Theoretical
and
methodological
research
on
threat
conditioning
provides
important
neuroscience-informed
approaches
to
studying
fear
anxiety.
The
framework
is
at
the
vanguard
of
physiological
neurobiological
into
core
mechanistic
symptoms
anxiety-related
psychopathology,
providing
detailed
models
neural
circuitry
underlying
variability
in
clinically-relevant
behaviors
(e.g.,
decreased
extinction,
heightened
generalization)
heterogeneity
clinical
anxiety
presentations.
Despite
strengths
approach
explaining
symptom-level
syndromal
heterogeneity,
vast
majority
psychopathology-oriented
work
has
been
conducted
using
Diagnostic
Statistical
Manual
(DSM)
paradigm.
Unfortunately,
DSM
categorizations
fail
capture
resolution
afforded
by
indices.
Further,
relations
between
fine-grained
neurobehavioral
measures
specific
are
substantially
attenuated
within-category
arbitrary
boundaries,
comorbidity,
limited
reliability
DSM.
Conversely,
Hierarchical
Taxonomy
Psychopathology
(HiTOP)
a
promising
for
modeling
studied
relating
broader
constructs.
To
date,
HiTOP
had
minimal
impact
field.
Here,
we
propose
that
combining
an
next
step
pathology.
We
provide
brief
review
prominent
critiques
how
they
affect
studies
suggest
solutions
recommendations
flow
from
perspective.
Our
hope
this
effort
serves
as
both
inflection
point
practical
primer
HiTOP-aligned
benefits
fields.
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
159, P. 105606 - 105606
Published: Feb. 29, 2024
Renewal
is
a
'return
of
fear'
manipulation
in
human
fear
conditioning
to
investigate
learning
processes
underlying
anxiety
and
trauma.
Even
though
renewal
paradigms
are
widely
used,
no
study
has
compared
the
strength
different
paradigms.
We
conduct
systematic
review
(N
=
80)
meta-analysis
23)
studies
assessing
renewal.
Our
analysis
shows
that
classic
ABA
design
most
effective
paradigm,
ABC
ABBA
designs.
present
evidence
conducting
extinction
multiple
contexts
increasing
similarity
between
acquisition
reduce
Furthermore,
we
show
additional
cues
can
be
used
as
safety
'protection
from
extinction'
cues.
The
alcohol
weakens
process
older
adults
appear
less
sensitive
context
changes
thus
large
variability
approaches
humans
suggests
standardisation
procedures
across
laboratories
would
great
benefit
field.
Psychophysiology,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
60(8)
Published: March 23, 2023
Abstract
The
replicability
of
fear
conditioning
research
has
come
under
recent
scrutiny,
with
increasing
acknowledgment
that
the
use
differing
materials
and
methods
may
lead
to
incongruent
results.
Direct
comparisons
between
main
two
unconditional
stimuli
used
in
–
an
electric
shock
or
a
loud
scream—are
scarce,
yet
these
are
usually
interchangeably.
In
present
study,
we
tested
whether
scream,
shock,
unpredictable
combination
affected
acquisition,
extinction,
return
amongst
healthy
participants
(
N
=
109,
81
female).
We
also
collected
hair
samples
relationship
endocannabinoid
levels.
Our
findings
suggest
that,
although
subjective
ratings
pleasantness,
arousal,
anxiety
were
similar
regardless
used,
skin
conductance
responses
significantly
lower
for
paired
scream
compared
alone.
Further,
reducing
predictability
stimulus
reduced
habituation
during
acquisition
reacquisition,
but
did
not
produce
stronger
Exploratory
analyses
suggested
endocannabinoids
associated
overall
physiological
arousal
conditioning,
as
well
higher
threat
cue,
safety
cue.
These
have
multiple
implications
design
provide
first
evidence
association
levels
human
conditioning.
International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
25(1), P. 100536 - 100536
Published: Jan. 1, 2025
Fear
extinction
is
the
foundation
of
exposure
therapy
for
anxiety
and
phobias.
However,
stability
memory
diminishes
over
time,
coinciding
with
fear
recovery.
To
augment
long-term
retention,
temporal
distribution
learning
sessions
critical.
This
study
investigated
effects
massed
spaced
training
(with
short
long
intervals)
on
retention
compared
to
a
classic
protocol.
120
healthy
participants
were
recruited
randomly
divided
training,
20-minutes
or
3-hours
intervals,
control
group.
The
group
completed
half
number
trials
other
groups.
conditioning/extinction
paradigm
consisted
three
consecutive
days
acquisition,
extinction,
recall,
followed
by
second
recall
one
week
later.
Skin
conductance
response
(SCR)
self-rating
questionnaires
(ratings
valence,
arousal,
fear)
recorded
analyzed
using
mixed
model
ANOVAs.
results
revealed
that
during
phase,
both
protocols
showed
significantly
lower
SCRs
group,
resulting
in
largest
effects.
In
only
no
significant
difference
between
threat
safety
cues.
self-report
assessments
indicated
furthermore
arousal
than
first
recall.
These
suggest
promote
learning,
but
improves
retention.
highlights
impact
trial
offering
insights
future
research
improving
efficacy.
Psychophysiology,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
62(2)
Published: Feb. 1, 2025
ABSTRACT
Non‐invasive
brain
stimulation
(NIBS)
is
an
emerging
treatment
for
mental
disorders
that
painlessness
and
easy
to
administer.
However,
its
effectiveness
modulating
fear
extinction
requires
further
elucidation.
We
searched
eight
bibliographical
databases
identified
randomized
controlled
trials
of
NIBS
in
healthy
populations.
Outcomes
were
evaluated
based
on
skin
conductance
responses
(SCRs)
under
three
experimental
stimuli:
threat
condition
(CS+),
safe
(CS−),
their
discrimination
(CS+
minus
CS−).
applied
a
random‐effects
model
determine
effect
sizes
(Hedge's
g
)
post‐stimulation
assessed
article
quality
using
Physiotherapy
evidence
database
(PEDro)
scale.
Twenty‐one
studies
meeting
systematic
review
criteria
included
this
analysis,
incorporating
40
independent
data
from
11
(
n
=
632)
the
meta‐analysis.
Compared
with
control
group,
SCRs
CS+
significantly
reducted
intervention
group.
Fear
was
more
effective
24‐h
test
than
immediately
after
NIBS.
In
conclusion,
enhanced
extinction,
time
interval
between
testing
may
serve
as
moderating
variable.
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
163, P. 105790 - 105790
Published: July 2, 2024
Pavlovian
conditioning
is
typically
distinguished
from
sensitization
but
a
conditional
stimulus
(CS)
also
results
in
sensitization.
A
CS
can
sensitize
responding
to
probe
that
related
the
unconditional
(US)
or
US
itself.
has
been
studied
defensive,
sexual,
and
feeding
systems.
In
sensitization,
focus
not
on
response
(CR)
directly
elicited
by
mode
activated
CS.
Activation
of
increases
probability
particular
responses
reactivity
various
stimuli.
reflects
this
increased
reactivity.
helps
uncover
successful
learning
situations
where
conventional
CR
does
occur.
encourages
broadening
our
conceptions
include
changes
afferent
processes.
Implications
for
biological
fitness
basic
translational
research
are
discussed.