Research Square (Research Square),
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Aug. 21, 2023
Abstract
Manual
segmentation
of
tumors
and
organs-at-risk
(OAR)
in
3D
imaging
for
radiation-therapy
planning
is
time-consuming
subject
to
variation
between
different
observers.
Artificial
intelligence
(AI)
can
assist
with
segmentation,
but
challenges
exist
ensuring
high-quality
especially
small,
variable
structures.
We
investigated
the
effect
quality
style
physicians
training
deep-learning
models
esophagus
proposed
a
new
metric,
edge
roughness,
evaluating/quantifying
slice-to-slice
inconsistency.
This
study
includes
real-world
cohort
394
patients
who
each
received
radiation
therapy
(mainly
lung
cancer).
Segmentation
was
performed
by
8
as
part
routine
clinical
care.
evaluated
manual
comparing
length
roughness
segmentations
among
analyze
inconsistencies.
trained
six
multiple-
individual-physician
total,
based
on
U-Net
architectures
residual
backbones.
used
volumetric
Dice
coefficient
measure
performance
model.
quantify
shift
adjacent
slices
calculating
curvature
edges
2D
sagittal-
coronal-view
projections.
The
auto-segmentation
model
multiple
(MD1-7)
achieved
highest
mean
73.7±14.8%.
(MD7)
(mean
±
SD:
0.106±0.016)
demonstrated
significantly
lower
test
cases
compared
other
individual
(MD7:
58.5±15.8%,
MD6:
67.1±16.8%,
p
<
0.001).
An
additional
multiple-physician
after
removing
MD7
data
resulted
fewer
outliers
(e.g.,
£
40%:
4
MD1-6,
7
MD1-7,
N
total
=394).
demonstrates
that
there
significant
care,
AI
algorithms
from
real-world,
datasets
may
result
unexpectedly
under-performing
inclusion
outliers.
Importantly,
this
provides
novel
evaluation
physician
which
will
allow
developers
filter
optimize
performance.
Physica Medica,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
130, P. 104911 - 104911
Published: Feb. 1, 2025
This
study
aimed
to
develop
a
deep-learning
framework
generate
multi-organ
masks
from
CT
images
in
adult
and
pediatric
patients.
A
dataset
consisting
of
4082
ground-truth
manual
segmentation
various
databases,
including
300
cases,
were
collected.
In
strategy#1,
the
provided
by
public
databases
split
into
training
(90%)
testing
(10%
each
database
named
subset
#1)
cohort.
The
set
was
used
train
multiple
nnU-Net
networks
five-fold
cross-validation
(CV)
for
26
separate
organs.
next
step,
trained
models
strategy
#1
missing
organs
entire
dataset.
generated
data
then
model
CV
(strategy#2).
Models'
performance
evaluated
terms
Dice
coefficient
(DSC)
other
well-established
image
metrics.
lowest
DSC
strategy#1
0.804
±
0.094
adrenal
glands
while
average
>
0.90
achieved
17/26
strategy#2
(0.833
0.177)
obtained
pancreas,
whereas
13/19
For
all
mutual
included
#2,
our
outperformed
TotalSegmentator
both
strategies.
addition,
on
#3.
Our
with
significant
variability
different
producing
acceptable
results
making
it
well-suited
implementation
clinical
setting.
Frontiers in Oncology,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
13
Published: Aug. 4, 2023
Auto-segmentation
with
artificial
intelligence
(AI)
offers
an
opportunity
to
reduce
inter-
and
intra-observer
variability
in
contouring,
improve
the
quality
of
contours,
as
well
time
taken
conduct
this
manual
task.
In
work
we
benchmark
AI
auto-segmentation
contours
produced
by
five
commercial
vendors
against
a
common
dataset.The
organ
at
risk
(OAR)
generated
solutions
(Mirada
(Mir),
MVision
(MV),
Radformation
(Rad),
RayStation
(Ray)
TheraPanacea
(Ther))
were
compared
manually-drawn
expert
from
20
breast,
head
neck,
lung
prostate
patients.
Comparisons
made
using
geometric
similarity
metrics
including
volumetric
surface
Dice
coefficient
(vDSC
sDSC),
Hausdorff
distance
(HD)
Added
Path
Length
(APL).
To
assess
saved,
manually
draw
correct
recorded.There
are
differences
number
CT
offered
each
solution
study
(Mir
99;
MV
143;
Rad
83;
Ray
67;
Ther
86),
all
offering
some
lymph
node
levels
OARs.
Averaged
across
structures,
median
vDSCs
good
for
systems
favorably
existing
literature:
Mir
0.82;
0.88;
0.86;
0.87;
0.88.
All
offer
substantial
savings,
ranging
between:
breast
14-20
mins;
neck
74-93
20-26
35-42
mins.
The
averaged
was
similar
systems:
39.8
43.6
36.6
min;
43.2
45.2
mins.All
evaluated
high
significantly
reduced
could
be
used
render
radiotherapy
workflow
more
efficient
standardized.
Advances in Radiation Oncology,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
9(5), P. 101470 - 101470
Published: Feb. 8, 2024
PurposeManual
contour
work
for
radiation
treatment
planning
takes
significant
time
to
ensure
volumes
are
accurately
delineated.
The
use
of
artificial
intelligence
with
deep
learning
based
autosegmentation
(DLAS)
models
has
made
itself
known
in
recent
years
alleviate
this
workload.
It
is
used
organs
at
risk
(OAR)
contouring
consistency
performance
and
saving.
purpose
study
was
evaluate
the
current
published
data
DLAS
clinical
target
volume
(CTV)
contours,
identify
areas
improvement,
discuss
future
directions.MethodologyA
literature
review
performed
by
utilizing
key
words
"Deep
Learning"
AND
("Segmentation"
OR
"Delineation")
"Clinical
Target
Volume"
an
indexed
search
into
PubMed.
A
total
154
articles
on
criteria
were
reviewed.
considered
model
used,
disease
site,
targets
contoured,
guidelines
utilized,
overall
performance.ResultsOf
53
investigating
CTV,
only
6
before
2020.
Publications
have
increased
years,
46
between
2020-2023.
cervix
(n=19)
prostate
(n=12)
studied
most
frequently.
Most
studies
(n=43)
involved
a
single
institution.
Median
sample
size
130
patients
(range:
5-1,052).
common
metrics
utilized
measure
Dice
similarity
coefficient
(DSC)
followed
Hausdorff
distance.
Dosimetric
seldom
reported
(n=11).
There
also
variability
specific
(RTOG,
ESTRO,
others).
had
good
CTV
multiple
sites,
showing
DSC
values
>0.7.
delineated
faster
compared
manual
contouring.
However,
some
contours
still
required
least
minor
edits,
require
improvement.ConclusionsDLAS
demonstrates
capability
completing
plans
efficiency
accuracy.
developed
validated
institutions
using
developing
institutions.
about
years.
Future
need
include
larger
datasets
different
patient
demographics,
stages,
validation
multi-institutional
settings,
inclusion
dosimetric
performance.
Manual
directions.
Of
improvement.
La radiologia medica,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: March 18, 2025
Abstract
Purpose
Low-dose
CT
protocols
are
widely
used
for
emergency
imaging,
follow-ups,
and
attenuation
correction
in
hybrid
PET/CT
SPECT/CT
imaging.
However,
low-dose
images
often
suffer
from
reduced
quality
depending
on
acquisition
patient
parameters.
Deep
learning
(DL)-based
organ
segmentation
models
typically
trained
high-quality
images,
with
limited
dedicated
noisy
images.
This
study
aimed
to
develop
a
DL
pipeline
ultra-low-dose
Materials
methods
274
raw
datasets
were
reconstructed
using
Siemens
ReconCT
software
ADMIRE
iterative
algorithm,
generating
full-dose
(FD-CT)
simulated
(LD-CT)
at
1%,
2%,
5%,
10%
of
the
original
tube
current.
Existing
FD-nnU-Net
segmented
22
organs
FD-CT
serving
as
reference
masks
training
new
LD-nnU-Net
LD-CT
Three
bony
tissue
(6
organs),
soft-tissue
(15
body
contour
segmentation.
The
compared
standard
reference.
External
actual
also
compared.
Results
performance
declined
radiation
dose,
especially
below
(5
mAs).
achieved
average
Dice
scores
0.937
±
0.049
(bony
tissues),
0.905
0.117
(soft-tissues),
0.984
0.023
(body
contour).
LD
outperformed
FD
external
datasets.
Conclusion
Conventional
performed
poorly
Dedicated
demonstrated
superior
across
cross-validation
evaluations,
enabling
accurate
available
our
GitHub
page.
Information,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
16(3), P. 215 - 215
Published: March 11, 2025
As
yet,
there
is
no
systematic
review
focusing
on
benefits
and
issues
of
commercial
deep
learning-based
auto-segmentation
(DLAS)
software
for
prostate
cancer
(PCa)
radiation
therapy
(RT)
planning
despite
that
NRG
Oncology
has
underscored
such
necessity.
This
article’s
purpose
to
systematically
DLAS
product
performances
PCa
RT
their
associated
evaluation
methodology.
A
literature
search
was
performed
with
the
use
electronic
databases
7
November
2024.
Thirty-two
articles
were
included
as
per
selection
criteria.
They
evaluated
12
products
(Carina
Medical
LLC
INTContour
(Lexington,
KY,
USA),
Elekta
AB
ADMIRE
(Stockholm,
Sweden),
Limbus
AI
Inc.
Contour
(Regina,
SK,
Canada),
Manteia
Technologies
Co.
AccuContour
(Jian
Sheng,
China),
MIM
Software
ProtégéAI
(Cleveland,
OH,
Mirada
Ltd.
DLCExpert
(Oxford,
UK),
MVision.ai
Contour+
(Helsinki,
Finland),
Radformation
AutoContour
(New
York,
NY,
RaySearch
Laboratories
RayStation
Siemens
Healthineers
AG
AI-Rad
Companion
Organs
RT,
syngo.via
Image
Suite
DirectORGANS
(Erlangen,
Germany),
Therapanacea
Annotate
(Paris,
France),
Varian
Systems,
Ethos
(Palo
Alto,
CA,
USA)).
Their
results
illustrate
can
delineate
organs
at
risk
(abdominopelvic
cavity,
anal
canal,
bladder,
body,
cauda
equina,
left
(L)
right
(R)
femurs,
L
R
pelvis,
proximal
sacrum)
four
clinical
target
volumes
(prostate,
lymph
nodes,
bed,
seminal
vesicle
bed)
clinically
acceptable
outcomes,
resulting
in
delineation
time
reduction,
5.7–81.1%.
Although
recommended
each
centre
perform
its
own
prior
implementation,
seems
more
important
due
methodological
respective
single
studies,
e.g.,
small
dataset
used,
etc.
medRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory),
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Oct. 21, 2023
Abstract
Background
Automated
organ
segmentation
from
computed
tomography
(CT)
images
facilitates
a
number
of
clinical
applications,
including
diagnosis,
monitoring
treatment
response,
quantification,
radiation
therapy
planning,
and
dosimetry.
Purpose
To
develop
novel
deep
learning
framework
to
generate
multi-organ
masks
CT
for
23
different
body
organs.
Methods
A
dataset
consisting
3106
(649,398
axial
2D
slices,
13,640
images/segment
pairs)
ground-truth
manual
various
online
available
databases
were
collected.
After
cropping
them
contour,
they
resized,
normalized
used
train
separate
models
Data
split
(80%)
test
(20%)
covering
all
the
databases.
Res-UNET
model
was
trained
input
images.
The
output
converted
back
original
dimensions
compared
with
in
terms
Dice
Jaccard
coefficients.
information
about
positions
implemented
during
post-processing
by
providing
six
anchor
segmentations
as
input.
Our
“TotalSegmentator”
through
testing
our
on
their
datasets
datasets.
Results
average
coefficient
before
after
84.28%
83.26%
respectively.
index
76.17
70.60
coefficients
over
90%
achieved
liver,
heart,
bones,
kidneys,
spleen,
femur
heads,
lungs,
aorta,
eyes,
brain
masks.
Post-processing
improved
performance
only
nine
TotalSegmentator
better
than
five
organs
out
15
common
almost
similar
two
Conclusions
availability
fast
reliable
tool
leverages
implementation
setting.
In
this
study,
we
developed
segment
multiple
algorithms.
presenting
large
variability
emanating
producing
acceptable
results
even
cases
unusual
anatomies
pathologies,
such
splenomegaly.
We
recommend
using
these
algorithms
good
performance.
One
main
merits
proposed
is
lightweight
nature
an
inference
time
1.67
seconds
per
case
total-body
image,
which
standard
computers.
Deleted Journal,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
1(1)
Published: Jan. 1, 2024
Abstract
Radiation
therapy
is
a
localized
cancer
treatment
that
relies
on
precise
delineation
of
the
target
to
be
treated
and
healthy
tissues
guarantee
optimal
effect.
This
step,
known
as
contouring
or
segmentation,
involves
identifying
both
volumes
organs
at
risk
imaging
modalities
like
CT,
PET,
MRI
guide
radiation
delivery.
Manual
however,
time-consuming
highly
subjective,
despite
presence
guidelines.
In
recent
years,
automated
segmentation
methods,
particularly
deep
learning
models,
have
shown
promise
in
addressing
this
task.
However,
challenges
persist
their
clinical
use,
including
need
for
robust
quality
assurance
(QA)
processes
risks
associated
with
use
models.
review
examines
considerations
adoption
auto-segmentation
radiotherapy,
focused
volume.
We
discuss
potential
(eg,
over-
under-segmentation,
automation
bias,
appropriate
trust),
mitigation
strategies
human
oversight,
uncertainty
quantification,
education
professionals),
we
highlight
importance
expanding
QA
include
geometric,
dose-volume,
outcome-based
performance
monitoring.
While
offers
significant
benefits,
careful
attention
rigorous
measures
are
essential
its
successful
integration
practice.
Scientific Reports,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
14(1)
Published: Jan. 30, 2024
Manual
segmentation
of
tumors
and
organs-at-risk
(OAR)
in
3D
imaging
for
radiation-therapy
planning
is
time-consuming
subject
to
variation
between
different
observers.
Artificial
intelligence
(AI)
can
assist
with
segmentation,
but
challenges
exist
ensuring
high-quality
especially
small,
variable
structures,
such
as
the
esophagus.
We
investigated
effect
quality
style
physicians
training
deep-learning
models
esophagus
proposed
a
new
metric,
edge
roughness,
evaluating/quantifying
slice-to-slice
inconsistency.
This
study
includes
real-world
cohort
394
patients
who
each
received
radiation
therapy
(mainly
lung
cancer).
Segmentation
was
performed
by
8
part
routine
clinical
care.
evaluated
manual
comparing
length
roughness
segmentations
among
analyze
inconsistencies.
trained
eight
multiple-
individual-physician
total,
based
on
U-Net
architectures
residual
backbones.
used
volumetric
Dice
coefficient
measure
performance
model.
quantify
shift
adjacent
slices
calculating
curvature
edges
2D
sagittal-
coronal-view
projections.
The
auto-segmentation
model
multiple
(MD1-7)
achieved
highest
mean
73.7
±
14.8%.
(MD7)
(mean
SD:
0.106
0.016)
demonstrated
significantly
lower
test
cases
compared
other
individual
(MD7:
58.5
15.8%,
MD6:
67.1
16.8%,
p
<
0.001).
A
multiple-physician
after
removing
MD7
data
resulted
fewer
outliers
(e.g.,
≤
40%:
4
MD1-6,
7
MD1-7,
Ntotal
=
394).
While
we
initially
detected
this
pattern
single
clinician,
validated
metric
across
entire
dataset.
lowest-quantile
(MDER-Q1,
Ntrain
62)
higher
(Ntest
270)
than
highest-quantile
ones
(MDER-Q4,
(MDER-Q1:
67.8
14.8%,
MDER-Q4:
62.8
15.7%,
demonstrates
that
there
significant
care,
AI
algorithms
from
real-world,
datasets
may
result
unexpectedly
under-performing
inclusion
outliers.
Importantly,
provides
novel
evaluation
physician
which
will
allow
developers
filter
optimize
performance.