Mitteilungen Klosterneuburg,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Jan. 1, 2024
Objectives:
During
the
COVID-19
pandemic,
potential
impact
of
vaccinations
on
menstrual
cycle
patterns
was
not
initially
a
widely
discussed
side
effect.
However,
as
global
race
to
develop
an
effective
vaccine
intensified,
significant
concern
arose
about
effects
disturbances,
catapulting
this
issue
forefront
health
priorities.
Materials
and
Methods
Our
study
employed
unique
descriptive
cross-sectional
design,
using
face-to-face
interviews
meticulously
structured
questionnaire
collect
data.
We
focused
menstruating
women
aged
18
50
from
May
31
July
31,
2022,
specifically
asked
their
cycles
in
first
12
following
either
infection
or
vaccination.
Results
The
survey
completed;
244
who
had
confirmed
infections
305
received
at
least
two
doses
recommended
by
authorities.
Among
these,
80
(32%)
reported
changes
post-infection,
48
(15.74%)
noted
Conclusion
findings
highlight
critical,
interrelated
conclusions.
Firstly,
vaccination
can
directly
affect
cycle,
notwithstanding
momentarily.
Secondly,
most
alterations
dissipate
within
six
months
post-infection
after
receiving
third
dose
Medicina,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
60(2), P. 206 - 206
Published: Jan. 25, 2024
Background
and
Objectives:
Menstrual
changes,
including
altered
cycle
length
bleeding
patterns,
have
been
reported
following
COVID-19
vaccination.
This
study
aimed
to
determine
the
prevalence
types
of
menstrual
changes
occurring
after
vaccination
among
female
students
staff
at
a
university
in
Saudi
Arabia.
Materials
Methods:
A
cross-sectional
was
conducted
women
aged
18–39
years
who
received
least
one
dose
vaccine.
Eligible
participants,
staff,
were
recruited
between
May
2022
November
2022.
Participants
completed
questionnaire
detailing
their
sociodemographic
characteristics,
general
medical
reproductive
history,
characteristics
before
The
various
(cycle
length,
days,
flow,
mid-cycle
spotting)
calculated.
demographic
factors
associated
with
analyzed
using
chi-squared
tests.
Results:
472
included
participants
had
mean
age
20.9
years,
95.3%
unmarried.
Changes
by
54.7%
respondents
overall.
most
common
change
followed
number
menstruation
days
flow.
not
age,
BMI,
occupation,
marital
status,
or
history.
intermenstrual
more
frequently
third
Pfizer
vaccine
compared
Moderna
(p
=
0.014).
Conclusions:
More
than
half
vaccination,
being
common.
potential
underlying
mechanisms
implications
these
alterations
require
further
investigation.
These
findings
provide
evidence
side
effects
vaccines
Frontiers in Drug Safety and Regulation,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
4
Published: Jan. 31, 2024
Introduction:
Menstrual
disorders
are
commonly
reported
after
COVID-19
vaccination
and
heavy
menstrual
bleeding
was
added
to
the
product
information
of
vaccines
Moderna
Pfizer.
The
aim
this
review,
using
a
systematic
search,
is
provide
an
overview
available
literature
on
risk
vaccination.
Methods:
review
conducted
according
Preferred
Reporting
Items
for
Systematic
reviews
Meta-Analysis
(PRISMA)
guidelines.
A
PubMed
search
performed
15
August
2023,
including
solely
quantitative
studies
in
English
Dutch.
Results:
total
61
were
included,
which
40
cross-sectional
studies,
18
cohort
three
self-controlled
case
series.
Outcomes
included
wide
variety
disorders,
changes
cycle
length
(
n
=
54),
amount
44),
menses
30),
experience
(pre)menstrual
pain
21),
breakthrough
18).
All
found
higher
percentage
at
least
one
disorder
first
different
types
doses.
Discussion:
In
conclusion,
evidence
suggests
that
may
cause
women
reproductive
age.
However,
there
need
more
longitudinal
because
important
limitations
study
designs
many
studies.
Although
short-lived
predominantly
mild,
it
healthcare
professionals
be
informed
about
these
potential
adverse
reactions
assess
events
clinical
trials
vaccines.
PLoS ONE,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
20(5), P. e0320162 - e0320162
Published: May 16, 2025
The
relationship
between
COVID-19
vaccines
and
menstrual
disturbance
is
unclear,
in
part
because
researchers
have
measured
different
outcomes
(e.g.,
delays
vs.
changes
to
cycle
length)
with
various
study
designs.
Menstrual
disruption
could
be
a
decisive
factor
people's
willingness
accept
the
vaccine.
We
searched
Medline,
Embase,
Web
of
Science
for
studies
investigating
length,
flow
volume,
post-menopausal
bleeding,
unexpected
or
intermenstrual
bleeding.
Data
were
analyzed
using
fixed-effects
meta-analysis
Shore's
adjusted
confidence
intervals
heterogeneity.
Seventeen
>1·9
million
participants
analyzed.
found
19%
greater
risk
increase
length
as
compared
unvaccinated
people
pre-vaccination
time-periods
(summary
relative
(sRR):
1·19;
95%
CI:
1·11-1·26;
n
=
23,718
participants).
was
same
Pfizer-BioNTech
(sRR:
1·15;
1·05-1·27;
16,595)
Moderna
1·05-1·25;
7,523),
similar
AstraZeneca
1·27;
1·02-1·59;
532),
higher
Janssen
1·69;
1·14-2·52;
751)
In
first
after
vaccination,
increased
by
Obstetrics and Gynecology,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Dec. 7, 2023
OBJECTIVE:
To
quantitatively
evaluate
the
effect
of
a
booster
vaccination
dose
against
coronavirus
disease
2019
(COVID-19)
on
menstrual
cycle
in
large-scale
retrospective
cohort
study
using
tracking
smartphone
application
(app).
METHODS:
Prospectively
or
retrospectively
recorded
data,
including
start
and
finish
dates
cycles,
were
collected
with
app.
Detailed
data
vaccinations,
side
effects,
participants'
characteristics
from
questionnaire
For
each
COVID-19
shot
(first,
second,
third),
within-individual
changes
length
up
to
fourth
postvaccination
evaluated.
RESULTS:
Among
7,376
6,873
participants
who
had
first
second
vaccine
doses
different
respectively,
cycles
immediately
after
(first
cycles)
an
average
0.22
days
(95%
CI,
0.06–0.39)
0.37
0.20–0.54)
longer
than
prevaccination
cycle.
In
contrast,
among
1,672
received
same
cycle,
was
4.21
3.69–4.72)
longer.
The
returned
level
However,
4,768
third
dose,
1.20
1.00–1.40)
longer,
prolongation
0.27
0.10–0.44)
0.41
0.22–0.59)
persisting
CONCLUSION:
may
have
greater
longer-lasting
primary-series
shots.
Although
size
small,
evidence
effects
immunization
menstruation
should
be
accumulated.
Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
33(8)
Published: Aug. 1, 2024
ABSTRACT
Background
Reports
of
adverse
menstrual
events
emerged
during
the
COVID‐19
vaccination
campaign
in
multiple
countries.
This
raised
question
whether
these
reports
were
caused
by
vaccines.
The
aim
this
systematic
review
was
to
evaluate
comparative
studies
on
topic
(registered
at
PROSPERO
[CRD42022324973]).
Methods
We
included
observational
such
as
cohort
and
surveys
comparing
response
self‐reported
questionnaires
between
post‐
versus
pre‐vaccination
data.
PubMed
Cochrane
Library
searches
conducted
1
September
2023.
primary
outcome
incidence
any
prespecified
event,
measure
risk
ratio.
meta‐analysis
using
Mantel–Haenszel
method
random
effects
model.
summarized
results
factors
well
key
findings
included.
Results
retrieved
161
references
from
electronic
databases
additional
sources
lists.
Of
those,
we
considered
21
studies.
event
reported
12
resulted
a
pooled
estimate
(risk
ratio
1.13;
95%
CI,
0.96–1.31)
that
did
not
favor
group.
analysis
constrained
considerable
clinical
statistical
heterogeneity.
Risk
for
changes
history
infection,
concern
about
vaccines,
smoking,
previous
cycle
irregularities,
depression,
stress,
other
issues.
Conclusions
group
heterogeneity
prevalent
among
Most
suggested
temporary,
minor,
nonserious.
Medicine,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
103(26), P. e38771 - e38771
Published: June 28, 2024
There
has
been
significant
interest
in
the
changes
menstrual
cycles
following
coronavirus
disease
2019
(COVID-19)
infection
or
vaccination.
This
study
aimed
to
investigate
evidence
for
such
and
their
potential
risk
factors.
We
used
a
descriptive
design
gathered
data
by
sharing
an
online
survey
questionnaire
on
social
media
platforms.
The
included
questions
regarding
sociodemographic
factors,
cycle
changes,
COVID-19
anxiety.
population
comprised
women
aged
18
49
years
from
Izmir.
All
analyses
were
performed
using
Statistical
Package
Social
Sciences
21.0.
factors
influencing
irregularities
determined
after
COVID
binary
logistic
regression
analysis,
including
univariate
multivariate
models.
Among
465
participants,
those
with
associate's
degree
had
significantly
higher
of
than
high
school
diploma
(P
=
.012).
Anxiety
scores
emerged
as
factor
.026).
However,
neither
nor
vaccination
resulted
characteristics
>
.05).
Other
variables,
age,
body
mass
index,
smoking,
not
associated
changes(P
findings
suggest
that
educational
level
anxiety
may
play
role
irregularities,
whereas
itself
directly
affect
cycle.
Italian Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
36(01), P. 82 - 82
Published: March 14, 2023
Objective.The
COVID-19
virus
disrupts
the
renin-angiotensin
system
by
reducing
expression
of
angiotensin-2
converting
enzyme
receptors
in
host
cells,
inducing
an
inflammatory
response.This
regulates
ovarian
follicular
development
and
steroid
hormone
production.So,
this
study
has
been
conducted
to
examine
possible
effects
vaccines
on
menstrual
cycle
Iranian
women.
Materials
Methods.In
retrospective
cohort
study,
online
researcher-made
questionnaire
containing
32
multiple-choice
questions
was
used
over
one
month
investigate
changes
after
receiving
among
916
eligible
women
aged
18
45
years.Results.The
mean
age
participants
34.34
±
8.37
years,
77.79%
were
married,
61.47%
government
employees.The
highest
number
(n
=
377,
39.68%)
had
vaccinated
with
Sinopharm.The
most
common
disorder
189)
Menorrhagia.Most
disorders
due
AstraZeneca
Sinopharm
vaccines.The
chance
polymenorrhea
Sputnik
vaccine
1.88
times
higher
than
(OR
P
0.04,
95%
CI
1.02,
3.46).The
hypermenorrhea
vaccination
2.77
0.01,
0.18,
0.74).
Conclusions.Regardless
type
vaccine,
females
subjected
may
experience
self-limiting
abnormalities.Awareness
before
prevents
further
worries
uninformed
judgments
that
negatively
impact
public
attitudes.
Current Respiratory Medicine Reviews,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
20(1), P. 24 - 30
Published: Dec. 1, 2023
Objective:
This
study
aimed
to
explore
the
impact
of
various
COVID-19
vaccines
on
menstrual
cycle
Jordanian
women.
Materials
and
Methods:
We
conducted
a
retrospective
analysis
tracked
changes
using
an
anonymous
questionnaire
written
in
local
language.
received
732
responses,
after
exclusions,
617
responses
were
analyzed.
The
covered
six
sectors:
demographics,
medical
history,
infection
vaccination
status,
obstetric
gynecological
specific
questions
about
length,
flow,
any
symptoms
before
each
vaccine
shot.
Participants
included
females
who
had
type
vaccine.
Results:
Among
participants
analyzed,
two-thirds
between
ages
20-35,
majority
normal
BMI
(59.6%).
Most
single,
nulliparous,
never
used
contraception
methods
(79.3%,
82.0%,
93.8%,
respectively).
Only
small
percentage
other
risk
factors
influencing
changes,
such
as
surgical
procedures
(10.5%)
medications
(8.10%).
Baseline
information
was
recorded.
Forty
percent
experienced
duration,
approximately
one-fifth
reported
heavier
more
severe
premenstrual
syndrome
(PMS)
symptoms.
Body
mass
index
(BMI)
directly
correlated
with
bleeding
intensity
vaccination.
Parity
weakly
proportional
However,
parity
did
not
significantly
correlate
PMS
symptoms,
or
cramps
Conclusion:
In
population
young,
non-sexually
active
women
BMI,
most
experience
significant
their
cycles
receiving
shorter
bleeding,
frequent,
painful,
post-vaccination.