Dynamic Navigation in Dental Implantology DOI Open Access
Lata Goyal, Hariram Sankar, Meghna Dewan

et al.

Discoveries, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 11(4), P. e178 - e178

Published: Dec. 31, 2023

Implant placement for dental rehabilitation has gained more popularity among patients in the recent past. Dental Implants are workhorse of dentistry. Previously, implants were placed with help traditional freehand approach. Even though conventional technique was successful, it his own shortcomings. Various methods have been introduced, like stent -guided implant and navigation guided placement, that enhance precision position. The three different placing approach, static dynamic navigation. Among these approaches, system is a promising technology being used successfully various other fields well known its accuracy. It gives an advantage to clinician by providing real-time three-dimensional position better clinical patient related treatment outcomes. This review summarizes literature evidence available on navigation, potential application, advantages, disadvantages future directions.

Language: Английский

Comparison of tooth substance loss and angle deviation in access cavity preparation using guided endodontics and conventional method in calcified canals – An in vitro study DOI Creative Commons

Rajinder Bansal,

Manu Bansal,

Reeshu Garg

et al.

Journal of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 28(1), P. 90 - 95

Published: Jan. 1, 2025

Abstract Aims: This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of access cavity preparation using guided endodontics (GE) and conventional technique (CT) in calcified canals. Subjects Methods: Twenty teeth with calcification up middle third were collected after scanning through RadioVisioGraphy (RVG). Preoperative cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan was done samples randomly divided into two groups ten each on basis method preparation. Group 1: Access prepared by CT, 2: GE. 3D template corresponding guide drill made for group 2 performing optical surface scans. After preparation, postoperative CBCT performed all samples. The amount tooth structure loss angle deviation calculated Sidexis Software. Statistical Analysis Used: data analyzed IBM SPSS Statistics, version 22. A t-test compared between groups, a one-way ANOVA multiple directions both (P < 0.001). Results: Our found that mean volume (17.19 mm 3 ± 06.11 standard [SD]) (4.82° ±01.66 SD) GE significantly less 0.001) as (38.85 19.07 (13.16° ±2.34 CT. Conclusion: is more accurate conservative than CT management

Language: Английский

Citations

1

Artificial intelligence and mixed reality for dental implant planning: A technical note DOI
Francesco Mangano,

Kyung Ran Yang,

Henriette Lerner

et al.

Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 26(5), P. 942 - 953

Published: June 28, 2024

Abstract Aim The aim of this work is to present a new protocol for implant surgical planning which involves the combined use artificial intelligence (AI) and mixed reality (MR). Methods This acquisition three‐dimensional (3D) patient data through intraoral scanning (IOS) cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). These are loaded into AI software automatically segments aligns patient's 3D models. models MR used surgery holography. files then exported design guides via open‐source software, printed prepare sites static computer‐assisted (s‐CAIS). case finalized prosthetically fully digital protocol. accuracy positioning verified by comparing planned position with actual implants after surgery. Results As proof principle, seems be reliable efficient when simple cases s‐CAIS in partially edentulous patients. clinician can plan an authentic environment without using any radiology‐guided software. precision placement clinically acceptable, minor deviations. Conclusions study suggests that technologies successfully planning. Further clinical studies needed validate

Language: Английский

Citations

6

The effect on the performance of a dynamic navigation system of superimposing a standard tessellation language (STL) file obtained with an intraoral scan on a cone beam computer tomograph (CBCT). An experimental in vitro study. DOI Creative Commons
Adrià Jorba‐García, Víctor Ruiz-Romero,

Jose Javier Bara‐Casaus

et al.

Journal of Dentistry, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 148, P. 105150 - 105150

Published: June 22, 2024

To compare the accuracy and operative time of implant placement using a dynamic computer assisted surgery (dCAIS) system based on cone beam tomography (CBCT) image, with without superimposing standard tessellation language (STL) file an intraoral scan patient. Ten identical resin models simulating upper maxilla posterior edentulism were assigned to two groups. In CBCT+STL group, CBCT STL superimposed used for registration; in registration was performed images. Six implants placed each model Navident® navigation system. Anatomy by tracing points or depending group. Preoperative postoperative images overlaid assess accuracy. Sixty analyzed (30 group). 3D platform deviation significantly lower (mean difference (MD): 0.17 mm; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.01 0.23; P = 0.039) group (mean: 0.71mm; (SD): 0.29) than 0.88mm; SD: 0.39). The remaining outcome variables (angular MD: -0.01; lateral 0.08mm; apex global 0.01mm; depth 0.33mm) (MD: 3.383 min.) similar both groups (p>0.05). introduction seems reduce deviations slightly dental dCAIS systems. However, clinical repercussion this improvement is questionable. Superimposing image does not seem increase systems but can be useful when radiographic artifacts are present.

Language: Английский

Citations

3

Robotic dental implant placement workflow for edentulous jaws DOI
Wenxue Wang, Xin Li,

Chenyang Yao

et al.

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: June 1, 2024

Language: Английский

Citations

3

Clinical study of immediate implant placement in posterior maxillary region assisted by dynamic real-time navigation: A randomized controlled trial DOI
Yun Yang,

Ningbo Geng

Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 125(5), P. 101976 - 101976

Published: July 21, 2024

Language: Английский

Citations

3

Smartphone application-based augmented reality for pre-clinical dental implant placement training: a pilot study DOI
Benedikt Schneider, Dragan Ströbele, Pascal Grün

et al.

Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 29(1)

Published: Jan. 17, 2025

Language: Английский

Citations

0

Impact of Surgeons’ Experience on Implant Placement Accuracy Using a Dynamic Navigation System: A Cadaver Pilot Study DOI Open Access
Francesco Pera, Camillo Vocaturo, Armando Crupi

et al.

Prosthesis, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 7(1), P. 20 - 20

Published: Feb. 18, 2025

Objectives: The study’s objective was to evaluate the accuracy of dynamic computer-assisted surgical implant placement systems during practical training on fresh defrozen cephali. Methods: Three cephali with terminal dentition received a total 26 implants (15 4.3 × 13 mm and 11 mm, Nobel Biocare Service AG (Zrich-Flughafen Switzerland)) following standardized protocol: digital scanning planning protocol followed by navigation surgery (X-Guide, X-Nav Technologies, LLC, Lansdale, PA, USA). All interventions were performed two surgeons: senior oral surgeon (OE) more than 5 years dentistry experience non-experienced (NE). Results: Different linear angular measurements (i.e., deviation shoulder point; tip depth B/L M/D deviations) calculated in duplicate estimate discrepancy virtual respect real clinical scenario. differences between operators also explored. results bivariate analysis detected negligible operators, without any statistically significant for all investigated parameters (p > 0.05). Conclusions: preliminary positive findings this pilot study suggest that system could be viable safe technique may offer additional safety benefits despite required learning.

Language: Английский

Citations

0

Impact of Cantilever Length on the Accuracy of Static CAIS in Posterior Distal Free‐End Regions DOI Open Access

Motoaki Miyashita,

Narit Leepong, Polathep Vichitkunakorn

et al.

Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 27(2)

Published: March 25, 2025

Implant placement accuracy in the distal free-end posterior region is often compromised, increasing risk of damage to adjacent anatomical structures and negatively affecting restoration function, occlusal loading, aesthetics. This study aimed assess implant using static computer-assisted surgery (CAIS) partially edentulous area with varying cantilever lengths evaluate correlation between length deviations. A prospective observational involved 40 patients 72 sites, divided into three groups: 1-unit (1-UC; a mesial neighboring tooth), 2-unit (2-UC; one-tooth space from control (single-tooth both teeth). Implants were placed fully guided CAIS, was assessed by comparing angular linear deviations at platform apex post-operative CBCT scans. The analyzed. 2-UC group exhibited significantly higher (5.01° ± 2.41°) compared 1-UC (3.60° 1.92°, p = 0.033) groups (2.62° 1.13°, < 0.001). 3D also greater (1.15 0.38 mm, 1.74 0.53 respectively) than (0.86 0.35 0.001; 1.30 0.47 0.002) (0.72 0.30 1.04 Deviations predominantly trended towards buccal apical directions. Additionally, positive correlations found (R 0.306, 0.034) levels 0.294, 0.042). Cantilever positions affects CAIS. positioned or exceeding 10 mm are more prone deviating planned positions.

Language: Английский

Citations

0

Accuracy of Static and Dynamic Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery During Dental Implant Placement: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis DOI
Aditya Kulkarni, Prafull Pujari, Arun Kumar Patnana

et al.

Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: May 22, 2025

Language: Английский

Citations

0

Is dynamic computer-assisted surgery more accurate than the static method for dental implant placement? A systematic review and meta-analysis DOI
Dileep Nag Vinnakota, Rekhalakshmi Kamatham,

E Nagaraj

et al.

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: Sept. 1, 2023

Language: Английский

Citations

8