Optimizing site selection for construction and demolition waste resource treatment plants using a hesitant neutrosophic set: a case study in Xiamen, China DOI
Yi-Wei Chen, Qiu Xie, Xiaoyu Ma

et al.

Engineering Optimization, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 1 - 22

Published: Dec. 5, 2024

The site selection of construction and demolition waste resource treatment plants is a complicated multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) issue 'not in my back yard' (NIMBY) facilities, which affected by spatial, economic, societal, environmental other factors. Traditional MCDM methods expose the shortcomings evaluation information representation spatial factor analysis. This study develops an optimized method hesitant neutrosophic set (HNS) environment, capable effectively handling uncertainty fully incorporating considerations. innovation this research lies integrating HNS into MCDM, combined with geographic system technology, revised DEMATEL-based analytic network process method, cosine similarity Euclidean distance measures. A case Xiamen, China, validates method's effectiveness, sensitivity analysis comparative studies demonstrate its superior stability, robustness resolution. main contribution development optimization for siting large-scale NIMBY facilities.

Language: Английский

A review of public opposition to the establishment of construction and demolition waste recovery facilities DOI
Moein Behzad, Salman Shooshtarian, Tayyab Maqsood

et al.

Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: Jan. 2, 2025

Purpose Urban expansion in recent decades has led to a surge new buildings and infrastructure, significantly increasing construction demolition (C&D) waste materials. This large stream presents environmental challenges, prompting stakeholders the recovery sectors establish facilities. However, these infrastructure projects often face public opposition. research aims identify root causes of opposition C&D facilities propose strategies manage mitigate concerns effectively. Design/methodology/approach adopts qualitative approach extract relevant literature using PRISMA model, which is common for systematic reviews. A set selection criteria were used most this field. The analysis methods are based on bibliometric as well document analysis. Findings findings indicate that five major categories impact public’s perceptions These include environmental, awareness perception, economic, health, safety well-being project management. Furthermore, provides eight effectively Research limitations/implications framework managing fairly efficiently. Comprising six steps with specific actions, addresses citizens’ while improving rates. It serves strategic roadmap can be adapted use various projects, fostering community support sustainable development. Originality/value review paper first attempt gather development guide policymakers who strive fair all affected by or involved establishment

Language: Английский

Citations

0

Towards a Circular Economy in Jordan: Selecting Organic Waste Treatment Options Using a Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach DOI Open Access
Hani Abu Qdais,

Sarah Al-Omoush,

Haniyeh Jalalipour

et al.

Sustainability, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 17(5), P. 2146 - 2146

Published: March 1, 2025

Solid waste management in Jordan is still following a linear model, where more than 90% of solid waste, including organic collected and disposed into landfills. Such practices are not sustainable may lead to adverse public health environmental impacts. Therefore, there pressing need look for alternative by adopting circular economy principles through which the impacts minimized benefits from resources maximized. The main objective this study select appropriate treatment technology Jordan. To achieve objective, an analytical hierarchy process was used as decision making tool. A model that consists four levels employed with 3 criteria 10 sub-criteria assess 4 alternatives treatment. Based on experts’ opinions pairwise comparison, AHP results showed criterion most important. On other hand, option composting weight 0.373, followed landfilling 0.203. Anaerobic digestion ranked third alternative, 0.201, while least-preferred found be mechanical biological treatment, 0.193. Sensitivity analysis based varying weights under different scenarios robustness continued first considered scenarios. Since national strategy currently subject review, findings current provide valuable information makers update their strategic plans move towards option.

Language: Английский

Citations

0

Decision-making of construction workers' waste reduction behavior: a study based on Cost-Benefit Theory and Cumulative Prospect Theory DOI Creative Commons
Shuitai Xu, Yuhui Zhou, Shengyuan Xu

et al.

Frontiers in Psychology, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 16

Published: March 20, 2025

The rapid advancement of industrialization and urbanization has led to a significant generation construction waste, causing serious resource wastage environmental pollution. To promote the sustainable development industry, this study integrates Cost-Benefit Theory Cumulative Prospect develop decision-making model for workers' waste reduction behavior (CWWRB), examining process under influence self-interested motivations cognitive biases among workers. This study, using project in Shenzhen, China, as case assigns variable values designs management scenarios based on field interview data simulate impact measures CWWRB, results indicate that: (1) Increasing negative incentive level significantly promotes but diminishing marginal effect is observed. (2) Optimizing atmosphere exerts lagging guiding CWWRB. (3) Combined can compensate single measures, thereby enhancing effectiveness. findings not only enrich theoretical framework also provide support formulating effective strategies.

Language: Английский

Citations

0

Resident support for financial incentives in domestic mineral extraction: Evidence from an experimental survey in major US mineral-producing states DOI

Mahelet G. Fikru,

Nhien Nguyen,

Kwame Awuah-Offei

et al.

The Extractive Industries and Society, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 23, P. 101659 - 101659

Published: April 3, 2025

Language: Английский

Citations

0

Modifying carbon feedback by transforming arctic soil into biochar DOI
Taewoo Lee,

Hoyeon Cha,

Jee Young Kim

et al.

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 216, P. 115712 - 115712

Published: April 8, 2025

Language: Английский

Citations

0

A dynamic perspective on “not in my backyard” effects: Comparing public attitudes toward waste-to-energy power plants in first-tier cities of China from 2019 to 2024 DOI
Yongjing Xie, Boqiang Lin

Journal of Environmental Management, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 383, P. 125534 - 125534

Published: April 25, 2025

Language: Английский

Citations

0

Critical construction waste minimization strategies for a circular economy in developing countries: A contractor’s perspective in China DOI Creative Commons
Huanyu Wu,

X. Weng,

Yan Li

et al.

International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: Nov. 2, 2024

Abstract Developing countries are often burdened by substantial construction waste (CW) generated through urbanization and urban renewal activities, highlighting the urgent need for effective CW minimization strategies to facilitate their transition towards a circular economy. Although previous studies have examined similar topics at various stages of projects from different perspectives, comprehensive study integrating all critical contractor’s perspective is still lacking. To fill this gap, aims identify in developing countries, with holistic concentration on planning, design, stages, using China as case study. æThe research began compiling list tailored based an extensive desktop survey focus group interview, resulting 32 strategies. A subsequent questionnaire leading management experts rigorous statistical analyses identified 9 minimizing countries. Finally, exploratory factor analysis, seven fundamental principles been established: “Planning Minimization” planning stage; “Optimized Design Building Structures,” “Optimization Process,” “Stakeholders’ Efforts Stage” design Construction Techniques,” Stage,” “Efforts Disposal” stage. This offers valuable insights stakeholders empowering them effectively minimize targeted strategies, facilitating economy supporting realization "zero-waste city" goal.

Language: Английский

Citations

1

A comprehensive risk management framework for NIMBY projects: Integrating social network analysis and risk transmission chains DOI Creative Commons

Jian Xu,

Ling Ran, Ming Yang

et al.

Ecological Indicators, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 169, P. 112942 - 112942

Published: Dec. 1, 2024

Language: Английский

Citations

0

Optimizing site selection for construction and demolition waste resource treatment plants using a hesitant neutrosophic set: a case study in Xiamen, China DOI
Yi-Wei Chen, Qiu Xie, Xiaoyu Ma

et al.

Engineering Optimization, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 1 - 22

Published: Dec. 5, 2024

The site selection of construction and demolition waste resource treatment plants is a complicated multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) issue 'not in my back yard' (NIMBY) facilities, which affected by spatial, economic, societal, environmental other factors. Traditional MCDM methods expose the shortcomings evaluation information representation spatial factor analysis. This study develops an optimized method hesitant neutrosophic set (HNS) environment, capable effectively handling uncertainty fully incorporating considerations. innovation this research lies integrating HNS into MCDM, combined with geographic system technology, revised DEMATEL-based analytic network process method, cosine similarity Euclidean distance measures. A case Xiamen, China, validates method's effectiveness, sensitivity analysis comparative studies demonstrate its superior stability, robustness resolution. main contribution development optimization for siting large-scale NIMBY facilities.

Language: Английский

Citations

0