Journal of Environmental Management, Journal Year: 2019, Volume and Issue: 249, P. 109364 - 109364
Published: Aug. 9, 2019
Language: Английский
Journal of Environmental Management, Journal Year: 2019, Volume and Issue: 249, P. 109364 - 109364
Published: Aug. 9, 2019
Language: Английский
Sustainable Cities and Society, Journal Year: 2020, Volume and Issue: 62, P. 102373 - 102373
Published: July 2, 2020
Language: Английский
Citations
311Natural hazards and earth system sciences, Journal Year: 2020, Volume and Issue: 20(1), P. 243 - 270
Published: Jan. 20, 2020
Abstract. Hydro-meteorological risks due to natural hazards such as severe floods, storm surges, landslides and droughts are causing impacts on different sectors of society. Such expected become worse given projected changes in climate, degradation ecosystems, population growth urbanisation. In this respect, nature-based solutions (NBSs) have emerged effective means respond challenges. A NBS is a term used for innovative that based processes ecosystems solve types societal environmental The present paper provides critical review the literature concerning NBSs hydro-meteorological risk reduction identifies current knowledge gaps future research prospects. There has been considerable scientific publications topic, with more significant rise taking place from 2007 onwards. Hence, process presented starts by sourcing 1608 articles Scopus 1431 Web Science. full analysis was performed 146 articles. confirmed numerous advancements area achieved date. These already proven be valuable providing sustainable, cost-effective, multi-purpose flexible reduction. However, there still many areas where further demonstration needed order promote their upscaling replication make them mainstream solutions.
Language: Английский
Citations
307Landscape and Urban Planning, Journal Year: 2021, Volume and Issue: 214, P. 104145 - 104145
Published: June 11, 2021
While the concept of green infrastructure (GI) is increasingly popular, definitions, terminology, and goals differ based on geographic disciplinary context. This paper examines these differences through a three-part systematic review: 1) content analysis academic GI review publications, 2) bibliometric publications focusing GI-associated terms, 3) an online search for grey literature. Parsing out conceptualizations GI, agendas they support, helps us better understand its probable outcomes in different contexts. We find that urban planning, forestry, ecology, engineering, landscape architecture, law have epistemic claims to use divergent implement concept. Moreover, there are number related concepts, each which associated with distinct scholarly community. These terms can be grouped into three primary categories: as greenspace planning concept, ecology water/stormwater management Cutting across categories we ecosystem services focus specific engineered facility types, gradient implicit definitions. A surprising (41% those reviewed here) do not define cause confusion or lead implementation projects fail meet expectations. therefore argue scholars practitioners need explicit about how defining purpose avoid siloing research practice take advantage opportunities address multiple simultaneously.
Language: Английский
Citations
157Journal of Cleaner Production, Journal Year: 2021, Volume and Issue: 303, P. 127022 - 127022
Published: April 9, 2021
Language: Английский
Citations
148Journal of Hydrology, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 620, P. 129381 - 129381
Published: March 11, 2023
Language: Английский
Citations
49Journal of Environmental Management, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 354, P. 120212 - 120212
Published: Feb. 9, 2024
The site selection for Low Impact Development (LID) practices is a significant process. It affects the effectiveness of LID in controlling stormwater surface runoff, volume, flow rate, and infiltration. This research paper presents comprehensive review various methods used selection. starts by introducing different tools. Three main methods: index-based methods, GIS-based multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA), models tools, are discussed detail. A comparative these then conducted based on ten criteria. These criteria include number variables, data properties, scale analysis, benefits maximization approach, multi-attribute user-friendliness, community stakeholder participation, validation methods. comparison reveals limitations each method. inadequate availability quality, lack evaluation assessment spatial explicitness. challenges underscore need future to prioritize clarity, broaden criteria, improve quality through standardization, incorporate field visits remote sensing robust results, integrate big data, develop web-based, open-source tools enhanced accessibility. key strategies provide valuable insights advancing
Language: Английский
Citations
21Land Use Policy, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 150, P. 107465 - 107465
Published: Jan. 8, 2025
Language: Английский
Citations
2Sustainable Cities and Society, Journal Year: 2019, Volume and Issue: 53, P. 101963 - 101963
Published: Nov. 15, 2019
Language: Английский
Citations
116The Science of The Total Environment, Journal Year: 2018, Volume and Issue: 646, P. 1219 - 1231
Published: July 26, 2018
Language: Английский
Citations
97Environmental Modelling & Software, Journal Year: 2018, Volume and Issue: 113, P. 42 - 47
Published: Dec. 18, 2018
Language: Английский
Citations
91