Societal
challenges
put
public
mental
health
at
risk
and
result
in
a
growing
interest
resilience
as
trajectories
of
good
during
stressor
exposure.
Resilience
factors
increase
the
likelihood
resilient
responses.
This
systematic
review
summarizes
evidence
on
predictive
value
individual,
social
societal
factors.
Fifty-one
studies
reported
various
stressors
(e.g.,
pandemics).
Higher
income
socioeconomic
status,
better
emotion
regulation
flexibility
were
related
to
Findings
mixed
for
most
supporting
importance
fit
between
situational
demands.
Research
into
is
needed.
PLoS ONE,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
19(5), P. e0302141 - e0302141
Published: May 13, 2024
A
recent
meta-analysis
claimed
decreasing
prospective
effects
of
acting
with
awareness
and
non-reacting,
two
facets
dispositional
mindfulness,
on
subsequent
anxiety
depressive
symptoms.
However,
the
meta-analytic
cross-lagged
were
estimated
while
adjusting
for
a
prior
measurement
outcome
variable
it
is
known
that
such
adjusted
may
be
spurious
due
to
correlations
residuals
regression
mean.
We
fitted
competing
models
simulations
same
data
found
mindfulness
symptoms
probably
spurious.
It
important
researchers
aware
limitations
effects,
meta-analytically
or
not,
in
order
not
overinterpret
findings.
PLoS ONE,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
19(2), P. e0298158 - e0298158
Published: Feb. 13, 2024
A
recent
meta-analysis,
of
38
studies
with
data
from
43
independent
samples
(total
N
=
24,668),
claimed
evidence
for
positive
reciprocal
prospective
effects,
and
hence
both
top-down
bottom-up
processes,
between
general
domain-specific
self-esteem.
However,
the
meta-analytic
cross-lagged
effects
were
estimated
while
adjusting
a
prior
measurement
outcome
variable
it
is
known
that
such
adjusted
may
be
spurious
due
to
correlations
residuals
regression
mean.
In
present
reanalyses,
we
found
all
spurious.
Consequently,
claims
about
increasing
processes
self-esteem
can
questioned.
It
important
researchers
aware
limitations
panel
analyses,
analyses
correlational
in
general,
order
not
overinterpret
findings.
Objective:
To
show
which
adjusted
cross-lagged
and
concurrent
effects
to
expect
from
panel
models
in
the
case
of
true
causal
increasing
decreasing
effects.Design:
Full
factorial
prospective
situ
experimental
study.Setting:
The
first
author’s
kitchen.Participants:
Twenty
plastic
cups.Main
outcome
measures:
Total
weight
(i.e.
including
their
content)
cups
before
after
adding
or
removing
water
to/from
them.
Results:
We
found
amount
added
have:
(1)
A
positive
effect
on
subsequent
total
when
adjusting
for
initial
weight;
(2)
negative
(3)
-
difference
cups.
Removing
filled
with
had
opposite
effects.Conclusions:
same
combination
signs
as
should
be
expected
between
studied
constructs
all
areas
research,
such
psychology.
Estimation
three
these
effects,
instead
only
one,
allows
stronger
inference
about
causality
is
recommended
order
triangulate
scrutinize
findings
models.
SAGE Open,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
14(4)
Published: Oct. 1, 2024
A
recent
meta-analysis
claimed
to
provide
evidence
that
academic
self-concept
and
achievement
have
reciprocal
prospective
effects
on
each
other
(reciprocal
model).
However,
were
estimated
while
adjusting
for
a
prior
measurement
of
the
outcome,
this
method
is
susceptible
spurious
findings
due
correlations
with
residuals
regression
mean.
Here
we
re-analyze
meta-analytic
show
different
plausible
models
can
support
opposing
claims:
either
had
an
increasing
or
decreasing
effect
achievement,
vice
versa.
Consequently,
claims
beyond
positive
cross-sectional
correlation
between
including
model,
be
questioned.
The
validated
by
analyses
simulated
data,
which
indicated
true
not
necessary
observed
associations.
We
further
propose
extended
skill
development
model
(ESDM)
as
more
parsimonious
alternative
model.
Frontiers in Psychology,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
16
Published: Feb. 7, 2025
In
a
recent
meta-analysis,
Krauss
et
al.
found
support
for
reciprocal
model
of
low
self-esteem
and
eating
disorders
where,
in
vicious
circle,
makes
people
more
vulnerable
to
developing
disorders,
turn,
scars
individuals'
self-esteem.
However,
the
present
reanalyses
same
meta-analytic
data,
we
that
prospective
effects
between
are
likely
spurious,
meaning
they
do
not
reflect
true
causal
effect,
but
rather
correlations
with
residuals
regression
mean.
Consequently,
claims
by
can
be
challenged.
To
avoid
statistical
artifacts,
recommend
researchers
fit,
as
did
study,
complementary
models
their
data
order
evaluate
if
may
genuinely
increasing
or
decreasing
appear
spurious.
Heliyon,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
9(11), P. e21458 - e21458
Published: Oct. 24, 2023
In
a
recent
meta-analysis,
Giletta
et
al.
(2021)
[1]
found
positive
effect
of
peers'
behavior
at
time
1
on
target
youths'
2
while
adjusting
for
and
claimed
to
have
quantified
peer
influence.
However,
it
is
established
that
controlled
cross-lagged
effects
could
be
due
correlations
with
measurement
errors
reversion
in
the
direction
mean
rather
than
true
decreasing
or
increasing
effects.
Here,
reanalysis
same
meta-analytic
data
as
used
by
al.,
we
influence,
operationalized
may
been
distorted
(i.e.
spurious).
We
do
not
claim
influence
does
exist,
but
hard,
maybe
even
possible,
prove
analyses
observational
exist.
Difficulties
causal
common
all
areas
research
specific
European Journal of Personality,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
38(3), P. 534 - 543
Published: Aug. 28, 2023
A
recent
meta-analysis
found
reciprocal
prospective
effects
between
self-esteem
and
some
aspects
of
work
experience,
for
example,
job
satisfaction,
the
authors
concluded
that
their
findings
were
consistent
with
a
causal
model,
where
affects,
is
affected
by,
experiences.
However,
estimated
while
adjusting
prior
measure
outcome
variable,
it
known
such
adjusted
cross-lagged
may
be
spurious
due
to
correlation
predictor
residuals
in
initial
measurement
regression
mean.
The
present
reanalyses
same
meta-analytic
data
all
experiences
spurious.
It
important
researchers
aware
limitations
order
not
overinterpret
findings.
Behavioral Sciences,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
14(4), P. 284 - 284
Published: March 29, 2024
Although
the
association
between
post-traumatic
stress
disorder
(PTSD)
and
social
support
is
well
documented,
few
studies
have
tested
causal
pathways
explaining
this
at
several
points
in
acute
post-trauma
recovery
period
or
examined
whether
varies
for
different
sources
of
support.
To
address
these
gaps,
151
community
individuals
(mean
age
=
37.20
years,
69.5%
women)
exposed
to
trauma
within
previous
6
months
were
recruited
complete
measures
PTSD
from
intimate
partners,
friends,
relatives
four
times
1
year.
In
line
with
recent
recommendations
research
on
symptoms,
random
intercept
cross-lagged
panel
modeling
(RI-CLPM)
was
used
examine
dynamic
changes
severity
over
time.
The
pattern
RI-CLPM
coefficients
indicated
that
positive
deviations
one’s
expected
stable
level
total
(across
all
sources)
sped
up
symptoms
end
year,
more
severe
than
based
started
eroding
midway
through
assessment
When
specific
analyzed
separately,
within-person
increases
friends
any
given
time
point
accelerated
across
entire
Among
participants
partners
(n
53),
partner
did
not
predict
but
predicted
less
following
point.
Results
longitudinal
study
provide
additional
bidirectional
relationship
suggest
perceived
may
be
especially
helpful
during
recovery.
Studies
using
cross-lagged
panel
models
(CLPM)
have
shown
prospective
effects
of
initial
scores
on
various
predictors,
e.g.,
job
control
and
depressive
symptoms,
subsequent
work
engagement
when
adjusting
for
engagement.
However,
it
is
well
established
that
may
be
spurious
due
to
correlations
with
residuals
regression
the
mean.
Here,
we
reanalyzed
data
simulated
resemble
in
twelve
studies
CLPM,
suggesting
increasing/decreasing
Through
triangulation,
show
all
these
suggested
appear
been
rather
than
truly
increasing/decreasing.
Researchers
need
aware
correlations,
including
models,
do
not
prove
causality.
For
improved
causal
inference,
recommend
researchers
triangulate
scrutinize
by
fitting
complementary
their
data.