Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences,
Journal Year:
2018,
Volume and Issue:
285(1871), P. 20172299 - 20172299
Published: Jan. 17, 2018
Weaponry,
for
the
purpose
of
intraspecific
combat
or
predator
defence,
is
one
most
widespread
animal
adaptations,
yet
selective
pressures
and
constraints
governing
its
phenotypic
diversity
skeletal
regionalization
are
not
well
understood.
Here,
we
investigate
evolution
tail
weaponry
in
amniotes,
a
rare
form
that
nonetheless
evolved
independently
among
broad
spectrum
life
including
mammals,
turtles
dinosaurs.
Using
phylogenetic
comparative
methods,
test
links
between
morphology,
ecology
behaviour
extant
amniotes
known
to
use
as
weapon,
extinct
taxa
bearing
osseous
armaments.
We
find
robust
ecological
morphological
correlates
both
lashing
bony
weaponry,
large
body
size,
armour
herbivory,
suggesting
these
life-history
parameters
factor
into
antipredator
behaviours
suggest
because
large,
armoured
herbivores
uncommon
terrestrial
faunas,
they
have
been
throughout
evolutionary
history.
Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society,
Journal Year:
2018,
Volume and Issue:
94(1), P. 60 - 101
Published: June 20, 2018
ABSTRACT
We
propose
a
practical
concept
that
distinguishes
the
particular
kind
of
weaponry
has
evolved
to
be
used
in
combat
between
individuals
same
species
and
sex,
which
we
term
intrasexually
selected
weapons
(ISWs).
present
treatise
ISWs
nature,
aiming
understand
their
distinction
evolution
from
other
secondary
sex
traits,
including
‘sexually
weapons’,
sexually
dimorphic
monomorphic
weaponry.
focus
on
subset
traits
are
result
same‐sex
combat,
defined
here
as
ISWs,
provide
not
previously
reported
evolutionary
patterns,
offer
hypotheses
answer
questions
such
as:
why
have
only
some
fight
for
opposite
or
breeding
resources?
examined
seem
entire
animal
phylogeny,
restricting
classification
ISW
enlarged
adults
one
sexes,
during
intrasexual
fights.
Because
absence
behavioural
data
and,
many
cases,
lack
discriminated
series
juveniles
adults,
exclude
fossil
record
this
review.
merge
morphological,
ontogenetic,
information,
first
time
thoroughly
review
tree
life
identify
separate
ISWs.
found
bilateral
animals,
appearing
independently
nematodes,
various
groups
arthropods,
vertebrates.
Our
sets
reference
point
explore
taxa
with
potential
morphological
studies
warranted.
establish
most
come
pairs,
located
near
head,
endo‐
exoskeletal
modifications,
overdeveloped
structures
compared
those
females,
modified
feeding
and/or
locomotor
appendages,
common
terrestrial
taxa,
frequently
guard
territories,
both,
also
signalling
displays
deter
rivals
attract
females.
females
few
possess
better‐developed
than
males,
cases
independent
evenly
distributed
across
animals
possessing
developed
non‐hunting
habits
(e.g.
herbivores)
faunivores
prey
very
small
relative
body
size
insectivores).
Bringing
together
perspectives
variety
conceptualize
there
five
ways
trait,
apart
primary
can
fixed:
sexual
selection,
fecundity
parental
role
division,
differential
niche
occupation
interference
competition.
discuss
these
trends
factors
involved
nature.
Behavioral Ecology,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
32(5), P. 781 - 794
Published: May 11, 2021
Sexual
selection
is
a
key
component
of
evolutionary
biology.
However,
from
the
very
formulation
sexual
by
Darwin,
nature
and
extent
have
been
controversial.
Recently,
such
controversy
has
led
back
to
fundamental
question
just
what
is.
This
included
how
we
incorporate
female-female
reproductive
competition
into
or
natural
selection.
In
this
review,
do
four
things.
First,
examine
want
definition
do.
Second,
define
selection:
Behavioral Ecology,
Journal Year:
2017,
Volume and Issue:
29(4), P. 783 - 797
Published: Oct. 25, 2017
Support
for
the
role
of
sexual
selection
in
speciation
has
grown
over
last
30
years.
Work
this
area,
however,
largely
focused
on
a
single
dominant
question:
when
and
how
do
divergent
male
signals
corresponding
female
preferences
lead
to
reproductive
isolation?
The
field
not
given
adequate
attention
that
competition,
Darwin's
second
mechanism
selection,
might
also
play
speciation.
In
review,
we
summarize
recent
work
shows
precopulatory
competition
can
initiate
sympatry,
drive
divergence
competitive
phenotypes
allopatry,
strengthen
barriers
between
types
during
secondary
contact.
manner
by
which
contributes
allopatry
is
poorly
understood
yet
compelling
area
research;
similar
choice,
may
be
more
likely
working
concert
with
ecology,
sets
stage
among
environments
reduced
gene
flow.
To
encourage
future
research
place
potential
mechanisms
into
existing
frameworks
propose
theoretical
empirical
agenda
reveal
accumulation
isolation.
Our
current
understanding
leads
isolation
limited,
particularly
well-suited
fastest
most
likely.
Scientific Reports,
Journal Year:
2017,
Volume and Issue:
7(1)
Published: Aug. 10, 2017
Abstract
The
early
evolution
of
archosauromorphs
(bird-
and
crocodile-line
archosaurs
stem-archosaurs)
represents
an
important
case
adaptive
radiation
that
occurred
in
the
aftermath
Permo-Triassic
mass
extinction.
Here
we
enrich
archosauromorph
record
with
description
a
moderately
large
(3–4
m
total
length),
herbivorous
new
allokotosaurian,
Shringasaurus
indicus
,
from
Middle
Triassic
India.
most
striking
feature
is
presence
pair
supraorbital
horns
resemble
those
some
ceratopsid
dinosaurs.
species
dimorphic
and,
as
occurs
horned
extant
bovid
mammals,
these
structures
were
probably
sexually
selected
used
weapons
intraspecific
combats.
relatively
size
unusual
anatomy
broadens
morphological
diversity
Early–Middle
tetrapods
complements
understanding
evolutionary
mechanisms
involved
diversification.
Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society,
Journal Year:
2020,
Volume and Issue:
95(4), P. 847 - 864
Published: Feb. 24, 2020
Papers
on
sexual
selection
often
highlight
the
incredible
diversity
of
sexually
selected
traits
across
animals.
Yet,
few
studies
have
tried
to
explain
why
this
evolved.
Animals
use
many
different
types
attract
mates
and
outcompete
rivals,
including
colours,
songs,
horns,
but
it
remains
unclear
why,
for
example,
some
taxa
others
horns.
Here,
we
first
conduct
a
systematic
survey
basic
distribution
signals
weapons
animal
Tree
Life.
Based
survey,
describe
seven
major
patterns
in
trait
distributions.
We
then
discuss
10
unanswered
questions
raised
by
these
patterns,
how
they
might
be
addressed.
One
pattern
is
that
most
are
apparently
absent
from
phyla
(88%),
contrast
conventional
wisdom
present
Furthermore,
clustered
Arthropoda
Chordata,
only
within
certain
clades.
Within
clades,
evolved,
appear
evolved
repeatedly.
By
contrast,
other
arthropod
chordate
clades
lack
all
or
types,
similar
repeated
at
smaller
phylogenetic
scales
(e.g.
insects).
Although
research
focuses
female
choice,
find
numbers
(among
sampled
species)
involved
male
contests
(44%)
choice
(55%).
Overall,
largely
unexplained
unexplored,
as
fundamental
about
evolution
traits.
suggest
understanding
may
require
shift
towards
macroevolutionary
relatively
deep
timescales
tens
hundreds
millions
years
ago).
Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
97(5), P. 1948 - 1966
Published: July 4, 2022
ABSTRACT
In
many
species
that
fight
over
resources,
individuals
use
specialized
structures
to
gain
a
mechanical
advantage
their
rivals
during
contests
(i.e.
weapons).
Although
weapons
are
widespread
across
animals,
how
they
affect
the
probability
of
winning
is
still
debated.
According
theory,
understanding
weapon
function
essential
to:
(
i
)
its
importance
in
determining
winner,
and
ii
identifying
what
traits
(e.g.
length
versus
shape
performance)
most
relevant
for
contest
success.
However,
quantitative
evaluations
affects
extent
which
influence
success
lacking.
Here,
we
first
develop
an
individual‐based
model
evaluate
increasing
winner
translates
differences
between
winners
losers.
Then,
meta‐analysis
identify:
whether
different
measures
outcome
differently;
animals
fights
–
i.e.
function;
iii
if
correlates
outcome.
Our
showed
that,
as
increased
chance
mean
difference
losers
also
increased.
Therefore,
our
used
trait
proxy
The
literature
search
identified
49
suitable
studies,
containing
information
52
species,
totalling
107
effect
sizes.
Four
main
patterns
emerged.
First,
focuses
on
linear
weapons,
while
performance
concentrated
Crustacea
Squamata;
other
types
were
rare.
Second,
measurements
greater
than
when
all
combined
(and
only
subset).
Third,
bear
almost
always
perform
visual/tactile
displays
before
engaging
physical
contact.
And
fourth,
way
display
did
not
size
outcomes,
fighting
style
predicted
would
be
higher.
Species
push
or
lift
(even
with
functions)
compared
impact,
pierce,
pull
squeeze.
Overall,
results
show
have
incomplete
animal
built
mostly
few
select
taxa.
Thus,
should
start
focusing
measuring
according
wider
diversity
species.
One
forward
conduct
studies
integrate
morphology
ensure
ecologically
variables.
Human Nature,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
35(2), P. 114 - 133
Published: June 1, 2024
Abstract
Humans
have
undergone
a
long
evolutionary
history
of
violent
agonistic
exchanges,
which
would
placed
selective
pressures
on
greater
body
size
and
the
psychophysical
systems
that
detect
them.
The
present
work
showed
in
humans
predicted
increased
knockout
power
during
combative
contests
(Study
1a-1b:
total
N
=
5,866;
Study
2:
44
openweight
fights).
In
exchanges
reflective
ancestral
asymmetries,
heavier
combatants
were
200%
more
likely
to
win
against
their
lighter
counterparts
because
they
knock
them
out
2).
Human
dominance
judgments
(total
500
MTurkers)
accurately
tracked
frequency
with
men
(
516)
knocked
similar-sized
adversaries
3).
able
directly
perceive
man’s
attending
cues
size.
judgments—which
are
important
across
numerous
psychological
domains,
including
attractiveness,
leadership,
legal
decision-making—accurately
predict
likelihood
potential
mate,
ally,
or
rival
can
incapacitate
adversaries.
Ornithology,
Journal Year:
2017,
Volume and Issue:
134(3), P. 587 - 611
Published: May 24, 2017
Avian
plumage
has
captivated
scientists
and
the
public
alike
for
generations
been
a
fundamental
study
system
research
into
signal
evolution.
By
contrast,
relatively
little
attention
paid
to
avian
bare
parts
such
as
exposed
skin,
bills,
feet,
combs,
despite
considerable
variation
in
structure
coloration
within
between
species.
To
better
understand
potential
signaling
role
of
parts,
we
conducted
comprehensive
literature
search
that
returned
321
published
studies.
In
reviewing
these
studies,
found
(1)
bare-part
color
is
widely
distributed
taxonomically
produced
by
diverse
mechanisms;
(2)
many
are
likely
be
dynamic,
honest
signals
current
condition
or
status
can
also
reflect
genetic
makeup
early
developmental
conditions;
(3)
function
pluripotent
social
signals,
mediating
interactions
competitors,
mates,
kin.
Differences
phenology
information
content
support
multiple-messages
interpretation
their
respective
roles,
may
contain
complementary
to,
but
distinctive
from,
conveyed
plumage-based
signals.
We
consider
it
great
deal
"hidden
plain
sight,"
meaningful
not
recorded
urge
more
careful
extensive
characterization
wider
range
species
because
its
advance
our
understanding
constraints,
with
particular
reference
dynamic
evolution
multiple
ornamentation.