Discoveries,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
11(4), P. e178 - e178
Published: Dec. 31, 2023
Implant
placement
for
dental
rehabilitation
has
gained
more
popularity
among
patients
in
the
recent
past.
Dental
Implants
are
workhorse
of
dentistry.
Previously,
implants
were
placed
with
help
traditional
freehand
approach.
Even
though
conventional
technique
was
successful,
it
his
own
shortcomings.
Various
methods
have
been
introduced,
like
stent
-guided
implant
and
navigation
guided
placement,
that
enhance
precision
position.
The
three
different
placing
approach,
static
dynamic
navigation.
Among
these
approaches,
system
is
a
promising
technology
being
used
successfully
various
other
fields
well
known
its
accuracy.
It
gives
an
advantage
to
clinician
by
providing
real-time
three-dimensional
position
better
clinical
patient
related
treatment
outcomes.
This
review
summarizes
literature
evidence
available
on
navigation,
potential
application,
advantages,
disadvantages
future
directions.
Journal of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
28(1), P. 90 - 95
Published: Jan. 1, 2025
Abstract
Aims:
This
study
aimed
to
evaluate
the
accuracy
of
access
cavity
preparation
using
guided
endodontics
(GE)
and
conventional
technique
(CT)
in
calcified
canals.
Subjects
Methods:
Twenty
teeth
with
calcification
up
middle
third
were
collected
after
scanning
through
RadioVisioGraphy
(RVG).
Preoperative
cone-beam
computed
tomography
(CBCT)
scan
was
done
samples
randomly
divided
into
two
groups
ten
each
on
basis
method
preparation.
Group
1:
Access
prepared
by
CT,
2:
GE.
3D
template
corresponding
guide
drill
made
for
group
2
performing
optical
surface
scans.
After
preparation,
postoperative
CBCT
performed
all
samples.
The
amount
tooth
structure
loss
angle
deviation
calculated
Sidexis
Software.
Statistical
Analysis
Used:
data
analyzed
IBM
SPSS
Statistics,
version
22.
A
t-test
compared
between
groups,
a
one-way
ANOVA
multiple
directions
both
(P
<
0.001).
Results:
Our
found
that
mean
volume
(17.19
mm
3
±
06.11
standard
[SD])
(4.82°
±01.66
SD)
GE
significantly
less
0.001)
as
(38.85
19.07
(13.16°
±2.34
CT.
Conclusion:
is
more
accurate
conservative
than
CT
management
Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
26(5), P. 942 - 953
Published: June 28, 2024
Abstract
Aim
The
aim
of
this
work
is
to
present
a
new
protocol
for
implant
surgical
planning
which
involves
the
combined
use
artificial
intelligence
(AI)
and
mixed
reality
(MR).
Methods
This
acquisition
three‐dimensional
(3D)
patient
data
through
intraoral
scanning
(IOS)
cone
beam
computed
tomography
(CBCT).
These
are
loaded
into
AI
software
automatically
segments
aligns
patient's
3D
models.
models
MR
used
surgery
holography.
files
then
exported
design
guides
via
open‐source
software,
printed
prepare
sites
static
computer‐assisted
(s‐CAIS).
case
finalized
prosthetically
fully
digital
protocol.
accuracy
positioning
verified
by
comparing
planned
position
with
actual
implants
after
surgery.
Results
As
proof
principle,
seems
be
reliable
efficient
when
simple
cases
s‐CAIS
in
partially
edentulous
patients.
clinician
can
plan
an
authentic
environment
without
using
any
radiology‐guided
software.
precision
placement
clinically
acceptable,
minor
deviations.
Conclusions
study
suggests
that
technologies
successfully
planning.
Further
clinical
studies
needed
validate
Prosthesis,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
7(1), P. 20 - 20
Published: Feb. 18, 2025
Objectives:
The
study’s
objective
was
to
evaluate
the
accuracy
of
dynamic
computer-assisted
surgical
implant
placement
systems
during
practical
training
on
fresh
defrozen
cephali.
Methods:
Three
cephali
with
terminal
dentition
received
a
total
26
implants
(15
4.3
×
13
mm
and
11
mm,
Nobel
Biocare
Service
AG
(Zrich-Flughafen
Switzerland))
following
standardized
protocol:
digital
scanning
planning
protocol
followed
by
navigation
surgery
(X-Guide,
X-Nav
Technologies,
LLC,
Lansdale,
PA,
USA).
All
interventions
were
performed
two
surgeons:
senior
oral
surgeon
(OE)
more
than
5
years
dentistry
experience
non-experienced
(NE).
Results:
Different
linear
angular
measurements
(i.e.,
deviation
shoulder
point;
tip
depth
B/L
M/D
deviations)
calculated
in
duplicate
estimate
discrepancy
virtual
respect
real
clinical
scenario.
differences
between
operators
also
explored.
results
bivariate
analysis
detected
negligible
operators,
without
any
statistically
significant
for
all
investigated
parameters
(p
>
0.05).
Conclusions:
preliminary
positive
findings
this
pilot
study
suggest
that
system
could
be
viable
safe
technique
may
offer
additional
safety
benefits
despite
required
learning.
Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
27(2)
Published: March 25, 2025
Implant
placement
accuracy
in
the
distal
free-end
posterior
region
is
often
compromised,
increasing
risk
of
damage
to
adjacent
anatomical
structures
and
negatively
affecting
restoration
function,
occlusal
loading,
aesthetics.
This
study
aimed
assess
implant
using
static
computer-assisted
surgery
(CAIS)
partially
edentulous
area
with
varying
cantilever
lengths
evaluate
correlation
between
length
deviations.
A
prospective
observational
involved
40
patients
72
sites,
divided
into
three
groups:
1-unit
(1-UC;
a
mesial
neighboring
tooth),
2-unit
(2-UC;
one-tooth
space
from
control
(single-tooth
both
teeth).
Implants
were
placed
fully
guided
CAIS,
was
assessed
by
comparing
angular
linear
deviations
at
platform
apex
post-operative
CBCT
scans.
The
analyzed.
2-UC
group
exhibited
significantly
higher
(5.01°
±
2.41°)
compared
1-UC
(3.60°
1.92°,
p
=
0.033)
groups
(2.62°
1.13°,
<
0.001).
3D
also
greater
(1.15
0.38
mm,
1.74
0.53
respectively)
than
(0.86
0.35
0.001;
1.30
0.47
0.002)
(0.72
0.30
1.04
Deviations
predominantly
trended
towards
buccal
apical
directions.
Additionally,
positive
correlations
found
(R
0.306,
0.034)
levels
0.294,
0.042).
Cantilever
positions
affects
CAIS.
positioned
or
exceeding
10
mm
are
more
prone
deviating
planned
positions.
Journal of Dentistry,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
148, P. 105150 - 105150
Published: June 22, 2024
To
compare
the
accuracy
and
operative
time
of
implant
placement
using
a
dynamic
computer
assisted
surgery
(dCAIS)
system
based
on
cone
beam
tomography
(CBCT)
image,
with
without
superimposing
standard
tessellation
language
(STL)
file
an
intraoral
scan
patient.
Ten
identical
resin
models
simulating
upper
maxilla
posterior
edentulism
were
assigned
to
two
groups.
In
CBCT+STL
group,
CBCT
STL
superimposed
used
for
registration;
in
registration
was
performed
images.
Six
implants
placed
each
model
Navident®
navigation
system.
Anatomy
by
tracing
points
or
depending
group.
Preoperative
postoperative
images
overlaid
assess
accuracy.
Sixty
analyzed
(30
group).
3D
platform
deviation
significantly
lower
(mean
difference
(MD):
0.17
mm;
95%
confidence
interval
(CI):
0.01
0.23;
P
=
0.039)
group
(mean:
0.71mm;
(SD):
0.29)
than
0.88mm;
SD:
0.39).
The
remaining
outcome
variables
(angular
MD:
-0.01;
lateral
0.08mm;
apex
global
0.01mm;
depth
0.33mm)
(MD:
3.383
min.)
similar
both
groups
(p>0.05).
introduction
seems
reduce
deviations
slightly
dental
dCAIS
systems.
However,
clinical
repercussion
this
improvement
is
questionable.
Superimposing
image
does
not
seem
increase
systems
but
can
be
useful
when
radiographic
artifacts
are
present.
