Catalytic co-gasification optimization of biomass and polyethylene wastes in oxygen-rich environments DOI

Wei-Hsin Chen,

Jamin Escalante, Xuan Liu

et al.

Fuel, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 381, P. 133214 - 133214

Published: Sept. 25, 2024

Language: Английский

Synergetic effect of heating rate, temperature, and residence time of modified agro-industrial waste biochars on phosphate adsorption DOI
Amanda Ribeiro da Rocha, Frederico Luis Felipe Soares, Antônio S. Mangrich

et al.

International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 22(6), P. 4203 - 4214

Published: July 12, 2024

Language: Английский

Citations

1
Remediation of Alizarin Yellow GG from aqueous sources by Quasi-UiO-66; Box-Bencken design optimization and adsorption cherctization DOI

Pegah-Sadat Ghaemmaghami,

Javad Zolgharnein,

Mohmmad Yaser Masoomi

et al.

Inorganic Chemistry Communications, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 168, P. 112881 - 112881

Published: July 21, 2024

Language: Английский

Citations

1
Enhancing Sustainability of Water‐Emulsified Diesel–Hydrogen Carrier Biogas as Fuel in Dual‐Fuel Engines through the Parametric Optimization DOI Creative Commons
Bhaskor Jyoti Bora, Prabhakar Sharma, Mansoor Alruqi

et al.

International Journal of Energy Research, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 2024(1)

Published: Jan. 1, 2024

This study investigates the usage of biodiesel‐based emulsified fuel as pilot and waste‐derived biogas prime to run dual‐fuel engines at varying compression ratios (17, 17.5, 18), injection timing (23°, 26°, 29°, 32° BTDCs), engine loads (20%, 40%, 60% 80%, 100%). Mahua biodiesel, surfactants, water were used produce two‐phase stable emulsification. The findings showed that using combined ratio 18 advanced time 29° BTDC increased performance lowered emissions. Additionally, response surface methodology with variance analysis was create prediction models for all outputs a robust R 2 value (0.8927–0.9974). operation optimized employing desirability approach be 85.3% load, 18, BTDC. At optimal settings, anticipated 17.46% brake thermal efficiency, 318.5°C exhaust gas temperature, 76.1% liquid replacement, 45.3 bar peak in‐cylinder pressure, 3.97 vol.% carbon dioxide, 137.43 ppm monoxide, 132 hydrocarbon, 42 oxides nitrogen. lab‐based testing found results well within 7.14% projected values these operating parameters.

Language: Английский

Citations

1
Co-gasification of waste biomass-low grade coal mix using downdraft gasifier coupled with dual-fuel engine system: Multi-objective optimization with hybrid approach using RSM and Grey Wolf Optimizer DOI
Thanh Tuan Le, Prabhakar Sharma, Bhaskor Jyoti Bora

et al.

Process Safety and Environmental Protection, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 191, P. 234 - 248

Published: Aug. 23, 2024

Language: Английский

Citations

1
Catalytic co-gasification optimization of biomass and polyethylene wastes in oxygen-rich environments DOI

Wei-Hsin Chen,

Jamin Escalante, Xuan Liu

et al.

Fuel, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 381, P. 133214 - 133214

Published: Sept. 25, 2024

Language: Английский

Citations

1