
International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 105069 - 105069
Published: Dec. 1, 2024
Language: Английский
International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 105069 - 105069
Published: Dec. 1, 2024
Language: Английский
Building and Environment, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 263, P. 111898 - 111898
Published: July 29, 2024
Language: Английский
Citations
12Habitat International, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 153, P. 103187 - 103187
Published: Sept. 27, 2024
Language: Английский
Citations
9International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 105246 - 105246
Published: Jan. 1, 2025
Language: Английский
Citations
1Natural Hazards, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown
Published: March 6, 2025
Language: Английский
Citations
1International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 108, P. 104552 - 104552
Published: May 10, 2024
Language: Английский
Citations
6Sustainability, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 16(12), P. 5076 - 5076
Published: June 14, 2024
Despite the increasing number of flood studies, interrelationships between urban form indices (UFIs) and resilience (FR) have received little attention hold miscellaneous perspectives. Consequentially, this study identifies how UFIs at various spatial scales affect FR by synthesizing article findings proposing insights for future research. Scientometric analysis has been used to analyze gathered peer-reviewed articles from nine research engines without time restrictions. One hundred eighteen relevant were included thoroughly investigated using Preferred Reporting Items Systematic Reviews Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) protocol. Our indicate that divergent dialectical perspectives about efficacy are due multiple disciplines, methodologies, different case contexts. The studies classified according scale as macro (citywide), meso (districts), micro (block), multi-scalar 80.5%, 6.8%, 10.2%, 2.4%, respectively. Furthermore, categorized based on type into realistic literature reviews, modeling, hybrid analysis, with 74.6%, 7.6%, 14.4%, 3.4%, At macroscale, city density distribution degree most significant effect FR. same time, mixed uses, connectivity, coverage ratio, block arrangements, street characteristics scales. Further trade-offs commonality UFIs, FR, overall required shape climate-adaptive, sustainable communities.
Language: Английский
Citations
4Ecological Indicators, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 173, P. 113335 - 113335
Published: March 22, 2025
Language: Английский
Citations
0BMJ Global Health, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 10(4), P. e016963 - e016963
Published: April 1, 2025
There is recognition of the importance community resilience in mitigating long-term effects health emergencies on communities. To guide policy and practice, conceptual clarity needed what involves how it can be operationalised for protection ways that empower strengthen local agency. identify core components to using a scoping review methodology. PubMed, EMCARE, Scopus, Web Science, PTSDpubs, APO ProQuest Dissertations were systematically searched studies published from 2014. Studies included if they reported original research papers investigating context emergency. Data extracted specially developed data extraction form. Qualitative subjected meta-synthesis consisting three levels analysis. 38 evidence reviews included. Analysis identified recurring characteristics resilience. Six 10 abilities required including: adapt, transform, absorb, anticipate, prepare, prevent, self-organise, include, connect cope. 25 11 types resources: social, economic, environmental, governance, physical infrastructure, institutional, communication, human capital, health, emergency management socioeconomic. 21 have been used as basis operationalising measuring In contexts disaster management, fairly mature concept reflects community's inherent capacity/abilities withstand recover shocks. need incorporate 'resource' perspective speaks wider enabling environment. scope investigate whether same set here has relevance public emanating disease or acts aggression articulate logics critical endpoints management.
Language: Английский
Citations
0International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 105540 - 105540
Published: May 1, 2025
Language: Английский
Citations
0Risk Analysis, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: unknown
Published: Dec. 6, 2024
Abstract Community resilience measurement to natural hazards is becoming increasingly relevant due the growth of federal programs and local state offices in United States. This study introduces a methodology co‐produce an actionable metric measure locally modifiable indicators community for South Carolina. The “actionable” metrics, based on Baseline Resilience Indicators Communities (BRIC) index, are calculated at county tract scale then compared “conventional” versions BRIC. Actionable BRICs perform better reliability testing than conventional BRICs. Correlations across two scales BRIC construction show stronger relationship between conventional, though all highly correlated. When mapped, shows shifted region low when BRIC, suggesting that distinct. Scale differences dissimilar drivers resilience, with county‐level driven by community, social, environmental tract‐level social institutional resilience. appears be best representation Carolina, but it comes trade‐offs, including calculation complexity changing geographies over time. Regardless scale, resulting indices offer useful tracking mechanism office highlight importance integrating top‐down bottom‐up perspectives consider can replicated other states localities produce metrics.
Language: Английский
Citations
3