Spatiotemporal changes in ecosystem services in the conservation priorities of the southern hill and mountain belt, China DOI Creative Commons
Shuai Ma, Liangjie Wang,

Dianzhen Zhu

et al.

Ecological Indicators, Journal Year: 2020, Volume and Issue: 122, P. 107225 - 107225

Published: Dec. 13, 2020

Ecosystems are severely damaged with rising global temperatures, the rapid increase in population and continuous exploitation utilization of natural resources. The selection conservation priorities is great significance to regional ecological security sustainable development. Here we identified by balancing ecosystem services trade-offs analyzed spatiotemporal changes services. Water yield, soil conservation, carbon storage, habitat quality, recreation were quantified using InVEST model. By comparing efficiencies under each scenario, found for water be 1.05, 1.76, 1.30, 1.37 1.41, respectively. consistently greater than 1 during years 2000–2015. implementation Grain-for-Green Programme increased rainfall have improved our results environmental protection improvement

Language: Английский

Climate change versus land-use change—What affects the ecosystem services more in the forest-steppe ecotone? DOI
Fengqi Cui,

Bojie Wang,

Qin Zhang

et al.

The Science of The Total Environment, Journal Year: 2020, Volume and Issue: 759, P. 143525 - 143525

Published: Nov. 23, 2020

Language: Английский

Citations

95
Urban sprawl decreases the value of ecosystem services and intensifies the supply scarcity of ecosystem services in China DOI
Yujie Yuan, Dongxiang Chen, Shaohua Wu

et al.

The Science of The Total Environment, Journal Year: 2019, Volume and Issue: 697, P. 134170 - 134170

Published: Aug. 28, 2019

Language: Английский

Citations

87
Ecosystem service multifunctionality assessment and coupling coordination analysis with land use and land cover change in China's coastal zones DOI
Chao Liu, Minghui Yang,

Yuting Hou

et al.

The Science of The Total Environment, Journal Year: 2021, Volume and Issue: 797, P. 149033 - 149033

Published: July 17, 2021

Language: Английский

Citations

85
Spatial spillover effects of urbanization on ecosystem services value in Chinese cities DOI Creative Commons
Lu Xing, Yingming Zhu, Junpeng Wang

et al.

Ecological Indicators, Journal Year: 2020, Volume and Issue: 121, P. 107028 - 107028

Published: Oct. 8, 2020

Research on the relationship between urbanization and ecosystem services value (ESV) has been a hot topic recently. However, few studies have quantified effects of neighboring local ESV in terms spatial interactions process. This paper first evaluated at city level based adjusted equivalent factors. Then, through built panel econometric model, spillover land (LU), population (PU) economic (EU) were explored with data for 340 Chinese cities during 2000–2015. Our results indicated that: (1) The China 2015 was 29.12 trillion yuan (at price 2000). (2) Only LU exerted significant robust negative ESV, 1.04% decrease every 1% increase LU. (3) Local increased by 0.32% average ESV. (4) According to decomposition analysis, development EU area could improve while PU had Basing above evidences, exploration this study provides important scientific basis future sustainable urban planning regional joint governance.

Language: Английский

Citations

84
Spatiotemporal changes in ecosystem services in the conservation priorities of the southern hill and mountain belt, China DOI Creative Commons
Shuai Ma, Liangjie Wang,

Dianzhen Zhu

et al.

Ecological Indicators, Journal Year: 2020, Volume and Issue: 122, P. 107225 - 107225

Published: Dec. 13, 2020

Ecosystems are severely damaged with rising global temperatures, the rapid increase in population and continuous exploitation utilization of natural resources. The selection conservation priorities is great significance to regional ecological security sustainable development. Here we identified by balancing ecosystem services trade-offs analyzed spatiotemporal changes services. Water yield, soil conservation, carbon storage, habitat quality, recreation were quantified using InVEST model. By comparing efficiencies under each scenario, found for water be 1.05, 1.76, 1.30, 1.37 1.41, respectively. consistently greater than 1 during years 2000–2015. implementation Grain-for-Green Programme increased rainfall have improved our results environmental protection improvement

Language: Английский

Citations

78