Studies in neuroscience, psychology and behavioral economics, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 87 - 108
Published: Dec. 18, 2024
Language: Английский
Studies in neuroscience, psychology and behavioral economics, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 87 - 108
Published: Dec. 18, 2024
Language: Английский
International Journal of Telemedicine and Applications, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 2023, P. 1 - 24
Published: April 30, 2023
The significance of deep learning techniques in relation to steady-state visually evoked potential- (SSVEP-) based brain-computer interface (BCI) applications is assessed through a systematic review. Three reliable databases, PubMed, ScienceDirect, and IEEE, were considered gather relevant scientific theoretical articles. Initially, 125 papers found between 2010 2021 related this integrated research field. After the filtering process, only 30 articles identified classified into five categories on their type methods. first category, convolutional neural network (CNN), accounts for 70% (n = 21/30). second recurrent (RNN), 10% 3/30). third fourth categories, (DNN) long short-term memory (LSTM), account 6% 30). fifth restricted Boltzmann machine (RBM), 3% 1/30). literature's findings terms main aspects existing pattern recognition SSVEP-based BCI, such as feature extraction, classification, activation functions, validation methods, achieved classification accuracies, are examined. A comprehensive mapping analysis was also conducted, which six categories. Current challenges ensuring trustworthy BCI discussed, recommendations provided researchers developers. study critically reviews current unsolved issues development selection multicriteria decision-making (MCDM). trust proposal solution presented with three methodology phases evaluating benchmarking using fuzzy techniques. Valuable insights developers provided.
Language: Английский
Citations
29Neural Computing and Applications, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 36(17), P. 10355 - 10378
Published: March 16, 2024
Language: Английский
Citations
11Artificial Intelligence Review, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 56(S1), P. 53 - 117
Published: June 21, 2023
Language: Английский
Citations
21Applied Data Science and Analysis, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 16 - 41
Published: March 15, 2023
Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is a complex neurodevelopmental disorder that requires careful assessment and management. The prioritization of ASD patients involves navigating through complexities such as conflicts, trade-offs, the importance different criteria. Therefore, this study focuses on prioritizing with in healthcare setting an evaluation benchmarking framework. aim to develop framework utilizes Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods assist professionals patients, particularly those moderate injury levels. methodology outlines several phases, including dataset identification, development decision matrix, weighting 19 criteria using FWZIC method, ranking 432 VIKOR evaluating proposed four sensitivity analysis scenarios. Among criteria, criterion 'verbal communication' obtained highest weight. Additionally, 'laughing for no reason', 'nodding', 'patient movement at home', 'pointing index finger' similar higher weights, indicating their potential impact patients. experimental results highlight significance adjusting weights influencing final rankings method. This emphasizes need consideration when assigning ensure accurate prioritization. Moreover, provides valuable insights into improving care support provided individuals autism Iraq. findings contribute existing body knowledge field pave way future research interventions aimed enhancing quality
Language: Английский
Citations
21Complex & Intelligent Systems, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 10(5), P. 6159 - 6188
Published: June 4, 2024
Abstract This study delves into the complex prioritization process for Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), focusing on triaged patients at three urgency levels. Establishing a dynamic solution is challenging resolving conflicts or trade-offs among ASD criteria. research employs fuzzy multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) theory across four methodological phases. In first phase, identifies dataset, considering 19 critical medical and sociodemographic criteria The second phase introduces new Decision Matrix (DM) designed to manage effectively. third focuses extension of Fuzzy-Weighted Zero-Inconsistency (FWZIC) construct weights using Single-Valued Neutrosophic 2-tuple Linguistic (SVN2TL). fourth formulates Multi-Attributive Border Approximation Area Comparison (MABAC) method rank within each level. Results from SVN2TL-FWZIC offer significant insights, including higher values "C12 = Laughing no reason" "C16 Notice sound bell" with 0.097358 0.083832, indicating their significance in identifying potential symptoms. base prioritizing triage levels MABAC, encompassing behavioral dimensions. methodology undergoes rigorous evaluation through sensitivity analysis scenarios, confirming consistency results points. compares benchmark studies, distinct points, achieves remarkable 100% congruence these prior investigations. implications this are far-reaching, offering valuable guide clinical psychologists cases patients.
Language: Английский
Citations
5International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 17(1)
Published: June 17, 2024
Abstract In the context of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) triage, robustness machine learning (ML) models is a paramount concern. Ensuring ML faces issues such as model selection, criterion importance, trade-offs, and conflicts in evaluation benchmarking models. Furthermore, development must contend with two real-time scenarios: normal tests adversarial attack cases. This study addresses this challenge by integrating three key phases that bridge domains fuzzy multicriteria decision-making (MCDM). First, utilized dataset comprises authentic information, encompassing 19 medical sociodemographic features from 1296 autistic patients who received diagnoses via intelligent triage method. These were categorized into one labels: urgent, moderate, or minor. We employ principal component analysis (PCA) algorithms to fuse large number features. Second, fused forms basis for rigorously testing eight models, considering scenarios, evaluating classifier performance using nine metrics. The third phase developed robust framework encompasses creation decision matrix (DM) 2-tuple linguistic Fermatean opinion score method (2TLFFDOSM) multiple-ML perspectives, accomplished through individual external group aggregation ranks. Our findings highlight effectiveness PCA algorithms, yielding 12 components acceptable variance. ranking, logistic regression (LR) emerged top-performing terms 2TLFFDOSM (1.3370). A comparative five benchmark studies demonstrated superior our across all six checklist comparison points.
Language: Английский
Citations
5Applied Data Science and Analysis, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 1 - 15
Published: Feb. 23, 2023
Myopia, a prevalent vision disorder with potential complications if untreated, requires early and accurate detection for effective treatment. However, traditional diagnostic methods often lack trustworthiness explainability, leading to biases mistrust. This study presents four-phase methodology develop robust myopia system. In the initial phase, dataset containing training testing images is located, preprocessed, balanced. Subsequently, two models are deployed: pre-trained VGG16 model renowned image classification tasks, sequential CNN convolution layers. Performance evaluation metrics such as accuracy, recall, F1-Score, sensitivity, logloss utilized assess models' effectiveness. The third phase integrates trustworthiness, transparency through application of Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) techniques. Specifically, Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations (LIME) employed provide insights into decision-making process deep learning model, offering explanations myopic or normal. final user interface implemented XAI bringing together aforementioned phases. outcomes this contribute advancement objective explainable in field detection. Notably, achieves an impressive accuracy 96%, highlighting its efficacy diagnosing myopia. LIME results valuable interpretations cases. proposed enhances transparency, interpretability, trust process.
Language: Английский
Citations
13IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 70(7), P. 3892 - 3898
Published: June 8, 2023
This
article
presents
a
fuzzy
simple
additive
weighting
multi-objective
micro-genetic
algorithm
(FSAW-MO-MGA)
for
high-power
microwave
(HPM)
sources
optimization.
The
FSAW-MO-MGA
and
single-objective
genetic
are
independently
used
to
optimize
the
same
Language: Английский
Citations
11International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 26(1), P. 274 - 303
Published: Nov. 17, 2023
Language: Английский
Citations
11Energy Strategy Reviews, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 51, P. 101251 - 101251
Published: Nov. 27, 2023
Energy Systems Integration (ESI) involves coordinating and planning energy systems to provide reliable affordable services while minimizing environmental harm. It optimizes interactions among different sources achieve sustainability goals promotes efficient resource usage. However, evaluating benchmarking ESI frameworks select the most suitable transparent ones is a complex Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) problem. This complexity arises from trade-offs, conflicts, importance considerations of six evaluation characteristics: Multidimensional, Multivectoral, Systemic, Futuristic, Systematic, Applied. Hence, this study aims address by integrating Fuzzy-Weighted Zero-Inconsistency (FWZIC) Multi-Attributive Border Approximation Area Comparison (MABAC). The proposed methodology consists two phases. Firstly, development Dynamic Decision Matrix (DDM) handle 26 as alternatives characteristics criteria. Secondly, integration mathematical processes formulated based on FWZIC-MABAC methods. Using FWZIC technique, criteria were weighted preferences twelve experts. ESI-C2 (Multivectoral) ESI-C1 (Multidimensional) received highest weights 0.195 0.190, respectively, ESI-C5 (Systematic) criterion lowest weight 0.110. remaining criteria, namely ESI-C3 (Systemic), ESI-C6 (Applied), ESI-C4 (Futuristic) obtained 0.189, 0.168, 0.147, respectively. MABAC results showed that A11 (Energy Security) A15 Security under decarbonization) ranked first with score value 0.28081 for both. Conversely, A19 (EJM) had −0.17022. systematic rank sensitivity analysis assessments conducted verify efficiency methodology. We benchmarked against three other benchmark studies achieved 100 % across key perspectives. offers valuable support in making informed sustainable decisions sector.
Language: Английский
Citations
11