Background
and
purpose:
Studies
investigating
the
application
of
Artificial
Intelligence
(AI)
in
field
radiotherapy
exhibit
substantial
variations
terms
quality.The
goal
this
study
was
to
assess
amount
transparency
bias
scoring
articles
with
a
specific
focus
on
AI
based
segmentation
treatment
planning,
using
modified
PROBAST
TRIPOD
checklists,
order
provide
recommendations
for
future
guideline
developers
reviewers.Materials
methods:
The
checklist
items
were
discussed
Delphi
process.After
consensus
reached,
2
groups
3
co-authors
scored
evaluate
usability
further
optimize
adapted
checklists.Finally,
10
by
all
co-authors.Fleiss'
kappa
calculated
reliability
agreement
between
observers.Results:
Three
37
5
32
deemed
irrelevant.General
terminology
(e.g.,
multivariable
prediction
model,
predictors)
align
AI-specific
terms.After
first
round,
improvements
formulated,
e.g.,
preventing
use
sub-questions
or
subjective
words
adding
clarifications
how
score
an
item.Using
final
list
articles,
only
out
61
resulted
statistically
significant
0.4
more
demonstrating
agreement.For
41
no
obtained
indicating
that
level
among
multiple
observers
is
due
chance
alone.Conclusion:
Our
showed
low
scores
checklists.Although
such
checklists
have
shown
great
value
during
development
reporting,
raises
concerns
about
applicability
objectively
scientific
applications.When
developing
revising
guidelines,
it
essential
consider
their
without
introducing
bias.
Frontiers in Radiology,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
4
Published: March 27, 2024
The
aim
of
this
systematic
review
is
to
determine
whether
Deep
Learning
(DL)
algorithms
can
provide
a
clinically
feasible
alternative
classic
for
synthetic
Computer
Tomography
(sCT).
following
categories
are
presented
in
study:
∙
MR-based
treatment
planning
and
CT
generation
techniques.
id="IM2">∙
Generation
images
based
on
Cone
Beam
images.
id="IM3">∙
Low-dose
High-dose
generation.
id="IM4">∙
Attenuation
correction
PET
To
perform
appropriate
database
searches,
we
reviewed
journal
articles
published
between
January
2018
June
2023.
Current
methodology,
study
strategies,
results
with
relevant
clinical
applications
were
analyzed
as
outlined
the
state-of-the-art
deep
learning
approaches
inter-modality
intra-modality
image
synthesis.
This
was
accomplished
by
contrasting
provided
methodologies
traditional
research
approaches.
key
contributions
each
category
highlighted,
specific
challenges
identified,
accomplishments
summarized.
As
final
step,
statistics
all
cited
works
from
various
aspects
analyzed,
which
revealed
that
DL-based
sCTs
have
achieved
considerable
popularity,
while
also
showing
potential
technology.
In
order
assess
readiness
methods,
examined
current
status
sCT
Radiotherapy and Oncology,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
194, P. 110196 - 110196
Published: March 2, 2024
Background
and
purposeStudies
investigating
the
application
of
Artificial
Intelligence
(AI)
in
field
radiotherapy
exhibit
substantial
variations
terms
quality.
The
goal
this
study
was
to
assess
amount
transparency
bias
scoring
articles
with
a
specific
focus
on
AI
based
segmentation
treatment
planning,
using
modified
PROBAST
TRIPOD
checklists,
order
provide
recommendations
for
future
guideline
developers
reviewers.Materials
methodsThe
checklist
items
were
discussed
Delphi
process.
After
consensus
reached,
2
groups
3
co-authors
scored
evaluate
usability
further
optimize
adapted
checklists.
Finally,
10
by
all
co-authors.
Fleiss'
kappa
calculated
reliability
agreement
between
observers.ResultsThree
37
5
32
deemed
irrelevant.
General
terminology
(e.g.,
multivariable
prediction
model,
predictors)
align
AI-specific
terms.
first
round,
improvements
formulated,
e.g.,
preventing
use
sub-questions
or
subjective
words
adding
clarifications
how
score
an
item.
Using
final
list
articles,
only
out
61
resulted
statistically
significant
0.4
more
demonstrating
agreement.
For
41
no
obtained
indicating
that
level
among
multiple
observers
is
due
chance
alone.ConclusionOur
showed
low
scores
Although
such
checklists
have
shown
great
value
during
development
reporting,
raises
concerns
about
applicability
objectively
scientific
applications.
When
developing
revising
guidelines,
it
essential
consider
their
without
introducing
bias.
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
34, P. 100744 - 100744
Published: March 7, 2025
Labeling
cone-beam
computed
tomography
(CBCT)
images
is
challenging
due
to
poor
image
quality.
Training
auto-segmentation
models
without
labelled
data
often
involves
deep-learning
generate
synthetic
CBCTs
(sCBCT)
from
planning
CTs
(pCT),
which
can
result
in
anatomical
mismatches
and
inaccurate
labels.
To
prevent
this
issue,
study
assesses
an
model
for
female
pelvic
CBCT
scans
exclusively
trained
on
delineated
pCTs,
were
transformed
into
sCBCT
using
a
physics-driven
approach.
replicate
noise
artefacts,
(Ph-sCBCT)
was
synthesized
pCT
water-phantom
scans.
A
3D
nn-UNet
of
cervical
cancer
Ph-sCBCT
with
contours.
This
included
patients:
63
training,
16
validation
20
each
testing
Ph-sCBCTs
clinical
CBCTs.
Auto-segmentations
bladder,
rectum
target
volume
(CTV)
evaluated
Dice
Similarity
Coefficient
(DSC)
95th
percentile
Hausdorff
Distance
(HD95).
Initial
evaluation
occurred
before
generalizability
The
performed
well
generalized
CBCTs,
yielding
median
DSC's
0.96
0.94
the
0.88
0.81
rectum,
0.89
0.82
CTV
CBCT,
respectively.
Median
HD95's
5
mm
7
CBCT.
demonstrates
successful
training
images,
necessarily
delineating
manually.
Radiation Oncology,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
20(1)
Published: Feb. 4, 2025
Abstract
Rationale
and
objectives
This
study
evaluated
StarGAN,
a
deep
learning
model
designed
to
generate
synthetic
computed
tomography
(sCT)
images
from
magnetic
resonance
imaging
(MRI)
cone-beam
(CBCT)
data
using
single
model.
The
goal
was
provide
accurate
Hounsfield
unit
(HU)
for
dose
calculation
enable
MRI
simulation
adaptive
radiation
therapy
(ART)
CBCT
or
MRI.
We
also
compared
the
performance
benefits
of
StarGAN
commonly
used
CycleGAN.
Materials
methods
CycleGAN
were
employed
in
this
study.
dataset
comprised
53
cases
pelvic
cancer.
Evaluation
involved
qualitative
quantitative
analyses,
focusing
on
image
quality
distribution
calculation.
Results
For
sCT
generated
CBCT,
demonstrated
superior
anatomical
preservation
based
evaluation.
Quantitatively,
exhibited
lower
mean
absolute
error
(MAE)
body
(42.8
±
4.3
HU)
bone
(138.2
20.3),
whereas
produced
higher
MAE
(50.8
5.2
(153.4
27.7
HU).
Dosimetric
evaluation
showed
difference
(DD)
within
2%
planning
target
volume
(PTV)
body,
with
gamma
passing
rate
(GPR)
>
90%
under
2%/2
mm
criteria.
MRI,
favored
provided
by
StarGAN.
recorded
(79.8
14
HU
253.6
30.9
bone)
(94.7
7.4
353.6
34.9
bone).
Both
models
achieved
DD
PTV
GPR
90%.
Conclusion
While
metrics,
better
preservation,
highlighting
its
potential
generation
radiotherapy.
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
28, P. 100512 - 100512
Published: Oct. 1, 2023
Background
and
purposeAccurate
CT
numbers
in
Cone
Beam
(CBCT)
are
crucial
for
precise
dose
calculations
adaptive
radiotherapy
(ART).
This
study
aimed
to
generate
synthetic
(sCT)
from
CBCT
using
deep
learning
(DL)
models
head
neck
(HN)
radiotherapy.Materials
methodsA
novel
DL
model,
the
'self-attention-residual-UNet'
(ResUNet),
was
developed
accurate
sCT
generation.
ResUNet
incorporates
a
self-attention
mechanism
its
long
skip
connections
enhance
information
transfer
between
encoder
decoder.
Data
93
HN
patients,
each
with
planning
(pCT)
first-day
images
were
used.
Model
performance
evaluated
two
approaches
(non-adversarial
adversarial
training)
model
types
(2D
axial
only
vs.
2.5D
axial,
sagittal,
coronal).
compared
traditional
UNet
through
image
quality
assessment
(Mean
Absolute
Error
(MAE),
Peak-Signal-to-Noise
Ratio
(PSNR),
Structural
Similarity
Index
(SSIM))
calculation
accuracy
evaluation
(DVH
deviation
gamma
(1
%/1mm)).ResultsImage
similarity
results
2.5D-ResUNet
2.5D-UNet
were:
MAE:
46±7
HU
51±9
HU,
PSNR:
66.6±2.0
dB
65.8±1.8
dB,
SSIM:
0.81±0.04
0.79±0.05.
There
no
significant
differences
models.
Both
demonstrated
DVH
below
0.5
%
gamma-pass-rate
%/1mm)
exceeding
97
%.ConclusionsResUNet
enhanced
number
of
outperformed
generation
CBCT.
method
holds
promise
generating
ART.