
engagement
is
limited
or
misguided.
To
challenges
associated
conservation,
we
introduce
four
dominant
approaches
analyzing
who
less
familiar
theories
of
power.
These
include
actor‐centered,
institutional,
structural,
and,
discursive/governmental
complement
these
more
common
framings
power,
also
discuss
further
approaches,
notably
non‐human
Indigenous
perspectives.
We
illustrate
how
operates
at
different
scales
contexts,
provide
six
guiding
principles
for
better
consideration
practice.
include:
(1)
considering
spaces
(2)
clarifying
underlying
values
assumptions
actions,
(3)
recognizing
conflicts
as
manifestations
dynamics,
(4)
wins
loses
(5)
accounting
participatory
schemes,
(6)
assessing
right
intervene
consequences
interventions.
hope
that
a
deeper
can
make
while
improving
transdisciplinary
Global Environmental Change,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
82, P. 102727 - 102727
Published: July 4, 2023
Decision-making
under
uncertainty
is
important
for
managing
human-natural
systems
in
a
changing
world.
A
major
source
of
linked
to
the
multi-actor
settings
decisions
with
poorly
understood
values,
complex
relationships,
and
conflicting
management
approaches.
Despite
general
agreement
across
disciplines
on
co-producing
knowledge
viable
inclusive
outcomes
context,
there
still
limited
conceptual
clarity
no
systematic
understanding
what
co-production
means
decision-making
how
it
can
be
approached.
Here,
we
use
content
analysis
clustering
systematically
analyse
50
cases
multiple
time
spatial
scales
26
countries
9
different
sectors
last
decade
serve
two
aims.
The
first
synthesise
key
recurring
strategies
that
underpin
high
quality
decision
many
diverse
features.
second
identify
deficits
opportunities
leverage
existing
towards
flourishing
support
decision-making.
We
find
four
emerge
centred
around:
promoting
innovation
robust
equitable
decisions;
broadening
span
interacting
systems;
fostering
social
learning
participation;
improving
pathways
impact.
Additionally,
five
areas
should
addressed
improve
are
identified
relation
to:
participation
diversity;
collaborative
action;
power
relationships;
governance
inclusivity;
transformative
change.
Characterising
emergent
their
improvement
help
guide
future
works
more
pluralistic
integrated
science
practice.
Sustainable Development,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
31(3), P. 1250 - 1267
Published: Jan. 9, 2023
Abstract
The
importance
of
governance
for
achieving
the
Sustainable
Development
Goals
(SDGs)
is
uncontested.
However,
design
effective
arrangements
to
initiate
and
deliver
necessary
transformations
complex,
multi‐scale,
multi‐actor
many
knowledge
gaps
remain.
For
would‐be
reformers,
a
fundamental
challenge
arises
because
all
transformative
efforts
must
proceed,
at
least
initially,
within
existing
which
can
be
highly
resistant
change.
While
there
rich
literature
on
transformations,
remains
fragmented.
In
this
paper,
we
first
review
highlight
important
scales
as
spatial,
jurisdictional,
sectoral
temporal.
We
common
challenges
that
may
arise
from
tensions
between
these
scales,
how
framings
choices
actors
accentuate
or
ameliorate
challenges.
To
further
illustrate,
selection
recent
case
studies
SDGs
solutions.
conclude
by
suggesting
five
concrete
steps
reformers
could
usefully
take
increase
likelihood
their
transformation
will
meet
with
success.
Oxford University Press eBooks,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: May 25, 2023
Abstract
How
does
governing
work
today?
society
(mis)handle
pressing
challenges
such
as
armed
violence,
cultural
difference,
ecological
degradation,
economic
restructuring,
geopolitical
shifts,
global
pandemics,
migration
flows,
and
technological
change
in
ways
that
are
democratic,
effective,
fair,
peaceful,
sustainable?
This
book
addresses
this
key
question
around
the
theme
of
‘polycentrism’:
i.e.
idea
contemporary
is
dispersed,
fluctuating,
messy,
elusive,
headless.
Chapters
develop
notion
polycentrism
from
a
broad
spectrum
academic
disciplines
theoretical
approaches.
Readers
thereby
obtain
full
coverage
exciting
new
thinking
about
how
today’s
world
(mis)ruled.
The
distinguishes
four
paradigms
knowledge
polycentric
governing—organizational,
legal,
relational,
structural—and
pursues
conversations
across
divides
normally
keep
these
approaches
separate
research
communities.
These
exceptional
inter-paradigm
exchanges
focus
especially
on
issues
techniques
(how
done),
power
(what
forces
drive
governing),
legitimacy
(whether
rightful).
Comparisons
between
multiple
perspectives
highlight,
help
to
clarify,
distinctive
emphases,
potentials,
limitations
each
approach.
In
addition,
combinations
diverse
theories
generate
promising
novel
avenues
thought
polycentrism.
Through
their
engagement
with
book,
readers
can
own
understandings
today
become
more
empowered
political
subjects.