BMC Public Health,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
22(1)
Published: Sept. 14, 2022
Abstract
Background
Additional
doses
of
COVID-19
vaccine
have
been
proposed
as
solutions
to
waning
immunity
and
decreased
effectiveness
primary
against
infection
with
new
SARS-CoV-2
variants.
However,
the
additional
relies
on
widespread
population
acceptance.
We
aimed
assess
acceptance
(third
annual
doses)
among
Canadian
adults
determine
associated
factors.
Methods
conducted
a
national,
cross-sectional
online
survey
from
October
14
November
12,
2021.
Weighted
multinomial
logistic
regression
analyses
were
used
identify
sociodemographic
health-related
factors
third
dose
indecision,
compared
refusal.
also
assessed
influences
decision-making,
preferences
for
future
delivery.
Results
Of
6010
respondents,
70%
reported
they
would
accept
dose,
while
15.2%
undecided.
For
doses,
64%
acceptance,
17.5%
Factors
indecision
similar
those
indecision.
Previous
receipt,
no
history
disease,
intention
receive
an
influenza
vaccine,
increasing
age
strongly
both
Chronic
illness
was
higher
odds
self-reported
disability
being
Higher
education
attainment
income
accepting
doses.
Minority
first
language
undecided
about
visible
minority
identity
refusing
dose.
All
respondents
government
recommendations
important
influence
their
decision-making
identified
pharmacy-based
delivery
drop-in
appointments
desirable.
Co-administration
vaccines
viewed
positively
by
75.5%
3
group,
12.3%
8.4%
refusal
group.
Conclusions
To
increase
targeted
interventions
populations,
disability,
are
required.
Offering
vaccination
at
pharmacies
through
facilitate
uptake,
offering
COVID-19/influenza
co-administration
may
little
benefit
Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
7(10), P. 298 - 298
Published: Oct. 13, 2022
The
World
Health
Organization
(WHO)
recommended
coronavirus
disease
2019
(COVID-19)
booster
dose
vaccination
after
completing
the
primary
series
for
individuals
≥18
years
and
most-at-risk
populations.
This
study
aimed
to
estimate
pooled
proportion
of
COVID-19
vaccine
uptake
intention
get
among
general
populations
healthcare
workers
(HCWs).
We
searched
PsycINFO,
Scopus,
EBSCO,
MEDLINE
Central/PubMed,
ProQuest,
SciELO,
SAGE,
Web
Science,
Google
Scholar,
ScienceDirect
according
PRISMA
guidelines.
From
a
total
1079
screened
records,
50
studies
were
extracted.
Meta-analysis
was
conducted
using
48
high-quality
Newcastle-Ottawa
Scale
quality
assessment
tool.
Using
included
studies,
acceptance
198,831
subjects
81%
(95%
confidence
interval
(CI):
75–85%,
I2
=
100%).
actual
in
eight
involving
12,995
31%
CI:
19–46%,
100%),
while
have
79%
72–85%,
vaccines
HCWs
66%
58–74%),
99%).
Meta-regression
revealed
that
previous
infection
associated
with
lower
dose.
Conversely,
significantly
higher
level
uptake.
WHO
region
Americas,
which
did
not
include
any
vaccination,
77%
66–85%,
Western
Pacific
89%
84–92%,
100),
followed
by
European
region:
86%
81–90%,
99%),
Eastern
Mediterranean
59%
46–71%,
Southeast
Asian
52%
43–61%,
95).
Having
chronic
trust
effectiveness
significant
predictors
acceptance.
global
rate
is
high,
but
rates
vary
region.
To
achieve
herd
immunity
disease,
high
required.
Intensive
campaigns
programs
are
still
needed
around
world
raise
public
awareness
regarding
importance
accepting
proper
control
pandemic.
Vaccines,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
10(7), P. 1097 - 1097
Published: July 8, 2022
The
emergence
of
breakthrough
infections
and
new
highly
contagious
variants
SARS-CoV-2
threaten
the
immunization
in
individuals
who
had
completed
primary
COVID-19
vaccination.
This
systematic
review
meta-analysis
investigated,
for
first
time,
acceptance
booster
dose
its
associated
factors
among
fully
vaccinated
individuals.
We
followed
PRISMA
guidelines.
searched
Scopus,
Web
Science,
Medline,
PubMed,
ProQuest,
CINAHL
medrxiv
from
inception
to
21
May
2022.
found
14
studies
including
104,047
prevalence
intend
accept
a
was
79.0%,
while
unsure
12.6%,
that
refuse
14.3%.
main
predictors
willingness
were
older
age,
flu
vaccination
previous
season,
confidence
most
important
reasons
decline
adverse
reactions
discomfort
experienced
after
vaccine
doses
concerns
serious
doses.
Considering
burden
COVID-19,
high
rate
could
be
critical
controlling
pandemic.
Our
findings
are
innovative
help
policymakers
design
implement
specific
programs
order
decrease
hesitancy.
Vaccines,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
10(3), P. 464 - 464
Published: March 17, 2022
COVID-19
booster
uptake
remained
poor
among
healthcare
workers
(HCW)
despite
evidence
of
improved
immunity
against
Delta
and
Omicron
variants.
While
most
studies
used
a
questionnaire
to
assess
hesitancy,
this
study
aimed
identify
factors
affecting
hesitancy
by
examining
actual
vaccine
across
time.
Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
8(3), P. 159 - 159
Published: March 5, 2023
As
the
COVID-19
pandemic
continues
and
transitions
to
an
endemic
stage,
booster
vaccines
will
play
important
role
in
personal
public
health.
However,
convincing
people
take
boosters
be
a
key
obstacle.
This
study
systematically
analyzed
research
that
examined
predictors
of
vaccine
hesitancy.
A
search
PubMed,
Medline,
CINAHL,
Web
Science,
Scopus
uncovered
42
eligible
studies.
Globally,
average
vaccination
hesitancy
rate
was
30.72%.
Thirteen
factors
influencing
emerged
from
literature:
demographics
(gender,
age,
education,
income,
occupation,
employment
status,
ethnicity,
marital
status),
geographical
influences
(country,
region,
residency),
adverse
events,
perceived
benefit/efficacy,
susceptibility,
severity,
prior
history
infection,
recommendations,
health
knowledge
information,
skepticism/distrust/conspiracy
theories,
type.
Vaccine
communication
campaigns
interventions
for
COVID
should
focus
on
confidence,
complacency,
convenience.
Vaccines,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
10(5), P. 758 - 758
Published: May 11, 2022
Background:
Despite
the
availability
of
COVID-19
vaccines
and
proven
benefits
vaccinations
outweighing
potential
risks,
hesitancy
to
accept
additional
doses
remains
a
persistent
problem.
Therefore,
purpose
study
was
investigate
hesitancy,
confidence,
literacy,
role
multi-theory
model
(MTM)
constructs
in
booster
uptake.
Methods:
This
cross-sectional
utilized
52-item
psychometric
valid
web-based
survey
conducted
during
month
October
2021
recruit
nationally
representative
sample
U.S.
adults.
Univariate,
bivariate,
multivariate
statistical
tests
were
used
analyze
data.
Results:
Among
hesitant
group
(n
=
209,
41.7%),
significantly
larger
proportion
respondents
unvaccinated
with
primary
series
(43.5%
vs.
11%,
p
<
0.001),
among
18−44
years
age
(51.2%
31.8%,
single
or
never
married
(33.0%
24.3%,
0.04),
had
lower
education
some
high
school
(6.2%
2.4%,
0.03),
identified
themselves
as
Republicans
(31.6%
20.5%,
0.01).
The
mean
scores
vaccine
19%
odds
behavioral
confidence
than
their
non-hesitant
counterparts
(adjusted
ratio
0.81,
95%
CI:
0.71−0.92).
Conclusions:
findings
this
underscore
need
raising
public
awareness
through
effective
multi-theory-model-based
communication
campaigns.
Vaccines,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
10(5), P. 724 - 724
Published: May 5, 2022
The
threat
of
new
SARS-CoV-2
variants
indicates
the
need
to
implement
COVID-19
vaccine
booster
programs.
aim
this
study
was
identify
level
acceptance
and
its
determinants.A
cross-sectional
online
survey
conducted
in
Jakarta
Bali,
Indonesia.
Booster
divided
into
three
categories:
non-acceptor,
planned
acceptor,
actual
acceptor.
primary
independent
variables
were
health
beliefs,
media
influence,
trust
authoritative
sources.
Other
covariates
included
demographics,
socioeconomic
status,
history.
A
analysis
through
multinomial
logistic
regression.
effects
hypothetical
situations
on
tested
using
Wilcoxon
signed-rank
test.The
final
2674
respondents
with
a
rate
56.3%
(41.2%
acceptors,
15.1%
acceptors).
Health
social
information
sources
identified
as
determinants
for
acceptance.
Socioeconomic
status
indicators
also
increased
scenarios
involving
requirements
work,
travel,
accessing
public
places.Booster
found
be
lower
than
predicted
prior
launch.
acceleration
coverage
requires
strategies
that
leverage
beliefs
focus
people
status.
Journal of Medical Internet Research,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
24(10), P. e39063 - e39063
Published: Sept. 23, 2022
COVID-19
vaccines
are
highly
effective
in
preventing
severe
disease
and
death
but
underused.
Interventions
to
address
vaccine
hesitancy
paramount
reducing
the
burden
of
COVID-19.We
aimed
evaluate
preliminary
efficacy,
usability,
acceptability
a
chatbot
for
promoting
vaccination
examine
factors
associated
with
hesitancy.In
November
2021,
we
conducted
pre-post
pilot
study
"Vac
Chat,
Fact
Check,"
web-based
vaccination.
We
survey
(N=290)
on
at
university
Hong
Kong.
A
subset
46
participants
who
were
either
unvaccinated
(n=22)
or
vaccinated
hesitant
receive
boosters
(n=24)
selected
given
access
7-day
trial
period.
The
provided
information
about
(eg,
efficacy
common
side
effects),
debunked
myths
vaccine,
included
decision
aid
selecting
platforms
(inactivated
mRNA
vaccines).
main
outcome
was
changes
Vaccine
Hesitancy
Scale
(VHS)
score
(range
9-45)
from
preintervention
(web-based
survey)
postintervention
(immediately
posttrial).
Other
outcomes
intention
vaccinate
willingness
encourage
others
scale
1
(not
all)
5
(very).
Usability
assessed
by
System
0-100).
Linear
regression
used
VHS
scores
all
respondents.The
mean
(SD)
age
respondents
21.4
(6.3)
years,
61%
(177/290)
female.
Higher
eHealth
literacy
(B=-0.26;
P<.001)
perceived
danger
(B=-0.17;
P=.009)
lower
hesitancy,
adjusting
age,
sex,
chronic
status,
previous
flu
vaccination,
susceptibility
COVID-19.
significantly
decreased
28.6
(preintervention)
24.5
(postintervention),
difference
-4.2
(P<.001)
an
effect
size
(Cohen
d)
0.94.
increased
3.0
3.9
participants,
whereas
1.9
2.8
booster-hesitant
participants.
Willingness
2.7
(P=.04).
At
postintervention,
median
(IQR)
72.5
(65-77.5),
recommendation
7
(6-8)
0
10.
In
post
hoc
4-month
follow-up,
82%
(18/22)
initially
reported
having
received
29%
(7/24)
boosters.This
initial
evidence
support
young
adults
booster-hesitant.
Vaccines,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
11(3), P. 623 - 623
Published: March 9, 2023
While
considerable
evidence
supports
the
safety
and
efficacy
of
COVID-19
vaccines,
a
sizable
population
expresses
vaccine
hesitancy.
As
per
World
Health
Organization,
hesitancy
is
one
top
10
hazards
to
global
health.
Vaccine
varies
across
countries,
with
India
reporting
least
was
higher
toward
booster
doses
than
previous
shots.
Therefore,
identifying
factors
determining
hesitance
(VBH)
sine
qua
non
successful
vaccination
campaign.This
systematic
review
followed
Preferred
Reporting
Items
for
Systematic
Reviews
Meta-analysis
(PRISMA)
2020
standards.
A
total
982
articles
were
pooled
from
Scopus,
PubMed
Embase,
while
42
that
addressed
VBH
finally
included
further
analysis.We
identified
responsible
divided
them
into
three
major
groups:
sociodemographic,
financial,
psychological.
Hence,
17
stated
age
be
factor
hesitancy,
most
reports
suggesting
negative
correlation
between
fear
poor
outcomes.
Nine
studies
found
females
expressing
greater
males.
Trust
deficit
in
science
(n
=
14),
concerns
about
12),
lower
levels
regarding
infection
11),
worry
side
effects
8)
also
reasons
Blacks,
Democrats,
pregnant
women
showed
high
Few
have
income,
obesity,
social
media,
living
vulnerable
members
as
influencing
study
44.1%
towards
could
attributed
dominantly
low
rural
origin,
previously
unvaccinated
status,
or
individuals.
However,
two
other
Indian
reported
lack
availability
slots,
trust
government,
doses.Many
confirmed
multifactorial
nature
VBH,
which
necessitates
multifaceted,
individually
tailored
interventions
address
all
potentially
modifiable
factors.
This
chiefly
recommends
strategizing
campaign
by
evaluating
appropriate
communication
(at
both
individual
community
levels)
benefits
risk
losing
immunity
without
them.
Vaccines,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
10(3), P. 425 - 425
Published: March 10, 2022
We
estimate
the
willingness
to
take
booster
dose
in
a
representative
sample
of
Danes.
an
overall
adult
Danish
population
about
87
percent
and
95.5
among
primary
vaccine
takers.
Moreover,
we
show
that
these
percentages
are
significantly
lower
younger
populations,
as
well
groups
who
do
not
see
COVID-19
threat
society,
those
feel
they
have
ability
follow
recommendations
('self-efficacy'),
perceive
advice
health
authorities
effective
against
disease
spread
('response
efficacy'),
costs
following
high
cost').
Vaccines,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
10(7), P. 1061 - 1061
Published: June 30, 2022
Given
the
concerns
of
waning
immunity
from
primary
COVID-19
vaccines
and
first
booster
dose,
we
conducted
an
online
cross-sectional
study
in
May
2022
to
investigate
willingness
receive
a
second
dose
or
new
vaccine
its
associated
factors.
Overall,
62%
participants
were
willing
be
vaccinated,
25.8%
unsure,
12.3%
unwilling
vaccinated.
The
main
reasons
against
accepting
dose/new
about
side
effects
effectiveness
opinion
that
further
vaccination
is
unnecessary.
Males,
younger
individuals,
without
previous
diagnosis,
those
with
good/very
good
self-perceived
physical
health
significantly
more
frequently
vaccine.
Additionally,
increased
fear
COVID-19,
trust
vaccinations,
decreased
was
willingness.
Our
results
show
some
hesitancy
unwillingness
toward
indicate
affects
public
opinion.