In Vitro Effect of Mouthrinses on the Microhardness of Three Different Nanohybrid Composite Resins DOI Creative Commons
Jhonn Luis Bernaldo-Faustino, Julissa Amparo Dulanto-Vargas, Kilder Maynor Carranza-Samanez

et al.

International Journal of Dentistry, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 2023, P. 1 - 8

Published: Nov. 7, 2023

Introduction. Daily use of different mouthrinses at home or in the dental office can alter properties resin hardness. The present study aimed to compare Vickers microhardness (VHN) vitro nanohybrid composite resins (NCRs) immersed mouthrinses. Materials and Methods. In total, 120 discs (10 ⨯ 2 mm) were prepared from three NCR shade A2 (n = 40/group) with FiltekTM Z350 XT (Z350XT), Tetric EvoCeram (TEC), Polofil NHT (PNHT). specimens incubated artificial saliva (37°C 24 hr). Specimens distributed into four 10/group) (control), chlorhexidine (CHX 0.12%, pH 5.6), cetylpyridine chloride (CPC 0.075%, 5.84), CHX 0.12% + CPC 0.05% (pH 6.2) (2 times/day, 2’ 12 VHN (300 gf/10”) was measured after hr, 14, 21 days. Data analyzed by three-way analysis variance, followed post hoc Tukey 0.05 level significance. Results. results revealed a global effect interaction time between NRC evaluated ( P = 0.001 ). Baseline PNHT Z350XT higher than TEC. Within each group NCR, > other (PNHT/14 days; Z350XT/21 days), >CPC (Z350XT/14 days). mouthrinses-intragroups, decreased 14 days (CHX, CPC) maintained over CPC). VHN-TEC similar among groups. Conclusion. Microhardness showed differences due type composition mouthrinses, time. more affected lower filler content pH.

Language: Английский

Effects of different antiviral mouthwashes on the surface roughness, hardness, and color stability of composite CAD/CAM materials DOI Creative Commons
Ahmet Hazar, Ecehan Hazar

Journal of Applied Biomaterials & Functional Materials, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 22

Published: Jan. 1, 2024

Objective: To evaluate the effect of COVID-19 preventive mouthwashes on surface hardness, roughness (Ra), and color change (ΔE) three different polymer-based composite CAD/CAM materials (Vita Enamic (ENA), Grandio Block (GB), Lava Ultimate (LU)). Methods: A total 100 rectangular-shaped specimens with dimensions 2 mm × 7 12 were obtained by sectioning blocks randomly divided into five subgroups according to 30 days mouthwash immersion protocol as follows: Control: artificial saliva, PVP-I: 1% povidone-iodine, HP: 1.5% hydrogen peroxide, CPC: containing 0.075% cetylpyridinium chloride, EO: essential oils. Microhardness, Ra, ΔE values measured at baseline after protocols. Data analyzed using Wald Chi-square, two-way ANOVA, post hoc Tukey tests. Results: The independent factors (materials solutions) significantly influenced microhardness ( p < 0.001). Ra was not affected any > 0.05). each material varied in PvP-I HP highest percentage microhardness, found LU immersed mouthwashes, while lowest ENA groups Conclusion: Within limitations this study, it that hardness tested are susceptible degradation mouthwashes.

Language: Английский

Citations

2
Effect of Anti-COVID-19 Mouthwashes on Shear Bond Strength of Resin-Matrix Ceramics Repaired with Resin Composite Using Universal Adhesive: An In Vitro Study DOI Creative Commons

Wichuda Limsiriwong,

Awiruth Klaisiri, Nantawan Krajangta

et al.

Journal of Functional Biomaterials, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 14(3), P. 158 - 158

Published: March 16, 2023

Using anti-COVID-19 mouthwashes has become necessary to reduce acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) transmissions. Resin-matrix ceramic (RMCs) materials that are exposed may affect the bonding of repaired materials. This research was performed assess effects on shear bond strengths (SBS) RMCs with resin composites. A total 189 rectangular specimens two different (Vita Enamic (VE) and Shofu Block HC (ShB)) were thermocycled randomly divided into nine subgroups according (distilled water (DW), 0.2% povidone-iodine (PVP-I), 1.5% hydrogen peroxide (HP)) surface treatment protocols (no treatment, hydrofluoric acid etching (HF), sandblasting (SB)). repair protocol for (using universal adhesives composites), assessed using an SBS test. The failure mode examined a stereomicroscope. data evaluated three-way ANOVA Tukey post hoc significantly affected by RMCs, mouthwashes, protocols. Both (HF SB) both whether immersed in mouthwash or not, improved SBS. For VE HP PVP-I, HF had highest ShB SB

Language: Английский

Citations

5
Effect of Antiseptic Mouthwashes on the Microtensile Bond Strength of Self-Etch Adhesives to Dentin: Rinsing Versus Non-Rising with Water DOI

Nichaya Songwathana,

Salunya Tancharoen,

Piyapanna Pumpaluk

et al.

Published: Jan. 1, 2024

Language: Английский

Citations

0
Influence of three antiseptic mouthwashes on microtensile bond strength of self-etch adhesive to dentin: rinsing versus non-rinsing with water DOI Creative Commons

Nichaya Songwathana,

Salunya Tancharoen,

Piyapanna Pumpaluk

et al.

Heliyon, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 10(23), P. e40867 - e40867

Published: Dec. 1, 2024

Language: Английский

Citations

0
Mouthwashes: Surface Hardness and Accuracy of Dual-cured Visible Light-Cured Composite DOI Creative Commons
Saja Ali Muhsin,

Ihab Nafea Yaseen

Tikrit Journal for Dental Sciences, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 11(2), P. 285 - 294

Published: Jan. 10, 2024

In the oral environment, longevity and durability of aesthetic composite resin restorative materials are critical considerations. However, many studies have been done on effect certain mouthwashes surface hardness accuracy resin. Therefore, this study aims to examine GUM® alcohol-free Listerine alcohol-contained dimensional cured dual-cured visible light-cured composite.Methods: Thirty-disc specimens Nanohybrid were prepared according ISO standardization (4049/2000). The sample was divided into three groups (n=10), Control non-treated in distilled water; Alcohol-free Alcohol-contained mouthwashes. measured at different immersion intervals. These include initial immersion, after one four weeks, light dual-curing procedure. Data analyzed via one-way ANOVA (post-hoc Tukey test) performed a significant P-value (p ≤.05) confidence level 95%.Conclusion: After process, mouthwash showed reduction material. had static specimen diameters.

Language: Английский

Citations

0
Comparison of Surface Roughness of Nanohybrid Composite Resin Immersed in Various Mouthwashes DOI Creative Commons

Rina Permatasari,

Kianti Islamiah

Interdental Jurnal Kedokteran Gigi (IJKG), Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 20(2), P. 267 - 273

Published: Aug. 1, 2024

Introduction: Surface roughness is a contributing factor to the accumulation of plaque and development secondary caries, also can determine aesthetic long-term durability dental restoration materials, such as nanohybrid composite resin. The use mouthwash one factors that cause surface Material Methods: research method used was laboratory experimental with pre-test post-test design. Thirty samples resin were randomly divided into three treatment groups (n=10) according types (alcohol-containing, alcohol-free, herbal), then immersed for 36 hours. measurements performed tester before after treatment. Results Discussions: One-way ANOVA statistical analysis showed significant difference (p<0,05) in all groups. Conclusion: highest found alcohol-containing mouthwash, followed by alcohol-free herbal mouthwash.

Language: Английский

Citations

0
In Vitro Effect of Mouthrinses on the Microhardness of Three Different Nanohybrid Composite Resins DOI Creative Commons
Jhonn Luis Bernaldo-Faustino, Julissa Amparo Dulanto-Vargas, Kilder Maynor Carranza-Samanez

et al.

International Journal of Dentistry, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 2023, P. 1 - 8

Published: Nov. 7, 2023

Introduction. Daily use of different mouthrinses at home or in the dental office can alter properties resin hardness. The present study aimed to compare Vickers microhardness (VHN) vitro nanohybrid composite resins (NCRs) immersed mouthrinses. Materials and Methods. In total, 120 discs (10 ⨯ 2 mm) were prepared from three NCR shade A2 (n = 40/group) with FiltekTM Z350 XT (Z350XT), Tetric EvoCeram (TEC), Polofil NHT (PNHT). specimens incubated artificial saliva (37°C 24 hr). Specimens distributed into four 10/group) (control), chlorhexidine (CHX 0.12%, pH 5.6), cetylpyridine chloride (CPC 0.075%, 5.84), CHX 0.12% + CPC 0.05% (pH 6.2) (2 times/day, 2’ 12 VHN (300 gf/10”) was measured after hr, 14, 21 days. Data analyzed by three-way analysis variance, followed post hoc Tukey 0.05 level significance. Results. results revealed a global effect interaction time between NRC evaluated ( P = 0.001 ). Baseline PNHT Z350XT higher than TEC. Within each group NCR, > other (PNHT/14 days; Z350XT/21 days), >CPC (Z350XT/14 days). mouthrinses-intragroups, decreased 14 days (CHX, CPC) maintained over CPC). VHN-TEC similar among groups. Conclusion. Microhardness showed differences due type composition mouthrinses, time. more affected lower filler content pH.

Language: Английский

Citations

0